On Monday The Gateway Pundit released an explosive report by Cara Castronuova on an FBI confidential source who infiltrated the Proud Boys before the Jan. 6 protests in Washington DC.
The confidential human source James Ehren Knowles then reported to the FBI that the Proud Boys did nothing wrong. Stewart Rhodes has agreed to waive his Fifth Amendment rights and testify before Liz Cheney and the January 6 Committee BUT ONLY if they will allow him to testify live.
Stewart wants to confront the committee LIVE and IN PERSON.
We asked Stewart on Monday about his reaction to this new explosive report. Stewart says the government has hours and hours of interviews like what The Gateway Pundit exposed on Monday
Stewart Rhodes: “The problem is, that the DOJ doesn’t care. They already know the truth. The same goes for the so-called Select Committee. They know the truth too. They just indicted Michael Greene another innocent man… The problem is the DC government does not care.”
(Please also see yesterday’s post on the Proud Boys)
2. “Scientists have given science a bad name”.
(The following article reminds me of something that happened to me maybe 15 years ago or more. Once, a Jewish woman overheard me talking to a friend in a pub. I know she overheard me because she laughed out loud when I said to my friend, ‘It really is important now that parents do not send their children to university if they want them to get an education, since all they get in all fields now is leftist indoctrination’. A few months later, she approached me on the street and said that while she had laughed at me when she heard me say it, she had recently attended a Jewish event at a prestigious Synagogue in Toronto where the Rabbi said exactly the same thing as I had and she no longer found it funny.)
A caller to my radio show yesterday, a physician, took strong issue with me regarding COVID-19 therapeutics. He accused me of not believing in science. His last words before we had to go to a commercial break were, “I’m a scientist.”
Given that I am not a scientist, he assumed that comment would persuade me — or at least persuade many listeners — that I was not qualified to disagree with him.
If that was his assumption, he was wrong.
“I don’t care,” I responded. “It’s irrelevant. Scientists have given science a bad name.”
I would not have said that as recently as three years ago.
But in recent years, and especially in the past two years, some basic suppositions of mine have changed.
I no longer assume when I read a statement by a scientist that the statement is based on science. In fact, I believe I am more committed to scientific truth than are many scientists.
The American Medical Association advocates the removal of sex designation from birth certificates. If many doctors or other scientists have issued a dissent, I am not aware of it.
On that same theme, here is an American Thinker article on how actual scientists are denouncing the pseudo-reality of climate science.
Also here, in a similar article.
3. Sri Lanka’s “Ruinous Green agenda” has caused the riots in that county. Policies that Trudeau may have planned for Canada.
“I tried to push through a number of stories that were censored and cancelled. We were no longer committed to truth and honesty,” Klowak told Wood.
Klowak described how she wanted to show both sides of the vaccine debate and let viewers decide for themselves. Moreover, at the time, she was finding concerning data coming out of Israel — a country where vaccines were available months before most others like Canada — and thought it was newsworthy. CBC disagreed.
“This was at the time when Israel was reporting links between the Pfizer vaccine and heart inflammation,” Klowak continued. “And, we were talking about this in the newsroom, about this link, and what could it mean… and how the trials were on for this vaccine until 2023, and I called a meeting with the managing editor and the exec, and I said we have to be really careful on this bandwagon we’re getting on promoting this vaccine because we don’t know what the outcome is going to be in a few years down the road.”
“What if this becomes another Thalidomide?” she asked, referencing the 1950’s drug that was given to pregnant women for nausea before being recalled after birth defects were discovered to be a prevalent side effect.
But her concerns fell on deaf ears.
The interview can be heard here.
5. An old AIDS drug with serious side effects in PAXLOVID (which costs heaps) is being pushed on us to treat COVID-19 in the latest fear porn campaign.
PAXLOVID acts as a protease inhibitor – see the simple 22 minute video below by Dr. Campbell.
But recent research has also found that ivermectin is a better protease inhibitor PLUS ivermectin prevents the virus from binding to and infecting cells of your body (blocks ACE2 receptors). By employing at least 2 known effective mechanisms of action means ivermectin is ideal to treat COVID-19.
The problem is that ivermectin is off-patent and therefore cheap.
Our government and so-called medical “experts” are not serious about treating COVID-19.
PDF on Paxlovid Vs Ivermectin can be downloaded here.
Thank you all who grace these pages. Perhaps in time we’ll all be sages.
