Reader’s Links for Nov. 26th, 2025

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

18 Replies to “Reader’s Links for Nov. 26th, 2025”

  4. The Reformation did not liberate Europe from the Church; it exported the Church’s theological hatred and intolerance into multiple competing sects which promoted Supersessionism, Demonization of Jews, Replacement theology, and Sanctification of violence for ideological purity. Calvin’s Letter to Bullinger, About Luther, on 25 November 1544

    In a letter to Bullinger, dated November 25, 1544, he adjured him to treat the great man, meaning Luther, with respect. A lot of good that letter had! Both Calvin and Luther together with the Poop of Rome all directly contributed to the 30 year war blood bath. The theological absolutism of Xtianity became the political absolutism of the modern European nation-state.

    The Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648), a political earthquake. This devastating conflict in Europe, involving numerous states and religious factions. Indeed, the theological and political tensions fostered by figures like Calvin, Luther, and the Papacy played significant roles in its escalation. The Protestant Reformation, led by Calvin and Luther, splintered Xtianity in Europe. This division created deep-rooted animosities that fueled the 30 years Civil War between Protestant and Catholic states.

    Only the WWI and WWII Civil Wars slaughtered such a gross and disgusting blood bath. The Catholic Church, being a central institution during this period, sought to maintain its power against the growing Protestant movements. Actions taken by the Papacy often intensified the conflict. Religious Intolerance branded Europe just like as did Nazi racism. This inherited, perhaps genetic intolerance, perpetuated by leaders across Europe. Proved and validated: scratch a European and find a barbarian; 2023–2024: Europe slanders Israel and enables pogrom mobs on University Campuses while pretending moral authority.

    Calvin and Luther contributed to the intense hatred, matched only by the Nazi hatred of Jews! Their legacies directly responsible for the 30 years war where Xtianity as a religion proved itself as worthless tits on a boar hog avoda zarah. UN Hypocrisy as the Direct Inheritance of European Xtian Super-sessionist Ideology. Palestinian Nationalism as a Post-1964 European-Framed Gospel mythology!

    Calvin and Luther did play roles in shaping the religious landscape of Europe. The context in which they worked, marked by significant corruption within and across the church Av tuma avoda zarah. Goyim throughout European history – utterly barbaric in their violence. The Crusades stand out as but just one example of this Dead God religion, an expression of the nadir of the barbaric animal soul of European sub-human man. Europe Has No Moral Standing Over Israel.

    The violence witnessed in the Thirty Years’ War, the World Wars, and other conflicts certainly reflect a human propensity for brutality, especially when ideologies at stake. The capacity for intolerance and hatred has shadowed many aspects of human history, leading to tragic outcomes. Herzl wrote his “Jewish State” because he argued that Europeans, impossible for them to heal themselves from their anti-Semitism cancer infected minds.

    Europeans utterly addicted to ideology in shaping human behavior and societal structures. Honest discourse and acknowledgment of past atrocities immediately flies out the window whenever mob Jew hating protests condemn Jews. The disgrace of Europe during the anti-Jewish Oct 7th massacre by Hamas, Islamic Jihad and UNWRA stands proves that Europeans memory of their past crimes “forgotten” in their Holocaust Denial where the ICC assumes it has jurisdiction over Israel despite Israel’s rejection of the Rome Accords!

    The slander accusations which call Israel a genocide state matched only by the violence of Nazi inferior race propaganda that reached a pre-War cracindo during the pogrom “Night of Shattered Glass”. Long-standing struggles with intolerance and hatred define the corrupt European soul. The Thirty Years’ War illustrates how religious divisions, combined with political ambitions, lead to catastrophic violence and suffering, with devastating impacts on civilian populations. The persistent presence of anti-Semitism in European history reflects deep-seated biases that have manifested in various forms of violence and discrimination.

    UN accusations of genocide, despite the UNWRA participation in the Oct 7th massacre, never presented by the reactionary propaganda MSM press as accusations – but rather as cold proven facts. This reality proves the mental insanity that Europeans pass down from generation to generation. The Palestinian “Passion Play” over made up imaginary facts. Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate territory the instant Ben Gurion declared Jewish national independence in 1948. Goyim hatred of Jews who defeated Arab Armies – dedicated to throw the Jews into the Sea and fulfill like Jesus did the words of the prophets, the Nazi Shoah across Europe; despite the PLO charter explicitly declaring that only ’48 Israel qualified as “Occupied Territories”, the UN declared post ’67 that Samaria and Gaza as “Occupied Territories”. Yet Goyim mental insanity fails to catch the UN lie.

