“In summary, we have highlighted the pitfalls of having considered until now COVID-19 mRNA vaccines as just conventional vaccines, and we have indicated the preclinical, clinical and post-marketing safety assessments that are most urgently needed. COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are actually pharmaceutical drugs, and consequently their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and possibly also their pharmacogenetics, must be properly characterized to provide a solid background of knowledge for their rational and targeted use, thus stopping ‘playing dice’ with these products due to the misbelief that the same vaccine at the same dose is good for everyone, and that adverse effects occur just by chance.”
Those were the words of Italian researchers in a recent pharmacological analysis of the COVID shots published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences nearly two years after these products were foisted upon 5.35 billion human beings – often multiple times – under the false pretense of the jabs acting like vaccines. Who will be held accountable?
Every day, news pours out about the lack of safety and ineffectiveness of the shots, but they fail to move the needle on policy. It is unclear what it will take to get these biological agents pulled from the market, but here are some of the most recent bombshells proving the shots are extremely unsafe and ineffective:
(Time to be extra careful on vaxx info. The changing narratives on it may not mean that transparency or accountability is being restored to the world. It may mean that now that no one is taking the shots anymore, they are reestablishing trust in order to apply the same authoritarianism to the next issues. Climate, war or something else we don’t know about yet.)
(It is clear to all at this point that the vaccines do not work. Even to the die-hard advocates of it, they are not taking the 4th or 5th shots overall. It is also clear that Covid or whatever it is, is not very serious if you have not been vaxxed. So why is the Trudeau government still doing this? If anyone is aware that is has been cancelled, please leave a comment. Thank you.)
The Government of Canada continues to work with partners across the country to protect the health and safety of Canadians by reducing the spread of COVID-19. Isolation remains one of the most effective ways to reduce the risk of spreading COVID-19. However, for some people in Canada, crowded housing conditions and costs can make it unsafe or impossible to isolate, putting themselves, their families, and communities at risk.
Today, Irek Kusmierczyk, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion, on behalf of the Honourable Jean-Yves Duclos, Minister of Health, announced $4.2 million for the Corporation of the County of Essex to continue to administer a safe voluntary isolation site for temporary foreign agri-workers in the Windsor-Essex region. These workers tend to live in close accommodations and work in congregate settings, which makes it difficult to isolate, if required. The site was previously operated by the City of Windsor and is now being administered and operated by the County of Essex.
The Safe Voluntary Isolation Sites Program (SVISP) directly supports cities, municipalities, and health regions across Canada that are at-risk of COVID-19 community transmission. The sites funded through the SVISP provide an accessible location where people can safely isolate for the required period. Access to these sites is completely voluntary and local public health officials determine eligibility and manage all aspects of the sites.
(IT would also be good to know if CBC, Global or CTV ever addressed this issue at all, or demanded to know why it was being done. Of course none of the people there want to end up in one, so probably not)
The New York Times initially framed a story on an election software company’s connection to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as a “right-wing conspiracy theory,” but within 24 hours the story turned out to be true.
A Times article published Tuesday reported that “right-wing” election deniers in Arizona had crafted a conspiracy theory that election software company Konnech had secret ties to the CCP and gave the party access to personal information about two million U.S. poll workers.
The following morning, the company’s top executive, Eugene Yu, was arrested for the alleged theft of poll workers’ personal information.
“At an invitation-only conference in August at a secret location southeast of Phoenix, a group of election deniers unspooled a new conspiracy theory about the 2020 presidential outcome,” the Times’ original lede read.
(The good news is, the Flu shot does less than nothing from what all studies say recently. So no loss if people decide not to take it to be sure. The public needs tests at this point to tell if anything we get is whatever it is supposed to be. If someone wants to get really, really rich, develop that test. Maybe start with a hand held spectroscope.)
The National Guard administered the COVID-19 vaccine to multiple service members who were lined up for the influenza vaccine, including a member who objected to the COVID-19 vaccine on religious grounds, according to officials and one of the members.
The incident took place in late 2021.
During a vaccination clinic where both flu and COVID-19 vaccines were being administered, “three service members were accidently given a COVID vaccine,” Maj. Carl Lamb, a spokesman for the Maine National Guard, told The Epoch Times in an email.
Mathew Bouchard, who is no longer with the Guard, has identified himself as one of the members.
Bouchard said he was ordered to receive an annual flu vaccine and went to the clinic to get that vaccine. He verified his name, date of birth, and part of his social security number, and told officials at the clinic he was there for the flu vaccine. But he was injected with a dose of a messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine, officials told him.
(For the “How communist are we now” files)
Ontario Superior Court orders mother not to share COVID anti-vaxx info with 14-year-old son, grants father sole decision-making for vaccination
On October 18, 2021, Justice Mackinnon of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sitting in Ottawa released an important judgment in Saint-Phard v. Saint-Phard, 2021 ONSC 6910, concerning decision-making and information sharing around COVID-19 vaccinations with the parents’ 14-year-old son. The boy’s father was in favour of him receiving the vaccine, while the mother was adamantly opposed.Ultimately, the Court in this case finds that it is in the 14-year-old’s best interests to be vaccinated (which is the relevant test per A.C. v. L.L., 2021 ONSC 6530 as Her Honour points out). However the Court is also alive to the issue of consent, and opts to order that the father (who is pro-vaccination) should have sole parental decision-making responsibility, and prohibits the mother from sharing he anti-vaxx views with her son, or taking him to anti-vaxx doctors.Justice Mackinnon took judicial notice of the facts that the COVID-19 vaccination had been approved for 12-17 year-olds, that all levels of government in this jurisdiction have been actively promoting COVID-19 vaccinations, that the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine has been endorsement by government and public health agencies, and that that the Ontario Ministry of Health website confirms that the Pfizer COVID vaccine is approved for the relevant age group, has been proven safe through clinical trials, provides excellent efficacy in adolescents, and that a full course is strongly recommended by NACI (the National Advisory Committee on Immunization).