1. Nice that someone else noticed that the current anti-Israel movement across the West is in reality an anti-Western Civilization movement. It is easy math to do, to look at what happens if Israel disappears in terms of the total food supply to the Middle East. While these countries love to hate Israel, most of Israel’s exports are marked in Arabic.
2. Peter Menzies article in Epoch Times as to what it means that Emperor Carney chose to appear on a US TV talk show as the opening salvo on what is certainly a Potemkin campaign (There is no way a guy like Mark Carney would run for this position if he didn’t think he had it in the bag. All who run against him for party leadership and Canadian media reporting on the leadership campaign, is more likely to provide the illusion of a real competition. Someone should follow the money for the $300.000.00 it costs to run for leadership for all of them and see where it came from.) The Epoch Times thinks it is a condemnation of the CBC that he made this choice. We think he is placing the curtain around the man with the levers and buttons and steam and mirrors. Below, probably one of the most important scenes in movie history.
I refer, of course, to the decision by the man who would be Canada’s next Liberal Party leader and prime minister—Mark Carney—to pre-launch his campaign with an appearance on Jon Stewart’s “The Daily Show” on Comedy Central, a U.S. cable channel.
It is rare, if not unheard of, for a politician to seek favour in his own country by appearing on a foreign television program, at least as the starting point for a campaign. Perhaps other well-connected, high-profile candidates will adopt a similar strategy.
It’s also a decision that clearly throws the CBC—in both languages—under the bus. Mr. Carney’s campaign surely chose “The Daily Show” for his pre-debut because it was the most likely program to draw a lot of the right kind of attention in Canada. The additional benefits would be a non-hostile interview from which useful social media clips could be taken. Or he was just following the example set by outgoing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau who, since his resignation announcement, has only done interviews with American media.
One might argue that, despite past efforts, there are no late night talk show alternatives on Canadian TV networks. But Mr. Carney could have easily offered himself to CBC News Network, CTV News Channel, or even CPAC. Some might speculate that he didn’t because the political risk of dealing with journalists as opposed to comedians is higher, and there could be merit to that suggestion. Chances are also good that the social cachet in Canada of a Jon Stewart interview is more significant than a heart-to-heart with Rosemary Barton or Vassy Kapelos.
3. Anyone who doesn’t get the Muslim Israel thing yet, doesn’t want to. Islam despises Israel for two reasons. It exists on what they view as Dar al Islam. In other words, Islam teaches its idiots followers that any land once ruled under Sharia law will always and must always be under sharia law. Therefore the idea that a Western nation, which truth be told in many ways is more a Greco-Roman polity than it is a Jewish one, is intolerable. The second reason is it is full of Jews. And al Islamic scripture is super clear about how it feels about that. In Koran itself, one of Islam’s greatest triumphs is when Mohammad and his band of caravan robbers, turned on the people who helped and fed them and murdered them all in the Jewish city of Yathrib. Now it’s called “Medina”.
The second thing is that Muslims play the victim in war, and if in some manner they are not removed from the Earth in entirety by the end of hostilities, they declare victory. This has happened a lot. But before this Gaza conflict, I think it was 2016 when Israel took out most of Hizb’allah’s tactical capabilities and when the world managed to get Israel to stop for some reason or other, Hizb’allah declared victory because there were still a few of them left.
This is necessary to understand why they pivot from claiming genocide and starvation to victory in under 2 minutes.
Caroline Glick with a more geopolitical approach and Qatar’s role. But frankly. without an understanding of Islam, and by this I mean a genuinely multicultural approach, not the dialectical use of the word, meaning everyone in the world is a socialist but has different skin tones, I mean understanding fundamentally different approaches to every aspect of their epistemology, you can never get it. Islam does not think in the same terms as say, Carl von Clausewitz, even if what Von Klausewitz’ ideas indeed have an impact on Muslims.
4. Chrystia Freeland get busted for skimming $2 Billion of tax payers money to invest in a company that doesn’t even exist
As we can see, running Freehand and maybe one or two others, is to make Canadians heave a sigh or relief when Carney is anointed as Emperor. This is so obvious that the money put up to run all the Liberal Candidates for leadership is probably from the WEF or some other part of the COMINTERN.
