Now and again along comes a courageous man from inside Islam’s core that tells it like it is and at his own risk.
There are not a lot of ways one can tell that someone else is sincere, or telling the truth as they know it to be. One of them is that they gain nothing and lose a lot by doing so. I personally have difficulty imaging how life must have changed for people like Dr. Mark Trozzi. Before Covid he was a successful ER Doctor with decades of experience. He had an amazing reputation. People I know personally who had been treated by him would rave about his skills and manner. Life must have been both secure and psychologically satisfying for him before he decided to try and save as many lives as he could by warning people not to take the mRNA Covid 19 injections. That was of course, the end of his medical career and the beginning of his problems with the state narrative control mechanisms like the CPSO. The same goes for Dr. May O’Connor. She was also much older when the state decided to persecute her for issuing exceptions to people for the toxic shot syndrome all the Western nations imposed on its people. I would want to ask for permission to publish what happened to her next. But suffice it to say that her sacrifice for the general public continues to this day. Very few of us would want the life she has now, even not in comparison to being an M.D.
These two I picked as examples because I know them the best. But there are dozens and maybe hundreds of doctors who we can know truly believed what they said about the shots and Covid restrictions because they all lost a lot for doing so.
And so it is with people like ex-Salafist imam, Bruno Guillot. Apostatizing from Islam after converting to it, and being accepted at one of the top Islamic universities in the world and becoming a known commodity is painting a target on your own back. Sam Solomon did the same thing. I know that the doctors that warned us about Covid and the Vaxx did not do so in vain. That while they did not manage to penetrate the narrative being beamed at us all from all sides 24/7, those who had some doubts found them and it allowed them to have the strength to resist the pressure to take the shots and fight the lock downs. I know that these doctors did more good than they think they did.
I hope the same for people like Sam Solomon and Bruno Guillot and many other apostates from Islam that show their faces and share their names knowing that the Salmon Rushdie treatment is waiting for them sooner or later. I hope that they at least get the satisfaction of seeing the West recognize the threat that is Islam and fight back before it’s too late.
Please see the summary of this interview at RAIR Foundation.
THE CRITICAL EVALUATION OF Bruno Guillot’s ACTIVITY
— based on Rair’s video.
__________________________________________________
I’m not sure but this can be extremely refined Takiyya as well. Because all he is saying in the video is trueISH… So let’s combine that with his possible target audiences:
Some red flags:
– His beard: looks like it’s still Islamic — the Mohammed -style with shaved skin around the mouth. It looks on him as if he was wearing it like that, only to let it grow back a bit for the interview. Thar would make him a double agent.
– His mimicks: he does not look honest to me…
– Content: making a difference between “radical Islam” and not radical — a difference that does not exist. Even when he talks about “radical Islam” he connects it to the Muslim Brotherhood — which is politcizing the danger away. And it is also in line with Macron’s politics re the Brotherhood — which is of course a huge red flag… Then what he FAILS to inform us about: it’s that Sharia and (even violent) Jihad are interconnected. This makes Sharia look like something that is the internal affair of the Muslims — or in a worst case scenario the basis of cladestinely spreading Islam (like with gradually introducing curfew to women etc.). These things can still be explained away as someting being far in the future or even morally exceptable.
Conlcusion:
– Possible motives: “lying with the truth”. All he is saying are in fact common knowledge among the wise except he distorts that (see above). And you must acknowledge that his “truth” about Islam and the Kafirun in it is lightyears away that of Dr. Bill Warner which is the WHOLE truth.
– France/ Belgium (the alleged aposte’s prime target audiences), IMO, are already in stage 2 or stage 3 Jihad on a scale of 10. Locally stage 4 or 5. In these circumstances let’s re-evaluate his testimony:
A) Everyone who already knew 90% about Islam, Sharia and Jihad are being misled by him.
B) Everyone who are FULLY aware of the danger of Islam (like this site) are being made IRRELEVANT in the information war.
C) Everyone who are being directly EXPOSED to Islam in France/Belgium are being misled: they are made to believe that there is someting called “Radical Islam” (and hence there must exist something within Islam that is not so “radical” and hence not that dangerous). So those French people who have the misfortune to live in a French Sharia zone get a double message: 1) there is indeed danger in Islam 2) “not every Muslim” is like that (which is in itself true).
– Double messages a) create divisions in the target population b) convey the message that they do not have to do anything about it because the good Macron handles it by handling the Brotherhood c) at the same time create the sense (in deliberate contradiction with point “b”) that Islam does target French culture and whoever recognizes that as a regular citizen and is in the know about Islam is LEFT ON THEIR OWN DEVICES.
– Also, politically at this stage of Jihad in France, Islam increasingly NEEDS CASUS BELLI — which the Imam seems to provide them with by instigating the French against Muslims … however without the whole picture of how to handle Islam.
This effectively PREVENTS FRANCE TO ERADICATE ISLAM.
Because at that stage of takeover Islam can only be handled by VERY HARSH METHODS. Let me quote GoV:
“(…) when the number of Muslims increases to more than one-third of the population. At that point, simple brutality will not be enough to contain the problem. The Russian state will have three choices:
1. Partition Russian territory into Islamic and non-Islamic enclaves, and leave Muslims to their own devices in their areas.
2. Implement Sharia law.
3. Exterminate all Muslims within Russian territory.
They can take their pick. There are no other choices once the Islamic population is that large.”
– Regarding the claim that as an apostate he is being persecuted: either it is true or not. I can imagine that inside the Islamic communities and cicrles the message is circulated that his Apostasy is fake and all he is saying is in fact Takiyya, meaning that it’s quite possible that he is actually protected…
In conlcusion: Bruno Guillot’s warnings, the way he presented them, may have had some real effects if said 50 years ago in Europe. (Even though they would have been too little at that time as well.) Today they may rather serve nefarious purposes though — tha tis the Islamic takeover of Europe — despite the claim he is doing the opposite.
______
Disclaimer: I have not conducted an extensive research about this guy. Therefore all I have written is subject to error.
Correction:
*morally exceptable = morally acceptable
(With acknowledging that Islam, to play a word game, is also morally exceptable according to itself.)