This is not a small point, nor is it an attempt at being clever. This matters. A lot.
The UK is communist in the most classical sense, but in a modern method of execution. it is also being implemented in stages as opposed to all at once. We are in a phase of that revolution across the West and most noticeably to we English speakers in the Anglosphere for obvious reasons. That is the news and social media posts we can understand. Germany and other Western nations are also undergoing the same process though.
A central feature of a communist revolution is the movement upwards of political power from the individual to the state. That power can then be exorcised in what seems as even a whimsical way by the faceless bureaucrats and leaders who run the state. False narratives that are clearly and obviously untrue can be invented and launched on to the public with massive consequences to the culture and people’s most fundamental rights. Opposing them is initially fought by unofficial state thugs like ANTIFA or BLM, Me Too movement etc. while the revolution is still nascent and then later as the revolution becomes mature, by statute. Off the top of my head I can’t think of a better example than Canadian bill C4 that criminalizes parents if they try and talk their own children out of being spayed or neutered in the name of “trans-affirming care” after a state agent like a teacher or councillor talked them into it. Usually with an insane metaphysic like “being born in the wrong body”. This one dialectic is all of the above in one Line of Operation.
In a modern Communist state, the crime most important to power is to stand against a state narrative from a position of authority. That will be punished severely. We can know this by what happened to every doctor or scientist that objected to the Covid measures and the mRNA injection mandates. Any doctor, scientific authority or influential journalist who spoke against these insane measures found their lives destroyed. This site is too full of examples to mention here although the first one we interviewed personally, Dr. Mary O’Connor is truly a stellar example of the state modus operandi and its consequences. They will not call it that though. They will use a device and the most convenient one for wealthy powerful or famous men is usually the ‘Me Too’ method of negating a person by accusations of sexual misconduct. The British have been doing this a while now. They did it to Vladimir Bukovski. He was a high profile ex-Soviet citizen who escaped to the UK and become well known for explaining that the EU was in fact a reproduction of the Soviet system of control and even by design of the USSR. He was cancelled in the UK for illegal pornographic material on his computer.
For those who want to know more about Bukovsky, find anything you can by Diana West on him. Also there are still lots of videos of his lectures. They are worth it if you want to know what the true nature of the EU is.
Brand also went against state narratives. During Covid he was pretty good actually. We were personally suspicious of how someone of his stature could actually stand against the Western States’ narratives on Covid and the Vaxx and not be arrested. Those questions are here somewhere on that site. But he went against a lot of state narratives and did point out some of the dialects directed against reality itself. Like the metaphysic of people being born in the wrong body. There is a video at the bottom of this post where he spends over half an hour with Charlie Kirk on some of these.
We covered somewhat on another post in the last few days the obvious contrast between how Muslims who do real rape are handled in the UK (and in the West in general) with evidence, DNA, video, recent testimony and witnesses. These cases are pretty much treated like littering or parking infractions. Ok some of the worst do time somewhat close to Brand’s sentence, although I don’t know how long they serve inside, but their crimes are crimes. Not 20 year old allegations resting on reframed descriptions of events where the names of the accusers are not known, and police actually asked them to come forward. No right to face the accuser. In France not that long ago, a Muslim broke into an elderly Jewish woman’s apartment, raped her and threw her off her balcony to her death. He was acquitted because he was smoking Marijuana at the time. I bet you Russel was high on a lot more than that when he was hitting on women who didn’t seem to object at the time. And why am I comparing France to England? Because they are all undergoing the same communist revolution at the same time, deploying the same revolutionary methods against their legacy populations. The mass import of hostile aliens, the transformation of Rule of Law into this hybridized Sharia-Communist system, the raising to the level of sacred scripture of state narrative and the total capture of mass media and replacement of truth with language that forces people of legacy culture to accept the morbid and grotesque untruths as morally superior to how every culture everywhere throughout all of history would deal with these issues.
As we have said many times, hate speech laws are the secular equivalent of blasphemy laws in Muslim countries. And like blasphemy laws, they are applied in ways that increases state power. Not in any form of equal application of justice. We see that across the West and especially in the UK and soon Canada, where people are being arrested by the tens of thousands for criticizing Islam even in a totally factual and important way, while in Mosques 5X a day they openly call for the extermination of Jews and Christians. This again, is NOT two tiered justice. It has a Telos. It has a purpose. It has an end state which all of the enforcement and judgments and so on point to. This is not corruption of a system. it is an entirely new system with a different objective than the one people are feverishly clinging to and imagining still exists.
At this point people actually know the real laws. Legacy British people know what will happen if they accuse a migrant, especially a Muslim or rape. The chances of them being arrested for pointing out the Islamic fact of their behaviour, dress and so on means they might more likely be arrested than the rapist.
