From Political Islam: You only need to kill one

This is truly an important and short essay. The point is one we make here on Vladtepes in a number of ways and numerous times. But this is well put.

Eeyore for Vlad.

From Political Islam

You Only Need To Kill One

Of Interest
“The Authority of the Prophet and his Sunnah”
“Following the Messenger of Allah is a Must”
“The Sunnah
“Adhering to the Sunnah of the Prophet

You Only Need to Kill One

A Democratic congressman was at a public meeting that included a military officer. The question was asked: What is the most important function of the military today? The officer replied that fighting Islamic militants was the most important mission. The congressman quickly replied that it was not a problem and besides, we could not fight 1.5 billion Muslims.

The congressman shares a worldview with George Bush. George Bush made a critical mistake after the attack on September 11th; a mistake that created the presidency of Barack Obama. Bush could not name the enemy-political Islam. Then in the Iraq war he was only effective at the military war. Churchill and Roosevelt were great war leaders because they were able to conduct a military war and a propaganda war at the same time. A political leader’s task in war is as an ideological leader. The generals cannot do this job.

As a result, Bush won the military war and lost the propaganda war. Those who hated the Iraq war were drawn to Obama. This is how Bush created Obama’s success.

Bush is incapable of being an ideological leader. On September 12th he should have declared political Islam to be the enemy of all kafir civilization. In doing so, he would have only repeated what was in the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. Instead, his blindness made him create a logical impossibility-a war without an enemy.

Islam is the perfect war machine. It has both a military strategy, found in the Sira and the Hadith, and a brilliant war ideology. This perfect war machine has worked flawlessly for 1400 years and is working brilliantly today. November 4 th was a greater victory for political Islam than September 11th.

But no university teaches anything about Islamic war doctrine. West Point does not teach a single course on Islamic war doctrine or history. West Point’s Middle East professors are as dhimmized as Harvard’s professors (which is where West Point gets their teachers). Remember that Bush went to exclusive schools and received a good education. As a result he knows nothing about political Islam, any more than any of his classmates do.

Is it impossible to kill 1.5 billion Muslims? It is a military possibility, but kafirs do not have the political will for such a task. Besides, it is not necessary to kill Muslims. You just need to kill Mohammed. In short, we need to launch an ideological war to respond to Islam’s jihad doctrine.

And what would an ideological war look like? How about open debate without the usual politically correct, multicultural narrow-mindedness? How about a leader, such as a congressman, being able to speak about Islam’s jihad doctrine. (Of course, few of our so-called political leaders would ever speak against a potential voter. A notable exception to this is Sue Myrick of North Carolina who has formed an Anti-Terrorism Caucus.

An ideological war would include our schools, particularly state schools, teaching about the Koran and the Sunna. History courses that would include the Tears of Jihad, the killing of 270 million kafirs. Women’s studies that would include Sharia law. Religion courses that would teach the death of Christianity in Turkey, the Middle East and Africa. Military history that would include the great battles of Islam. Courses on slavery that would go beyond the standard-issue West Africa/white man on wooden ships.

An ideological war would include a media that actually used critical reasoning and connected the dots in the Islamic violence that wracks the world with 12,221 attacks since September 11th in 39 countries.

So, we don’t need to kill 1.5 billion Muslims, but we do need to kill Mohammed if we are not to go the way of Christianity in Turkey, which is now 99.7% Muslim. We will either fight an ideological war or die as a kafir civilization.

Bill Warner


copyright (c) CBSX, LLC Use and distribute as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

2 Replies to “From Political Islam: You only need to kill one”

  1. Hi,

    1. Setup a copy of your article at From Political Islam: You Only Need To Kill One Kaffir Ideology: Corporate, Religious and Ethnic $&CFB Hypocrisy and Deception of the Science of War

    2. Copy of my comment to Red Quirrel on Islam’s Terrorism Jihad as ‘Tactics’ of War:

    This may be controversial; but I imagine you aren’t shy of controversy.

    I do not disagree with you that there are indeed horrors to Sharia law, depravities. And I also want to point out that their indeed are certain aspects that are not what the average person may consider ‘evil’. For example Sharia banks who applied their refusal to participate in usury have not experienced the problems of Western Corporate Fascist Central Banking Exponential Function of Debt Usury Meltdown problems.

    Another example was Mohammed teaching (granted not followed by many Muslims) on the importance of loving procreation (as opposed to hateful slave and cannon fodder breeding procreation). He had certain guidelines that children should be conceived out of love, and commitment, and because children were wanted, not needed as slaves or indentured servants.

    And having said that I certainly don’t think that Britain should feel obliged to accept any immigrants her citizens don’t want..

    But to get back to Terrorism/Jihad. It is my opinion if you dig deeper ‘Jihad’ is simply another ‘tactic’, just like ‘terrorism’.

    According to the most blunt study — 1986 Vice President Bush TAsk Force on Terrorism study — The root cause of terrorism is overpopulation. More specifically overpopulation colliding with scarce resources and the conflict resulting over those scarce resources, manifests as ‘terrorism’.

    A a few more indepth economic – energy – population , scarce resources studies and the consequences of the exponential function growths and collision of these issues, I setup at; should you be willing to consider the plausibility of the argument.

    You may also be interested in the Pentagon and CIA’s perspective on the issues of overpopulation and the lack of political will to address the causes, resulting in the terrorism and resource wars consequences. Copy at


  2. Well I do not have the time to unspin this at the moment. There is so much inaccurate here that I could write a novelette. The problem with Sharia banking has more to do with the people who determine where interest money must be spent than the fact that the owner of the capitol cannot take the income. The income is still there and used, just for terrorism instead of a nice apartment and some new curtains. See the video I will post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *