1. Very often, we discuss and compare Islam with Communism. On the surface, which is as far as most people get, they seem antithetical. But at any meaningful level there is no daylight between them. RAIR Foundation just published this essay which goes into the heart of the matter.
In fairness though, the subject deserves an entire book. So there is a lot to add. But for a digestible initial look at it, this is a great start. If I do say so myself.
At the end of the day though, once Communism does enough damage to an individualist and therefore free society, Islam wins. I think any political map of the world will illustrate that very well. All the Stans, Chechnya, the Balkans, Iran all prove this. Once again the spectacularly excellent speech at the memorial service for Pim Fortuyn given by Douglas Murray. Here it is as a downloadable txt file. It is truly worth the effort and time to read.
2. Here is a huge slice of the problem pie using a single illustration.
This is a CTV article on the call to prayer by a Regina Saskatchewan mosque. And while this appears to be less blatant propaganda than CTV usually does, as it is still avoiding anything meaningful. Normally they would frame opponents of the call to prayer using Marxist critical-theory and Discourse Theory terms. racist and so on. Also dipping into Marcusian “Repressive Tolerance” theory.
But let me make this simple.
The world is at war. It is the Marxist Left and Islam against everything else. People do not see this because people confuse strategy with tactics. Because they don’t see a lot of uniformed soldiers in formation shooting at our armies, they think this is not a war. Granted, Islam tends to prefer knives, trucks and occasionally airplanes and bombs, but they use it very sparingly to reach strategic goals, which they always do. Mosques are beachheads and deliverers of enemy propaganda. To know what this propaganda is, is easy. Go to MEMRI.org and read and watch. Secondly, or maybe primarily, read Islamic scripture from which they cannot deviate. Read a real translation of Koran like Maududi, the authoritative Hadiths, and Reliance of the Traveller. Islam, like communism, was created to be at war with everything else. both systems demand global hegemony. They are not interested in diversity whatsoever. They seek destruction of all other cultures and systems of human organization and authority. They are both fully dedicated against the individual.
Pretending Islam is a religion with 1st amendment rights or whatever is a reframing of reality in such a way that they will inevitably win. They will take over any part of the world that sees it that way. The left, media including CTV, CBC and Global frames all the information you get to make sure you do not wake up to this simple and obvious set of facts. They in fact do the full Orwell 2 minutes of hate against Trump, just as media did against Bush, Raegan, and Nixon. They also, and this is so blatant its proof of how people can be fooled if the lie is big enough, frame Jews and Israelis as the oppressor in the Gaza conflict while Muslims are waging a genuine genocide against Christians in several parts of Africa. This is not covered by MSM at all. But every single day in Nigeria, Churches full of Christians are attacked with effects that are too brutal to post videos of here, lest once again my website will get blacklisted. Reality, is the one thing the censors cannot stand.
The Muslims therefore will continue to win by increments because we won’t even allow each other to see the truth. One of our number will always chime in to sound wise an fair by talking about tolerance and religious freedom. But religious freedom was never meant to mean that a system, lets call it what they do, a Deen, which was designed from the ground up to be a dedicated engine of global Manifest destiny, can operate unimpeded in our midst. Mosques, once again are beachheads. not similar to a Church, Synagogue or any other religious house of worship. They are disseminators of enemy propaganda. And during times of war, which this is, we would never have tolerated this ever before.
The solution, as Stephen Coughlin often says when quoting a Rabbi he knows, “We have to stop seeing what we know and start knowing what we see”. This is true. But in the absence of a description of what we see that means nothing. Now hopefully it does.
3. Stockwell Day was a Canadian politician who started a new party called The Reform Party in Canada some years ago, with the intention of being an actual Conservative Party as opposed to the controlled opposition that the Conservatives were even back then, I really had no idea what he has been up to since till this video:
The language is still way to soft and cautious but the point being made is at least a valid point that needs to be made.
4. Here’s a good case for Hanlon’s Razor. Is this regulation or law incompetence or malice?
‘We’re still carrying,’ Maryland synagogue security volunteers say, defying county gun ban
An Orthodox Jewish security volunteer in Silver Spring, Md., told JNS that he brought his gun to synagogue on Saturday as usual, despite a new Montgomery County ordinance barring guns within 100 yards of houses of worship and other designated places of public assembly.
“I’d rather be judged by 12 than carried by six,” the volunteer said, of facing a jury rather than being killed and then carried in a coffin.
“We are still carrying,” the man, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told JNS. “That remains true, despite Montgomery County’s best efforts.”
Degan Bartels, public information officer for the Montgomery County Police Department, told JNS that officers will “enforce this the same way as every other law.”
“If someone calls 911 or they call the non-emergency with a complaint, that’s how it’s handled,” Bartels told JNS. “But we’re not going to be actively checking people when they’re going into church or synagogue.”
The Jewish volunteer in Silver Spring told JNS that one person opted not to bring his gun to synagogue on Saturday“I don’t know if that will be true this week, as well,” the volunteer said.
The ordinance, which Marc Elrich, county executive, signed on July 27, prohibits firearms in or within 100 yards of houses of worship.
The U.S. Department of Justice sued the county on Monday and filed 11 declarations from residents, who attend religious services and want to carry firearms for protection. The declarations state that the county “has left us defenseless against armed attackers.”
Well, let’s game this out with some things we can state confidently are facts, and some decent speculation:
A: A person intending to shoot up a house of worship likely doesn’t care about the law, and is fully unlikely to be stopped by this regulation.
B: The law abiding might, if learning disabled, actually abide by the law, but some in fairness might feel the risk of the punishment for carrying a firearm might be more than is worth it. Either way the malicious actor with murderous intent will know that the probability of an armed opposition is lower and so he can inflict more harm before stopped. This therefore, like all gun free zones such as US military facilities, work to the advantage of the terrorist. Just ask any of the families of the victims at Fort Hood when Muslim psychiatrist, Nidal Hassan slaughtered a large number of serving US military personnel in 2009.
C: Like every other law and regulation it is much less likely to be enforced against Muslims or whatever the favoured group of the day is in whatever jurisdiction we are talking about. So it becomes an additional layer of increased probability of attack against whatever group against which, this law will be enforced. This is no different than any other instance of disarming a future victim in order to ensure the outcome of this conflict.
So the inevitable consequence of this will be Islamic or leftist attacks on Jews in a Synagogue. Potentially of course attacks on any building the state determines is a “house of Worship”. But I think we know where the risks lie. This is not a slam dunk for malice over incompetence. although it is a strong case. But looking at it teleologically, looking at it from the point of view of the actual guaranteed outcome of said law, it may as well be malice. And should be treated as such.
Some good news though from the same article:
He said that he heard rumors that police officers in the county won’t be enforcing the ordinance.
The second volunteer only knows of one person in his synagogue who did not carry his gun as usual.
5. Canadians are starting to finally learn what Multiculturalism actually means.
Someone in the comments thread left this image as a reply:
Douglas Murray speech for Pim Fortuyne 
I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say, No. They did not. They likely spent 40M$, a few hundred thousand of which at most went to print a few posters and maybe had them put up with the bulk of the money used to fly people from Ghana to Canada and put them up in apartments and pay them and cover their costs of living.
Alternatively, none of these posters were made at all and all the money went to cover this Cloward Piven plan of mass destruction of the West, save for a few bucks stolen by politicians and bureaucrats.
For those who don’t know what this is, here is Charlie Kirk explaining it in under a few minutes.
Thank you all for checking out this site.
