Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.
This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.
So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.
This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.
For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression.
Chris Martenson looks at the French election.
Woke economic policies such as solar and wind farms are draining the middleclasses. The people respond by trying to vote their lives back into solvency. The Left counters by rigging elections, or playing the coalition game to deny the people’s wishes, while retaining power.
Interesting times.
https://youtu.be/4spVbJon9rg?si=wXw8xT2hLlk0E1f1
Orban forbidden from addressing EU Parliament:
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/orb-ns-big-hungarian-presidency-152150251.html
LAWLESS: Chuck Schumer Announces Scheme to Strip President Trump of Court-Granted Immunity and Send Him to Jail (VIDEO)
thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/lawless-chuck-schumer-announces-scheme-strip-president-trump/
Jul. 9, 2024 11:00 am
Screenshot: The Hill
Screenshot: The Hill
A historic Supreme Court ruling is not stopping Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) from trying to imprison President Trump.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, the Supreme Court last week ruled 6-3 along ideological lines in favor of Trump, asserting that presidents are immune from criminal liability involving official acts during their tenure.
The case Trump v. United States arose from narcissistic Special Counsel Jack Smith’s corrupt indictment against Trump, who is falsely accusing the 45th President of conspiring to throw out the 2020 presidential election results.
The garbage charges Smith has levied include spreading “claims” of election fraud and “attempting to obstruct the certification of the election results.”
Schumer took to the Senate floor Monday to whine about the ruling. According to the Hill, he declared the Court was wrong to grant Trump “a breathtaking level of immunity.”
“They incorrectly declared that former President Trump enjoys broad immunity from criminal prosecution for actions he took while in office. They incorrectly declared that all future presidents are entitled to a breathtaking level of immunity so long as their conduct is ostensibly carried out in their official capacity as president,” Schumer complained.
Schumer went on to say the court majority had “effectively placed a crown on Donald Trump’s head,” “putting him above the law” and making him “in many ways untouchable.”
Schumer then announced he had something to ensure that Trump could still be prosecuted effectively despite the Court ruling. He said he would be working with his fellow Democrats to classify Trump’s acts after the 2020 election as unofficial ones not subject to immunity, thereby removing court-granted immunity.
If implemented into law, this would be a huge lifeline for the Biden regime as it tries to remove the presidential frontrunner from the field.
WATCH: Video at site
SCHUMER: I will work with my colleagues on legislation classifying Trump’s election subversion acts as unofficial acts not subject to immunity. We’re doing this because we believe that in America no president should be free to overturn an election against the will of the people, no matter what the conservative justices may believe.”
As we work on this important matter, we will also continue to develop other proposals to reassert Congress’s Article One authority to rein in the abuse of our federal judiciary.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/lawless-chuck-schumer-announces-scheme-strip-president-trump/
REPORT: Former Biden Stenographer Claims Biden Blackmailed Obama with Threats of Exposing Former President’s Alleged Homosexual Affairs
Jul. 9, 2024 7:45 am
Mike McCormick, a former White House stenographer who worked with Joe Biden, claimed during an interview with Alex Jones that Biden used potential damaging information to manipulate Barack Obama.
McCormick alleges that Biden threatened to expose Obama’s supposed homosexual affairs unless certain conditions were met, wielding this information as a tool for political leverage.
Mike McCormick is a former White House stenographer who worked closely with Joe Biden during his tenure as Vice President. In this role, McCormick was responsible for accurately transcribing speeches, meetings, and other communications involving Biden and other governmental officials.
His firsthand experience provided him with an intimate perspective on the operations and inner workings of the Obama regime.
He wrote a book titled “The Case to Impeach and Imprison Joe Biden,” an eyewitness account of six years as Joe Biden’s White House stenographer.
According to his book:
McCormick, who made national news in April 2023 by revealing he submitted evidence to the FBI that would impeach Joe Biden, confirms that he was interviewed extensively about his knowledge of Biden’s corruption and evil by investigators from the House Oversight Committee and the Senate Homeland Security Governmental Affairs Committee.
McCormick courageously identifies US government officials who assisted Joe Biden in his evil schemes, including then president Barack Obama. And McCormick names the journalists who continue to cover for the Obama–Biden corruption. Despite all the evidence, he has not yet been asked to testify under oath about what he saw. That’s why he’s written this book.
