F.B.Lie, Trudeau reaps what he sows, Holocaust Survivors wish to not take experimental drugs: Links 2, August 30, 2021

1. FBI Allegedly Funded White Supremacist Publisher: Court Documents

(A few years ago, and I think for abut 6 years, there was a stellar TV series called, Homeland. It was stunning in how brave it was, to present so much reality in a fictional series. Nothing like it had ever been done since the West started succumbing to Marxism. The closest thing would be a 1970s British series called, The Sandbaggers. Which I feel could be the best TV ever made. There was one season of Homeland though that I wasn’t sure about. It seemed to have gone woke and portrayed Islamic terrorists as victims within the US. But in fact, it now seems that yes, The FBI often did create numerous plots and arrests that simply would not have happened at all had the FBI not found and radicalized some muslims and set them on a trajectory of terror. We know they did that with anti-communist pro trump people in 2020. Then the phoney kidnapping of Gov. Whitmer to try and make Trump lose the election on lies and Biden to win on different lies. So this is more a data point than any kind of surprise at this point.)

The FBI allegedly paid a publisher of white supremacist literature more than $144,000 over 16-plus years to serve as a confidential informant, according to recent filings in an ongoing domestic extremism case.

These allegations were made earlier this month by Kaleb Cole, an accused member of the white supremacist group Atomwaffen. Cole was arrested in February 2020 for allegedly participating in an Atomwaffen intimidation campaign against Jewish people and journalists of color.

On Aug. 13, Cole filed a motion to suppress evidence seized during the FBI’s search of his Texas home. According to Cole, the FBI failed to disclose the sordid background of one of its confidential informants in the bureau’s application for a search warrant.

“The CI [confidential informant] is a convicted felon and currently owns and operates a publishing company that distributes white supremacist writings,” Cole said in his Aug. 13 filing.

“The CI began his long career as a professional informant in exchange for consideration regarding his sentence on a federal conviction for possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number and an unregistered silencer.

“He has continued this work for pay.”

2. Trudeau is greeted by many people who seem to want to engage in reproductive activities with him.

Just FYI, the audio here makes for a great ring tone.


3. Holocaust Survivors Write to the European Medicines Agency

(Some of these people may have met Josef Mengele. So they should know what that looks like)

Ahead of Anticipated COVID Vaccine Approval in Europe, Holocaust survivors and their descendants have delivered a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), demanding a halt to the COVID-19 vaccination program. The survivors charge medical regulators with failing to accurately inform populations of vaccine dangers, in violation of the Nuremberg Code, calling the vaccination program a ‘second holocaust’.

(The documents can be downloaded from the link above)

4. Pelosi is amazingly condescending to the legume in the Oval Office. Not even the politeness of a nurse or anything. Reffering to Biden in the 3rd person even as she talks to him directly. His pronouns are “him” and him only I guess.

5. We have smoothly gone from “Two weeks to flatten the curve” to this:

(And at each stage I have heard people scream to ‘go along with it to get freedom back’ and called insane for calling out the next logical stage of this tyranny. Even had people say, “Just do this, this is not the hill to die on. If they do the next thing, then you get your revolution”.

I don’t want a revolution. I want a counter-revolution. And each stage was clearly and obviously a step to the next one, as each one was based on lies and scientism instead of science.)

Thank you M., Hellequin GB., Maplewood, KAF., Tania Groth, Xanthippa and all who contributed to this site’s efforts over the past week.

So what happens when people realize that they cannot eat money, and digital currency can’t even make a paper-linen salad? It is also a powerful argument against Fiat currency. In a gold or silver based system, I mean actually using gold and silver like the Romans did, which cannot just be fabricated on demand, nothing like this could possibly happen.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

7 Replies to “F.B.Lie, Trudeau reaps what he sows, Holocaust Survivors wish to not take experimental drugs: Links 2, August 30, 2021”

  1. 3.)

    If this won’t do the trick, then we know for a fact that Josef Mengele is back with a vengeance and a Nuremberg Trial 2.0 is needed fast and furious.

    Including, the old-time botched favourite by John C. Woods from 1946 “Swinging the Rope-dance”

  2. About destroying Crops;

    I heard the same a couple of Month back from one of our Farmers here in South Africa.
    He was shocked with the demand to stop growing Food by the ANC Government

  3. From time to time there shall be artificially contrived food and water shortages and medical care to remind the masses that their very existence depends on the goodwill of the Commitee of 300.

    Excerpt from Dr. John Coleman’s book;
    Conspirators Hierarchy : The Story of the Commitee of 300

  4. Food is a weapon! Ask the Sudanese Christians…..many who had to enter Muslim territory to beg for UN food….change their Christian name to Islamic….and beg in the name of Allah…
    That……or starve!

  5. I don’t think there’s anything new in this letter, but it’s an open letter to the Quebec Minister of Health from a University of McGill Professor about the vaccines:

    An Open Letter on Coercive Mandates and Vaccine Passports
    Voiced by Amazon Polly
    [Editor’s Note: The below is an Open Letter from Dr. Douglas Farrow regarding proposed COVID-related mandates and passports specifically in Quebec, Canada, and the letter can serve as a model for other jurisdictions.]

