Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.
This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.
So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.
This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.
For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like.
Signal Group Leak?
Dangerous Times beginning @ 25:32…
Jovan Pulitzer – March 25, 2025
https://rumble.com/v6r783y-are-there-bad-actors-within-the-trump-administration-you-decide.html
A courageous Canadian woman, the Tard Army, Western collapse…the beat goes on:
https://youtu.be/pWAj91OLAL4?si=8fXetzsXOy_ejnrq
In the above video Canadian Tards protest while enjoying police protection. Their bank accounts are not frozen and they don’t get 10-years in prison for “Mischief”. They don’t get fired from their day jobs because they are covertly paid for this to be their day job. Legacy media does not bring their unlawful actions to the broader public, and if it does it twists their show of power to present as noble and virtuous underdogs requiring protection against evil Jewish overlords. The Canadian model of deconstruction is the German, British, Dutch, French, Italian, Spanish, Austrian, Swiss, Belgian model of deconstruction.
The video below shows us more of one of the primary architects of this model, Mark Carney. Despite cries of warning from people in-the-know he goose steps to power with powerful help.
Sorry American friends, but once this wolf in sheep’s clothing steals the election our problem really becomes your problem, too.
I don’t like Redacted but this journalist is good:
https://youtu.be/E2akaiRtAys?si=LQb34dNrXKB-Sx6D
Bondi makes accountability fashionable again in Washington Fashion Week, or Death By a Thousand Volts:
This Friday, the last Friday during Ramadan, is Al-Quads Day in Toronto. The police and Ford Nation have designated areas where they can March. There is to be no hate speech, violence blah, blah, blah………….
I remember when Doug Ford was running for Premier the first time, he was adamant there would be no Al-Quads Day in Ontario. “Our government will take action to ensure events like Al-Quads Day, which calls for the killing of an entire civilian population in Israel are no longer part of the landscape in Ontario.”
Remember when Justine Trudeau gave 26 million dollars to the Muslim Association to help with Islamophobia? Carney has also stated we must work against Islamophobia. Ford the pretending Conservative Premier, has stated what a brilliant business man Carney is.
Methinks the politicians are using Confusion as a tactic or are they the confused ones?
Confusion — confusing messages shut off the brains logical capacity – capability capacity off count on others for direction —COMPLY.
Not long an Ottawa resident, Abdullah Al-Reyati, visited a Toronto protest, where he recited:
“We heard the voice of soldiers.
Attack it again with guns and powders
To hear the voice of soldiers
Let’s hear the gunfire
We don’t want to talk to Israel
Attack it again with guns and powders
To hear the voice of soldiers
Let’s hear the gunfire.
Make Brave New World fiction again
We don’t want to talk to Israel except with guns
We heard the voice of soldiers.”
Will he be in attendance?
So Ford and Carney allow this on our streets but both were quick to condemn the truckers as insurrectionists. Are the people of Toronto being told to “Stay home”, “Stay safe” and keep their mouths shut?
I never did get my genetic test done, contrary to the behest of my friends and family. I was paranoid that some CCP buggers would get hold of it for nefarious reasons, plus I didn’t want to suffer the disappointment of finding out I have not a lick of Martian in me. Anyhow, customers are freaking out now because 23 and Me has gone bust and its data base will be auctioned off. I wonder what the buyer will use it for?
https://investors.23andme.com/news-releases/news-release-details/23andme-initiates-voluntary-chapter-11-process-maximize
the data was always going to flow out somehow – didn’t the business model seemed more designed to collect and to propel consumers and not to make money?
The Climate Scam is Over..
