1. I’d like to draw your attention to this article at RAIR. Like a lot of the articles and events that this site tries to zoom in on, this one, while not spectacular in terms of violence etc. is critically important in terms of understanding the engine behind the destruction of the West. In this case, it is how the government of Spain knew about the invasion, that Morocco had even warned them multiple times before it took place that it would and a great deal more information that is pretty much a slam dunk that Leftist Western governments have and are engineering the total demise of Western Civilization and deracination of Judeo-Christian, Greco-Roman values and systems of thought.
Furthermore, that dozens of Moroccan military personnel are embedded within the invading forces to monitor Spanish Military and security apparatus response to the invasion, and not for Spanish evaluation.
‘Migration Was Only the Formal Cover’: 72 Moroccan Military Coordinators Embedded in Ceuta
Spanish army intelligence has identified at least 72 Moroccan military personnel still operating inside Ceuta, two months after 80,000 people surged across the border on July 30. Twenty-two are agents of Rabat’s intelligence services. Fifty are soldiers embedded in the invasion. Seven additional Moroccan reservists voluntarily presented themselves to Spanish National Police. The classified reports describe them as “centers of gravity” for financing and controlling the settlements still occupying the city.
The original reporting appeared in El Español on September 28, based on three classified army reports and a senior military officer who spoke on the record. The Telemadrid broadcast summarized the same reports. Brussels Signal confirmed the details independently.
The officer’s assessment is unambiguous: “We have confirmed that there are 72 Moroccan military personnel in Ceuta, and we don’t know if there could be more.”
Please read the whole article at RAIR linked above. The links also will bring you to major related reveals on the nature of this event. This is the revolution gone overt.
2. Those of you aware of the US somehow managing not to deploy the death penalty to a convicted criminal in the US can imagine how Canadians are seeing this. Basically the US should just send over those on death row and have them enter as refugees claiming they are depressed.
3. Overt October 1917 level communist revolutionary action in France remains extreme.
One of the signs shown, translates as: “The youth tells the Front National to Piss off” except they use the French word for shit in it. Merde. So… not a conservative movement here. We should very much appreciate though, that the video has a sort of warning on it, that Euronews is funded in whole or in part by the EU. That is refreshing. Normally they don’t put any kind of caveat on leftist enemy propaganda, and Euronews most certainly is. They are as deceptive and purpose driven as the CBC in Canada.
4. Moose on the Loose covers the right events in his videos. But to the surprise of no-one I don’t always agree with his analysis of those events.
In the case of the first story, the important part is that the state will use defacto methods to destroy people that state counter-narrative views publicly. At least where they cannot use De Jure methods to do so. What should concern us is how it is now trickling down to the plebs. During the communist revolution in the West of 2020, only doctors and scientists and people of influence got punished for stating counter-narrative views, usually more true than the narrative naturally, but now its a guy in a T shirt working at a brewery. And why would that even make the news? As to “not the smartest thing to do to wear it on the national day of blah blah blah” that’s like saying “He broke up with me on the day I found out my turtle was sick”. What would be a good day to break up with you then? Either you believe in freedom of speech or you do not. Trying to amplify the harm done by speaking truth to narrative by referencing a fake holiday based on narrative is more enemy propaganda. And that is just the first item. Nonetheless, the video, like all the MOTL videos are worth seeing to get the events.
5. Another video on the Canada-US trade issues.
Related issue. Many Canadian media outlets will refer to the banning of American products in Canadian stores as a “boycott”. To be clear, a boycott typically means you have the choice of buying something and chose not to do so for whatever reasons. Like all the dialectical language of Canada now, they try and make it look like something the people have chosen, as opposed to imposed on the people by the state. I would like to buy American liquor, but apparently I can’t because the only outlet legally allowed to sell liquor in Ontario, the LCBO, will not allow the sale of US made booze. Therefore I do not have the choice to buy it. So it is not a boycott. Much like the mRNA shots were forced on the public. No, they didn’t put a gun to your head or strap you down and make you take it, although yes, they certainly did to that in many cases to the very vulnerable, but generally they coerced it to the point that the law would have called it force, had it been a secretary that didn’t go out on a date with her boss and got fired for it. This is just another state mass line narrative attack. The attempt is to make Canadians think it’s their idea to disconnect from the US by mass lines against Trump, and against American products as if somehow Donald J. Trump personally profited by every bottle of Jack Daniels or Wild Turkey that was imported to Canada.
