The most profound reveal of the nature of leftist thought in a 25 second video: Narrative uber alles

As many know, a jihadi attacked a ‘gay pride’ march in Berlin over the weekend. For the details on who did it etc. Please check this post at RAIR Foundation.

From the PoV of this site, this is the bit that carries mass.

This is an LGBTQ activist, prominent enough to be given a mic at the official memorial ceremony after the attack. She likely said a lot more than this, so speculating on what she didn’t say, would not be fair, as she may well have added thoughts to the tragedy that befell the victims.

But what she did say was that she, when she heard about the attack, she hoped the attacker, the person who killed one of her members and injured dozens more, was a white male Christian.

This shows the nature of the LGBTQ movement, at least in part. They exist as a manifestation of a narrative attack against Western civilization, and biological normalcy. They operate under the Marxist narrative of groups, united under the banner of being oppressed against the oppressors, which they have projected on to white straight Christian males.

This isn’t me saying it. This is them. Below is footage from a “trans” march on Bank street in Ottawa a couple of years ago where the MC at the event defines the enemy herself:

The video above only has sixty four thousand views which is interesting. This is the core of the LGBTQ impetus. It’s raison d’être. The left both collects, takes existing groups and projects attributes of being oppressed, and even manufactures groups which can be framed as victims of white male Christianity, but also under various other oppressor names like ‘colonialists’. That allows them to more comfortably attack non white or non straight people, or anyone who they claim as their members who may publicly defend Western Civilization under a rubric that is less awkward than when the Marxist captured media referred to the conservative radio talk show host who ran for governor of California in 2021, Larry Elder, as “The black face of White supremacy”.

Actually that descriptor was an excellent reveal of all we are saying here all by itself.

The LGBTQ activists are not unique in this by the way. The Marxist BLM claimed to speak for all black people in order to usurp authority for leftist revolutionary tactics and goals, and Jewish groups like B’nai B’rith are equally guilty of the same tactics albeit more subtly. They sent out an email to everyone they could possibly reach demanding that Canadians support the odious bill C-9. A distinctly political and far left move while claiming to speak for all jews. 

FWIW, NO ONE speaks for all jews. Jews are not a hive mind. But then, neither are people with sexual ambitions that are not heterosexual or people with darker skin than legacy Norwegians. In fact, back in the first Trump term, when I wore my MAGA hat on walks, the only people who were friendly to me were black and Mexican. Seriously. Whites were coldly contemptuous in that Canadian way because you know, that hat made me a racist.

Back to the jihad attack on the ‘pride’ march, this is what Grok has to say about the woman and event she was speaking at in Berlin:

Where and when:
This took place at the open community vigil / Trauerkundgebung (memorial gathering) on Pariser Platz in front of the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, on the afternoon of Sunday, July 26, 2026 (starting around 2 p.m. local time). It was held the day after the July 25 van-ramming attack near the Christopher Street Day (CSD/Pride) events. Thousands attended; it was a public gathering separate from the more formal memorial service later that day at St. Mary’s Church (Marienkirche), which featured politicians and other official figures.
At the end of the day, we get at least an indication that the left feels it is more important that their narrative of oppression oppressed holds together, than those people they have gathered and trotted out as the oppressed actually live or die doing so. In true communist fashion, the truth itself is the enemy.
If the people who organized various “pride” marches actually cared about the rights and well being of the people they lump into groups based on whatever, they would absolutely want to deal with the truth of who was killing them and why. But what this woman said is the big reveal. Groups of people based on race or behaviour or religion were invented by the left in part, in order to make them a weapon against Western Civilization, and the real concern is that the narrative stays intact. Even above and beyond the lives of the members. I have yet to see a leftist group claiming to speak for the rights of homosexuals condemn Iran for hanging gay people or Islam for demanding it be done.
As that historically significant Nazi propagandist once said in extremely clear terms,
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Paul Joseph Goebbels:

Nazi Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

2 Replies to “The most profound reveal of the nature of leftist thought in a 25 second video: Narrative uber alles”

  1. In the current European society i would say that the left leaning identity politics, and victim mentality are dominant.

    There are actually many comparing the EU to the Soviet Union.
    But i would say that the comparison is describing similar and familiar things(at least for some of us who are from the Eastern Union), but are yet still different.

    I think it is because the EU and its institutions have been feminized (Helen Andrews) so greatly, that it is now bordering on what some call gyno-fascism.(But if a better term is found please do not hesitate to tell me.) Whereas the Soviet Union did not have this.

    And if you think about how the EU deals with dissenting voices and people/countries who do not fall in line, you can see a similar kind of attitude that how women treat other women who do not follow the group consensus. (Which in turn is similar to how the Soviet Union did. Although there you had at least a chance to get out of jail should you turn out to be valuable to the party:P)

    The EU also does not solve problems, but tries to enforce consensus, or shoves it away in hoping that it will fix it somehow magically.
    It also enforces compliance and not solutions or dealing with problems.

    Facts and evidence have also been ignored, if they contradict the feeling of moral superiority. Undermining the reputation instead of engagement in debates is also quite normal.

    My estimation is that within 15 years the EU will simply crumble. (Maybe earlier if it keeps going down this road.)
    Structural, societal, economical, and political issues remain ignored, or denied, because of “moral superiority” or feelings.

    The resources are directed towards people who are outright hostile and unfit to incorporate themselves into western societies and the EU.
    Yet somehow it is still our moral obligation and duty to do so.
    It is the right thing to do. (-> it makes us feel good. That we are the good people. )

    So the tools of the EU and the SU are the same. But the reasoning and underlying causes are different.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*