Peer-reviewed AI analysis completely debunks all of the “man-made” claims
Robert W Malone MD, MS
Mar 22, 2025
On March 21, 2025, the Science of Climate Change journal published a ground-breaking study using AI (Grok-3) to debunk the man-made climate crisis narrative. Click on the link below for the paper titled: A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming Hypothesis:
Climate Change Paper https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F76b7e623-8df3-45ad-8ec8-e870b6a13b6d_1566x742.png
This peer-reviewed study and literature review not only reassesses man’s role in the climate change narrative it also reveals a general trend to exaggerate global warming.
https://www.malone.news/p/the-climate-scam-is-over
Uncrewed surface vehicle unveiled
ENDEAVOR MANTA: The ship is programmed to automatically return to its designated home port and would self-destruct if seized by another party
By Hung Chen-hung and Jake Chung / Staff reporter, with staff writer
The Endeavor Manta, Taiwan’s first military-specification uncrewed surface vehicle (USV) tailor-made to operate in the Taiwan Strait in a bid to bolster the nation’s asymmetric combat capabilities made its first appearance at Kaohsiung’s Singda Harbor yesterday.
Taking inspiration from Ukraine’s navy, which is using USVs to force Russia’s Black Sea fleet to take shelter within its own ports, CSBC Taiwan (??????) established a research and development unit on USVs last year, CSBC chairman Huang Cheng-hung (???) said.
With the exception of the satellite guidance system and the outboard motors — which were purchased from foreign companies that were not affiliated with Chinese-funded or Chinese-owned supply chains — the rest of the USV was produced in Taiwan, he said.
The Endeavor Manta, Taiwan’s first military-specification uncrewed surface vehicle, maneuvers in Kaohsiung’s Singda Harbor yesterday.
Photo: CNA
The ship uses a trimaran hull for better balance in choppy seas and is designed for low observability. It is 8.6m long and 3.7m wide, can carry up to 1 tonne of payload — including lightweight torpedoes and high-powered explosives — and has a top speed of 35 knots (64.8kph), Huang said.
The vessel can alternate between 4G networks, radio frequency or satellite guidance for remote control when its signal is interrupted, he said.
The ship is programmed to automatically return to its designated home port and would self-destruct if seized by another party, he added.
The USV has in-built settings for multiple USVs to operate together, collision prevention, artificial intelligence-assisted target acquisition and anti-ship hijacking, Huang said.
The Yushan-class landing platform dock, for example, can carry about 20 USVs, he said, adding that a single control station can control up to 50 USVs.
CSBC said it would not be attending the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology USV contest involving the institute’s project Kuai Chi (??), as it would have its hands full with the development of the Endeavor Manta, which was so named because the designers took inspiration from the manta’s camouflage abilities and the comparably severe sting compared with its size.
Meanwhile, the Chinese-language Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) reported yesterday that the first F-16 block 70 jets have completed tests would be turned over to Taiwan in Greenville, South Carolina, on Friday.
As of press time last night, neither the air force nor the Ministry of National Defense had commented on the report.
The ministry on March 13 said that it would send a deputy minister to the event, while the air force said it would send its deputy chief of staff.
https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2025/03/26/2003834074
A Third Of All DC District Judges Were Not Born In United States
By: Beth Brelje
March 25, 2025
6 min read
Image Credit
Highsmith/Library Of Congress
Of all the judges in the U.S. all five foreign-born judges of the D.C. court managed to get their fingerprints on controversial Trump cases.
Author Beth Brelje profile
Beth Brelje
Visit on Twitter
@BethBrelje
More Articles
Share
Share Article on Facebook
Share Article on Twitter
Share Article on Truth Social
Share Article via Email
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the source of many of the cases interfering with President Donald Trump’s authority, has 15 judges, (Counting Chief Judge James Boasberg) and five of them were born outside the United States.
While country of origin doesn’t come up in most jobs, it is worth asking if judges with ties to foreign nations and cultures are the right ones to make decisions affecting the U.S. military or immigration.
The concept of foreign-born judges is a newer phenomenon in this district. In addition to the 15 main judges, the D.C. District has 10 older, senior judges who still occasionally hear cases in the district. This group, nominated as far back as Ronald Reagan the 1980s, were all born in the U.S.
But starting in 2014, former President Barack Obama appointed Judge Tanya Sue Chutkan, born in Kingston, Jamaica. She was in the U.S. by 1979, attending George Washington University. Before sitting on federal court, she had no experience as a judge. Chutkan is overseeing the legal challenge to DOGE’s work to slash excess government spending.
