RAIR published an archived video from the Islamic State days explaining the importance of an Islamic precept. The idea that once Islam has conquered a territory, it is by Islamic law, always Islamic lands, It was just published yesterday.
Today, Montreal Jewish Arabic Montreal Prof. Gad Saad, published a short video explaining the same concept. This fight we are in isn’t just for all the marbles. As Islam sees it, it is for all the marbles for all time.
Gad Saad:
The blue cities aren’t going to like the caliphate crowd is my hunch. Oh well it only took Spain 700 years to root them out.
Boston is deepest, darkest blue.
Wealthy, white champagne-communists together with scions of Qatari-bred jihadis. Looks a little different, but not from the perspective of a boot stomping your face, I would guess.
Interesting timing cycle roughly 700 years from when they were kicked out of Spain.
Lol! Yeeeaaah, I don’t think Jabal has done the math on rednecks and rifles, but thats ok…coyotes and hogs gotta eat, too. Go choppy-choppy aloha snackbar in the concrete jungle all you want, but realize its not safe for you to leave.
Knew about this some time ago, like right after 9/11. The greasy and repulsive moslems really only have one goal, to make the world as crappy as they know how. Looking forward to spoiling their ambitions.
According to Sharia Law, Spain, Hungary, Serbia, and parts of Austria are occupied territory like Palestine.
Honestly, the soil is so poor down here, its compressed clay – chert. Can’t grow shit. We need decomposing organic matter to renew the earth. Gobs and gobs of it, tilled and buried, until the rain renews the earth and makes it fertile again.
So glad it imports itself from drier more desolate parts of the planet for us.
The Power of Positive Thinking.
My grandma used to dry her dishes with that towel.
As for the 2nd video, in islam such lands are called “an endowment from Allah”. of course it’s the duty of every muslim to get a holy endowment back if it’s “stolen” (reconquered). Any islamic government that does not strive for this is considered to “neglect its duty”. Such governments are considered apostates and thus illegitimate, or taghut. This why Anwar Sadat was assassinated, and why OBL strove to depose the house of Saud.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taghut
[..]
n modern times, the term is also applied to earthly tyrannical power.[5] The modern Islamic philosopher Abul A’la Maududi defines taghut in his Quranic commentary as a creature who not only rebels against God but transgresses his will.[6] Due to these associations, in contemporary political discourse, the term is used to refer to people considered anti-Islamic and agent of Western cultural imperialism.[citation needed] The term was introduced to modern political discourse since the usage surrounding Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini during the 1979 Iranian Revolution, through accusations made both by and against Khomeini.
As for Dar al-harb, the situation is a bit more nuanced:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisions_of_the_world_in_Islam#Dar_al-harb
[..] a term classically referring to those countries which do not have a treaty of non-aggression or peace with Muslims (those that do are called dar al-‘Ahd or dar al-Sulh). [..] According to some scholars, the term “abode of war” was simply a description of the harsh reality of the premodern world.
[..]
Wahbah al-Zuhayli argues that the concept of dar al-harb is mostly historical: “The existence of D?r al-Isl?m and D?r al-?arb in contemporary times is rare or extremely limited. This is because Islamic countries have joined the United Nations covenant that stipulates that the relationship between nations is peace and not war. Therefore non-Muslim countries are D?r al-‘Ahd …”[20]
According to Abu Hanifa there are three conditions that need to be fulfilled for a land to be classified as dar al-harb:
Implementation of the laws of the non-Muslims openly and that no rule of Islam is implemented any longer
Bordering another dar al-harb
No Muslim remains safe as he was before the non-Muslims took power.
The purpose behind differentiating between dar al-Islam and dar al-harb was to identify the land as either one of safety for the Muslims or of fear. So, if Muslims are generally safe in a land and not in fear, then it cannot be classified as dar al-harb.