During the interview with Alex Jones, McCormick claimed Biden discovered potentially scandalous information about Obama’s private life early in their partnership and used it to ensure his place as a close and indispensable advisor.
Alex Jones: So finishing up with this area, you’ve been inside, worked for Trump, worked for Biden. You’ve been in the middle of it while you’re there with the world leaders, creating a record of it. We’re talking about a fly on the wall. What does the Democrat establishment do?
Because I’ve always thought and seen that Obama had a lot of control of Biden. But I agree, he’s shifting more towards Hillary. Do you think Obama was really the power behind it, or was that made up? Or has it always just been Biden in control?
Mike McCormick: I think people talk about Obama being the puppet master and Biden being the puppet. I think it was the other way around. I think Obama made his mark in the Democratic circles in 2004 with a big speech at the Democratic Convention. Joe Biden at that time knew he wanted to run in 2008. So he marked this guy. He probably had his operatives go look into his background.
In 2006, when Obama makes it through and gets him in the Senate, Biden tucked him right under his wing. He was the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. He tucked him right under his wing and put him on the Foreign Relations Committee so he could get some foreign policy experience. Probably Biden at that time thought he would be the presidential candidate and have Obama as his vice president.
Well, Obama flipped the script on him. But Biden may have known something about Obama, something out of his personal life that Obama had to hide. He makes Biden his vice president. Biden always had this saying about Obama that he told him, “I want to be the last guy in the room after everybody leaves when there’s a big deal to be done.”
I want to be the last guy in the room with you. That’s probably when Biden told him, “Okay, you’re going to do this with me because I know this.”
Alex Jones: What is that thing? That Obama is a homosexual?
Mike McCormick: Yeah, I think that’s what he was talking about. What I knew, I don’t know for certain what Obama was behind the scenes.
Alex Jones: But you were watching this as his stenographer. Wow.
The evidence for these allegations, according to McCormick, lay in the Air Force One passenger manifest. He claimed that there were several instances where Obama would travel alone to Chicago or California without his family, raising questions about his activities during these trips.
Trending: Is She Okay? Kamala Harris Zones Out on Marine Helicopter (Video)
Mike McCormick: I will tell you this. We used to get the Air Force One passenger manifest. Obama would fly back and forth to Chicago. When he flew back and forth to Chicago, very rarely, maybe only less than five times, he would go there all the time because that’s where his political office was for re-election.
Michelle and the kids never went with him. So he would go back to their home, their house, where they were born and grew up without his family. Why would he do that? Michelle Obama was a Chicago girl.
She had friends there. She never went back with him. Why was that? And that’s what I saw in the Air Force One manifest. Obama had something going on in Chicago, and the same thing played out on the West Coast. When Obama first met Xi as a president, that was in June of 2013, there was a big…
There’s a question around the meeting. It was out in a place in California called Sunnylands. It’s in Palm Springs. And Xi showed up with his wife, but Obama didn’t show up with Michelle. And people were asking, “Why isn’t Michelle here? Xi brought Madame Xi, why isn’t Michelle here?”
And there was never a good answer. And so she wasn’t out there. So there were a lot of times in California trips where Michelle wasn’t around, California and Chicago. I don’t know what they were doing, but I have a feeling that there was something going on. It was what Joe Biden knew.
Alex Jones: But you saw Biden basically say, “I got Obama by the short hairs.”
Mike McCormick: That’s what my feeling was behind the scenes.
When asked if he believed Biden was blackmailing Obama with homosexuality, McCormick agreed, suggesting that this was the reason Biden received many significant assignments during their time in office.
Alex Jones: You’re saying, from what you saw, your dead reckoning is that Joe Biden was blackmailing Obama with homosexuality?
Mike McCormick:Yeah, probably. I think that’s why he got so many big assignments. In 2009, I wasn’t there at this time, but this is what my understanding is. He came in and he got the Recovery Act. He started doing meetings in the cabinet room. It was always like a junior president.
Alex Jones:Clearly, it’s been known that Obama is involved in a bunch of weirdness. He’s blackmailed. But you’re saying it’s been Biden that brought him in day one that’s controlling him. I’m going to put the headline out that, “White House whistleblower believes Biden has been blackmailing Obama.”
Mike McCormick:That’s why Biden got all these big assignments. Joe did Iraq. Joe went into Afghanistan. He made their decision on Afghanistan. Joe did the Alliance for Prosperity. Joe did Ukraine. Joe did Putin. He did the [Great Reset], all these things because Joe came in there, he wanted to be the President. He’s in the hot seat there.