Obama also appointed Judge Amit P. Mehta to the D.C. court. Mehta also had no previous experience as a judge. Mehta was born in Patan, Gujarat, India. He and his parents came to the U.S. when he was a baby, age one. He was raised in Maryland. Mehta will oversee four January 6 civil cases that aim to blame Trump for injuries and squeeze money, court time, and political embarrassment out of him.
The other three foreign born judges were nominated by former President Joe Biden.
Judge Ana Cecilia Reyes was nominated in 2021, also with no prior experience as a judge. She was born in Montevideo, Uruguay and moved to Spain, and while still a child, moved to Louisville, Kentucky, where she grew up. She is the first openly LGBT Latina to be appointed to this court. Reyes presided over an objection to Trump’s executive order declaring “gender dysphoria” as “inconsistent” with the “high standards for troop readiness,” as The Federalist’s Shawn Fleetwood reported. Reyes blocked Trump’s order with a preliminary injunction.
The first Muslim and Arab American in the D.C. district court, Judge Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali was born and raised in Canada to Egyptian parents. According to his Questionnaire for Judicial Nominees, Ali was not required to register for the U.S. Selective Service. That is because he was not a citizen until 2019. He graduated from the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada with a software engineering degree in 2008 and then attended Harvard Law School in the U.S., graduating with a law degree in 2011. He worked as a volunteer on Biden’s 2020 transition team and for a phone bank in support of Biden’s presidential campaign. He worked for some nonprofits but never served as a judge until Biden appointed him in 2024. Amir has written extensively and negatively about Trump’s so-called “Travel ban,” a 2017 Executive Order which restricted travel to the U.S. from seven predominantly Muslim countries for 90 days.
In his writing, he said, “prejudice and intolerance” were “the very hallmark of [Trump’s] campaign against Muslims.”
Before he was a judge, Ali spoke at the National Press Foundation and gave tips to reporters about how to cover the courts.
When confirmed, Amir was a member of the Capital Area Muslim Bar Association; Muslim American Judicial Advisory Council; National Arab American Bar Association; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; National Police Accountability Project; and the Native American Bar Association of D.C., among others.
Ali single handedly restored $2 billion in USAID spending to foreign nonprofit contractors that the Trump Administration had paused for 90 days, in a stunning overreach of authority last month.
The newest judge on the D.C. District Court is also foreign born.
Before slinking out of office, Biden and his handlers got Judge Sparkle Sooknanan confirmed. She was sworn in Jan. 2, 2025. Born in the dual-island nation Trinidad and Tobago in 1983, she left her home country at age 16 to pursue college and graduated from Brooklyn Law School in 2010.
She was a law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and during the Biden Administration she was the principal deputy assistant attorney general in the Civil Rights Division for the Department of Justice before Biden tapped her for her first ever judge gig in the D.C. Court, according to her Questionnaire for Judicial Nominees.
Last week, Sooknanan dutifully did her part to slow Trump’s agenda, ordering the reinstatement of Democrat Susan Grundmann to the Federal Labor Relations Authority, a move that keeps the board in a Democrat majority.
None of these cases have gone in front of conservative judges in conservative states, say in Missouri or South Dakota. They all happened to land in the laps of judges that have spoken out or ruled against Trump or his policies in the past.
Out of all the judges in the nation, all five foreign-born judges of the D.C. District court managed to get their fingerprints on a controversial Trump case.
The United States is in the midst of a soft coup. Not the violent kind that takes out a nation’s leader, but one orchestrated by judicial actions that choke off executive power before our eyes.
We have seen other obvious, corrupt schemes in plain sight before. The Biden basement presidential campaign of 2019; the “insurrection” that wasn’t; the mask and vaccine mandates; the Biden is mentally competent story; the “flawless” Afghan withdrawal; the “secure” borders; and the incompetent candidate swap to Kamala Harris, made Americans realize the best chance we have to stop corruption is to vote it out.
The public did its part by voting in a clear mandate for Trump’s agenda. But corruption is still visible, though court decisions by unelected activist judges.
