A few words by way of preface.
I do not endorse her specific criticisms of anyone she specifically names. Personally I have never seen Brett Weinstein’s earlier positions on Covid regs and the vaxx, so can’t personally verify her on this. As for John Campbell, I believe he has a Ph.D. in nursing, so a doctor of philosophy in the field of nursing or similar medical knowledge. He does have extensive medical knowledge and I am personally grateful to him as his change of heart on the vaxx was the only thing that stopped a close friend from actually taking these clot-shots.
Also John Campbell did in fact make a video or two of severe contrition about his former beliefs. He did appear to be suffering from the knowledge of how many people he hurt or killed by advocating these shots so forcefully. And he did indeed to that. Major shaming of anyone who spoke against them. Like Jordan Peterson for that matter. “Just take the damn vaccine!” and, “Trust the government for three months”
i may be wrong about the time frame he said, but he did instruct his followers to trust the same government that criticism of it rocketed him to major fame. The same government who passed compulsory speech laws.
I am posting this video for its more central truth. That controlled opposition is a real thing and a major part, an enormous part of information and political warfare. That she is way correct on her overall reasoning. Whether or not she is correct on specific individuals is up to us all to decide for ourselves. And probably some lawyers down the road, although truth, courts, lawyers… systemically vestigial at best.
This site has posted similar thoughts in paragraph form about a few individuals for the same reasons. But the rule from which these names were extracted is that any doctor who feverishly pushed the shots irrationally and using more rhetoric than reason, scientism instead of science, and then had an about-face once the vast majority of the public stopped taking them is not to be trusted. A married pair of women doctors in Australia far far to the left who made the most outrageous demands about people who wouldn’t take the shots and then suddenly came around after poll numbers showed no one wanted them anymore, them I would watch 24/7.
Same for a British cardiologist who suddenly came around after his father was vaxx damaged. Why did it take that? As a cardiologist did he not see a pile of bodies from clots and myocarditis? His story feels like it was written by a publicist more than a medical thing. Also he contradicted himself on Tucker Carlson within minutes, claiming that freedom of speech would have allowed people enough information to decide if they wanted the shots (true) but then said the cure for obesity was draconian restrictions and propaganda campaigns against foods he doesn’t like.
So our rule is, if they came around after people stopped taking the shots, listen as they may reveal the fabled 1000 truths to sell the one lie.
If you want to win, listen to and learn from the 1000 truths and don’t believe the lie. Once out of the matrix, you can tell the difference. The lie rests on the authority of the speaker. The truth has substance and rests on its own evidence.
An afterthought:
Polly does mention another component which is very useful. All these people who came out against the shots once it didn’t really matter anymore, don’t seem to mention the fake-covid deaths, where people who died of other things were said to have died of Covid to juice the numbers and justify state control measures. This is a fact. They did do this. I have sworn testimony from the head health guy in Rhode Island swearing to this in court. It was a CDC directive.
There were many more aspects of this set of imposed conditions during the Covid years which were ludicrous, scientisms as well that these guys don’t touch. If one wanted to be as cynical as reality often demands, one may suspect it is because they are planning to use those tactics again. So being against the vaxx itself won’t matter as it will be some other thing or things. But the masks, or 6 feet apart, or store closures except for booze and dope and a dozen other insane totalitarian things they did which the dream team don’t mention, those may be planned for future encores.
Who would be most disadvantaged if no one believed anything they heard in legacy media? If a category 5 hurricane was coming and you didn’t pay heed to the weather report you’d be in trouble, right? You would be the most disadvantaged, indeed, and not the weatherman safe in his broadcast studio. Despite this, humanity survived hurricanes in the olden days without weathermen.
What if we take another extreme but different example such as Nicolae Ceausescu’s Romania. One can only imagine the extreme level of skepticism that peaked December 25, 1989 when the people executed him. Nice Christmas present. We can imagine the thorough weariness of government lies the people there had endured until nothing eminating from official media was believed. Peak skepticism was, therefore, required to bring that pot to a boil. So in this example advantage went to the unbelievers. The freedom hurricane had arrived.
What about the Covid hurricane? What was, and is, a “trusted source” of information? Why does Jordan Peterson retain credibility when he told us to just “…get the damned vaxx!” Why have real medical experts who were the original heroes been marginalized, such as Dr. Peter McCullough? How is it that approximately 15-20% of the population that was not part of the “expert” group was ahead of the majority of the expert group by being skeptical? I will call this the autodidact group. Non-experts on alert.
