The other day we posted a video about Margaret Sanger, the woman who created Planned Parenthood which made her out to be a KKK-Nazi eugenicist. The video made a lot of important claims if true, and we asked people who read this site if they had any substantiating or exculpatory evidence on this woman and her actions and views. The comments came in and are quite amazing. Please do take a moment and read through them.
In one of the think-tanks I sit in from time to time, a retired doctor from a far part of the Anglosphere quietly hints that what we are fighting today are the same people we fought in WW2. Ok perhaps not the exact people, but their ideological and genetic descendants. As time goes by, it becomes easier to accept that this is the case. Especially if you watch the videos by TIKhistory that we post here from time to time. He does the deep dive on what and who the Nazis were, and what they actually believed and tried to do.We have ordered a couple of the source texts he uses to check them out.
1. CBC tries to explain that higher interest rates despite inherent contradictions in government narratives about the state of the economy, is not from any policies in the past 15 years like QE or a result of artificially low interest rates or any of a number of clear reasons, but from global warming. To be clear, Global Warming is not happening. For a video on some of the science of it click here and here although this site has an entire page dedicated to the actual climate science which is likely to be made illegal officially soon, instead of a violation of consensus and subsequent aufhaben which it is now.
As we’ve seen in the recent surge in climate disasters, the effect of a gradual increase in temperatures does not necessarily result in a gradual impact on people’s daily lives. Nor does it affect people equally.
Wednesday’s Monetary Policy Report from the Bank of Canada offered a similar lesson, as the central bank once again warned that the poor and over-borrowed were likely to suffer more from both high inflation and the high borrowing rates needed to bring down stubborn inflation.
[…]
But of course there are many examples of what we might call the last straw effect, when a final increase in rates or the final rise in global temperatures can lead to a cascade of consequences. The impossible thing to know in advance is when the moment is reached. Certainly both the Bank of Canada and the U.S. Federal Reserve have gotten sudden changes wrong in the past.
Many economists have suggested that central banks around the world have gone too far, too fast in hiking rates and that the well-known lagging effect of previous sharp rate hikes could come all at once.
[…]
But the other thing that may be “buffering” the effects of higher rates are forces similar to the K-shaped recovery that we saw after the COVID-19 pandemic meltdown. Just as we’ve seen in recent climate disasters, not everyone is affected the same.
The article does list some rational factors. But a couple of times in that familiar, Michael Moore type way, the article tries to create the impression that somehow interest rates are a consequence of ‘Global Warming’. (these select bits may or may not be out of order. best to check the CBC propaganda yourself for full context)
2. Let’s just call these, advertisements for Homeschooling
3. Russia appears to have launched a CBDC. This article details it as well as some propaganda around it making it appear benign. But it does appear to be like every other CBDC, the ultimate control of the individual by the government. A 15 minute city doesn’t need walls to keep you in. It just has to make sure your money is no good past a certain distance from home. And yes, CBDCs can be programmed that way.
[…] Guys, this was huge big news—the digital ruble is now official. It now has a formal legal status. It’s happened. It’s here and it’s probably not going away. For better or worse (probably for worse, but you never know!), the ratification of this law was a historic event.
I checked RT.com, the #1 source for Russia News. Nothing. (Or maybe I just didn’t see it? Or maybe they are seconds away from filing a report about this momentous event, which occurred almost 24 hours ago?)
Come on, now. Is Edward Slavsquat really the only English-language internet destination that thinks Russia’s adoption of a Central Bank Digital Currency is newsworthy? People seem to be interested in Russia. There is also much interest in CBDCs. But for some reason, when you put these two things together—crickets.
4. Although the word, “Dialectics” is not used in this video, it is an excellent explanation for what it is, and how it was used to attack Humanity overall using the Transsexual vector of attack.
5. Trudeau uses mostly a form of initiate language that once you have the rosetta stone, it’s actually pretty clear. For instance when he says “White supremacist” or many of the usual pejoratives he uses, when you realize he really means either counter-revolutionary’, meaning anyone opposed to the now-obvious communist revolution that has taken place across much of the West and certainly in North America, or he could mean, middle class. Which from a Marxist perspective is the same thing. This lie though is a little different. When he says make borders around the world matter, he of course doesn’t mean it the way we understand it. After all, he was all for the UN Migration Compact and is, through the Century Initiative, trying to triple Canada’s population by immigration in short order. Which means nothing less than the total and utter dialectic, Aufhaben der Kultur/der Volks. In this case by “borders matter” he could telling a run of the mill lie. If it is, he has bigger stones than most of us thought he had since it’s such a whopper. It is as likely though that it’s initiate language for what he envisions for borders of the future. A way to keep the middle class out and force all within a certain area to conform to the Neo-Maoist culture being imposed on all of us. After all, even in 1984, they had districts even at war with one another. England was Airstrip One. I wonder what Canada will be named. Trudopia perhaps.
