1. A look at both baby-eating videos together. More and more it looks like a troll of the leftists.
2. Marion Marechal Calls for French to Resist ‘Great Replacement’
French former populist MP Marion Maréchal has called on her supporters to fight the “Great Replacement” at a major French right-wing conference.
Ms Maréchal made her comments on Saturday in Paris at the “Convention of the Right”, stating that massive demographic change, known as the Great Replacement, is a vital challenge for the right in France to overcome, Europe1 reports.
“The first major challenge, the most vital, is the Great Replacement, this demographic countdown, which already makes us realise the possibility of becoming a minority on the land of our ancestors,” Maréchal said.
She added that the consequences of the Great Replacement would be a “multicultural society that wants to be fractured and violent”.
3. Under communism, Bull**it is the best thing. you can hope for.
A commuter was today hailed as a ‘hero’ after headbutting a man who had allegedly been fighting and making violent threats on board a train from London.
The suited man, who was believed to have been travelling home, struck the bearded man on the c2c service between West Ham and Barking in East London yesterday.
Commuters cheered and praised the suited man for protecting other passengers whom the bearded man was said to have been harassing on the train. […]
He told MailOnline: ‘I’m looking round over my left shoulder, facing a girl sitting down. He’s mumbling on about ‘I’m from f***ing Afghanistan’.
‘Then an old workman behind him has got up and said to this guy ‘leave her alone’. Then the guy punched him five or six times. I saw him fall backwards.
https://twitter.com/BasedPoland/status/1180183311936901123
5. Man Who Doesn’t Understand Consent Has ‘Fundamental Right to Sex’, Court Rules
A mentally disabled man who does not understand consent and who presents a “moderate risk” of sexually assaulting women has a “fundamental right to sex”, a court has ruled.
A 36-year-old man identified as JB has autism and impaired cognition and lives in a supported residential home. Since 2014, the local authority subjected him to a care plan which limits his freedoms due to his behaviour towards women and his lack of understanding of a woman’s right to consent.
However, the man has won his case to have the care plan lifted. A Court of Protection judge ruling that despite the dangers he poses to women, he has a “fundamental right to sex”, reports The Guardian on Thursday.
Mrs Justice Roberts said that insisting he understand consent before embarking on a sexual relationship was tantamount to discrimination because it would “impose on him a burden which a capacitous individual may not share”.
(How can a person have a fundamental right to something which has to be supplied from another person?)
(Going out on a limb to explain what we see in these cases: Governments and media have bought into the idea that Islam cannot be considered a motive for Islamic Jihad, and Islamic Jihad cannot be considered terrorism, as the Cairo declaration on human rights in Islam, a formal document submitted to the UN, specifically states that jihad cannot be called terrorism. So the only way a person who is a devout muslim and decides to obey Islamic precepts on martyrdom and kill a few infidels for allah can be thought of as a terrorist group, is if they find some linkage to the person doing it, and some kind of official group that actually promotes kinetic jihad. Which they can call terror because its a group or something.
This is a lot like how we fail at dealing with communists. Unless they are “Card carrying members of a communist group or party” we don’t think they are a threat. Bella Dodd had no such card. Nor did Alger Hiss I believe. The problem is the ideology. And we are being anesthetized into thinking it isn’t.)
The French civilian police worker who murdered four colleagues with a knife has been linked to a radical Islamist terrorist organisation.
Michael Harpon, 45, was shot dead following the rampage inside the historic Paris Police Prefecture, next door to Notre Dame Cathedral, on Thursday afternoon.
His wife, Iham, was arrested soon afterwards and told detectives that Harpon had ‘heard voices’ and was ‘incoherent and suffered a dementia attack’ the night before.
Now, following a raid on the couple’s flat in the Paris suburb on Gonesse, anti-terrorist prosecutors in the French capital have opened an enquiry for ‘assassination of a public servant in relation to a terrorist enterprise, attempted assassination of a public servant in relation to a terrorist enterprise, and conspiracy in terrorism’.
Computer records and telephone intercepts have linked Harpon to a ‘radical Islamist group’ such as ISIS of Al-Qaeda, said a source close to the case.
Iham Harpon remains in custody, and is also believed to have offered evidence against her husband.
(Funny how we cannot even know the name of the group)
7. This is a very worth the time, Tucker video on President Trump and the US intel services.
Related:
AN activist and former Muslim of the Year nominee has been filmed telling a rally that “jihad is the only solution” – sparking a police probe.