    The empty platitude: An honest and thorough examination of the past is essential for creating a more tolerant future. Tits on a boar hog empty drum noise. Recognizing the role ideologies play in shaping societies and the harm they can cause, this the diseased minds of European governments simply cannot do. Not in the days of Calvin and Luther and not today. The common denominator which ties all European society together … their cold dead religion of Xtianity’s rabid hatred of Jews.

    Post WWII Jews say Never Again. Meaning Never Again shall European governments dictate any other “solution” for “the Jewish problem” post Shoah. Israel’s response to UN Resolutions 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc … NEVER AGAIN. The longstanding strains of anti-Semitism in Europe, indeed intertwined with historical events, creating cycles of prejudice that Europeans – without fail – always ignore or minimize every time that mobs rage across European cities. This persistent hatred has roots in religious, economic, and social contexts. UN accusations and resolutions reflect broader political agendas of biased assessment of reality, leading to distorted perceptions and narratives. Israel has washed its hands of Europe like Pontius Pilate washed his hands over the false messiah JeZeus. Jews, post Shoah, no longer accept responsibility for Blood Libels, or poisoning the wells etc.

    Anti-Semitism in Europe has no cure other than Jews breaking all diplomatic relations with European governments as possible allies in international relations. The instances of mob behavior and anti-Semitic sentiment in cities across Europe reveal a consistent repeated pattern of Jewish hatred and historical biases, specifically that Ottoman Greater Syria never referred to by the name Palestine other than in European made maps which the “Sick Man of Europe” bought and acquired after Napoleon.

    The role of the UN, a betrayal of the Balfour Declaration/League of Nation Palestine Mandate to establish a Jewish National Home in Palestine. UN revisionist history which promotes the Arafat lie that Arabs lived as Philistine boat-people who originally invaded Gaza from the Greek Islands, yet fails to confront the inconvenient fact that Arab people never originated from European countries. Ignored that not till 1964 did Arab propaganda opportunistically embrace the name Palestine! Yet amazingly European and Arab propaganda promotes the lie that Jews occupy Palestine mandate lands of Samaria despite England’s separation of the Palestine Mandate territory from Trans-Jordan at the Jordan River in 1923.

    The reference to “Palestine” in historical contexts reflects colonial influences rather than indigenous identity. The narrative that Arab identity shifted around the name “Palestine” post-1964 a political maneuvering that utterly distorts and perverts history. This revisionist history denies the Balfour Declaration and the League Palestine Mandate and substitutes UN 3379 Zionism is Racism slander only matched by the recent Israel commits genocide slander.

    The persistence of anti-Semitic actions and sentiments in Europe, a cyclical and deeply rooted mental insanity, invariably ignored or minimized by those in power for the entire Easter period passion play. European Xtians prioritize “I am saved” stupidity which they drum into the heads of their fellow believers to remain oblivious to their blood soaked, cruel and puke history as a people. Anti-Semiticism morphed into Colonialism and later into imperialism. Dominant European states addicted to ruling the roost of the balance of power across the major regions of the Planet Earth.

    After the fact, Spanish sincere apologies for expelling the Jews from Spain in 1492 compare to a screen door on a submarine German sorrow over the slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry and Rome’s most sincere remorse over the post WWII Nazi Rat lines or Poland’s anti-Jewish pogroms! Europeans lie, just that simple. They do not possess a shred of human sincerity simply because as soon as the immediate disgrace of their inhumanity to man gets passed over through the passage of time, European behave like dogs who return and eat their own vomit again and again and again.

    The complexities of Jewish identity, historical narratives, and the struggles against Amalek/anti-Semitism resonate deeply in contemporary discourse. Propaganda narratives around “Palestine”, influenced by colonial European motivations emphasizes the impact of power dynamics in shaping identity and historical memory. The idea of post-1964 Arab identity being a political maneuver underscores the contested nature of history in this context.

    Hostile pro Arab narratives touching “Palestine”, in essence seek to deny both the Balfour Declaration and the League of Nations Palestine as the establishment of a Jewish National Home. All Arab wars fought, including the 1948 Independence War, the Arab rejection that dhimmi refugee Jews have equal rights to achieve self determination in the Middle East. UN Resolution 3379 – Zionism is Racism, and current chants: From the River to the Sea Palestine will be Free reject the European red herring “Land for Peace”. Arafat offered East Jerusalem and 98% of Samaria and Gaza as a Palestinian State. Hamas took over a Gaza independent state and immediately made repeated wars that culminated in the Oct7th Abomination 2023 War.

