1. Please watch the video in this article on Substack on Mark Carney’s measures to censor speech by Canadians. Please note Carney’s exact language. It goes to the hypothesis that Carney wrote Trudeau’s scripts and was more than just an advisor for the last 9 years. Trudeau always uses the initiate language of the Marxist. More so than a typical hedonistic party boy likely would. This might be a data point as to where that language came from. Also that it is less clumsily used by Carney as compared to Trudeau who just spat these words out on occasion.
More: Carney vows to push for internet censorship
Prime Minister Mark Carney says a re-elected Liberal government will move forward with new regulations targeting harmful online content, marking a third attempt to legislate internet speech in Canada.
Blacklock’s Reporter says Carney made the comments during a campaign rally in Hamilton, after being interrupted by hecklers.
Responding to accusations from the crowd, including questions about ties to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, Carney paused briefly before refocusing his remarks.
“There are many serious issues that we’re dealing with,” he said. “One of them is the sea of misogyny, antisemitism, hatred, and conspiracy theories — this sort of pollution online that washes over our virtual borders from the United States.”
While Carney said he could tolerate conspiracy theories directed at him personally, he emphasized the broader danger to Canadian society.
“The more serious thing is when it affects how people behave — when Canadians are threatened going to their community centres or their places of worship or their school or, God forbid, when it affects our children,” he said.
“My government, if we are elected, will be taking action.”
I asked Chat GPT for the Canadian legal definition of Hate Speech, as generally it is left vague in order to be used for dialectic enforcement. The real answer is every bit as bad:
ChatGPT said:
Yes, that’s correct — hate speech has been illegal in Canada since amendments were made to the Criminal Code in 1970, specifically through the addition of Sections 318 and 319, which are still in force today.
Here’s a clear summary of how “hate speech” is legally defined in Canada under those sections:
? Section 318: Advocating Genocide
This is the most serious form of hate-related speech.
It makes it a criminal offence to advocate or promote genocide, meaning any act committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, any identifiable group.
Penalty: Indictable offence, up to 5 years imprisonment.
Identifiable group: Includes those distinguished by color, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or mental or physical disability.
? Section 319(1): Public Incitement of Hatred
This prohibits communicating statements in a public place that are likely to lead to a breach of the peace, and that incite hatred against an identifiable group.
It requires proof that the speech could provoke violence or disorder, not just that it was offensive.
Penalty: Summary conviction (lesser charge), up to 2 years imprisonment.
? Section 319(2): Willful Promotion of Hatred
This is broader than 319(1) and more commonly referenced in hate speech debates.
It criminalizes:
“Communicating statements, other than in private conversation, that willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group.”
Penalty: Indictable offence, up to 2 years imprisonment.
“Willfully” means the person intended to promote hatred — negligence or recklessness isn’t enough.
? Defenses under Section 319(3)
The law also provides specific legal defenses to hate speech charges, including:
Truth — if the statement is true.
Good faith religious opinion — if expressed on a religious subject.
Public interest — if the statement was made in good faith for discussion on a matter of public interest and without intent to promote hatred.
Attempt to expose — if the statement was intended to point out or counter hatred rather than promote it.
Now if we look at any of the videos or articles by Muslims in mosques across Canada, or the protests that take place constantly, or what is said when communists/Muslims take over a campus, they break all these laws with zero arrests, let alone charges. Which makes the definition arguably worse than a vague one, as the dialectic is in the enforcement, rather than in the nature of the charge. Either way it means that the anti-free speech laws will be, and are used, to destroy Canada as a Western ‘republic’.
2. Brian Lilley makes an observation about the photo below:
3. Carney is working on tracking production of carbon, or put more accurately, tracing any kind of real productivity for Canada. But not for China.
4. Couldn’t happen to a more appropriate person
5. The thing about this is, it doesn’t matter if it’s parody anymore. This site made a conscious decision to avoid jokes of logical extremes years ago, as it clearly was more predictive programming than funny or instructive. So even of. this is an attempt at parody through logical extreme, its true already and soon, reality will bypass it as groups of muslims will take over space at a mall and do prayer-provocation specifically to show dominance.
https://twitter.com/mark_slapinski/status/1910508713980440707
Thank you all for reading this site.
Quick question: Why did these people not start with like, the Dodo instead? At least then we would see something new in Chinese Restaurants.
According to the book, Last Chance to see, authored as a collaborative effort between Douglas Adams and photographers from the BBC, a truly entertaining book by the way, the Dodo became extinct because Dutch sailors landed on a new tropical island where a friendly species of large flightless bird lived that had no natural predators.
They thought these upright monkeys arriving in large boats where a curious and interesting thing and walked up to the beach to greet them, at which point, the dutch sailers clubbed them to death. Other Dodos followed to see what the fuss was about and got clubbed to death for their efforts.
I feel this explains a great deal of what is happening to Western nations from mass unvetted Islamic immigration.
The bloodwolf ressurection (anything but) story is more a marketing tool for DNA hacking Yuval Harari–style than anything else taken on its face value.