If Obama, God forbid, dropped when he was President, Joe would have been the President. That was his dream come true. So the entire time he was in the White House, he was angling to be the President ahead of Hillary. He wanted to be the candidate in 2016. And he was pushing hard to do that, especially in 2014.
And then Beau got sick, and he died. And Joe basically backed down from wanting to be President. But his staff wanted him to be President. He wanted to be President. He was pushing Obama behind the scenes.
You can watch the full 1-hour interview below:
White House Whistleblower Believes Joe Biden Blackmailed Obama With Homosexuality@JoeUnauthorized pic.twitter.com/4ZssaQ6dwT
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 8, 2024
The Gateway Pundit reported that in a 1982 letter to former girlfriend Alex McNear, Barack Obama, then 21, discussed his thoughts on sexuality and his own “androgynous” mind, according to the redacted portion of the letter obtained by The New York Post.
The letter, penned in November 1982, has come to light after Obama’s biographer, Pulitzer Prize-winning historian David Garrow, uncovered the redacted paragraphs. He included them in his book “Rising Star: The Making of Barack Obama” and recently shared them during an extensive interview about the former President.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Tablet’s David Samuels sat down lengthy Q&A with historian David Garrow.
The interview started with Garrow sharing the story about how Obama’s relationship with Sheila Miyoshi Jager, his girlfriend in the 1980s, ended. Garrow says their relationship fell apart after Obama refused to condemn antisemitism.
But the claim that is getting the most buzz is the part where Garrow discusses Obama’s girlfriend at Occidental College, Alexandra McNair. He revealed that when McNair showed him letters from Barack, she redacted one paragraph in one of them and just claimed that “It’s about homosexuality.”
The letter is now housed at Emory University, where it is not permitted to be photographed or removed. The redacted text was transcribed by Garrow’s friend Harvey Klehr and provided to The Post.
“He spent his whole life at Emory, but they won’t let him take pictures. So Harvey has to sit there with a pencil and copy out the graph where Barack writes to Alex about how he repeatedly fantasizes about making love to men,” Garrow told Samuels during the interview.
This begs the question: could Obama be gay or bisexual?
“In regard to homosexuality, I must say that I believe this is an attempt to remove oneself from the present, a refusal perhaps to perpetuate the endless farce of earthly life. You see, I make love to men daily, but in the imagination,” Barack Obama wrote to McNear in 1982.
“My mind is androgynous to a great extent and I hope to make it more so until I can think in terms of people, not women as opposed to men. But, in returning to the body, I see that I have been made a man, and physically in life, I choose to accept that contingency,” Obama continued.
“I Make Love to Men Daily, But in the Imagination” – Barack Obama’s Letter to Former Girlfriend Reveals Frequent Fantasies of Gay Sex
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/report-former-biden-stenographer-claims-biden-blackmailed-obama/
The protection software won’t let me post the full post on X, they have polled everyone they can think of against Trump and Trump wins all of the contests.
https://x.com/IAPolls2022/status/1810704963661635634
Post
Conversation
Citizen Free Press
@CitizenFreePres
105 people were shot (19 died) in Chicago this weekend, so the democrat mayor blames Richard Nixon.
The last republican mayor of Chicago left office in 1915.
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1810716314714923300
Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2024/07/thomas-wants-to-address-what-arms-are-protected-by-second-amendment/#ixzz8fVl5wkAM
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
Thomas Wants to Address What ‘Arms’ are Protected by Second Amendment
Ammoland Inc. Posted on July 9, 2024 by David Codrea
We the People Constitution Gavel
The question before the courts should be simple: How did people at the time of ratification define “arms”?
“We have never squarely addressed what types of weapons are ‘Arms’ protected by the Second Amendment,” Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas noted in his statement on the Court’s July 2 denial of petitions for writs of certiorari in HARREL v. RAOUL, a challenge to the State of Illinois’ so-called “assault weapons” ban. The procedural sidestepping means the edict will continue to be enforceable, a decision on a right denied will continue to be delayed, and American citizens will continue to be at risk of having their lives destroyed for daring to claim their right to keep and bear arms.
That’s the key word: Arms. And using the Court’s Bruen standard of history, text, and tradition, it’s impossible to see how any but gaslighting liars, and/or totalitarian fanatics, and/or the mentally defective could argue semiautomatic firearms are not arms, with the only proscription being that government “shall not” infringe.
