Bill Gates fit to be tried in the Hague? Israel-Iran and more: Links 1 for Oct. 25, 2024

1. Alleged US intel on Israeli preparations for strike on Iran appears online

Pro-Iran Telegram account posts two files it claims to be observations by Pentagon on Israeli exercises, handling of munitions ahead of a response to Iran’s Oct. 1 missile attack

The documents have not been authenticated by news outlets, and the Pentagon and the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence have not officially commented on the alleged leak.

However, CNN reported that US authorities are investigating the apparent leak of highly classified information, citing three unnamed people familiar with the matter. The outlet quoted a US official casting the development as “deeply concerning.”

Before that, a senior Israeli official told the Axios news site that the defense establishment was taking the leak very seriously. A US official said that the alleged leak, while extremely concerning, wouldn’t impact plans for an attack against Iran.

The documents, allegedly showing a visual intelligence report by the Department of Defense National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), noted observing IAF exercises using air-launched ballistic missiles (ALBMs), air-to-surface ballistic missiles, fighter jets, UAVs, and refueling tankers previously used during Israeli strikes on Houthi sites in Yemen.

According to the documents, the IAF has handled at least 16 Golden Horizon ALBMs and 40 IS02 (Rocks) ALBMs since October 8.

(It makes a certain amount of sense that there is not much Iran could do even if they knew what was coming.)

2. Now this is interesting. More because it is so difficult in the era of control by the Ministry of Truth to determine the relationship between real events and what we are told. Sometimes even figuring out the qui bono of these equations can be vexing and counter-intuitive. But here we go with one anyway. Thi is former UK MP Andrew Bridgen, someone for whom I have a great deal of time and respect, posting this:

Hopefully this becomes a real thing. Something we can follow and that has real processes rooted in law and consequences beyond a slap on the wrist and removal of his pass to Epstein Island or P Diddy’s fun ranch for 5 days or whatever. Consequences that are in proportion to the level of the crime.

3. Donald Trump remains an advertising genius.

4. Quebec opens investigation on another religious incident in a public school

“If these events are confirmed, you can be sure decisions will be made,” says Education Minister Bernard Drainville. “I’m not going to let this go on without a very firm and determined response.”

QUEBEC — The Quebec government has opened an investigation into another incident of religion reappearing in a public elementary school, with Education Minister Bernard Drainville saying Quebec will not turn a blind eye to the fresh allegations.

One day after suspending the teaching licences of 11 teachers at the Bedford elementary school in Côte-des-Neiges over allegations of violations on Quebec’s state neutrality laws, Drainville said he was troubled to hear about another case.

Cogeco Nouvelles Wednesday reported that the Maghreb parents of an 11 year-old-boy had decided to withdraw their son from the Alphonse-Pesant school in St-Léonard out of fear a teacher would try to indoctrinate him into the Muslim faith.

The parents told the radio network they did not want their son to be subject to the teaching and even feared for the safety of their child.

 

5. Increasingly, it looks like Trudeau gets a certain amount of political support from Khalistan separatists, and thinks he can smooth it all over with India by dressing up as a Hindu groom and dancing a little in a public event somewhere in India. It would also explain why the head of the NDP props him up in his minority, since there is evidence that Sing is far more concerned about Khalistan than Canada. And now we have this:

Full text:

Canada Border Services Agency has confirmed that the person wanted by India is working for them.

Sandeep Singh Sidhu has alleged ties to Khalistani group, terrorist groups, murder, smuggling drugs and weapons so naturally he works at Canada’s borders and is getting protection from the Liberal government.

How did he got the job? Why is no one in the government alarmed by this?

Much more to say about a lot of these issues and more today. Thanks for staying with us so far.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

5 Replies to “Bill Gates fit to be tried in the Hague? Israel-Iran and more: Links 1 for Oct. 25, 2024”

  1. If Bill Gates is sued for disinformation over Covid, then this will be used as a precedent to sue every last nobody who warns about the dangers of uncontrolled immigration, using the exact same arguments.

    We should not be cheering for more censorship precedents, even if we despise the current target. The problem was not that rich celebrities endorsed a foolish policy. That happens all the time. The problem is that contrary voices were suppressed, and that governments coerced their own citizens. The people responsible for *that* should be prosecuted, or – at least – fired from government posts.

    • 100% correct.

      If the charge is disinformation, then it should not be in a court.

      But Gates is guilty of fraud and other crimes which are traditional crimes and carry real jail terms. he should be charged with those.

      • Are you sure the charge of Fraud is not a wolf in sheep’s clothing? I.E. he quited what he believed were facts, which turned out to be egregiously false, and now he’s being sued for this. Such a precedent would be as harmful as a straightforward disinformation charge. How many simple citizens could survive a legal process in which they had to prove that they were simply mistaken, rather than deliberately deceitful?

        • Am I sure? No.

          Does Gates need to be on trial for crimes against humanity? Yes

          Could this be another con to create a stronger matrix of totalitarian rule against anything counter-narrative?
          Very possible.

          I guess we’ll just have to see.

          Your concerns are truly worthy. But people who are charged with conspiracy to murder and convicted on rational standards is upholding rule of law, as an example.

          People who commit massive frauds against the public by selling something knowingly bad for them under false pretences, that is also upholding rule of law.

          As you point out, this is all in how it is done. If the charge is misinformation or disinformation we are all screwed. As you say.