    The British French propaganda expressed in post ’67 UN Resolution 242 exposed as revisionist history. Russia and Poland occupy Prussia to this day! The Allies made a forced 14 to 20 million population transfer of Germans living for generations in Prussia and the Czech Republic. The Indian/Pakistan mass population transfer Britain and other Western Powers praised to achieve “peace”. Such revisionist history never to this day denounced as a blaggard lie. European imperialist vs. Israel follow the rule: Do as I say but not as I do.

  6. BREAKING: At Least Two National Guard Members Shot Near White House
    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/breaking-two-national-guard-members-shot-near-white/
    Nov. 26, 2025 1:40 pm
    Podcast cover featuring Jordan Conradsen and Steve Abramowicz discussing the implications of a 50-year mortgage, set against a backdrop of the U.S. Capitol.
    Skip to content
    by Cristina Laila

    At least two National Guard members were shot near the White House on Wednesday.

    The White House is reportedly on lockdown.

    National Guard shot near White House. NTD’s @marisotsu on site where her uber window was blown from bullets pic.twitter.com/vbdN3YmTtT

    — Bohan Jiang (@bohansjiang) November 26, 2025

    According to Newsmax, two National Guardsmen were shot.

    Their conditions are not known.

    BREAKING: Secret Service tells me 2 National Guard members have just been shot near the White House. pic.twitter.com/uGLCAPcDXX

    — Mike Carter (@MikeCarterTV) November 26, 2025

    BREAKING…please check back for updates.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/breaking-two-national-guard-members-shot-near-white/

  7. Why Other Countries Envy Your 2nd Amendment
    Ammoland Inc. Posted on November 24, 2025 by Dan Wos

    Opinion
    Will Noty Comply American Flag Militia Confiscation AdobeStock_Tomasz Zajda 110451903
    AdobeStock_Tomasz Zajda

    In an era when people around the world are debating freedom, safety, and government power, one truth stands firm: rights are only preserved if they are exercised, and rights abandoned are rarely restored.

    As Americans, we are heirs to a constitutional tradition unlike any other country. We place individual liberty at the center of our national identity. At the heart of that tradition stands the Second Amendment, a cornerstone of the Bill of Rights, securing not just the ability to own firearms but the broader principle of self-governance.

    But as we look beyond our borders, a different pattern is evident. Nations that once embraced firearm ownership as a normal aspect of life, countries like the United Kingdom and Canada, for instance, have gradually imposed sweeping gun bans. For many citizens, these restrictions have led to limits on their speech, independence, and personal freedom. Their experiences compel us to acknowledge that when governments limit the means by which citizens safeguard themselves, they often redefine the very concept of freedom itself.

    The irony of this stolen freedom is that over time, many people can be conditioned to accept it.

    The U.K. is an example of incremental control with lasting impact.

    The United Kingdom’s move toward near-total handgun prohibition began in the late 20th century, culminating in extensive bans following the 1996 Dunblane tragedy. While the justification was public safety, the effects extended far beyond firearm ownership. Today, the U.K. public has one of the most limited sets of firearm rights among Western democracies, and many citizens feel that decisions about personal protection are no longer theirs to make. The pattern is clear. Once the government has the leverage to violate one fundamental right, it becomes easier for it to expand its authority into others. This isn’t about whether British citizens are safe or unsafe. It’s about whether they retain the sovereign right to choose.
    ADVERTISEMENT
    SCROLL DOWN TO CONTINUE READING

    And many no longer do.

    Canada is a case study in the acceleration of restrictions.

    Canada’s firearm landscape has changed dramatically over the past several decades. From the Firearms Act of 1995 to the 2020 order-in-council banning numerous so-called “assault-style” firearms, the trajectory of increasing restrictions, while decreasing individual authority, has been consistent.

    Many Canadians who once lawfully owned certain rifles or handguns found themselves becoming criminals almost overnight. Whether you agree with these policies or not, the impact is unmistakable. The government has the power to swiftly and unilaterally reshape fundamental rights, and citizens are limited to simply complying.
    Rights constrained by government decree are rights dependent on government permission. In other words, rights have been turned into privileges.
    The difference between other countries and America is the Second Amendment. It has created a guardrail for liberty.

