Islamisation of Europe: When will Russia react?

Original translation from PI-news.net by Carpe Diem

From PI News:

How long will Russia stand idle and watch how Western Europe is transferred into a predominantly Islamic-, nuclear-armed-, EU-totalitarian entity. Since Russia is not governed by dreamy ideologists but political realists, one may assume that the Kremlin is concerned about the consequences of the Islamization and totalitarianism in EU-Western Europe for the external security of Russia. Especially the following issues might concern Russian strategists:

(by C. Jahn)

1. The Islamization of EU-Western Europe is a threat to Russia

Despite a growing opposition movement in some Western European countries, like France and England, it can be expected that Western European governments will continue their previous politic of Islamization in an unaltered manner. Also in the future, they will get millions of Muslims into Europe, who will for their part continue the ‘Conquest from within’ and step by step extend their influence on power over politics, administration and the armed forces. Especially in Germany, with its feeble opposition, the government will push the Islamization forward with particular aggressiveness. Although it may take another three to four decades until Muslim minorities have become the majority in important Western European heartlands – in Belgium, Holland, vast parts of France, England, Germany, Austria – the Islamic influence on the political leadership in Western Europe will shortly be strong enough to make Russia and the former Eastern bloc remain the bulwark left against the spread of Sharia in Europe and the traditionally aggressive Islamic ideology of world conquest.

An Islamized Western Europe will inevitably come into a cultural-ideological conflict with Russia as well as the rather nationally oriented states of the former Eastern bloc unlikely to be Islamized over the medium term, especially Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic. It has to be assumed that primarily the – opposition-less but highly influenced by Islam – country of Germany will incite especially loudly against Christian Russia but also other countries of the former Eastern Bloc. Merkel’s latest tirades against Russia and the undisguised hostility towards Hungary potentially address future agitation and front lines in Europe in advance.

Thus, in the upcoming decades an Islamized and due to the Islam-immanent readiness for conflict and war a militarily more aggressively-thinking EU-Western Europe will evolve to a confrontational, potentially hostile power west of Russia. This hostile sphere of control in the west will supplement geographically with today’s existing Islamic-hostile sphere in the south (Chechnya, Turkic states e.g.). As a membership of the neo-Islamised and always dangerously nationalistic Turkey in the EU is conceivable, in a not to distant future Russia will find itself clenched by entirely Islamic, latent or openly hostile forces in the west as well as in the south.

2. The EU will tighten its totalitarian stance

The anti-democratic development within the EU will intensify during the next years, the totalitarian trend within the EU’s power apparatus will increase. Virtually all leading parties in Western Europe promote a policy in favour of an even more concentrated EU centralism while simultaneously surrendering power of the democratically elected state parliaments. This development, compatible with the development within the conglomerate of nations in the USSR, will ultimately lead to a no longer democratically or just marginally legitimised dictatorship of unelected bureaucrats whose exercise of authority, similar to the USSR, will progressively gain a character of the absolute.

Since even today an effective power control of EU leaders is almost impossible to the Western European population, this anti-democratic development of the EU, like historical experience with all totalitarian systems has shown, will increase the political and military risk disposition among EU management circles, in specific: lower the inhibition threshold for military adventures and make the EU distinctly more dangerous. The combination of those two major political trends in Western Europe, Islamisation and totalitarianism create a dangerous cocktail for the external security of Russia over the medium term.

3. The EU will acquire access to military force and weapons

For years there have been efforts within the EU to provide Brussels’ bureaucrats with their own military apparatus by centralising national armies. There is no doubt that constituting such an army is only a matter of time. This army will be rather small in the beginning but will, through adaptation over time as overall development of the EU has always shown, replace national armies completely. From that point on, French nuclear weapons will no longer be under control of a democratic government but will directly or indirectly be subject to Brussels’ civil servants centralism which doesn’t have to justify its measures to any voters.

Thus, the merging of the currently nationally fragmented military powers in Western Europe to a gigantic collective military apparatus will not only be an entirely new quality of military potential at Russia’s western flank but also essentially change the decision making processes for triggering a military confrontation through fast decision making among some few totalitarian Leaders instead of cumbersome consensus-building among elected democrats. Both developments will lower the inhibition threshold and raise the readiness for confrontation on behalf of the Western European political leadership.