What was the common understanding “back then”?
“Noah Webster (1758 – 1843), was a lexicographer and a language reformer,” MasonSoft Technology explains. “In 1806, Noah Webster published his first dictionary, A Compendious Dictionary of the English Language. Then in 1807 he began working on an even more comprehensive edition, and in 1828 this was published as An American Dictionary of the English Language.”
He lived through the time of the Revolution and the ratification of the Constitution. Here’s what how his authoritative dictionary defined that key word:
It’s interesting to note that “or armor for defense and protection of the body” shows prohibitions like New York’s body armor ban with its standing army exemptions for the unconstitutional tyrannical abominations that they are.
And so much for Joe Biden’s demented assertion that when the Second Amendment was passed, “You couldn’t buy a cannon.”
Justice Thomas is correct in highlighting that “The AR-15 is a civilian, not military, weapon. No army in the world uses a service rifle that is only semiautomatic” (even ATF agreed that it was intended for the civilian market back when it was introduced). Where those who decry them as “weapons of war” all miss the point that those are exactly what the Framers intended for the citizenry to have.
As Continental Congress Delegate Tench Coxe asserted:
“Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American…. [T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” (Tench Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.)
It wasn’t just Congress that had no power. Neither, in this case, does Illinois.
“No clause in the Constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give the Congress a power to disarm the people,” William Rawle warned in View of the Constitution (standard constitutional law text at Harvard until 1845 and at Dartmouth until 1860). “Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under a general pretense by a state legislature. But if in any pursuit of an inordinate power either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both.”
“Second Amendment commas still causing controversy,” this correspondent noted in a June AmmoLand column, further exploring the effects of grammar on historic text and understanding. That prompted WarOnGuns Correspondent “Patrick F.” to send photographic evidence that many accepted documents following ratification found no disconnect in presenting the amendment with only one comma:
“I have attached a book titled, ‘Jefferson’s Manual’ which was printed by the authority, and the order, of the US Senate in 1828. The book is basically Robert’s Rule of Order of the day and was given to all members of the Senate and the House of Representatives for reference. Here, the 2nd has one comma. One must know that this is the correct version because the U.S. Senate of the day, only 39 years after the ratification of the Bill of Rights, had it printed, and everyone knew at the time that it must be printed correctly.”
Note an important synopsis on the index page that, in a rational world, would put an end to the false argument that prompted the need for the Heller case and the entire “the Second Amendment was only intended for the Militia” lie):
“Rights of the Citizen declared to be– to keep and bear arms.”
That was the crux of it, what was considered most important. Any argument that contradicts that by claiming prohibitions are about “gun safety” is an intentional deception. Citizen disarmament is about power. Anyone who says differently is a liar, a fool, or both.
The questions now are, will the Supreme Court ever acknowledge that truth, or will the November elections hand Democrats the power to reshape it with an apparatchik majority? And what are gun owners willing to do to prevent that from happening, or to respond to tyrannical decisions if they don’t?
You know that I find Ben Shapiro irritating, something about dialect, rapid delivery.
But he’s mostly on the Right side and no sissy.
He has handguns, a shotgun and an AR. He’s been advertising BYRNA Tech for some time. He’s gotten pushback on this devise:
https://byrna.com
Observant Jews are rapidly acquiring firearms skills. Lots of articles at sites of special interest.
Op-Ed: The Need For New York Yidden To Obtain Firearms.
Jewish safety has always been an issue in NY. The frum [haredi] community, who stand out as obvious Jews, has long been a target for attacks. We need the ability to protect ourselves by ourselves, and embrace our right to bear arms to deter the threats against us.
https://frumnews.com/op-ed-the-need-for-new-york-yidden-to-obtain-firearms/
I agree about Ben Shapiro he is irritating but on the right side most of the times.
That “pistol” is better then nothing but I will stick with my 1911 .45 auto it is accurate out to the ranges I consider rifle range (at those ranges a 30-06 or a 30-30 preferred) and has a well proven track record.
Maybe he’s offering baby steps and people like the Tactical Rabbi will pick up the pace.
(Turning off the sound and using subtitles helps with Ben S.)
That could be what he is doing, he is normally smart and the people in the cities have been indoctrinated with the idea that the tools useful for self defense (guns) are evil and will cause you to commit crimes. It takes time to reeducate people. The way things are going and the way SCOTUS is ruling it shouldn’t be many more months before it becomes easier for everyone to get self defense tools.