    To the Minister of Health:

    I wish to record my opposition to coercive vaccine mandates and to vaccine passports. I offer for your own consideration the following reasons:

    The mandates are incoherent. Either the “vaccines” (which are more accurately described as experimental gene therapy treatments) protect or they do not protect those who have received them. If they do protect, there is nothing to fear but fear itself, which the government has a duty to resist rather than promote. If they don’t protect, they ought not to be forced on others.
    Such mandates are contrary to science, as to sound reasoning. It has become evident recently that the vaccinated, too, are prone not only to contract the Delta variant but to spread it. There is increasing evidence, as predicted by eminent scientists, that mass vaccination of people who do not need protection is driving variant production and dangerous antibody dependent enhancement (ADE). Moreover, many have already been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and have robust natural immunity. It is particularly dangerous for them, as for the young, to take these injections.
    Coercive mandates represent a violation of individual autonomy. Vaccination decisions, as some courts have recently reaffirmed, are personal medical decisions that cannot appropriately be determined by anyone other than a patient and his or her own doctor; nor can information about those decisions, except in extreme cases, be demanded by third parties. In this connection, I remind you that the weekly COVID-related death rate in Canada per 100,000 people is currently zero.
    These mandates serve to reinforce the vaccine passport system or to achieve its goals by other means. But vaccine passports violate the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity. They severely erode natural and constitutional rights while accomplishing nothing that protects the citizenry, for people without passports are often immune and people with passports are often not immune. This suggests to any thinking person that such instruments are political not medical in nature; in short, that they are instruments of power not of faithful service to the public.
    It is deeply unethical to ask people—especially young people who, absent serious co-morbidities, are not at risk from the virus but are at risk from experimental measures—to submit to those measures because older people, in a position of power over them, are fearful. Inasmuch as this fear is stoked by those plainly in a conflict-of-interest position, who stand to gain financially and politically from the imposition of vaccines or vaccine passports, it is doubly unethical.
    People who are pressured or coerced into vaccination and who suffer vaccine injury—deaths and serious injuries are being reported in significant numbers in many jurisdictions—will be in a position to take legal action against those who did the coercing or who suppressed knowledge of these injuries. Others who are disadvantaged by non-compliance may also be in a position to take legal action. (I encourage you to read the Statement of Non-Compliance produced by Professor Forte, with which I concur.) Likewise those for whom nothing has been done to provide the option of a vaccine that is ethically produced and genuinely safe.
    Coercive mandates, in the case of experimental treatments, violate the Nuremberg Code, which ought to be held sacrosanct among both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. They do so by abandoning the principle of informed consent with which it begins. Indeed, it can be argued cogently (though I cannot conduct that argument here) that each of the code’s ten points has been violated, or on the present trajectory will be violated. FDA approval of the Pfizer product notwithstanding, these gene therapies remain by definition experimental. Their short-term performance is disconcerting and their long-term effects are unknown.
    What is already clear enough is that, unlike traditional vaccines, they produce dangerous, even fatal, clotting effects; require frequent boosters; disrupt the natural immune system; and, through global rather than targeted use, contribute to the emergence of breakthrough variants. The public has not been properly informed of these features. Rather, it has been encouraged, quite irrationally, to scapegoat the unvaccinated. Even such consent as it has afforded, then, does not meet Nuremberg standards. Moreover, the consent of one adult does not suffice in lieu of another’s; nor, in such circumstances, can the consent of many override the dissent of one.
    Emerging evidence about the behavior of the virus and of the vaccines, and about the behavior of those suppressing safer and more viable treatments for their own gain, makes the position of officials who enforce mandates and passports extremely tenuous. History will judge harshly all who undertake to act contrary to reason and in violation of basic moral principles, as will God and nature itself.

    I remind you of this government document containing the ten points of the aforementioned code, for the sake of those unfamiliar with the duties it prescribes. I observe that able clinicians working on COVID-related public health problems have supplied good medical reasons (here are ten) why we ought to steer clear of coercive mandates and instead re-examine the peculiar premises on which recent public policy has been based. Sadly, such voices are being censored, but many other capable doctors and scientists are of the same mind. As the Harvard epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff remarked in a recent interview: “To me, as a public health scientist, it is stunning that we suddenly threw out [the sound] principles we have used for decades to deal with public health issues.”

    To sound principles we must return immediately. May we count on you to help set things right? Refusing to endorse coercive mandates and abandoning vaccine passports would be a good start. In the other direction lies grave peril, both for the people and for those who govern them.


    Douglas Bryce Farrow
    Professor of Theology and Ethics
    School of Religious Studies, McGill University

  6. Food shortages result in civil wars, often civilian against civilian, as the demand exceeds the supply while increasing the price. Remember when people fought over toilet paper?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.