Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.
This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.
So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.
This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.
**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.
For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.
ADDENDUM:
This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.
Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)
We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary
or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.
Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.
This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.
Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.
Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.
This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.
Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.
Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.
Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.
That is dialectics.

Carney want people to stop making memes about him.
A meme is a joke……
Generally a person with high narcissistic traits or narcissistic personality disorder, will rarely admit they ARE wrong, and doing so threatens their FRAGILE self-esteem. Instead of taking responsibility they usually deflect the blame or twists facts to protect their over inflated ego. They protect a false image or perfection and SUPERIORITY —admitting they made a mistake feels too painful and is damaging to their inner self.
Mark Carney is a back- stabbing, short, aggressive agitator whose alter ego is a wounded little victim. Most child like WEF placed Prime Minister EVER. A threat to Canada and an embarrassment.
The world is going to hell in a hand basket, the libs in all Western Nations are work to destroy their nations and our civilization. We can expect things to get much worse over the winter.
Canadian geese will now be Donald’s ducks. LOL
Zineb Riboua
The Islamic Republic’s Illusion of Power: Iran’s Strength Was Always Conditional
For months, I have made the same argument: the IRGC is weak and will lose. The numbers have taken longer to surface than the strategic reality, but they are now increasingly difficult to dismiss. More interesting is why recognition took so long. Part of the answer lies in the effectiveness of the Islamic Republic’s propaganda. Another part lies in assumptions about Iran and the Middle East that have remained remarkably resistant to evidence.
Three assumptions in particular have distorted much of the debate about Iranian power.
– Role of proxies
– “Kissinger once said that “Iran had to decide whether it wanted to be a nation or a cause.” The Islamic Republic has always tried to be both…
– Iran can live with sanctions forever because it has already done so for decades.
https://www.zinebriboua.com/p/the-islamic-republics-illusion-of
_ (^u^)_
Mike Doran – also from the Hudson Institute – has a more extensive analysis.
Trump’s Third Way
With Iran, the president is trying to chart a middle course between George Bush’s war and Barack Obama’s retreat. Whether that can succeed is an open question.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/israel-middle-east/articles/trump-third-way-iran
….
My short answer?
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION.
No there isn’t a diplomatic solution, we can either invade and loose a lot of people, arm the Iranian people which will take longer, or continue with the economic war which will end with Iran having a new government. The latter will take the longest but it will happen as long as we don’t declare victory (surrender) and come home.
Iran was always doomed to loose the war, the left around the world has been working hard to hide this fact but it is becoming obvious to even the willfully blind. Their collapse probably won’t happen before the midterms but it may, just as China’s collapse without the cheap Iranian oil is also inevitable, many people refuse to see this but it will happen.
Today I read a very funny headline “Prime Minister should recall the House early. LOL he is rarely there. Shhhhh. Now just go back to sleep Canadian citizens, Carney will make sure you will own nothing and you will be happy.