4. The EU will distract from inner problems by aggressive behaviour towards the exterior

There are countless motivations for triggering military conflicts, but almost always internal political problems play a role of which ruling powers want to distract by focusing the forces against an external enemy.

EU-Western Europe is factually broke and is, as is well known, only kept solvent by printing money – on a permanent basis such a system that is artificially kept alive has no chance to survive. The inflated welfare systems will lead to an ever increasing taxation and therefore to an additional weakening of Western European economic and growth capacity. The international competitiveness of Western Europe will continue to decline, Western Europe will lose world market shares, today’s visible impoverishment will accelerate. Moreover, the unabatedly radically impelled settling of peoples from all over the world in Western Europe will weaken the structural cohesion of societies ever more evidently. The current interethnic hollow peace in countries like France, Holland, Belgium as well as in parts of Germany will gradually cultivate into civil unrest and most likely an internal war. It seems to be just a matter of time until these countries suffer the same cruel fate as other polyethnic- multireligious artificial states, namely Yugoslavia, Syria and Iraq.

Thus, in the upcoming years, Western Europe almost inevitably will become poorer, more violent and, in consequence of the foreseeable ethnoterritorial fragmentation, ungovernable in vast parts. Historical experience teaches that in such situations politicians, simply upon grounds of self-protection, regularly yield to the temptation of shifting the glaring potential for conflict within towards the exterior by putting the focus on an allegedly common ‘enemy’. Therefore, Russia runs the risk to become the lightning rod for the economic decline and the growing interethnic tensions in Western Europe.

5. When will Russia act?

Even when assumed in a favourable light that the developments outlined occur only partly politically intended, i.e. the political class in Western Europe doesn’t necessarily act viciously deliberately, a certain automatism lies within the mentioned macro trends in Western Europe: Mass settlement leads to Islamisation, thus, to a growing aggressiveness towards the exterior, loss of democracy leads into dictatorship, thus, a declining inhibition threshold, military centralisation leads to concentrated strategic strength, economic decline and civil unrest lead to a search for external scapegoats and the mobilisation of the masses for an external war.

As only Russia is in line for being the opponent in such a war – an Islamised Western Europe will not wage war against the Arab world, democratic Switzerland, observed with growing hostility by EU’s elites, is no serious match – the question arises how long Russia will stand idle and watch this development. From the Russian perspective – and Western European politicians should in fact put themselves into this position once – Russian interference with the current political and ethnical developments in Western Europe would be under no circumstances an ‘Intrusion into Internal Affairs’ of EU-Western Europe but would in fact lie, due to the geopolitical and military threat scenario combined to these developments on the long term, within Russia’s immediate interests of security.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

5 Replies to “Islamisation of Europe: When will Russia react?”

  1. Why is This Not Betrayal? By Fjordman

    http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/06/why-is-this-not-betrayal/

    This is what I raised some 5 years ago

    http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/carry-on-anjem.html?showComment=1237681920000#c6416986090100766302

    and more pertinently where I post the question

    The question is how to stop Muslim immigration without it appearing as religious discrimination. The next question is how to reverse Muslim immigration. Both need to be done in a manner that does not appear discriminatory, does not require laws to be passed that are viewed as unconstitutional. Or as Kenny Everett, a radio DJ used to put it, “All done in the best POSSIBLE taste”.

    http://reflight.blogspot.co.uk/2010/08/manhattan-verdun.html

  2. A very good analysis, I will have to take the time to read it closely rather then just skim it.

    Off the top of my head Putin will act when he thinks Russia (he) will be able to make vassal state/s of all of the EU nations. Never forget that Putin desires to become Czar of all the Russias and has also inherited the communist desire to be world ruler.

  3. * Must Read *

    “The Cold War’s Arab Spring: How the Soviets Created Today’s Middle East”
    Stolen Kremlin records show how the Soviets, including Gorbachev, created many of today’s Middle East conflicts.
    ____
    *Far and away, this is the best background reading currently available about Russian adventures in the Mideast. Many know bits and pieces anecdotally, but this documentation is a knock-out.

    *Besides, it confirms everything my father said contemporaneously.

    http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/103576/the-cold-wars-arab-spring#