I haven’t tried turning off the sound and using closed captions, since I have lost significant levels in the upper registers with some of them totally gone his high pitched fast delivery is putting it diplomatically irritating.
Important Carry Case Set to Start in Massachusetts Court
By
Mark Chesnut –
July 8, 2024 30
concealed carry holster draw pistol
Shutterstock
?Previous Post
Next Post?
In one of the biggest decisions following the 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, a district court in Massachusetts ruled last August that the state’s law barring nonresidents from carrying a firearm in the commonwealth to be unconstitutional.
Now, the case, Commonwealth v. Dean F. Donnell, is set to begin the appeals phase before the State Supreme Judicial Court.
As some background, the case revolves around a New Hampshire man who was arrested and prosecuted for carrying a firearm in Massachusetts without a permit from that state. In an interesting twist, the defendant’s attorneys argued that Massachusetts law requiring a permit to carry “is unconstitutional on its face, is unconstitutional as applied to the defendant, and violated the defendant’s right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.”
The court chose to use the new Bruen standards, which asks whether the “Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct?” If the answer is yes, it next asks whether there exists a “historical precedent from before, during and even after the founding [that] evidences a comparable tradition of regulation?”
In writing the opinion, Judge John F. Coffee said the Massachusetts law failed on both accounts.
“The conduct of the defendant in the instant case clearly is covered by the Second Amendment,” Judge Coffee wrote. On the second point, he later concluded, “The Commonwealth points to no historical precedent limiting the reach of one’s exercise to a federal constitutional right only within that resident’s state borders.”
While that was powerful enough in itself, Judge Coffee dropped bombshell after bombshell in explaining the ruling.
“A law-abiding resident of New Hampshire who is exercising his constitutional right should not become a felon by exercising that right while he is traveling through Massachusetts merely because he has not obtained a Massachusetts license to carry, which now, under the holding of Bruen, has to be issued to an applicant unless the applicant is otherwise disqualified,” the judge further wrote. “The court can think of no other constitutional right which a person loses simply by traveling beyond his home state’s border into another state continuing to exercise that right and instantaneously becomes a felon subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of incarceration.”
Of course, Massachusetts appealed the ruling, and the justices are seeking amicus briefs prior to the beginning of the proceedings. According to court records, interested parties filing briefs to date include gun-ban groups the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, along with pro-gun U.S. Rep. Jason Gerhard, R-New Hampshire. It’s likely pro-gun groups like the National Rifle Association and Firearms Policy Coalition will be weighing in with briefs in the near future.
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/important-carry-case-set-to-start-in-massachusetts-court/
Eli Lake:
Iran’s New ‘Reformist’ President Is Anything But
‘He’s a garden-variety regime guy’ loyal to the Ayatollah and his Revolutionary Guards.
If you saw the headlines in the Western press about Iran’s election over the weekend, you might have thought it had yielded a miracle: the country’s new president, Masoud Pezeshkian, is a “reformer.”
Spoiler alert. He is not. But it’s worth examining why so many media outlets, including The New York Times and NPR, have leapt at the chance to declare Pezeshkian a liberal…
https://www.thefp.com/p/iran-new-president-not-a-reformist
……….
More media complicity.
JPost still attempts balance if you read beyond the headlines, but the trend is down. Amplifying garbage, like Times of Israel, feeding from the Haaretz trough, which is owned and run by the same sub-tribe of yekkes as the NYT.[*]
This is what Jew-ish “Americans” are consuming. Boosting the enemy-funded protest movement by those posing as sincere progressives. That apparent destabilization was a signal to Hamas that the time was right on 10/7, 50 years to the day after the Yom Kippur War.
Now they’re back misrepresenting majority Israeli sentiment. Fake polls, “news”, editorials so nakedly partisan that both JPost and Times of Israel must preface nearly identical articles quoting Haaretz !!
When you see reference to “Trump Derangement Syndrome”, think David Axelrod and Karl Rove. Lazy recycling that reveals enemy MO for ‘color revolution’.
“Bibi Derangement Syndrome” in 2014-15 was a play on BDS.
Boycott, Divest, Sanction was an early economic weapon against Jews in Nazi Germany. The international tactic brought down the apartheid government of South Africa. Used against PT, it’s a dogwhistle for color revolution.
.
.
[*]An ethnic slur for German Ashkenazim.
