The United People of Canada and St. Andrew’s Church building in Ottawa

Dialectically weaponized and government funded media in Canada, such as Global, CTV, and CBC, have been doing what they do to assist the powers that be to destroy a noble project.

The people who are attempting to buy St. Andrew’s church and make it into a community centre which will allow all points of view, and various groups to hold events and meetings, are being attacked at every possible level. The reason is easy to see although its never stated. They, The United People of Canada, are a counter-revolutionary force. Or if not counter-revolutionary, are not active participants in the communist revolution rapidly redefining Canada.

To be clear, there is only one metric at play in the Western World at this time. Revolutionary, meaning the push against every single aspect of our culture, history, people, taboos, beliefs and anything we can use to define ourselves as a free people with a noble history, and counter-revolutionary, meaning anything causing resistance to the revolution.

The people at TUPOC are willing to hold discussions on ideas which defined Canada up until a few years ago. And that will not be tolerated in Trudeau’s Canada. Need we remind you what he said not too long ago on French TV about anyone resisting the ultimate demand for the abandonment of the self for the collective:

Trudeau has now paid off most of the media in Canada to be his enforcers in the information-war he has waged against the people of Canada. It was interesting to watch big-media interview people at TUPOC, if you can call screaming questions at the spokespeople in a manner that had it been a court of law, their lawyer would have objected and the judge would have sustained it. And then asking softball questions to the one or two protestors in front of the Church allowing them to state their full position without interruption and sympathetically.

It seems that media was deploying first and foremost, a “guilty by association” attack. Questioning William and others as to why they did not show more sympathy to people in the neighbourhood who might have been traumatized by the Freedom Convoy last January. None of them bothered to mention that none of the people who are at the Church have broken any rules, created any noise, made any mess. In fact, they have cleaned the area, provided security for the residents nearby, renovated and restored the Church to usability and more.

RAIR Foundation has several interviews with principles of this organization and did some original research that may help to explain why there is so much pressure on them to fold up their efforts and abandon the project. Please click through and have a look. It is well worth the trip.

First and foremost, we believe this is because it is a counter-revolutionary effort which has the appearance of being connected to the Freedom Convoy. This is a problem because the Freedom Convoy was the most effective grass roots effort to restore our Constitutional rights as Canadians. And they, the Trudeau government and his various Bolshevik thugs, cannot have that. The Freedom Convoy, like the protests of January 6th, must be dialectically reframed as major crimes to make any support of them a guilty-by-association offence. And we can see how it is being used exactly like that against the United People of Canada.

RAIR has additional information that also may explain why the pressure on them is way beyond the rational for a community centre. It includes interviews that go back a couple of weeks. The most recent one is below. It was taken with one of the principle spokesmen of TUPOC on Sunday, August 23, 2022.

One other point. Much of the media criticized the people who speak to them from TUPOC as using a kind of weird “legalese”. The fact is, when under a total and constant dialectic attack where the media and government invents the meaning for you in everything you say, one must, if you have even a prayer of surviving, and as it is in any communist country, imperitive that you speak as carefully as humanly possible.

Not the protestors though. They can be as rude and intolerant, as deceptive and insulting as they want with no consequences. For example:

Below she calls them “terrorists”

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

Comments are closed.