    This is where the United States stands apart. The Founders, having lived under a government that claimed near-total authority, designed the Bill of Rights not as a suggestion but as a permanent shield against government overreach. The Second Amendment is not merely about owning firearms. It’s a constitutional guarantee that recognizes the authority lies with the people, not the state.

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

    This unmistakable language reflects a philosophy:

    People who are able to defend themselves, individually and collectively, are destined to remain free. Unfortunately, there are many American citizens who have squandered their right to freedom for free handouts, political popularity, power, or out of anger toward those who have achieved more than they have. There is an almost irrational, angry thought process that lurks among the political left, which guides them to the point of denouncing, not only their freedom, but the freedom of their fellow citizens. This mindset is one that has been conditioned over generations. On the bright side, there are far more Americans who embrace the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Real Americans understand the importance of the Second Amendment and how it relates to all other rights recognized by our Founding Fathers.

    Unlike the U.K. and Canada, where rights can be altered by parliamentary vote or executive order, the United States enshrines the right to bear arms in its highest law.

    That means:

    The government does not grant the right; it recognizes it.
    The right does not depend on political trends or party leadership.
    Citizens retain the power to defend themselves, ensure their security, and maintain their autonomy.

    This matters now more than ever because when you lose the ability to protect yourself, you will lose the ability to protect your other rights. Freedom of speech, privacy, and property rights all rely on a broader ecosystem of personal sovereignty. The Second Amendment acts as a safeguard for them all.

    History shows that once a right is taken slowly, “temporarily,” or “for safety” it rarely comes back. Americans have the benefit of observing other nations’ paths and choosing a different one.

    Stand For Your Rights. Stay Informed. Stay Empowered.

    The debate over firearms is about far more than sporting, collecting, or even self-defense. It is about who ultimately holds power in a free society. The examples of the U.K. and Canada remind us that rights can fade quietly, gradually, and permanently if we allow them to. However, the American Constitution offers an alternative model. It is one in which the people retain the tools, responsibility, and authority to preserve their own liberty. The Second Amendment is the promise that freedom in America belongs to the people.

    Protect that promise. Know your rights. Stand for the Constitution.

    The 2nd Amendment is not a privilege. It’s your right.

    https://www.ammoland.com/2025/11/why-other-countries-envy-your-2nd-amendment/

  8. U.S. Supreme Court Said the AR-15 was Ban-proof 86 Years Ago
    Ammoland Inc. Posted on November 24, 2025 by Bill Cawthon

    May 15, 1939, was 69 years before Heller and 83 years before Bruen. Eugene Stoner was 16 years old; it would be 15 years before he went to work for Armalite.

    On that day, Associate Justice James McReynolds delivered the Supreme Court’s 8-0 decision in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174.

    Citing Aymette v. State, the Court said: “In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly, it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense.”
    ADVERTISEMENT
    SCROLL DOWN TO CONTINUE READING

    It’s often forgotten the only type of gun that was “on trial” was the sawed-off shotgun found in the possession of a couple of outlaws, Jack Miller and Frank Layton. This is important; it was the first time the Supreme Court established a standard for the types of bearable arms protected by the Second Amendment.
    In Miller, the Court said such protection applied only to weapons “hav(ing) some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia.”
    Many, including more than one Supreme Court justice, have interpreted this to mean the Second Amendment protects only a collective right, linking the keeping and bearing of arms strictly to service in a militia. Even a cursory examination of McReynolds’ statement shows the flaws in this interpretation.

    In 1939, the United States militia included all able-bodied men at least eighteen years of age and less than forty-five. After the passage of the Militia Act of 1903, the militia was subdivided into two groups: the organized militia was named the National Guard, while the balance of the group became the Reserve Militia.

    According to Article I, §8, Clause 16 of the U.S. Constitution, the government is obliged to pay only for the arming, equipping, and training of the National Guard and pay them at the same rate as a soldier in the regular Army. According to some quick, back-of-the-napkin calculations, this means roughly 36.6 million adult males are members of the Reserve Militia in 2025.
    In the event of a clear-and-present danger to the U.S., the President has the constitutional power to call up as much of the Reserve Militia as is deemed needed. As was true in 1792, members of the Reserve Militia would be expected to supply their own kit, including a suitable firearm meeting the standard set by the National Guard for general-issue guns.