Thank you all for checking out this site.
A note about Canada’s bill C-218 which is being voted on Wednesday
This bill attempts to stop the expansion of Canada’s MAiD program to allow the state to murder people based solely on a mental illness diagnosis. Specifically that being Mentally Ill is enough reason to qualify for state administered death.
If recent history is any example, the categories of medical illness will expand to include political views. This is not new. This is how the Soviets did it, and … well I asked my current favorite AI LLM what states used mental illness as a political instrument and here was the response:
Communist States
Soviet Union — The flagship case. The Moscow School of Psychiatry, led by Andrei Snezhnevsky, developed “sluggish schizophrenia” (also called “sluggish-type schizophrenia” or “reformist delusion”), a diagnosis broad enough to cover anyone who opposed the regime but still functioned normally in society. The underlying logic was explicit: since the Soviet system was the best in the world, anyone willing to sacrifice career, family, and freedom to oppose it must be mentally ill. Roughly one-third of Soviet political prisoners were locked in psychiatric hospitals rather than prisons, treated with neuroleptics (often with irreversible side effects). The KGB and Communist Party directed the program. Diagnoses included “sluggish schizophrenia,” “paranoid development with delusions of reform,” and “political intoxication.”Romania — Ceausescu’s regime used psychiatric imprisonment systematically. A 1997 IAPUP investigative committee confirmed several hundred victims of punitive psychiatry. A recent (2025) academic article frames it as “Psychiatric Violence as Communist Statecraft.”
People’s Republic of China — Ongoing and systematic. Chinese psychiatric literature explicitly labels political dissidents, petitioners, and Falun Gong practitioners as mentally ill (the diagnosis “political paraphrenia” appears in official texts). Robin Munro’s research documented this extensively. The World Psychiatric Association has repeatedly debated sanctions against China over it.
Cuba — Documented but described as shorter-lived and smaller in scale than the Soviet or Chinese programs.
Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria — Individual cases confirmed, but no evidence of a systematic state program.
East Germany (GDR) — Despite close intertwining of politics and psychiatry, researchers concluded there was no systematic political abuse program (controversial finding).
Nazi Germany
The Nazi case differs in character. Rather than diagnosing dissenters as mentally ill, the regime moved in the opposite direction: it declared the mentally ill and disabled as political/biological threats to the Volksgemeinschaft. The T4 “euthanasia” program murdered an estimated 200,000+ psychiatric patients. The Nazis also sterilized roughly 400,000 people diagnosed with hereditary conditions. This was the politicization of psychiatry inverted: not “dissent is illness” but “illness justifies extermination.” Political opponents (communists, social democrats) were more likely sent straight to concentration camps than to psychiatric wards.Core Pattern
What unites the communist cases (and distinguishes them from Nazi Germany) is a shared totalitarian logic: the state defines the range of acceptable belief, and deviation from it is ipso facto evidence of pathology. As the PMC historical overview puts it, the Soviet premise was that “persons who opposed the Soviet regime were mentally ill because there was no other logical explanation why one would oppose the best sociopolitical system in the world.” The Civic Solidarity Platform’s 2017 report notes that “virtually all cases of political abuse of psychiatry took place in collectivist (socialist or communist) states.”
Interesting. I know which one Canada most resembles.
“From the Masjid to City Hall”: Muslims from the US Are Coming to Canada to Teach Muslims in Canada How to Take Political Power
On October 10, 2026, the Hilton Toronto Markham will host a training session. The trainers are Muslim elected officials from the United States. The trainees are Muslims in Canada. The subject is how to capture political power for Islamic interests.
The session is called “From the Masjid to City Hall”. The convention is the 24th Annual UMAA Convention, organized by the Universal Muslim Association of America, a Shia Muslim NGO with consultative status at the United Nations. The theme: “The Next Chapter: From Identity to Impact.”
