1. Forensic Arborist explains. let us just say, ‘anomalies’ in the recent massive fires around the Western world.
2. It isn’t that Jordan Peterson is on the wrong side. He clearly is on the right side. It is that it seems like he doesn’t actually get what is going on, despite being one of the very first voices in Canada to warn us all about Post-modernism, which is at least a parallel to the Maoist Marxism which is attacking us. Perhaps he did warn about that as well, I stopped following him when he said “just take the damn vaccine” and “suspend judgment (to he government) for six months”. But before that he did some really excellent interviews as an observer of events from at least the better side of the dialectic attacks. Still, there is value here, and for those that have a more red pilled view, meaning in this case being able in some part to see the matrix from the outside instead of just describing one side or another of a specific created conflict, there is content.
Below is a more obvious example of exactly what I mean. Here is someone who is capable of well observing one dialectic attack on Western thought, and describing it. But not having the Z axis view needed to understand what it is. But a very good X and Y axis view. Her use of the descriptor, “Ironically” is the proof that she is describing the issue in terms of a Western thought system, and thereby contributing to its destruction. Crudely put, its like describing a bomb landing in your area where half the people think its a Christmas Tree and half of them think its some sort of device to create the whole in the ground where it landed, but no one actually gets that it’s a bomb. If I can think of a better analogy, I’ll replace that one. Hopefully people can understand what is meant.
@thespectatormagazine Author Lionel Shriver on identity politics ? Watch the full discussion on our YouTube! #lionelshriver #douglasmurray #identitypolitics #politics #culture #philosophy #culturewars #politicstiktok #thought #thespectator ? original sound – The Spectator
3. US supporting Al-Qaeda and ISIS to target mutual enemies. Probably us.
Here is a fascinating Bulgarian documentary made during the Obama years, showing how his admin was in fact supporting the Islamic State. When we first subtitled this Bulgarian news video, it was banned off of EVERY platform, inlcuding free speech ones, within minutes to hours. It was down off of YouTube in seconds and took a few hours to remove from Bitchute. Once Trump got in, it was suddenly allowed again. Even Minds.com had to take it down at the time. Keep that in mind as you watch it.
Stephen Coughlin wrote an astonishing article about a 2015 propaganda piece in The Atlantic, exposing the publication as a vector of leftist narrative attacks. In this article, the Atlantic softens the ground to get people comfortable with the idea that Al Qaeda, who attacked the WTC in 2001, and frankly, a ton of other targets already forgotten, are somehow the good guys and worthy of US support. Please take a read. It goes beyond just that one article. It allows one to see enemy propaganda from all sides more clearly.
Yes all three items in #3 are related. If nothing else, it suggests that Obama is actually the president, continuing his intention to “fundamentally change America”.
4. Science And The Rise Of Totalitarianism
This article makes valuable comparisons between current post-revolutionary censorship mechanisms, and previous left-wing totalitarian efforts such as the Nazis and Soviets to censor science and knowledge to conform to government narratives.
The cancellation of Professor Norman Fenton’s presentation at the UK’s NHS Health and Care Analytics Conference indicates a deeply disturbing increased level in the censorship of science.
The gravity of current developments is onerous. It is important to recognize parallels from the past and understand the initiating factors — including intolerance of ideas threatening state-approved ideology — that eventually allowed the rise of totalitarianism.
The National Health Service’s correspondence with Professor Fenton reveals this degradation. His scheduled presentation had nothing to do with the recent pandemic; the grounds for his dismissal claimed his views on vaccines may be distracting.
…the conference organising committee has just been alerted to the controversy around vaccinations on your Twitter account and fear that this may distract from the conference. They have asked that we not proceed with the planned session on Bayesian networks.
After receiving this notice, Professor Fenton wrote;
I was canceled not for the content of my talk but because I had done other work raising concerns about covid vaccine safety.
The NHS organizers openly admitted that an unacceptable perspective on a scientific topic — designated incontestable byauthorities — is grounds for ex-communication.
This denial of participation is solely because of Professor Fenton’s willingness to appraise and discuss subject matter deemed controversial. However, no one who has examined his cautious analysis of data during the pandemic has presented evidence disputing any of his findings. Scientific integrity doesn’t matter to conference organizers — in the same way, truth didn’t matter to censors in the past. […] A repressive act against an accomplished scientist is analogous to the Nazi party’s initial marginalization of researchers and academics who interfered with their quest for absolute authority.
5. Excellent expose of the American Library Association President using libraries as vectors of attack against Western civilization and all its values. This is really important stuff and shows the state of the revolution at the dullest places in our society. Click through to read. The video below is from this site.
Thank you for checking out this site and its perspectives.
As this event was in Texas, something approximating Justice might apply. But where the revolution has really taken hold, I think we all know what would happen to the potential burglary and murder victims inside the apartment
I would say that all information we get from official sources is a lie these days or in aid of a lie, and a goodly proportion of the material that pretends to be on side with reality as well. But bits of reality still seep out. They are just never allowed to have any influence.
It strikes me Jordan Peterson is a narcissistic type, he likes to be the centre of attention so he wants that attention both ways, for and against. He cannot be trusted imo.