Setting up the fix, and charting the fall of civilization: Links 1 for Oct. 6, 2024

1. Just have to make this single juxtaposition. Like similar ones we made in 2020, its primary value would be as an indicator of an election about to be stolen.

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1nAKEpDdkgyxL?t=1IXrMhF2DiV-qa0TT1a_DA&s=09

No one seems even the slightest bit put out by the ‘gas’ whatsoever. And what is with the guy throwing the umbrella? Is he auditioning for a Mary Poppins remake?

3. Ok this one isn’t any fun.

In every disaster there are multiple LOOs (Lines of operation) to derail any effective action or speech or organization against any potential counter moves. In terms of the Hurricane, the claim that there is a rare earth element in the hills and this is a gov’t plot to get to it. Like many of the more insane phoney ‘on-our-side’ counter-narratives about the vaxx, this appears to be untrue. Also rumours about dozing over whole towns, dead and all. This also is likely untrue. This following one I have no idea as of yet. It doesn’t seem much different than what we do know happens, but I would ask people to look at this more as a test of inf-warfare savvy than a piece of information. What is it. Is it an attack all on its own? or a report of something factually correct.

One comment in the thread gave a screen shot of this FEMA page.

Asking CHAT GPT about it:

No, generally, people who receive FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) payments in disaster zones do not have to repay the amount. FEMA provides financial assistance to individuals and households affected by federally declared disasters, and this aid is intended to help with immediate needs such as housing, repairs, and other disaster-related expenses. Since these payments are considered grants and not loans, they are not typically required to be repaid.

However, there are a few exceptions:

1. Duplication of benefits: If someone receives FEMA assistance and later receives money for the same purpose from another source, like insurance or a lawsuit settlement, FEMA may request repayment for the overlapping amount.
2. Incorrect payments: If FEMA later determines that a payment was made in error or if the recipient was not eligible, they may ask for the funds to be repaid.

But in normal circumstances, the assistance provided by FEMA is not something that disaster victims have to repay.

We already know GPT lies dialectically, meaning always lies to give weight to state narratives. But in this case it could be that the moneys being paid out have different conditions attached. No idea. The point of this item is to show the increasing liquification of all actual real events and their consequences.

4. I’m guessing Toronto because of the street car wires. Once again, I am very against restricting freedom of speech. If we didn’t allow people to chant these things, we wouldn’t know who they are. The issue in free nations historically, was decided via immigration. We didn’t let people in who hated us and wished us and our cultures death and slavery. The fact that these people have been imported by the millions and subsidized by the state shows the problem is much more serious than the odious LARPing (Live Action Role Play) by most of these people. The pink faced vegan college students and their seriously twisted Islamic and communist manipulators.

5. Meanwhile, at another display of Islamic/communist dominance in Australia, the only guy to be roughly arrested was a Jewish fellow carrying an Australian flag.

Let’s parse this a little.

At this point it should be clear to anyone who reads this site that the rule of law is over and the job of the police is to manage the collapse of Western civilization so it kicks up as little dust as possible as it falls. As a consequence we have seen and documented on this site for well over 15 years, police arresting peaceful people at demonstrations while howling mobs of savages cried out for their blood.

One especially comes to mind, I think it was Scandinavia but can’t remember for sure, where a group of Jewish protestors had a permit for a demo, built a little stage, sang folk songs and otherwise did the usual niceties bordering on the banal only to be arrested and forcibly removed by police while a howling mob of Muslims threw missiles at them and otherwise made illegal threats of violence. This was a long time ago, and while it was posted on this site, I wouldn’t even know how to search for it at this point.

There aren’t really many arguments if any at all that there is rule of law in the West. Events are managed to make sure that no one gets too badly hurt as a result of the policies that the COMINTERN have implemented across the West. At least not yet, but lots of people getting really hurt is quite likely once a certain point de bascule is reached, one might reasonably assume. November 6th certainly could be one of them. Which is why they won’t announce the winner for weeks afterwards, since they would likely only want the massive violence they plan should somehow Trump manage to win.

In the practical, if a Jewish person advocating for Israel or even the host country, in this case Australia, shows up at one of the now daily near-riots that take place across the West he probably needs to be removed for his own safety, only because the police do not have the physical resources to protect him and or arrest all the law breakers. And the architects of all this chaos are if nothing else, eminently practical. So the police work to protect the law breakers and use their monopoly on force to remove patriots and advocates for liberty and Western civ ‘for their own good’.