Last year’s convention focused on narrative and identity: how Shia communities are perceived. This year’s focus is impact: obtaining power inside public institutions. The shift is stated explicitly. “The Global Shia Narrative: Identity, Challenges, and Opportunities” has become “From Identity to Impact.” The mosque is the base. City hall is the target.
The Speakers
Abdullah Hammoud is the Mayor of Dearborn, Michigan, the first Muslim and first Arab mayor in the city’s history. Dearborn is the city where, in April 2024, protesters at an Al-Quds Day rally chanted “Death to America” and “Death to Israel”. Hammoud condemned those chants as “unacceptable and contrary to the heart of this city.” He also vowed to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu “for war crimes if he enters city limits”, and snubbed a meeting with Biden’s campaign manager over the Gaza war.
In September 2025, Hammoud told a Christian pastor at a City Council meeting that he was “a bigot, a racist, and an Islamophobe” who was “not welcome here,” adding that he would “launch a parade celebrating the fact that you moved out.” The pastor, Ted Barham, had questioned a city sign honoring Osama Siblani, a local publisher accused of supporting Hezbollah. Hammoud did not apologize. In September 2026, a federal lawsuit was filed alleging anti-Christian and anti-Jewish discrimination by Dearborn and its mayor, claiming the city “celebrated” Muslim holidays while denying equal treatment to Christian and Jewish residents.
Alabas Farhat is a Michigan State Representative from District 3, covering Dearborn and parts of Detroit. He condemned the “Death to America” chants at the April 2024 rally, calling them harmful and divisive. His legislative focus, however, tells a different story. He has called on the United States to “enforce its own Lebanon-Israel agreement” (meaning: restrain Israel), urged action on behalf of American citizens “stranded in Lebanon” during the Hezbollah conflict, and advocated for the return of American citizens from Gaza. His advocacy runs consistently against Israel and in favor of Islamic causes, from Lebanon to Gaza.
Akbar Ali is a 21-year-old Georgia State Representative, District 106, the youngest state legislator in Georgia’s history. He assumed office on December 18, 2025. He was endorsed and celebrated by CAIR-Georgia, which hailed his election as a victory for the Muslim community. His public record is thin: he has been in office for less than a year. What matters is that CAIR built him, CAIR backed him, and CAIR is now exporting him to Canada as a model.
Ali Aljarrah is not an elected official. He is a Senior Advisor at CAIR Action NJ, the political arm of CAIR in New Jersey, and serves as treasurer on the CAIR NJ board. CAIR Action NJ endorsed 22 state assembly candidates in the 2025 election cycle. Aljarrah is the machine builder: his job is to organize Muslims in the US into a voting bloc and elect them. He is coming to Canada to teach Muslims in Canada how to replicate the machine.
The Organization Counting the Army
The numbers come from CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations. In August 2026, CAIR counted 255 Muslim elected officials across 26 states, the highest number ever recorded. By 2028, CAIR projects more than a thousand Muslims running for office. “The wave is not coming. It is already here.”
CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial, the largest terrorism financing trial in American history. Government trial documents identified CAIR as part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee, whose purpose was to support Hamas “with media, money and political support.” CAIR’s executive director, Nihad Awad, said in 1994: “I’m in support of the Hamas movement.” After October 7, 2023, Awad said he was “happy” to see people “breaking the siege”.
CAIR disputes the co-conspirator label, noting that a federal judge found the Justice Department violated the Fifth Amendment rights of named organizations by publicly filing the list. The Fifth Circuit ruling addressed procedure, not substance. The government’s trial brief identified CAIR as part of the Palestine Committee. The documents are public record.
This is the organization counting the 255 elected officials and projecting a thousand candidates by 2028. This is the organization whose senior adviser is coming to Markham to teach Muslims in Canada how to build the same machine.