Thank you all for checking out this site.
One last item:
Communism is so anti-Christian that in a way it kind of is Christian. Only in the sense that if you are not a believer in God or Satan than you likely have no interest in them or their followers, other than what those followers may do in their name. Critics of Islam are great examples of that. We do not believe in Allah or Mohammad’s unspoken divinity etc. but we know what rabid obeyers of Koran does in their name. But Marxists are hellbent on destroying Christianity. From Trudeau’s refusing to hire any summer students who didn’t embrace abortion as a sacrament (which it is for the Marxists and is a clear counter-thesis to the Christian belief of the sanctity of life) to a British policeman arresting a woman just standing near an abortion clinic and had the temerity to ask her “what are you (silently) praying about?” In the Soviet Union they would hold plays on the street mocking Christian rituals and icons and in the USA today, the most sexually deviant men they can find will dress up as nuns and mock the crucifixion at baseball games. So yeah, Marxism is in its essence a counter-thesis to Christianity in particular. So this story probably should be seen in that light.
A Christian social worker in the U.K. is taking legal action after his job offer was rescinded for his Christian views of sexuality and marriage.
Felix Ngole was offered his “dream job” as a mental health support worker at Touchstone Support Leeds, a charity partnered with the U.K.’s National Health Service (NHS), but weeks later, the company rescinded the offer when it found out about his Christian beliefs and past victory in a religious liberty case. Several weeks after receiving his acceptance letter, he received an email from Touchstone Deputy CEO Kathryn Hart, saying he was not fit for the position because the company had “identified some significant areas and concerns” that did not “align with Touchstone Leeds’ ethos and values.”
So we see in the UK you can be arrested for literal thought-crimes. The woman was just standing there but was arrested for what she was thinking. Similar things are common in the UK but you have to express them usually.
“One last item:……..”
Well said Vlad.
Christianity-Thesis, Communism + isms- Antithesis.
I assume later, Freedom of Christianity they will claim led to Communism and immortality. People will demand the state enforce Christian laws (so they claim) so this is corrected and doesn’t happen again. Church+State-Synthesis. Fascism with the church as its moral compass. This is a replica of the 1260 years that ended in 1798.
Problem is, it is not Christian whatsoever to force religious rules on people. God is about freedom of religion, freedom of choice. Thats how we will know God is not behind laws like that.
Franco’s Spain.
Opus Dei + the Falange.
Jikkyleaks posted an article that explains how the German health care system morphed into the NAZI system. It started off as a systematic way to improve health care, but by changing the principles from an individual-based philosophy to a public healthcare-based philosophy, they granted more power to the state. One thing led to another. Economic shortfalls led to “efficiencies” and that snowballed into population control.
https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1679810616360603648
Know your history.
Every Western state is rapidly devolving into the Nazi model of “free” healthcare.
Nothing is free.
“Nazi medicine was implemented by a political-medical complex, a scientific and social philosophy imposed by a totalitarian regime”
https://fee.org/articles/national-health-care-medicine-in-germany-1918-1945/
“National Health Care: Medicine in Germany, 1918-1945
Does the modern bureaucratization of medicine risk a return to the horrors of national socialist medicine?”
Chris Rufo’s video is informative but his short history of the trans movement doesn’t go back far enough.
Source: Britannica
Magnus Hirschfeld:
In 1919 Hirschfeld opened the first sexology institute in the world, the Institute for Sexual Science, in Berlin; the institute and the considerable holdings of its library and archives were destroyed by Nazi demonstrators in 1933.
Magnus Hirschfeld, (born May 14, 1868, Kolberg, Prussia [now Ko?obrzeg, Poland]—died May 14, 1935, Nice, France), German physician who was an important theorist of sexuality and a prominent advocate of gay rights in the early 20th century.
Hirschfeld was born to Jewish parents in a Prussian town on the Baltic coast. He first studied modern languages and then medicine, obtaining a doctoral degree in 1892. After a period of travel, he returned to Germany and established a medical practice in Magdeburg in 1894. Two years later he moved to Berlin, where he would become actively involved in the scientific study of sexuality—in particular, homosexuality—and advocacy efforts on behalf of sexual minorities.
Hirschfeld maintained that sexual orientation was innate and not a deliberate choice, and he believed that scientific understanding of sexuality would promote tolerance of sexual minorities. His sexology research was guided by empiricism and activism, driven by the belief that the sexual ideology of Judeo-Christian civilization was a serious obstacle to the understanding of sexuality and to the reform of laws and practices that regulated it.
Initially Hirschfeld supported the concept that homosexuals constituted the “third sex,” although he soon moved on from that. He is best known for his subsequent theory of sexual intermediaries, which held that there were many types of naturally occurring sexual variations found across the human population, such as hermaphroditism, homosexuality, and transvestism. He is also credited with coining the term transvestite.