5. There are many reports of media being kicked out of Mark Carney’s pressers. The Western Standard was not allowed in to watch his announcement. But apparently Communist China was.
Thank you all for reading this site.
When the left has lost the Village People…
About the islam thing, there are so many accounts like this where they share the start of someone else’s video then add in crying kids or the like, sometimes “it’s my birthday ” and cry for if you scroll p ast you kill them, donate, touch these buttons :/ it’ll be toddlers too. This isn’t even the most clout of an account I’ve seen worse
https://www.instagram.com/sara._.arab.1?igsh=dDM0NTF4cG9keHlo
#3 It’s a bit more complicated than that, imho. The ideology of pan-Syrian nationalism is still alive, and it lays claim to the lands of Israel:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syria_(region)#In_pan-Syrian_nationalism
“Antoun Saadeh and his party, the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, envisioned “Greater Syria” or “Natural Syria”, based on the etymological connection between the name “Syria” and “Assyria”, as encompassing the Sinai Peninsula, Cyprus, modern Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq, Kuwait, the Ahvaz region of Iran, and the Kilikian region of Turkey.”
I think this flavor of nationalism has a religious dimension, “Greater Syria” contains most of islam’s holy places:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syria_(region)#Religious_significance
As for the purely religious argument, there’s a relevant quranic verse:
https://www.alhakam.org/what-does-the-quran-say-about-israel-and-palestine/
Hence, God conveyed this message to the Muslims that a time will come when the Israelites will occupy the Holy Land.
[..]
God forewarned the Muslims to be watchful that if at any time they show weakness in becoming His servants, Allah the Almighty will bring the Israelites back to Palestine. However, if the Muslims become true worshippers of God again, they will prevail anew.
[..]
Moreover, they should also realise that the mercy of the Holy Prophetsa is timeless and the era of Prophet Muhammadsa does not end with the triumph of the Israelites over Palestine. In fact, the mercy of Allah’s Messengersa transcends all ages, i.e., the periods before and after the occupation of the Israelites.
Thus, one should not be dismayed, as when divine mercy showers again, the Muslims will triumph once more in Palestine. (Tafsir-e-Kabir [2023], Vol. 8, pp. 105-106)
Explaining this prophecy of the Holy Quran, the Promised Messiah and Mahdi, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas says:
“It is clear from this verse that al-Ard, which refers to the land of [Greater] Syria, will always be inherited by the righteous people, and as of now, it is in the possession of Muslims.
[..]
This manifestly shows that the true heirs [of Palestine] will always be Muslims, and if it goes into the hands of some else at some point, such a possession would be similar to a scenario in which the mortgagor gives temporary control of their property to the mortgagee. This is the glory of Divine revelation, [and it shall surely come to pass].” (Al Hakam, 10 November 1902, p. 7)
[..]
The Jews have come to their own after wandering in wilderness for about 2000 years. But this great historical event, too, has taken place in fulfilment of a Quranic prophecy. The Muslims were told that in the time of the Promised Messiah[as], the Jews will be made to come back to their Holy Land from the ends of the earth (17:105). But this is only a temporary phase. The Muslims are destined to win it back. Let the whole world know that sooner or later – sooner rather than later – Palestine will revert to Muslim possession. This is a Divine decree and nobody can alter God’s decree.” (The Five Volume Commentary, Vol. 4, pp. 2122-24)
In Tafsir-e-Kabir, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra explained that through Prophet Mosesas, Israelites were informed of two catastrophes and also told that their possession of Palestine would not be permanent. Rather, they would occupy it at first and then be expelled. After some time, they will occupy it once more and yet again lose dominion over it.
etc etc
There’s also this:
https://quran.com/5:20/tafsirs/en-tafisr-ibn-kathir
BUT these ideas are not uncontroversial in islam:
https://www.thejc.com/judaism/what-the-koran-says-about-the-land-of-israel-qgkmcg33
You will find very clearly,” says Sheikh Dr Muhammad Al-Husseini, “that the traditional commentators from the eighth and ninth century onwards have uniformly interpreted the Koran to say explicitly that Eretz Yisrael has been given by God to the Jewish people as a perpetual covenant. There is no Islamic counterclaim to the Land anywhere in the traditional corpus of commentary.”