A fascinating moment of 1980s TV

2 Replies to “A fascinating moment of 1980s TV”

1. Trying to make sense of this TV show.

   I heard this same conversation take place many times in real life, over the decades — with the same result, i.e. the “conspiracy theorist” that has accused the usual suspects, like the Roo.ck.ef.ell.e.r.s, gets branded as a nutcase and the discussion is over during the cofee break.

   To me it means that that was the goal of this TV show and that’s a ps_yop planted in this 1990 show (and many others, probably). Notice that the “the.orist” gets laughed at.

   Reminds me of the recent “chip in the va_x” ps_yop. That has worked as well: when I tried to warn people around me back in 2021 of the dangers of the po_ison p.oke, they looked down on me with a condescending half smile and said: “and there’s a c.hip in it, right?”. … And then they went and took that goo, unfortunately. Notice that the va.x “the.orist” was laughed at in the last three years — just as in the 1990 Tv show in question …. looks like there is some connection there…

   So this sort of operation seems to be about discrediting the truth-seekers that could thwart central agendas.

   (But I guess the content of these info operations does not necessarily correspond directly with the truth or the opposite of the truth. Meaning that it does not mean that there isn’t (or won’t be) a plan to put a sorta “c.hip” in med products. And it does not mean either that it is the R.o.ck.e.f.ell.e.rs. that sit on the top of the world. Maybe they’re just another front org, like the S.o.ros inc…. At least if I was an ag_ent of a think tank responsible for planting such ps_yops I would build another twist in them, so that even the opposite of the story is not entirely true, in order to mislead the enemy. But probably the bottom line is that the reality must be somewhere AROUND the target or its opposite. For example the CEO of Ba_yer [if I remember well] has publicly talked about a pill that you swallow and it would send a signal that it is already in your belly or something. So the question is who is controlling the world then, if not the Rockies…)

2. Adam Smith’s 1776 book “Wealth of Nations” describes and promotes the concept and truth of the ‘Invisible Hand’ whereby societies find maximum economic benefit for all when people (within the bounds of existing law) buy and sell, whether goods or services, to achieve for themselves and their families what is needed to feed, house, and clothes themselves. Each will look to their own best interests — without dictates from “above.”

   The planned, top-down, model of economic activity leaves some people at the bottom wrung of poverty and guarantees massive riches for those at the top who have the power to make policies benefitting themselves at the expense of their “inferiors.”

   Let’s make Adam Smith once again a man whose wisdom is much sought after.