Canadian Government intends to licence opinions and are lying about it: Links 1, February 3, 2020

Posted on by

1. Streatham terror attack: Met Police storm homes in London and Hertfordshire in early hours

(May the victims and family of the victims sue the Met police and judicial system for millions for letting this guy out and not deporting him)

STREATHAM terror attack investigators have raided a number of homes in London and Hertfordshire in the early hours of this morning after a recently released prisoner went on a stabbing rampage. […]

The attack was carried out by Sudesh Amman, who stabbed two people just days after being released from jail.

2. WARNING: This is disgusting. However one cannot solve a problem till one knows and admits it is there.

3. The EU launches a classic communist propaganda campaign. This should be saved for future textbooks on how to create division and hatred while pretending to do its opposite.

One of the many great reactions to this hideous propaganda:

Let’s not forget what the same guy, Guy Verhofstadt, who tweeted out that propaganda video said in the EU:

(In case anyone is still unconvinced that the EU is a Soviet like project by the same kinds of people for the same kinds of reasons. A dissident from the USSR in the UK wrote among other major works exposing communism, a book on the COMINTERN roots of the EU. He recently died.)

4. Illegal invaders to Greece made demands of the public and government who did not want them there in the first place:

(Best sign: “We are not zombies”. Too bad. If they were we would know how to stop them)

5. Canadians really need to take this seriously. So do Americans as this is a disease that can spread. Please click through to read it at Spencer Fernando.

As more and more Canadians express outrage towards the Trudeau government’s media takeover plan, the National Citizens Coalition is calling on Canadians to make their voice heard directly to the offices of heritage minister Steven Guilbeault:

“Yesterday, while you were spending time with your family or shopping for Super Bowl snacks, the Trudeau Liberals were busy launching an all-out assault on our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

6. In this article about the mother of the Muslim terrorist who stabbed people yesterday in London, not a single word of concern is given by her about her son’s victims and she claims he was radicalized in prison, where he was serving time for Islamic terrorism! But it is the lack of concern, more than the lies about where his ideas came from, that should tell us what we need to know. Photo is of last muslim terrorist in London. It does appal though, that there is no report of her even asking how his victims are.

Just over two months ago, on November 29, convicted terrorist Usman Khan (pictured) killed two Cambridge graduates before he was fatally shot on London Bridge

7. Hassan Rahimpour Azghadi: We Should Use Blacks in America to Cause the U.S. to Disintegrate

8. Streatham terrorist Sudesh Amman was tailed around the clock on his release from prison by officers warned to carry guns because he was so dangerous but they still couldn’t stop him attacking 10 days later

Streatham terrorist Sudesh Amman was under full surveillance since he was released from jail and caused security teams such worry they were advised to carry guns because he was so dangerous. 

 

Amman, 20, was shot dead by officers on Streatham High Street after he stabbed two people on Sunday – just days after he was released from prison on January 23.  

He had been jailed for three years and four months in December 2018, when he pleaded guilty to 13 counts including possessing bomb-making manuals and knife-fighting guides, but he was automatically released halfway through his sentence, despite fears he still held extremist views.  

 

It is now understood that counter-terrorism bosses decided Amman needed round-the-clock watching by officers, and shortly after this decision surveillance squads were ordered to arm themselves after he was assessed to be even more dangerous than originally thought, sources told the Guardian. 

9. Liberals not only intend to licence opinions in Canada but are now lying about it:

Today:

Yesterday:

10. Greta Thunberg nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

(Boy things have changed. In my day, she would have been known locally as a whiney spoiled entitled brat and no one would like her much. Which is probably how it was for her till her parents figured out how to exploit her fully. It would be good though to see her next to Arafat and other Nobel Prize winners like that. Maybe it will kill that bogus prize altogether. I just hope she wins it before global warming melts her wax statue.)

Two lawmakers in Sweden have nominated Swedish teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg for the 2020 Nobel Peace Prize.

Jens Holm and Hakan Svenneling, who are both members of Sweden’s Left Party, said Monday that Thunberg “has worked hard to make politicians open their eyes to the climate crisis” and “action for reducing our emissions and complying with the Paris Agreement is therefore also an act of making peace.”

Thank you M., Wrath of Khan, EW., C., Johnny U., ML., Chris Jones, Xanthippa, and all who sent in materials today so far.

Get popcorn for this one:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

5 Replies to “Canadian Government intends to licence opinions and are lying about it: Links 1, February 3, 2020”

  1. Last night Mark Levin had Walter Williams on his swho, they talked about the attacks on our Constitutional Rights and why the Constitution and the Bill of Rights was written. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights were written to limit the size and power of the Federal Government. The US was established on the Federalist Principle of a Pyramid of power with each higher level having less and less power because they were further away from the voters. The Federal Government at the top of the Pyramid has the most limitations on what it is suppose to be able to do because it has the potential of being the most oppressive.

    They wanted to limit the actions of the Federal Government because they knew that throughout history the norm for the vast majority of the people has been arbitrary oppression at the hand of the National and local governments. From 1790 (When the Constitution was ratified by enough states to make it the governing law) until the first decade of hte 20th Century it served to limit the actions of the governments on all levels and to protect the individual rights and liberty of the citizens.

    In the late 19th Century Marxist of varying stripes started working to force the US away from the Constitutional Representative Republic and turn us into a Marxist nation with all of the evils that always accompany the Marxists once they gain power. They have succeeded to the point that well over half of what the Federal Government does is directly forbidden by the Constitution. (Read the US Constitution and then look at the many Departments of the Administrative Branch and tell me what part of the Constitution permits those departments to be formed. Remember the Founding Fathers specifically forbid using the phrase “Promote the General Welfare” to justify any action by the Federal Government.) With the Federal Government our Supreme Law (The Constitution) says that if a power is not specifically allowed it is forbidden. This rule is no longer followed.

    The Founding Fathers realized that in the future (our present) the Federal and State Governments would take too much power into their hands and start oppressing the people. The first safe guard was in Article 5 of the Constitution giving the States the right to call a Convention of the States to modify the Constitution and rein in the Federal and State Governments. The second was the Second Amendment which is meant to ensure that the people have enough infantry weapons to rebel against an oppressive government and force the government to obey the law. We are slowly working towards the Convention of the States but from the actions of the Far Left (in and out of government) it looks like the Second Amendment will be used to stop the oppression before the Convention of the States is convened.

    After the smoke clears from the battle to stop the oppression we will still need an Convention of the States to amend the Constituion to try and stop the Far Left for another Century or so.

    • Mark Levin always leaves out the part that Lincoln played. It’s because his father wrote the book on Lincoln. Don’t say anything about Andrew Jackson around Bryan Kilmead either because he wrote the book on him. We’re all rewriting History here

      • Yes they are both ignoring the unconstitutional actions of the 19th Century Presidents, those were individual actions that weren’t part of an organized effort to undermine the Constitution which may be why people don’t talk about them much.

  2. 3- Verhofstadt thinks his little hissy fit can accomplish what over 1000 years of European warfare did not. Imagine that.