The Overt Version, Cancelled
Months before UMAA’s convention in Markham, another Islamic conference was planned in Ontario. Hizb ut-Tahrir Canada announced its “Khilafah Conference 2025: Eliminating the Obstacles that are Delaying its Return,” set for January 18, 2025, in Mississauga. The conference was to promote the establishment of a global Islamic caliphate under Sharia law.
Hizb ut-Tahrir is an international pan-Islamic organization founded in 1953 in East Jerusalem. Its stated aim is the re-establishment of the Islamic caliphate and the implementation of Sharia globally. It has been banned as a terrorist organization in the United Kingdom (January 2024), Germany, Russia, China, Turkey, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Australia, and all Arab countries except Lebanon, Yemen, and the UAE. The UK Home Secretary described it as “an antisemitic organization that actively promotes and encourages terrorism.”
The Khilafah Conference was cancelled after public backlash and pressure from Canadian intelligence agencies that were assessing whether to designate Hizb ut-Tahrir as a terrorist entity under Canadian law. The Israeli Ambassador to Canada called on the government to ban the group. The conference was moved from Mississauga to Hamilton, then cancelled entirely.
Hizb ut-Tahrir is the overt version. UMAA is the institutional version. Both are about Islamic power in Canada. Hizb ut-Tahrir says “caliphate.” UMAA says “city hall.” The first was shut down. The second is proceeding, with the backing of an organization identified in federal court documents as part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee, with speakers who include a mayor who told a Christian he is “not welcome” in his city, a state representative who advocates for Lebanon against Israel, a 21-year-old CAIR product, and a CAIR political operative whose job is to build the machine.
The Doctrine That Connects Them
The link between the cancelled caliphate conference and the proceeding city hall conference is not analogy. It is doctrine. In Islamic law, the world is divided into Dar al-Islam (the house of Islam, where Sharia governs) and Dar al-Harb (the house of war, where it does not). Between them is Dar al-Ahd, the house of covenant: non-Muslim territory where Muslims live under a pact of security with the host state. Under the covenant, jihad does not cease. It changes form.
Imam Tom Facchine, an American convert to Islam and a scholar at the Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research, was asked about this by a devout Muslim in traditional dress, a full beard without moustache, the appearance of a man who takes his religion seriously enough to dress against the norms of the country he lives in. The questioner’s concern was that classifying the United States as Dar al-Ahd would “divorce Muslims in America from Muslims of the rest of the world who, uncomfortably, are actively at war with the country that we’re residing in.” His concern, in other words, was that the covenant would prevent Muslims from waging kinetic jihad alongside the Ummah.
Facchine corrected him. The struggle does not stop. The means change. Jihad in Dar al-Ahd is “with the pen and with politics.” That is what jihad is in Dar al-Ahd.
[EMBED VIDEO HERE]
The convention in Markham is that jihad. “From the Masjid to City Hall” is the pen and politics. The shift from identity to impact is the shift from narrative to power. The doctrine says it is jihad. The scholar says it is jihad. The convention’s own theme says it in softer words.
The Wave Already Here
The convention’s own framing makes the strategy explicit. Last year: identity. This year: impact. Last year: how Shia communities are perceived. This year: obtaining power inside public institutions. The shift from narrative to power is the stated plan, in the convention’s own words, on its own promotional materials.
The CAIR numbers track the trajectory: 255 elected officials today, a thousand candidates by 2028. The UMAA convention is the training ground for the Canadian phase. The speakers are the products of the American phase. The strategy is the same: use democratic institutions to advance Islamic interests, elect Muslims to public office, and use those offices to consolidate Islamic power inside the institutions that govern everyone.
The province that shut down the caliphate conference is hosting the city hall conference. The first said Sharia. The second says “impact.” The goal is the same. The method is quieter.
This is a global project. This is not a Canadian story. We are exposing a global template of methods for total Islamic control of Western civilization, and the accompanying destruction of all cultures and systems of governance of all the inheritors of Greco-Roman, Judeo-Christian civilization and 5,000 years of history and growth.
Tags: UMAA, CAIR, Dearborn, Markham, Ontario, Muslims in Canada, political power, Sharia, caliphate, Hizb ut-Tahrir, Abdullah Hammoud, city hall,