From the Defense Technical Information Center year 2000:
“Abstract: Operation Desert Storm has been proclaimed as the first space war. Because the ability of the United States to operate in space was not challenged, there was no battle for space superiority. However there was a contest for information superiority. Both sides conducted surveillance and reconnaissance operations to gather and exploit information. Coalition forces gained an edge with superior intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets and effective operational security and deception activities. This superiority enabled the coalition to mask its true intentions and convince the Iraqis that an amphibious operation was forthcoming even as forces moved in place for the left hook maneuver that caught the enemy by surprise. Information warfare has been a central element of military operations for the Armed Forces since the Persian Gulf War. Defensive and offensive information operations are conducted to gain information superiority over an enemy. With the increasing importance of achieving information dominance, the role of space has become prominent. As the Secretary of Defense has reported The support provided by space forces significantly reduces the fog, friction, and uncertainty of warfare. Joint forces can rapidly see, hear, and exploit the environment when space forces are properly integrated into the joint plan. This results in improved situational awareness, reduced response time, and a considerably more transparent battlespace, which provides the joint force commander JFC dominant battlespace awareness. Given the importance of space to information operations, the next conflict may include a space war in the face of efforts to diminish U.S. advantages.”
Note the fuzziness between space as in outer space and space as in information battlespace. When read to get a definition of the term “information battlespace” it has a certain perfection to it. Space works both as a metaphor and as a literal position from which to get clarity.
We must concede the possibility that anyone who is permitted to be heard in our current information battlespace configuration is an enemy agent. Problematic, for sure, because then Vladtepesblog can be in the enemy camp. Anyone and everyone anywhere can be lying to you. Is such a perspective self-defeating, then? Certainly, to an extent. Romanians, however, can argue no, it was the only way to go. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater leaves the tyrant with nothing to work with.
Here, Amazing Polly shoots the messengers, goes deep down her rabbit hole, and emerges what, as disinformation? Maybe. But she touches a vital nerve.
In the end it is the human sovereign, the autodidact, who carries the day. “Experts” can be recruited by tyrants as trusted-source gatekeepers, and as pied pipers to replace those that legacy lost. So legacy hangs on.
In a sense we are all Romanian now. Arguing for what is truthful in an ocean of lies almost plays into the hands of those who created the battlespace. Aren’t we already in what Bezmenov termed “Normalization”? In other words it doesn’t seem to matter what grand truth emerges on any given day because nothing seems to change. The revolution marches on. After all, we know truth is a required spice to every propaganda goulash.
Just not too much, thanks.
Note the fuzziness between space as in outer space and space as in information battlespace.
What did generals and their sovereigns use before the Space Age?
– – People had few genuine information sources. Expensive propaganda deified the Ruler; the priestly caste served as intermediaries to the chain of gods. Your “experts”, Johnny, the trusted-source gatekeepers.
– – Rulers themselves tended to be genuine believers: the Oracle of Delphi was consulted for thousands of years by big shots from Persians to Greeks to Romans.
.
.
Richard Nixon knew: “The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson’s time.”
Bezmenov explained how Soviet-styled “science” systematized dezinformatsiya. The Tsars had been using it for centuries. Though It went on hiatus in Peter the Great’s Russia, it came back with a vengeance in the mid-19th century. Today’s Russians are inoculated; they’re far more skeptical than targets around the world.
.
.
Foreign "Kremlinologists” became so consumed with Russophobia they missed the last 30 years. Warmed-over “Sovietologists” left and right. Everyone from NATO’s Atlantic Council to brilliant, deranged Anne Applebaum, to lightweights like Jeffrey Nyquist.......Sun Tzu: If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.
Get off the grid. Build a bunker.
.
.
Normalization indeed:
Palestinian at Anti-Israel Rally in London: “We Must Normalize the Massacres as the Status Quo”
…[In] London, Mohammed el Kurd, a Palestinian from eastern Jerusalem, told the crowd:
“This is a moment for transformation…. This is our moment to transform the world…
“We must reject Zionism in all of our institutions because to be anti-racist is to be anti-Zionist…
“It does not contain multitudes, it does not contain double meanings, it is not romantic. Zionism is apartheid, it’s genocide, it’s murder, it’s a racist ideology rooted in settler expansion and racial domination and we must root it out of the world. We must de-Zionize because Zionism is a death cult.”
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-782166
I think Polly is rightfully saying (warning), there are and always have been, levels of trained seals. Critical thinking seems to have gone amuck. i.e. how many doctors, nurses, healthcare works still are on board with the Covid scam.
Sit back, think, don’t jump on the band wagon. Remember, “All men make mistakes and only fools repeat them”.
Funny how my misinformation that took some time researching is blocked. GRRRR When the pitch fork people rise up……
I don’t know what is going on here, but I do know that sometimes if there are a lot of numbers or symbols in a comment the firewall might mistake it for malicious code.
If you can email me your comment I can post it for you, probably. But sometimes it blocks me as well.