Australia seems to do it more viciously than most nation states though.

I remember posting a video of an Australian girl with a baby brutalized by police when the lock downs were declared in Oz. I even got a phone call from someone who had a complete tantrum at me that this could not possibly be true. That no police force in the West could do this to a mother and baby doing nothing but walking down a street. Yet within weeks it became the new normal.

Finding exact posts I did is very difficult because there are usually 5 to 10 items in a post on this site with a title that is often overly clever but makes sense at the time. So it is difficult to locate them. But here are a few similar examples from X which is much easier to search:

Avi Yemeni does a nice juxtaposition to prove the point about the dialectical nature of policing in the West now

So. This was the state of things in 2020 and shortly after.

Islam and communism share the following attribute:

In Islam all things are halal (permitted) if they advance the authority of Islam. Examples could take all day but for the moment, when Iraq went full Islamic after the US deposed Saddam, jihadis went around making sure no one used technology that didn’t exist at the time of Mohammad. This included people with Falafel ball machines in the streets. They did this holding AK47s, They also have no issues with using YouTube and all other modern means of Dawa and Chutba (sp) or doing sermons online, even though Islam strictly prohibits the representation of living things whatsoever.

Communism uses a slightly different method to achieve the same result. They pretend to use rule of law to get general compliance, but adjust all the parameters to get the most leftist possible outcome to the scenario. And examples of this across the West since the revolution really came into effect, lets say in 2020 are too numerous and obvious to insult the reader’s intelligence by listing them at this point. After all, to a large degree, that has been the entire purpose of this site, is to point out the nature of the workings of our system as it operates now, and point to its desired outcome.

As Stephen Coughlin explains, this is not hypocrisy. This is a different system which has a different intention than what many allow themselves to believe.

Thanks for checking out this site.

A little addition from the UK. THis person did a good job of showing how the police operate dialectically. Arresting those with signs that state a fact in law, and ignoring actual calls for Jihad, claiming that Jihad has many meanings. I think the Muslims call this kind of deception, ‘Kitman’.

https://twitter.com/K0sher_C0ckney/status/1842706215911977360

Chat GPT offers this meaning of Kitman:

Kitman is a term in Islamic jurisprudence that refers to the act of withholding or concealing certain aspects of the truth without directly lying. It is often described as a form of mental reservation or partial truth-telling, where specific information is left out intentionally, allowing a listener to form a different or incomplete understanding of the situation.

In certain legal or theological contexts within Islam, Kitman is sometimes discussed alongside Taqiyya, which refers to concealing one’s faith or beliefs under specific circumstances, such as when facing persecution or danger. Kitman is thus a more subtle form of concealment, where someone may choose to withhold key information in a way that changes how the overall truth is perceived without directly stating a falsehood.

Context of Kitman:

1. Self-preservation: Kitman, like Taqiyya, is generally invoked when there is a threat to personal safety, especially during times of persecution or when one’s life or well-being is at risk. This concept is particularly relevant in historical contexts where certain Muslim groups, especially Shi’a Muslims, faced persecution by ruling powers.
2. Debates in theology: In debates over doctrine or when engaging in religious discussions, Kitman can refer to withholding certain beliefs or interpretations, especially in situations where fully expressing them might lead to conflict or danger.

Kitman in Practical Terms:

Kitman does not involve outright lying, but instead means deliberately omitting certain information to avoid giving a full account. This can lead someone else to draw conclusions based on partial information, but technically, the speaker has not spoken a falsehood.

Example:

If someone asks a person about their religious beliefs in a hostile environment, rather than denying their faith, the individual might choose to answer only a portion of the question, providing true information but omitting details that could put them at risk.

Ethical Debate:

There is ongoing debate among scholars about the use of Kitman. Some view it as a necessary tool for survival in hostile situations, while others caution against its use, emphasizing that Islam encourages honesty and truthfulness.

In summary, Kitman is a form of strategic truth-concealment used to protect oneself or avoid danger, without explicitly lying. It is a nuanced concept that is primarily discussed in relation to religious or survival contexts.

The London Police though are actually being less strict. They are simply enforcing what gives the political outcome the revolution wants.