The only remedy now is for the Supreme Court to step in and this time, get its hands dirty, deliberate, and make real decisions based on the Constitution.
https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/25/a-third-of-all-dc-district-judges-were-not-born-in-united-states/
Breaking: SCOTUS Upholds ATF’s ‘Frame and Receiver’ Rule
By Cam Edwards | 12:16 PM | March 26, 2025
AP Photo/Susan Walsh
In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld an ATF rule promulgated under the Biden administration that treats unfinished frames and receivers and DIY-gunmaking kids as fully functional firearms subject to federal law, overturning the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and holding that the regulation is not “facially inconsistent with the Gun Control Act.”
Advertisement
Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the majority opinion, which was authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch. In the majority opinion, Gorsuch explains why the rule passes muster; not from a Second Amendment standpoint, which was never the focus of the plaintiffs’ arguments, but under the Administrative Procedures Act:
Before ATF could enforce its rule, gun manufacturers and others filed what they described as a facial challenge under the Administrative Procedure Act, arguing that the GCA cannot be read to reach weapon parts kits or unfinished frames or receivers. The District Court agreed and vacated the rule. The Fifth Circuit affirmed, holding that §921(a)(3)(A) categorically does not reach weapon parts kits regardless of completeness or ease of assembly, and that §921(a)(3)(B) reaches only finished frames and receivers.
(a) Section 478.11’s provisions addressing weapon parts kits are not facially invalid under §921(a)(3)(A). That subsection contains two requirements: a “weapon” must be present, and that weapon must be able to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive, designed to do so, or susceptible of ready conversion to operate that way. Some weapon parts kits meet that description. Consider, for instance, Polymer80’s “Buy Build Shoot” kit, which contains all necessary components to build a semiautomatic pistol and can be assembled in about 20 minutes using common tools. That kit qualifies as a “weapon” because: (1) artifact nouns like “weapon” often describe unfinished objects when their intended function is clear, as with a disassembled rifle; (2) the statute treats starter guns as weapons though they require conversion work; and (3) the statutory text contemplates that some things short of fully operable firearms qualify as “weapons.” The kit also satisfies the statute’s second requirement, as it requires no more time, expertise, or specialized tools to complete than a starter gun ,which the statute treats as readily convertible into a functioning firearm. While other kits may be so incomplete or cumbersome to assemble that they cannot fairly be described as weapons capable of ready conversion, the facial challenge fails because kits like Polymer 80’s clearly qualify.
Advertisement
Remember, under a facial challenge the rule must be found to always violate a particular statute; in this case the APA. Even after today’s decisions manufacturers could bring an as applied challenge to the rule, and the Trump administration could also formally repeal the rule on its own.
What about treating unfinished frames and receivers as functional firearms, even if they’re not sold as part of a larger kit?
(b) Section 478.12(c)’s treatment of partially complete frames and receivers is also not facially invalid under §921(a)(3)(B). Like “weapon,” the artifact nouns “frame” and “receiver” may describe not yet-complete objects. The statute uses these terms to encompass some unfinished items elsewhere, as in §923(i)’s serialization requirements for incomplete weapons, silencers, and destructive devices. ATF has for decades interpreted the statute to reach some unfinished frames and receivers, and even the plaintiffs concede they have no “quarrel” with ATF’s prior practice of regulating those products. Accordingly, the statute authorizes ATF to regulate at least some incomplete frames or receivers that take minutes of work with common tools to complete. While other products may be so far from finished that they cannot fairly be described as frames or receivers, the facial challenge fails because the statute plainly reaches some partially complete items.
Is there any good news for Second Amendment advocates in the opinion? Well, yes, or at least maybe.
Advertisement
If unfinished frames and receivers can be treated as fully functional firearms because they can be converted into such, what’s stopping the Supreme Court (or lower courts) from adopting the arguments of anti-gunners that semi-automatic firearms should be treated like machine guns because they too can be converted to full-auto?
