Reader’s Links for February 26, 2022

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

20 Replies to “Reader’s Links for February 26, 2022”

  1. DEUTSCHE PRAVDA – How right-wing extremists use social media to lure followers

    Today’s right wing extremists are experts on how to present themselves on social media.

    By posting pretty looking content, they draw young people deeper and deeper into the scene.

  2. A #metoo-case in dutch politics: woman of turkish extraction thrown out of Soros-funded pro-EU party VOLT for “pawing” (groping), unwelcome sexual advances, harassment etc.

    Volt expels MP Gündo?an after 13 harassment accusations
    Volt has expelled MP Nilüfer Gündo?an from the parliamentary group, the party reported in a statement. According to Volt, a total of 13 reports have been made to a research agency that is investigating Gündo?an.

    The reports “range from pawing and unwelcome sexual advances to harassment and abuse of position,” Volt said. There was “one last conversation” with Gündo?an, after which her position, according to the party, proved insupportable.

    Gündo?an declined to give her side of the story during the investigation, according to the party. “We are shocked by these reports and the fact that Nilüfer has indicated that she does not want to cooperate,” Volt said in a statement.

    Volt suspended Gündo?an in mid-February over multiple reports of transgressive behavior and hired an external agency to investigate the reports. Gündo?an claimed she had no idea what the complaints were about and said she would not resign from her seat in parliament even if the investigation commissioned by Volt turned out negatively for her.

    “I will keep my seat regardless of what happens,” she wrote. “Preferably within my own faction because I am still convinced of Volt’s program.”

    The MP also apologized if “people have felt unsafe because of the style of my work.” Gündo?an, 44, was a member of Volt’s parliamentary faction since March 31, 2021. Volt said in the statement that it would take measures to prevent similar situations in the future, such as critically reviewing its candidate screening and complaint filing processes.

    Also see:

  3. I have some basic electrical knowledge, and I think this guy is making a lot of sense. He shows how electrical theory as we are taught must be wrong. This is a short video. I hope someone here has an electrical background and can comment on this.

    The Big Misconception About Electricity

    And it came from this site –

  4. We have seen his videos on here. He says now he is being targeted by canadian gov as a terrorist. He is a veteran.

    The description – “Submit now, before it’s too late. If our demands are not met, we will install a bouncy castle in a new Canadian city every day until you surrender”


  5. RT – Why does this influential, unelected globalist entity really exist?

    Much more light must be shed on the World Economic Forum’s agenda and its string-pullers

    Rachel Marsden is a columnist, political strategist and host of an independently produced French-language program that airs on Sputnik France.

    When Canadian parliamentarian, Colin Carrie, of the Conservative Party, asked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government this week how many Canadian ministers were actually “on board with the World Economic Forum agenda” — before his connection “broke up” in the videoconference — he and the Canadians he represents deserved an honest response rather than accusations of spreading “disinformation”, as left-leaning New Democratic Party MP Charlie Angus did.

    The World Economic Forum (WEF), colloquially known as “Davos”, for those familiar with the annual pilgrimage by the international elite to the eponymous town in Switzerland, has been on the tips of many tongues over the past two years — notably within the context of the Covid-19 crisis. Just before the Covid pandemic, on October 15, 2019, the organization announced that it was holding a “live simulation exercise to prepare public and private leaders for pandemic response.” If that sounds oddly coincidental, buckle up, because it only gets weirder.

    Speaking at a United Nations videoconference in the fall of 2020, Justin Trudeau raised eyebrows, with a hint of a potential link between the global pandemic and the Forum. “This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset,” Trudeau said. “This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts, to re-imagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and climate change,” he added, evoking a “reset” concept much promoted by the WEF from the onset of the pandemic, that frames the crisis as an opportunity to fundamentally change the way that developed societies function.

    Then in August 2021, Dutch MP Gideon van Meijeren asked Prime Minister Mark Rutte about a letter he wrote to WEF Founder Klaus Schwab in which he said that Schwab’s book, “Covid-19: The Great Reset,” published on July 9, 2020, within the first few months of the pandemic, “inspired him to build back better.” The phrase also happens to be the name of US President Joe Biden’s legislative agenda, which includes increased wealth transfer into the murky black hole of climate change and “social spending.”

    It would be easy to chalk it all up to creepy rhetorical coincidence if there wasn’t an actual link between Schwab, Davos, and elected officials like Rutte and Trudeau. It’s a link about which even Schwab himself has bragged. In 2017, he told an audience at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government: “What we are very proud of is the young generation, like Prime Minister Trudeau… We penetrate the cabinets.”

    He’s not kidding. Current Canadian finance minister and deputy prime minister, Chrystia Freeland, is on the WEF’s board of trustees, alongside former Bank of Canada and Bank of England governor, Mark Carney. Freeland was last seen announcing asset freezes and crackdown measures against truckers and supporters in the streets of Canada demanding an end to heavy handed Covid mandates and restrictions. And Carney recently qualified the Freedom Convoy as “sedition” in a hysterical opinion piece published in the Globe and Mail newspaper.

    It’s only logical that when citizens start seeing visible “World Economic Forum” branding on those taking – or publicly advocating for – drastic and unprecedented liberticidal measures against them, they start asking questions about the nature of the organization’s influence.

    No citizen in any country actually voted to adopt the Davos agenda. And it’s debatable whether a sufficient number actually would. According to its own website, the WEF agenda includes increased digital integration and digitization, “urgent” climate change response, and a vision of a “Fourth Industrial Revolution” that is “characterized by a range of new technologies that are fusing the physical, digital and biological worlds, impacting all disciplines, economies and industries, and even challenging ideas about what it means to be human.” The organization is also exploring the notion of “human enhancement”.

    And those are just the aspects that are public. It all sounds like it has the potential to give rise to a dystopian reality, particularly coupled with the previously unimaginable measures taken by democratic governments under a sanitary pretext over the past two years. And who, or what, influences the organization itself? A massive list of multinational entities with fiduciary obligations to increase shareholder wealth, according to the organization’s website. The WEF would like for the average citizen to believe that everything it does is for our own interests. But it’s difficult to imagine what the organization’s backers actually gain by empowering average citizens rather than maintaining control over them.

    Nonetheless, what is glaringly obvious is that the WEF serves as a clearinghouse and consolidator for ideas that promote a one-size fits all global agenda that has become interchangeable with the Western establishment status quo. There is nothing more undemocratic than elected officials serving any other master than their people.

    Much more light deserves to be shed on this supranational entity, its string-pullers, and the extent to which their agenda trickles down into our daily lives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *