Trying to spot the important atrocities in a sea of horror

Of course the regular media is all over public beheadings. I can’t blame them for that. In factI’m even grateful that at least they don’t ignore them despite getting important aspects wrong, like the ‘lone wolf’ nonsense used by the Obama administration to deflect from the obvious islamic motivations and scriptural support, and the general calls by high-ranking islamic organizations to commit these attacks.

But there are the little things that stick in my claw as being of significantly more importance than they are given, especially when they happen immediately before, or in the wake of an attack like we saw in Oklahoma.

Two such events took place within 24 hours of the Oklahoma attack.

The one I’d like to address first is the family that was thrown off of a British municipal bus because they were singing a song from a popular child’s TV showto their autistic daughter. They were also “branded racists”, the scarlet letter of today’s social crimes.

The couple, who live in Rotherham, started singing the song in an effort to cheer their daughter up, but say they were branded racists by another passenger and told to get off the bus by its driver.

The couple claimed the woman, who they say was wearing a hijab, took offence to the snorting sounds in the song and believed they were a reference to how pork is forbidden in Islam though this has not been confirmed.

She complained to the bus’s driver, who, it is claimed, then told the couple it would be ‘easier’ for them to get off two miles from their home.

We need to take a journey through the levels of abstraction before an event like this happens again, in order to ascertain and expose its meaning. Because the true meaning of this event is orders of magnitude larger than merely a couple and a disabled daughter being inconvenienced. This may be the best example yet of how sharia law results in islamic supremacy and the subjugation of the indigenous population of Europe that I have seen in the papers for some days, sad as that is to say.

First, the idea that you can’t eat pork or alcohol near people who have chosen, entirely arbitrarily, not to eat it themselves is a travesty of justice. Yes, people should be allowed to not eat whatever they choose not toDoing so is central to freedom. But how we made the leap of expecting other people not to eat or drink those things because it offends others, needs to be studied. It’s as if heterosexuals are compelled to hide their own heterosexuality in public places to avoid offending homosexuals. This is all about exerting control and supremacy over others, and should not be allowed to happen. It has no place in a tolerant or liberal society.

An important distinction here is that homosexuals do not choose their sexual preference. It is a condition of their existence, whereas eating halal is entirely a choice. This again shows how the islamic example is a show of control and supremacy even if it uses the totem of political correctness and religious tolerance.

Within the last decade, we have also seen muslim groups successfully force various “offensive” symbols to be removed from public service adds. The Scottish police ads which showed a black puppy was removed because muslims find dogs objectionable, especially black ones. But like the pork and alcohol issue, it was simply not enough for muslims to have the freedom not to own a dog if they don’t want to. They go so far as to ensure that public institutions not have dogs, both in theory and practice.  Special rules are in place so that muslim suspects won’t be searched by police dogs, but even ink spilled on paper in the shape of a dog cannot be allowed to exist in the public sphere.

In free societies, people who don’t want to eat pork, don’t have to; and people who don’t want a dog, don’t have to buy one. But thanks to some brutal mugging of the basic rules of logic, it has become necessary to roll back the rational rights of others to accommodate the arbitrary choices of muslims.

These food choices don’t involve allergies or legal requirements. Not that it matters, and not that it should bear mentioning, but an argument can be made that the koran actually says that any food fit for Christians and Jews is A-OK for muslims. Once again, this shows how it’s all about exerting control, and not about any kind of requirement, no matter how trivial or voluntary it may be. (Qur’an 5:5   Surah Al-Ma’idah (The Table Spread) We are not muslims. We have no obligation to observe the dietary requirements or other requirements of those who believe. Freedom specifically means that those want to, do; and those who do not want to, are not obliged to. Forgetting this basic fact is collective suicide.

So now we move into the realm of the final symbol of Islamic domination.

A family is on public transport with their child who happens to be autistic. Autism is not a choice. It is an involuntary condition. (Other people are not obliged to show special consideration, but given the circumstances, it would be polite to do so within reason.) The child needs calming and the parents sing her favorite song, the theme to a popular TV show in the UK.

Peppa Pig Theme Song     

A muslim family objects because the song refers to an animal that muslims have elected not to eat for arbitrary ‘religious’ reasons, and demand the family be removed from the bus. The driver, also a muslim, accommodates the muslim family and dumps the other family miles from home. How is this incident more important than a public beheading by a convert to islam answering to the call to jihad? Because while the bus incident is infinitely more subtle, it demonstrates the high degree of sharia norms already in place in a once Great Britain. It shows that even a whisper or tune referring to a fictitious animal on a kid’s TV show that just doesn’t happen to be on the muslim menu, will not be tolerated, and should even be treated as sedition.

Got that? We do not view or treat muslims who plan jihad, and who demand the overthrow of our legal and political system, as seditious or treasonous as they should be viewed. But, where numbers allow, muslims treat all of us as being guilty of treason, and punish us accordingly for the mere utterance of a reference to a symbol of something they use, to remind us who is really in control.

Now to the second major issue of the past couple of days…

In Cape Town, South Africa, a liberal imam opened a mosque where women and homosexuals could all pray together with the regular men in order to demonstrate that Islam was in fact a spiritual thing.

Near instant pressure from area muslims have pretty much forced the mosque to close, although the city is using the same veneer that some Western cities are using to deny construction of mosques, such as minor infractions of water, sewer and municipal services. But at the end of the day, it’s pretty clear even from a sanitized BBC report, that pressure from only Muslims will ensure this mosque never be open for business.

What is important about this story is not that this prevision of Islam was refused operation, but that a little public pressure from a few muslims can indeed close down a demonstrably un-islamic mosque. Not surprising that muslims wouldn’t allow this socialist multicultural remodeling of a mosque to represent itself as Islam. Not even the leftist apologists who attempt to claim that Islam really is like that – none of them would be caught with their heads on inside it.

This means that the thousands of mosques worldwide in which sedition, genocide, treason, death to homosexuals, and various terrorist attacks are planned, and which are still open today, are in fact truly islamic. No attempt by local muslim groups have been made to close them. This is defacto empirical evidence that Islam is what this and so many other sites have been saying; it is not necessary to even crack one copy of the koran or hadiths or the example of the pirate Mohamed.

If muslims can force the closure of a single mosque in short order and with little resistance because the mosque does not adhere to the tenets of Islam, then it stands to reason that all those mosques that remain open, do in fact represent the real Islam. Therefore the ones that have been caught with plans for terror attacks, preaching genocide of Jews, etc., and are not closed by their own community, must represent the true faith.

I remember some years ago thinking that when people tried to force a choice on you, the best solution was not to choose the opposite, but to make whatever choice you would have made anyways, even if it was the one that was being forced on you. That way, you do not let the tyrants win. To push back against people who would bully you, meant to do nothing different.

It was good thinking for those days. But today it won’t cut it. A serious demonstration needs to happen to show that our own choices will not be curtailed. People should make a point of wearing a Peppa Pig T shirt on a bus or train in the UK. Or have a few beers and some bacon in a clear grocery bag. Or at all times where not hideously inconvenient, a show that your own culture and habits will be tolerated by all must be made.

IF the lesson learned from the bus incident is that we will have to go a bit farther to not offend muslims in their infinite pressure to exert their increasingly draconian and symbolic demands on the rest of the world’s people, THEN we will find ourselves living in a spectacularly violent and dangerous kind of Arabian country where our various security services will be used to ensure the rest of us are kept up to speed with new Islamic demands. Does this sound paranoid? No more than had I predicted the events of the past year a decade ago. Meaning yes, it sounds so, but it will come to pass.

We won’t be able to get rid of the political elite. That group is just too good at destroying people who oppose the current orthodoxy of appeasement to Islam. Just look at Tommy Robinson and all the others who step out to oppose the new order. But we can frighten that group into representing our interests again if we act quickly enough, while the numbers still allow it.

Sing the pig songs. Wear the t-shirts that offend Islam in any and every way you can think of, so long as it’s symbolic and ideological. Discuss real world events loudly at the pub, etc., so that others can know it’s OK now to speak what is true. And most importantly, re-normalize the criticism of religious and political authority, the only actual value of freedom of speech at all.

Wear something with the Arabic letter “N”, which is the new symbol of support for all the people being wiped out worldwide by the Islamic State. You will enjoy the looks you get from religious muslims whom you encounter. But do it soon. There is a clock running on this strategy. If we do not elect to do this one, the next one will be considerably more costly.

Eeyore for Vlad.

(Special thanks to Sonia Bailey for proofing and correcting)

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

13 Replies to “Trying to spot the important atrocities in a sea of horror”

  1. Islamic State crisis: Al-Nusra issues threat over air strikes (BBC, Sept 28, 2014)
    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29398882

    “Syrian militant group al-Nusra Front has denounced US-led air strikes as “a war against Islam”.

    In an online statement, the al-Qaeda-linked group called on jihadists around the world to target Western and Arab countries involved.

    It comes as the US and other nations widened air strikes against Islamic State (IS) fighters in Iraq and Syria.

    The Pentagon said jets hit the Syrian city of Raqqa on Saturday as well as IS positions near the Turkish border….”

  2. I loved your article! Fantastic! We need to get out there and let these bullies know that their righteous indignation will not be tolerated anymore. Their sense of entitlement will be torn down bit by bit. If they find my eating or carrying bacon is offensive to them, then I scream “You are offensive to ME!” They will complain about anything and people are scared to literal death by these haters and morons. They are terrifying everyone and law enforcement is letting them do so by arresting the person that they maligned or harmed. We need to stand up to them. I’ll bet they will drop their mouths open once we do. Their method is intimidation and we have to stop being scared and face them and their ugly hateful ways!!!!!

    • “They will complain about anything and people are scared to literal death by these haters and morons. “

      The beheadings are working. That’s what secures the consent. You never know who might go jihad on you.

  3. Eeyor: “…Homosexuals do not choose their sexuality”

    Then logically from your statement we can deduce:

    “Transvestites do not choose their sexuality”

    And furthermore,

    “Pedophiles do not choose their sexuality”

    And further more, if everyone is ‘consenting and it is as pleasurable as much to the receiver (haram) as to the dominant (halal) then a happy and stable society of bonobo monkeys we all shall be.

    Of course, I disagree with Eeyor’s world view in this area, and I can produce testaments from Ex-Homosexuals as I can of Ex-Muslims – which informs me neither are born that way, nothing is rigidly fixed, and that the human brain may become fascinated and fixated on anything in Heaven or on Earth.

    Therefore in the matter of democracy, I only have to reason upon whether their lifestyles are harmful, benign or beneficial… and by their fruit they are the most destructive so-and-sos getting into politics and advancing their fetishes to the detriment of family life and children. That is, my line crossed.

    Those that Self-destruct, like smokers, have to bear the cost of their own poverty, this is the freedom of suffering that brings enlightenment. Just don’t bring anal sex into schools as a natural unnaturalness. This will disturb growing minds – as they well know.

    For example, yesterday I was in a food-counter queue and offered an empty cup to a woman who forgot to pick it up. A shop employee behind me suggested I use this as a pretext to go to her table and chat her up. I looked at him, realized he was a Moderate Muslim Clone and politely said this was the furthest from my mind. But for these homo-homosexuals, (some have defined as fixed in the womb and a normal response), while I would suggest they grew up with a cold distant mother who created this dissociation of affection and a hungry mummy-needy male. An immature development of their brains.

    Therefore, Muslims and Homosexuals have a common root with each other, and need years to recover, the time to heal, to become masters of their own lives and not enslaved by their sexual compulsions. It is the same for people with brain damage learning how to walk again. They were made blind, and the pathways to sight may be a realization, or a gradual awakening and control and power of their bodily functions.

    I also have a discussion to look forward to tonight with my son over the meaning of “Duck Fister” one of his friends refers himself to. This discussion regarding this single-mother adopted child is to whether he has, after indulging his pornographic fantasies over years of missing a daddy, mingled them with the natural desires to reproduce created a fulfilment and sense of satisfaction in reproducing a meme rather than a life. That he has created a new image of himself to remove conflict, just as a woman-fearer becomes the mistress, or Hindu-revert fulfils the satisfaction in a Muslim.

    For Islam to work – it has to be based on half-truths. If you are going to defeat them in showing them what they hold as false, with words, you don’t then say “some insanities are more equal than others”.

    The mentally-ill and ill-informed will always be with us. Compassion, kindness and support is always required. But you don’t take you eye off them for one moment and let them fly the plane. This is what we have done, changing the law to give themselves preferences, and are now concentrated hoard in power. The pink swastika is in Islam and the pink pound in Socialism. You don’t know who slept with whom and discussed what, for favors. It is a different kingdom, and you inviting it into yours gave them a free pass.

    Muslim, Gay, Heterosexual, Jew, Christian, Male, Female, Black, White; if they can afford to live by it, sure they can decorate their own houses and dress themselves to suit. Just don’t make me pay for it. And of those children they corrupt – I’ll keep telling them it is what it is, that the few will then hear and escape.

    The argument is, and has always been about consciousness. The Civilization of Man to protect the vulnerable.

    That you see the rectum as a sexual organ amazes me, Eeyor and the diseases, torn walls and butt-plugged damaged sphincters that resemble the lungs of smokers. You are not going to tell me smoking is a normal pastime? For similarly, these can be cured if they want to too.

    • Why drag smokers into the light? Because whenever I want to know anything about the running of an organization I huddle around the back of the building and join the smokers. In their semi-hypnotic state of forgetting-thru-getting-high indulgence they cannot lie.
      If I were a Communist agent I’d join the Police Commissioners in a Public ‘Sauna’.

      With Muslims I’d just go to a mujra.
      http://www.asiansinmedia.org/news/article.php/theatre/884
      http://www.asiansinmedia.org/news/article.php/theatre/884

      • Why should I labor over ‘being born that way’?

        Of our desires, we can and are everything. Cars, clothes, religions, cultures, food, pain, pleasure, are at our disposal.

        Our nurture in childhood affects how we behave. I have no problem with those who have the brains of the opposite gender. A physical problem rectified by a physical solution. Likewise a psychological problem needs a psychological solution.

        I spoke to a woman tonight about her informing her father for nearly fifty years held a grudge about his bullying. She told him what he did and how she felt. Yet it did not make her feel better. Why?

        Because she did not repent of her judging him. She still needed his approval, that he would confess his remorse and he would now be the good father she always yearned for.

        What she is doing is keeping that frightened child alive in her, and wants to feed it with comfort so it will be still and not hurt.

        This is the ‘phantom limb’ syndrome, locked to always itch as though it is still there. Homosexuals, pedophiles, Muslims and anyone afraid of the dark are in this cycle of feeding their anxieties.

        I am borrowing Professor Ramachandra’s discovery of holding up a mirror (and not Deepak Chopra’s Quantum Theory of positive attraction), when I refer to facing your fears, to meet that child and show it the way out by reliving the experience knowing what you know now. You will see the perpetrator is a victim of their own enslavement. You rise above the occassion and the child is set free.

        But, there are people who will approve and applaude and feed your nature, and one day, after vast amounts of cocaine and broken relationships, you will phone your enabling ‘friend’ and he will tell the world that you were the last person he called, and you now realize he was trying to say goodbye.

        Good fellow. Good on you, fellow.

  4. Now to the meat of Eeyor’s argument:
    Non Muslims forced to comply to Muslim sensibilities.
    Wearing the badge of Christian-oppression in solidarity.