Hirschfeld accomplished an enormous amount of work during his lifetime with regards to his research, writing, and advocacy efforts. In 1897 Hirschfeld established the Scientific-Humanitarian Committee with Max Spohr, Franz Josef von Bülow, and Eduard Oberg; it was the world’s first gay rights organization. Its main goal was to fight for the abolishment of Paragraph 175 of the German Imperial Penal Code, which punished sexual contact between men. In 1899 he started the Yearbook of Intermediate Sexual Types, the first journal in the world to deal with sexual variants; it was regularly published until 1923. He also published an important study on cross-dressing, The Transvestites (1910). Hirschfeld was one of the founders of the Medical Society for Sexual Science and Eugenics, established in 1913. The next year he published his study Homosexuality in Men and Women, which was based on the expansive statistical surveys on homosexuality that he had conducted. In addition to publishing works on sexology and sexual reforms, Hirschfeld also wrote about racism, politics, and the history of morals.
In 1919 Hirschfeld opened the first sexology institute in the world, the Institute for Sexual Science, in Berlin; the institute and the considerable holdings of its library and archives were destroyed by Nazi demonstrators in 1933. Hirschfeld also participated in the production of the first film to call for the decriminalization and acceptance of homosexuality, Different from the Others (1919). The controversial film ignited much debate and was banned by German officials within a year. In 1928 Hirschfeld founded the World League for Sexual Reform (WLSR), which had its roots in an early conference that he had organized in 1921, the First International Conference for Sexual Reform on a Scientific Basis. The WSLR called for reform of sex legislations, the right to contraception and sex education, and legal and social equality of the sexes.
Being a Jew, a gay man, and a sexual liberation activist made Hirschfeld the target of right-wing supporters, and he suffered serious injuries from an attack in 1920. Later, with the Nazis’ growing power, he was regularly assaulted, his lectures were disrupted, and, upon completion of his international speaking tour in 1932, he was unable to return to Germany. He instead went to Switzerland and then in 1934 to France, where he died the next year.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Magnus-Hirschfeld
“[I]t is not Christian whatsoever to force religious rules on people.”
Do you believe this because you hold that so-called “religious rules” are not actually based on the truth?
Say that to the Conquistadors as they witnessed the sacrifice of humans by the Aztecs.
Say that to Elijah as he confronted the priests of Baal.
Say that to Moses as he watched Pharaoh’s army drown.
“God is about freedom of religion, freedom of choice.”
No.
He’s about His freedom – the freedom to evangelize and baptize and lead people to His Truth.
(“[I]t is not Christian whatsoever to force religious rules on people.”
Do you believe this because you hold that so-called “religious rules” are not actually based on the truth?)
I believe this because of Gods actions with the one who rebelled against His government. God allowed Satan to choose to follow Gods law or not. Also, God extended that to all the angels that agreed with and chose Satan’s side. God did NOT destroy Satan for disobedience, but rather allow him to live here on earth, and by doing so, allows all the heavenly beings and us see the difference between Gods laws being played out versus Satan’s laws.
(Say that to the Conquistadors as they witnessed the sacrifice of humans by the Aztecs.)
I would say that to them.
(Say that to Elijah as he confronted the priests of Baal.)
There is no need to say that to Elijah. He was a man of God. By his very words backs up my claim.
“And Elijah came unto all the people, and said,How long halt ye between two opinions? If the Lord be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word” 1 Kings 18:21
(Say that to Moses as he watched Pharaoh’s army drown.)
Again, no need to. Another man of God. This example is God freeing a people out of slavery, freeing them from a place that does not have freedom of religion or freedom of conscience. Pharoah would not allow Gods people to worship God by how their conscience dictates. Pharoahs army drowned trying to keep his slaves.
(“God is about freedom of religion, freedom of choice.”
No.
He’s about His freedom – the freedom to evangelize and baptize and lead people to His Truth.)
His laws are about freedom of religion and freedom of choice. As we can see with His dealing with Satan and Satan’s angels, also with Adam and Eve. We can see what success the country has when they follow Gods principles of freedom of religion and freedom of conscience by all the protestant countries. The 1 in perticular that actually was founded on it was USA, and wow did it flourish. These countries today don’t have these traits anymore.
As 1John 4:8 says “for God is love”. You can’t force someone to love you, that would not be love. God can tell who loves Him by if they want to follow Gods governments rules, His commandments. His commandments are His character. How he wants us to treat each other is through the 2nd tablet of commandments (#5 through 10). And how we show love towards Him, #1 through 4 of the commandments.
John 3:16 ” for God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life”
Jesus, who is God, paid the wages of sin with his death. My God died for me. What an amazing God, what amazing Love.