No. This is not an exaggeration and has been the case for over 10 years now. Again, read Peter McLoughlin‘s book, Easy Meat or watch the interview in Michael Hansen’s movie, Killing Europe with a Rotherham Harem survivor.
Tommy Robinson is another obvious example of this system from day 1. The fact that he has managed to keep going despite the time in jail in multiple sentences, one of which was for actually questioning convicted Muslim Harem operators in the UK, is close to a miracle.
(As another aside, reading or listening to the Audiobook of Aristotle’s The Politics is wonderful to behold as we see the same issues and problems from three centuries before Christ. It offers a wry smile on every couple of pages for those contemplating the trade-offs a society has to make between power ,money and populations and even collectivization vs. individualism. So that didn’t start with Marx or Hegel.)
So in essence then, The UK, Canada, France etc. do NOT have a “two tiered justice system”. They have a very different system of laws and enforcement that people will either not understand, or most commonly, refuse to allow themselves to believe that such a thing is possible. They will cling to some version of Hanlon’s Razor that this is a corruption of the system they must believe still exists rather than accept that a fundamentally new system altogether is in place.
For example I know two men personally in Canada who in divorce court, the judge tilted the table against the fathers and explained why by using the word, “Patriarchy” in the court. This is no small thing. This is a negation of all fairness and the systematic attribution of malevolence to the male simply because he is a male. In both cases, the facts, the money, the custody of children made zero difference. It was a narrative dictated decision. Males are of the patriarchy, and therefore all judgements must heavily favour the female.
Look at what happened to people who gave a few dollars to the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa, before the trucks even arrived in that city for the protest. They had their accounts frozen by the state, and state thugs, namely ANTIFA attacked their homes and businesses. Those people just supported those who opposed totalitarian communist state narratives on movement, business and forced injections. And while the protest was still legal in the old fashioned sense of being legal. In other words, within the rights of the individual. Trudeau and Carney both passed bills that totally obliterate the individual’s rights to freedom of speech, control over your children’s decisions including not to get spayed or neutered in the name of “trans-affirming-Care”. And that is just one dialectic of many.
Frankly this subject really is the coinage of this site for the last at least 7 years. But in summary, calling it “two-tired-justice is to miss the target to the point where you have no effective opposition to it. Understand the enemy first. Then develop strategies and tactics. Ezra Levant may be the first person to defeat the “Canadian Human Rights Commissions”, itself a communist (and dialectical) organization who’s purpose is to remove human rights and create state controlled collective ‘rights’. Rights which are to be dialectically enforced like all the other examples given here, with Russel brand’s conviction and sentence being the anchor. Levant managed to defeat the previously undefeated “Human Rights Courts” by shining a powerful light on what they do to people. But that tactic no longer works because of the sheer volume of what people see as gross injustices by the state. It is now too much to bear and people switch off. As another rather laser sharp example of the dialectical nature of the CHRC,they convicted ethnic hair-waxing salons and fined them out of business because they refused to wax the testicles of a man who decided to claim he was a woman, and therefore his testicles had been alchemically converted into a Vulva and they were legally obliged to wax it. The CHRCs agreed. You can look up Johnathan Yaniv on this site or Blazing Cat Fur and find the whole ordeal in detail.
This understanding matters because the only shot we have to recover an individualist state, what people call a Democracy, is first, to understand we can’t fix this system within the system when it is not the system we think it is whatsoever. We have to understand what has actually taken place and we have to stage a counter-revolution to either reclaim what our ancestors have built, or more likely, re invent the wheel. Create a proper Constitution like the US one in modern and clear language with solid lines drawn between state power and individual rights, and then describe the machinery needed to preserve that constitution, fight for it, then raise children with an understanding of the system and how to preserve it.
The number of people who voluntarily left school and university to go fight WW2 compared to how many students dropped out to protest the Vietnam war tells us a lot about how education was captured first and what that led to is now obvious.
Still, Russel Brand is really just one data point for this thesis.
The following videos are good descriptions of what happened to Brand other than they call it a miscarriage of justice, or an example of a two tiered state. Again, it’s neither. It is in fact, a good example of the actual system that is now in place.
34 minutes of Charlie Kirk and Russel Brand. Both ‘inconvenient’ men are now dealt with.
Frankly, we don’t know or care if Brand’s Christianity is an act or not. if he is sincere, it will have the benefit of making his jail term easier. The value of faith is it allows greater endurance of suffering. One might argue that is why it exists in the first place. But he certainly looks like he is in the category of those canceled by the Communist state for opposing its narratives, whatever else he may be.