    In 1939, the standard National Guard firearms included: M1903 Springfield bolt-action rifle and the M1 Garand semi-automatic rifle, both chambered for .30-06; the M1918 Browning Automatic Rifle, also in .30-06; M1, M1A1 and M2 carbines in .30 carbine; M97 12 ga. pump shotgun with a 20-inch barrel; M1921 Thompson submachine gun, M1911/M1911A1 semi-automatic pistols, and M1917 revolvers, all in .45 ACP.

    In the civilian world, the bolt-action .30-06 rifle was fairly common, but the lever-action .30-30 rifle rivaled it in popularity. The Remington Model 8, chambered for .35 Remington, was among the most popular semiautomatic rifles. A fair percentage of rifles owned by American hunters were chambered for other calibers.

    The most common shotguns were 12-gauges in pump, break-action, or single-shot versions. The semiautomatic Browning A-5, also sold as the Remington Model 11 and Savage Model 720, had been around since 1902, but they were not common in U.S. military arsenals.

    Thanks to thousands “liberated” after World War I, .45-caliber handguns were fairly common, but there were also lots of pistols and revolvers chambered for various 38-caliber cartridges, including .38 Special, along with a large array of handguns chambered for .32 and other calibers. 9X19mm handguns were generally Lugers and Mausers brought back as war trophies and a limited number of Browning Hi-Powers, which was first introduced in Europe by Fabrique National in 1935.
    The Miller opinion didn’t include any specific guidelines for determining what was suitable for militia use, but strongly suggested weapons that were part of “the ordinary military equipment” were more likely to be protected by the Second Amendment. To be sure, guns chambered for the most common military calibers would ease logistical and supply issues.

    Flash forward to today. The M4 Carbine chambered for 5.56×45 NATO is the National Guard’s standard-issue rifle. With its selective-fire capability, the M4 also replaced the need for a submachine gun, and the BAR has been superseded by the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW). The standard pistol is the M17 9mm, with perhaps a few M9s, also in 9mm, lingering around. The Mossberg 590A1 12-gauge pump is the most common shotgun.
    According to the Miller standard, self-loading rifles using 5.56×45 NATO cartridges and self-loading 9mm pistols are fully protected by the Second Amendment and not subject to government regulation.

    What have been the best-selling firearms in America for well over a decade? Self-loading rifles (at least those capable of handling 5.56×45 NATO or chambered for .223 Wylde) and 9mm handguns. Rifles capable of accepting standard military magazines get extra points and there’s a bonus for a bayonet lug.

    Lower court rulings upholding assault weapon bans because AR-15s look like or function almost like military rifles fail completely. Judges obviously haven’t taken a close look at United States v. Miller: Those resemblances are really the reason AR-platform rifles would be suitable for militia use and therefore cannot be banned. The fact that they also easily meet the “in common use for lawful purposes” benchmark established by Heller is just icing on the cake.
    As for the “dangerous and unusual” standard set in Heller, the AR-15 is no more dangerous than any other semiautomatic rifle when handled properly. It’s certainly not unusual, having been the best-selling type of rifle in America for a number of years.

    This may all sound like it’s coming out of left field. Full disclosure: I am not an attorney and I don’t play one on TV. However, I can read and I have decent comprehension, even when it comes to legal documents and judicial findings.

    Based on careful study of the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence and Justice Antonin Scalia’s affirmation of the Miller decision in Heller, I have to stand by my conclusions.
    On Monday, May 15, 1939, about 23 years before Colt introduced the AR-15 Sporter rifle, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled it was protected by the Second Amendment.

    https://www.ammoland.com/2025/11/u-s-supreme-court-said-the-ar-15-was-ban-proof-86-years-ago/

  9. Fired From Canadian Cabinet, Chrystia Freeland Is Now A Foreign Mercenary On The Ukraine Battlefield

    Since Chrystia Freeland (lead image) was dismissed from her Canadian Cabinet ministry on September 16, she has become the “Special Representative for the Reconstruction of Ukraine.” This is a camouflage uniform.

    According to the official filing in parliament on November 5 by the Privy Council Office (PCO) on behalf of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Freeland has no staff for her post, no office, no budget, no travel expenses, and a pay cut of $79,700. The Privy Council Office, reporting to the House of Commons, says it has “searched its financial records and did not find any costs, start-up or otherwise, related to the role of the Special Representative for the Reconstruction of Ukraine.”

    As the longest-serving warfighter against Russia in Canadian government, Freeland is now a full-fledged foreign mercenary on the Ukraine battlefield.

    https://johnhelmer.net/fired-from-canadian-cabinet-chrystia-freeland-is-now-a-foreign-mercenary-on-the-ukraine-battlefield/