That result, the plaintiffs warn, could leave many Americans facing new and unforeseen criminal liability for possession of a “machinegun” simply because they own a “popular” and “commonly available” rifle. The plaintiffs’ fears are misplaced. The government represents that AR–15 receivers do not “qualify as the receiver of a machinegun.” Nor, the government emphasizes, has ATF ever “suggested otherwise.” Much the same can be said of our reasoning today. As we have stressed, a statute’s text and context are critical to determining whether (and to what extent) Congress used an artifact noun to reach unfinished objects. And, without doubt, the NFA and the GCA are different statutes passed at different times to address different problems using different language. Our analysis of the GCA thus does not begin to suggest that ATF possesses authority to regulate AR–15 receivers as machineguns under the NFA.
With all due respect to Gorsuch, he and his fellow justices have also stated that the Second Amendment isn’t a second-class right, but that hasn’t stopped lower court judges from treading all over our right to keep and bear arms. Similarly, today’s note of caution about treating semi-automatic firearms as “machineguns” may very well be disregarded by lower courts going forward. That’s one reason why SCOTUS needs to address semi-auto bans and declare them an affront to the Constitution and the Second Amendment.
Advertisement
In his dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas took issue with multiple aspects of the majority opinion, including its assertion that gun-making kits can be treated as completed firearms under the GCA.
The text, context, and structure of §921(a)(3) leave little doubt that weapon-parts kits are not “firearms,” and that the unfinished contents of these kits are neither “frame[s]” nor “receiver[s].” But, even if it were reasonable to treat artifact nouns differently, the Government would—at most—demonstrate statutory ambiguity. And, when a statute with criminal applications is ambiguous, the rule of lenity applies.
… Nothing in the GCA suggests that the terms “frame” and “receiver” also include the materials that one could use to create them, or that parts including neither a frame nor a receiver could constitute a “weapon.” There are, however, many reasons to conclude the opposite. Even the Government appears to have found these competing interpretations persuasive just a few years ago. See Brief for ATF 14, 36–39 (endorsing the position it now rejects). “Now it says the opposite. The law hasn’t changed, only an agency’s interpretation of it.”
… Congress could have authorized ATF to regulate any part of a firearm or any object readily convertible into one. But, it did not. I would adhere to the words Congress enacted. Employing its novel “artifact noun” methodology, the majority charts a different course that invites unforeseeable consequences and offers no limiting principle. I respectfully dissent.
In his own dissent, Justice Samuel Alito argued the Court “decides this case on a ground that was no traised or decided below and that was not the focus of the briefing or argument in this Court”, opining that that this wasn’t a true facial challenge as presented by the plaintiffs. But in a footnote, he also took pains to point out what he believes is the limited nature of today’s ruling.
Advertisement
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR’s suggestion that I have mischaracterized what the Court has held demands a response. Although JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR obviously wishes that the Court had gone further, all that the Court has actually held is that the ATF rule is not facially invalid because at least some applications of the rule are consistent with the statute. And the two examples that the Court cites are (1) a kit that contains all the parts needed to make a semiautomatic pistol and that can be assembled in 21 minutes, and (2) a frame that can be made functional simply by clipping off two plastic tabs and drilling a few holes. The Court has not held that any other kits or presently non-functional receivers are covered.
This is obviously not the decision Second Amendment advocates were hoping for, and as Thomas says, it opens the door for unforeseeable consequences in the future; if not under the Trump administration then the next time a Democrat president once again weaponizes the ATF to target gun owners and the firearms industry. President Trump can blunt today’s decision by formally repealing the “frame and receiver” rule, but that won’t stop a future administration from putting it (or something far worse) in place in the future.
https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2025/03/26/scotus-upholds-atfs-frame-and-receiver-rule-n1228101
Navy Deploys Missile Destroyer to Support Border Security Operations
Last updated: March 25, 2025 12:41 pm
By
Sara Carter Staff
March 25, 2025
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE
The United States Navy has announced the deployment of the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Spruance (DDG 111) from San Diego in support of U.S. border security operations off the California coast.
– Advertisement –
In a statement released over the weekend, Navy officials confirmed that USS Spruance will operate with an embedded U.S. Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachment (LEDET). This collaboration aims to bolster maritime security and enhance coordination between the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), reports Breitbart News.