Footage shows Sumaira Farrukh, 38, using the inflammatory word in a speech to crowds in Birmingham last month.
(Video not on page for some reason)
Thank you Richard, M., Wrath of Khan, C. EB., Malca, Yucki and all who sent in thoughts and links. More videos to come.
7 – Trump is still fighting, he doesn’t have many people in the media on his side but he has a lot of people.
Brennan and his Brothers/em> in the Deep State need to study more history, attitudes like there’s have triggered a lot of revolts and during and after those revolts people like Brennen and his Brothers usually end up losing their heads.
7- When I was young I loved abstract and absurdist art. Still do. I always found its complexity was on its way to a simpler, better place. Sometimes, though, thinking this way is utter bullshit. Sometimes compexity fails to arrive at eloquent simplicity.
A reverse way of stating this is that you cannot deconstruct beauty and still keep it. Beauty is a wholesome, singular truth. This is the oxygen real artists breath.
When I saw Jackson Pollock the first time painting with his paint splashes I think I immediately fell for it the same way every arthole falls for it. The first reaction is, like, what? C’mon… Then, the arthole’s own pretenses go to work. Beauty is in the mind of the beholder, indeed. Yet it is the artist who is supposed to give something more than half of the beauty to the equation. The portion that is the beholder’s is necessarily less, otherwise they will be on the artist’s side of the equation. This is where the con kicks in. When the “artist” creates something so overtly intellectual that critics who consider themselves very sophisticated will never admit to not “getting it”, the con is successful. Subjectivity is then handed to the beholder like a paintbrush and the con says, “–Here, you do it.” The shame is on all those sitting in the art gallery who just don’t have the confidence in themselves to say they don’t “get it,” or better, “this is a bad joke.” They must hand back that brush.
That Koons sculpture with the big stupid hand holding those big goofy flowers in Paris is a great example of this, right up to the delay between the unveiling and that first clap. That delay is critical. What facilitates that first clap is much less the object than it is the cognition of those in the gallery of the big crane that moved the piece into place, the cost of it all, the massive size of it, the reputation of the artist, and the obsequious deferrence to the con that all of this cannot possibly be wrong. It’s too big. Once the first clap (sucker) shows approval, the rest of the sheep file dutifully into the holding pen of public opinion. An appropriate counter-piece to this Koons sculpture–if I had my way–would be another sculpture of an equally-massive middle finger right in its fucking face. Because what I’ve described in all of this is the art world version of political correctness.
Otherwise, Mr. Koons, please explain the machinations of the sculpture, along with the gears and levers of the high art therein, in such clear detail that you can reveal it all to us, thereby destroying that very beauty. Don’t explain in words if you don’t want to, but in actions. Picasso did this. He willingly destroyed everything in the name of creation because this is the requisite accreditation of a true creator, and he knew it. Have you ever seen the pictures Picasso made when he was a kid? He destroyed all that by moving on. So did Miles Davis. Pollock did not and could not. He wasn’t capable of such ruthless destruction. –A fraud makes an oversized fist with flowers, sticks it in a Parisian park and awaits his greatness. The dedication of this piece, and the piece itself, would have been genius had it been dedicated to the whole world as a satirical metaphor, and refutation, of the Hegelian Dialectic. Imagine what our world would be if THAT happened. There would be no communism anywhere.
I guess art critics have a hard time, though, separating the wheat from the chaff, so to speak. They have to wrestle with this monster of compexity. A much, much bigger monster, though, a monster more powerful than the massive, mind-bending con of Hegel and Marx and Marcuse and the Frankfurt school combined is the good monster of clarity. This monster boots those artholes right through the goal posts of life, itself.
This is the genius of President Trump. Clarity. Listen to him speak here. The critics just can’t handle him.
Why not cut to the chase and erect a large hand with the Finger of Tawheed and title it “Oneness in Allah”.
I understand what you are saying Johnny, I use to stand in the back of halls and watch and listen to politicians, they would “plant the seeds” and the trained seals, puppets, the social climbers would clap with such zest no matter what nonsense the politicians said.
I have read studies where sociopaths in groups will follow the psychopath, and become more violent than when left on there own.
Ever closely watch Justine, how he degrades people in his slimey way and then looks at the audience for praise. I have wondered is it the acting lessons or was he always just a coy, master manipulator, a spoiled, rich kid.
Thx ET.
I always thought that Jackson Pollock was a house painter that realized there was more money in selling his old drop cloths to idiots than to painting houses.