About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

16 Replies to “A fun 5 minutes with Hamad Abdel Samad”

  1. Excellent. First time I have heard of him. More, please.
    In the States we are not exposed to such a lively discussion during which
    the anti-muslim speaker maintains control over the discourse.
    The women were very aggressive and rude.
    Stay safe, Mr. Samad.

  2. It is because of people like Hamed, Geert Wilders, Mark Steyn and others who have put their lives on the line for us, that I have any hope for Western civilization.

    I was in NY city on business the other day and the mood was somber. It seemed much less crowded than normal for a weekday. People are obviously nervous as was I hailed a cab that was driven by someone in MIddle Eastern “costume” who barely spoke English! My ride was very short or else I would not have gotten in the car. Even so, I was amazed that this guy could get a cabbie’s license when clearly he didn’t know what the hell he was doing.

    The city is filled with people from all over the world, speaking in their own languages. Many of course are tourists, but many live here or in the suburbs. There is no way to test them, to see who they really are or whether or not they hate the US and Christians.

    As we have seen it is very easy for a terrorist to do their deed. Too easy. So we wait for the next shoe to fall as we go about our business. I cannot imagine what it must be like to live in Europe.

  3. Very good, but I’d like to see it encapsulated with information defining Islamic deception, such as

    …”war is deceit” (Hadith 4:269) and Islam specifically provides the coinage of jihad economies :

    tools better known as taqiyya, tawriya, kitman and muruna

    And to assist with delivery of Islamic doctrinal tools of deception, there is the concept of abrogation, also known as dualistic logic .
    Our first clue about the dualism is in the Koran, which is actually two books, the Koran of Mecca (early) and the Koran of Medina (later). The insight into the logic of the Koran comes from the large numbers of contradictions in it. On the surface, Islam resolves these contradictions by resorting to “abrogation”. This means that the verse written later supersedes the earlier verse. But in fact, since the Koran is considered by Muslims to be the perfect word of Allah, both verses are sacred and true. The later verse is “better,” but the earlier verse cannot be wrong since Allah is perfect. This is the foundation of dualism. Both verses are “right.” Both sides of the contradiction are true in dualistic logic.
    The circumstances govern which verse is used
    .”
    Dr. Bill Warner, CSPI, Frontpagemag.com

    • Try this one, it is the complete book in digital form, print it out and read at your leisure. Throughout history many people have discovered these facts but Sun Tzu’s book is the oldest surviving text on the subject.

      http://classics.mit.edu/Tzu/artwar.html

      Here is Chapter 1

      I. Laying Plans

      1. Sun Tzu said: The art of war is of vital importance to the State.

      2. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. Hence it is a subject of inquiry which can on no account be neglected.

      3. The art of war, then, is governed by five constant factors, to be taken into account in one’s deliberations, when seeking to determine the conditions obtaining in the field.

      4. These are: (1) The Moral Law; (2) Heaven; (3) Earth; (4) The Commander; (5) Method and discipline.

      5,6. The Moral Law causes the people to be in complete accord with their ruler, so that they will follow him regardless of their lives, undismayed by any danger.

      7. Heaven signifies night and day, cold and heat, times and seasons.

      8. Earth comprises distances, great and small; danger and security; open ground and narrow passes; the chances of life and death.

      9. The Commander stands for the virtues of wisdom, sincerely, benevolence, courage and strictness.

      10. By method and discipline are to be understood the marshaling of the army in its proper subdivisions, the graduations of rank among the officers, the maintenance of roads by which supplies may reach the army, and the control of military expenditure.

      11. These five heads should be familiar to every general: he who knows them will be victorious; he who knows them not will fail.

      12. Therefore, in your deliberations, when seeking to determine the military conditions, let them be made the basis of a comparison, in this wise:–

      13. (1) Which of the two sovereigns is imbued with the Moral law? (2) Which of the two generals has most ability? (3) With whom lie the advantages derived from Heaven and Earth? (4) On which side is discipline most rigorously enforced? (5) Which army is stronger? (6) On which side are officers and men more highly trained? (7) In which army is there the greater constancy both in reward and punishment?

      14. By means of these seven considerations I can forecast victory or defeat.

      15. The general that hearkens to my counsel and acts upon it, will conquer: let such a one be retained in command! The general that hearkens not to my counsel nor acts upon it, will suffer defeat:–let such a one be dismissed!

      16. While heading the profit of my counsel, avail yourself also of any helpful circumstances over and beyond the ordinary rules.

      17. According as circumstances are favorable, one should modify one’s plans.

      18. All warfare is based on deception.

      19. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.

      20. Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.

      21. If he is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him.

      22. If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.

      23. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them.

      24. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.

      25. These military devices, leading to victory, must not be divulged beforehand.

      26. Now the general who wins a battle makes many calculations in his temple ere the battle is fought. The general who loses a battle makes but few calculations beforehand. Thus do many calculations lead to victory, and few calculations to defeat: how much more no calculation at all! It is by attention to this point that I can foresee who is likely to win or lose.

  4. This is edited. He mentions the woman spoke earlier for 15 minutes and you can also see where his speech is spliced. It isn’t that the program allowed him to dominate the discussion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.