General Gregory Guillot, Commander of U.S. Northern Command (USNORTHCOM), emphasized the strategic importance of this deployment:
“USS Spruance’s deployment as part of U.S. Northern Command’s southern border mission brings additional capability and expands the geography of unique military capabilities working with the Department of Homeland Security. With Spruance off the West Coast and USS Gravely in the Gulf of America, our maritime presence contributes to the all-domain, coordinated DOD response to the Presidential Executive Order and demonstrates our resolve to achieve operational control of the border.”
USS Spruance recently completed a five-month deployment in the Middle East, supporting operations under the 5th and 7th fleets as part of the USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group. Now, its reassignment to U.S. border security reflects the administration’s prioritization of territorial integrity and national defense.
– Advertisement –
According to USNORTHCOM:
“Spruance brings maritime capabilities to USNORTHCOM AOR in response to Presidential executive orders and a national emergency declaration and clarification of the military’s role in protecting the territorial integrity of the United States.”
President Donald Trump has taken decisive action to enhance border security. On his second day in office, he ordered the deployment of 1,500 active-duty military personnel to the U.S.-Mexico border. As reported by Breitbart Texas, this was part of a broader strategy to address illegal immigration and border security concerns.
On January 20, President Trump signed an executive order titled “Clarifying the Military’s Role in Protecting the Territorial Integrity of the United States.” This was one of ten executive orders focused on border security and immigration enforcement.
https://saraacarter.com/navy-deploys-missile-destroyer-to-support-border-security-operations/
“The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him.” ~ Niccolo Machiavelli
“Before all else, be armed.” ~ Niccolo Machiavelli
“A government which does not trust its citizens to be armed is not itself to be trusted.” ~ Niccolo Machiavelli
“A sign of intelligence is an awareness of one’s own ignorance.” ~ Niccolo Machiavelli
“Always assume incompetence before looking for conspiracy.” ~ Niccolo Machiavelli
“The tyranny of a prince in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in a democracy.” ~ Baron de Montesquieu
“There is nothing wrong with America that faith, love of freedom, intelligence, and energy of her citizens cannot cure.” ~ Dwight D. Eisenhower
“No one in government should ever think that the citizens they work for can’t or won’t scrutinize their actions” ~ Roy Barnes
“The world is filled with violence. Because criminals carry guns, we decent law-abiding citizens should also have guns. Otherwise, they will win and the decent people will lose.” ~ James Earl Jones
“The only title in our democracy superior to that of President is the title of citizen.” ~ Louis D. Brandeis
“The fundamental purpose of government is to protect its citizens.” ~ Arlen Specter
Thank you very much Richard, I shall repeat many of these over and over.
That is why I am putting them up, they give everyone ammo in discussions on various topics.
Two more:
“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.” (Attributed to Plato)
“Without justice – what else is the State but a great band of robbers.” St. Augustine – quoted by Pope Benedict XVl at the German Bundestag September 2011
Alberta separation may be closer than we think. One-hour interview with a prominent Alberta lawyer. Well worth it for both Canadians and Americans.
Essentially, everything including legal framework and procedures are ready to go. An October election there need only include a box to check. Should Carney win the federal election Albertans can exit.
https://youtu.be/-Kl724D5reE?si=IFv98kgOHKIFsh0r
Sorry American friends, but once this wolf in sheep’s clothing steals the election our problem really becomes your problem, too.
Alberta separation may be closer than we think.
I think Trump was very serious about Canada joining the US, and I think he see’s the entire globe falling apart and all nations scrambling for some semblance of stable footing to stand on while they try to survive the Globalist attempt to create a one world socialist government.
I worry about what is going to happen to all of my Canadian Friends during the chaos that will follow the planned economic collapse and the left’s attempt to seize total power. Down here in the lower 48 we still have the right of self defense and the weapons to use to exercise that right. (at least in most of the States) I pray that all of my friends survive the attempt to enslave all of humanity to further the Marxist nightmare. If we can delay the collapse until after your elections both nations will have a much better chance of continuing to have the right of a Free Born Englishman that we in the lower 48 fought to regain and have fought to keep since that revolt.