    The Socialist First Law states: ‘thou shalt not offend’.
    The Second is like this: ‘thou shall not offend those who are offended on behalf of someone who would be offended’.

    So haram activities and wearing the badge by kufar will offend.

    The European Human Rights Act was designed to protect and advance the interests of ideologues ‘BTW’ therefore it will first have to be torn up and publicly burned; although stating that is an incitement to civil disobedience and thus a crime; but without protest dhimmitude to a new lord and master will take over from the mistress. For Article 8 is a proudly stated as a “qualified right” and not unalienable right like America in giving freedom from the tyranny of their government.

    “Article 8 is a qualified right, so in certain circumstances public authorities can interfere with the private and family life of an individual. These circumstances are set out in Article 8(2). Such interference must be proportionate, in accordance with law and necessary to protect national security, public safety or the economic wellbeing of the country; to prevent disorder or crime, protect health or morals, or to protect the rights and freedoms of others.”

    Not worth the paper it is printed on.
    http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/documents/humanrights/hrr_article_8.pdf

  5. The important point is, children do not choose their traumas, they are defenceless through fear. Dr Who is very successful at promoting submission to same-sex sexuality by referencing any resistance to it in having to overcome alien monsters. Islam implants the same fear of horrible consequencies if you so not go along. So does Socialism.

    The sixty year old woman did not chose to hate men most of her life, so of homosexual I agree with Eeyor. But her destructive behavior matched very much theirs, and shared their loyalty to the darkness. She took the values of the other side. Until now. Now, she wants to be free, and whole.

    That is all. That is the freedom Muslims can have. Et al.

  6. It’s what Stephen Coughlin describes as ‘don’t-make-me-hit-you-again’ battered wife syndrome, the redefinition of incitement in UNHCR Resolution 16/18, something like which it seems was already present in the 1995 Johannesburg Principles:

    II. RESTRICTIONS ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

    Principle 6: Expression That May Threaten National Security

    Subject to Principles 15 and 16, expression may be punished as a threat to national security only if a government can demonstrate that:

    (a) the expression is intended to incite imminent violence;

    (b) it is likely to incite such violence; and

    (c) there is a direct and immediate connection between the expression and the likelihood or occurrence of such violence.

    Perhaps the intent here was to use incitement as originally defined. But by reacting violently to a ‘incitement’ like Peppa Pig, Muslims establish that there is a direct and immediate connection between singing the Peppa Pig song and violence occurring. So the way this is worded, it would seem that the singer can be punished as a threat to national security.

    These Jo’burg experts were convened by Article 19, a Soros-funded organization that pretends to defend freedom of expression. More recently (2009) they were responsible for something called ‘The Camden Principles on Freedom of Expression and Equality,’ which is an order of magnitude worse.

    One section (Principle 12) is called ‘Incitement to Hatred.’ ‘Incitement’ is used with something like its original intent, but there is a sub-section on ‘hate speech,’ feelings crimes. This is supposed to be rooted in article 20 (2) of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:

    20 (2): Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.

    The Camden Principles urge all states to adopt legislation prohibiting advocacy of ‘intense and irrational emotions of opprobrium, enmity and detestation towards the target group.’

    There is much else in this document that is designed to destroy free speech. Naturally then they are part of the ‘Free Word Centre,’ another London-based, Soros-funded NGO self-described as ‘the only international centre for literature, literacy and free expression in the world.’

  7. This is a case of a minority community being empowered by their religion which has been protected by the law: sharia, halal, whatever is untouchable as the law protects their prophet Mohammed and Islam. Blasphemy of Christianity, Judaism, Sihkism etc. Is almost impossible to prosecute but make rational critism of Islam or Mohammed and you are accused of islamophobia, which can get you sent to prison or beheaded, depending who gets to you first, the police or the jihadist ( religious Muslim).
    Multiculturalism, where one minority culture can impose their rules on the majority, has failed. There needs to be a serious rethink regarding the place of Islam within British society both by Moslems and society in general.