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/5501801/jewish/15-Facts-About-Yekkes-the-Jews-of-Germany.htm
________
Israel must prioritize hostages above all – editorial
It’s clear Netanyahu’s far-right flank does not want any deal, short of complete Hamas surrender.
Haaretz published an analysis on Monday sourcing unnamed officials in the defense establishment expressing their concern that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will likely torpedo the talks that are going to take place this week in Cairo and Doha to keep his coalition intact.
The talks in question are aimed at reaching a ceasefire in Gaza and the beginning of the return of the remaining hostages, and the analysis basically claims Netanyahu will choose political survival over the survival of the hostages.
That hypothesis, again without any official corroboration but possibly the opinion of one or two defense officials who are probably not fans of Netanyahu anyway, then becomes the lead story that morning on KAN Reshet Bet’s new bulletin, and the theory spreads and is disseminated both domestically and abroad.
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-809484
Newly Unearthed Email Shows Letitia James’ Office Corresponding with Biden DOJ Hatchet Man Matthew Colangelo About Plan to Get Trump
thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/newly-unearthed-email-shows-letitia-james-office-corresponding/
Jul. 9, 2024 8:00 pm
The House Judiciary Committee, led by Chairman Jim Jordan, unveiled a report on Tuesday titled “Lawfare: How the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and a New York State Judge Violated the Constitutional and Legal Rights of President Donald J. Trump.”
The report scrutinizes DA Alvin Bragg’s 34-count criminal indictment against Trump, which was announced on April 4, 2023.
The House Judiciary Committee also obtained a December 2022 email conversation between Biden’s DOJ hatchet man Matthew Colangelo and NY AG Letitia James’ office.
“Matthew-glad to see you are back in NYC. Sounds like you and Mr. Trump’s paths will continue to intersect,” James Sheehan wrote to Matthew Colangelo on December 7, 2022.
New document obtained by @JudiciaryGOP:
Letitia James’s office was thrilled when Matthew Colangelo was hired by Alvin Bragg.
“Matthew-glad to see you are back in NYC. Sounds like you and Mr. Trump’s paths will continue to intersect.” pic.twitter.com/fl8zWOiJ7H
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) July 9, 2024
Bragg’s top prosecutor Matthew Colangelo previously worked in the Justice Department (Biden appointee) and is a lifelong left-wing activist.
Biden sent Matthew Colangelo to New York to convict his main political opponent on non-crimes.
Why would Matthew Colangelo go from a senior position at the Justice Department to working for the Manhattan DA’s office?
It was obviously a political move to take out Biden’s main political rival Donald Trump.
In May a jury found Trump guilty on 34 felony counts after crooked judge Juan Merchan rigged the Stormy Daniels ‘hush money’ trial and allowed jurors to choose among three predicate crimes Trump committed.
We still don’t know what crimes Trump committed.
Chairman Jordan recently launched an investigation into Matthew Colangelo.
Jordan specifically called out Matthew Colangelo in his letter to US Attorney General Merrick Garland.
“The Committee on the Judiciary is conducting oversight of politically motivated prosecutions by state and local officials. Since last year, popularly elected prosecutors—who campaigned for office on the promise of prosecuting President Trump—engaged in an unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority: the indictment of a former President of the United States and current leading candidate for that office. New York County District Attorney (DANY) Alvin Bragg is engaged in one such politicized prosecution, which is being led in part by Matthew B. Colangelo, a former senior Justice Department official. Accordingly, given the perception that the Justice Department is assisting in Bragg’s politicized prosecution, we write to request information and documents related to Mr. Colangelo’s employment,” Jim Jordan wrote in a letter obtained by The Gateway Pundit.
Chairman Jordan said Colangelo’s recent employment history with the DOJ “demonstrates his obsession with investigating a person rather that prosecuting a crime.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/newly-unearthed-email-shows-letitia-james-office-corresponding/
Too dirty.
Now I have to trash the caches, wipe the screen.
Post
Conversation
Citizen Free Press
@CitizenFreePres
For anyone who missed it, this violent robbery happened 10 days ago in Denver, carried out by a gang of Venezuelans.
There were some arrests made two days later in El Paso.
We’ve heard nothing since from DHS.
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1810856458050818271
video at site
(Richard: Things like this are one of the reasons that Trump will win the election, and one of the reasons that the gun laws are going to be repealed or tossed out by the Courts.)