Immigration, climate and communism: Links 3, September 23, 2019

1. London. You’ve come a long way baby!

2. This man must have saved up for his retirement. Because his pension was likely cancelled.

3. ANTIFA preaches communism, stops traffic

4. Do Hugo Boss make those police uniforms?

5. GOLDSTEIN: Feds scrapped 100 years of data on climate change

Canadians already suspicious of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s carbon tax are likely be even more suspicious given a report by Ottawa-based Blacklock’s Reporter that Environment Canada omitted a century’s worth of observed weather data in developing its computer models on the impacts of climate change.


The scrapping of all observed weather data from 1850 to 1949 was necessary, a spokesman for Environment Canada told Blacklock’s Reporter, after researchers concluded that historically, there weren’t enough weather stations to create a reliable data set for that 100-year period.


“The historical data is not observed historical data,” the spokesman said. “It is modelled historical data … 24 models from historical simulations spanning 1950 to 2005 were used.”


These computer simulations are part of the federal government’s website launched by Environment Minister Catherine McKenna on Aug. 15.

And if you add that article to this appearance of climate minister McKenna, you get the full Goebbels of the Liberal Party policy.

6. Check out this story about a man banned from Facebook with zero infractions and NO violations of the ToC. He just tried to post the video about why people should probably avoid using Facebook’s new Crypto currency if they want to avoid the full Chinese Social Policy consequences we all know Facebook will impose on users of its currency.

7. ANTIFA gets violent creating consensus. Consensus of course, is where a pressure group forces a certain narrative. And then everyone who opposes that narrative is guilty of a form of hate speech (denier). This is a clearly laid out strategy by Frankfurt School member, Habermas. ANTIFA are merely a tactic of it.


thank you M., Richard, ET., Ramjetjamar, Malca, Coram Deo, PC,. and all who sent in materials. 


About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

4 Replies to “Immigration, climate and communism: Links 3, September 23, 2019”


    Google Manipulating Search Engine Results To Get Justin Trudeau Re-Elected
    by Dan Murray, Immigration Watch Canada

    Research Psychologist Robert Epstein (ironically, a supporter of Hilary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election) has concluded that Google manipulated its Search Engine to favor the Democratic Party in the 2016 Election and that it continues to manipulate Google Search Engine results by providing Google users with results that favor one political ideology over another. He has developed a technique called SEME (Search Engine Manipulation Effect) to determine bias.

    In the past week (July, 2019), he has been testifying before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee.

    Robert Epstein argues that On Line Searching must be made competitive again and that the Internet must be declared a Public Commons. In other words, Tech Giants such as GOOGLE have too much power and must be reined in and broken up by Anti-Trust legislation in the U.S. (Other countries must produce similar legislation.)

    Google Searches extend all over the world and subliminally influence election results and the entire political landscape. In other words, Google users are unaware that Google is manipulating their Google searches and censoring/suppressing information on the internet. If Google searches favored Clinton in 2016, they also favored Trudeau in 2015 and continue to do so.

    If Google and other Tech Giants are allowed to continue as they are currently constituted, democracy cannot survive and elections will become meaningless.

    Here are five disturbing findings from Epstein’s research, which adheres, he says, to the highest possible scientific standards in all respects.

    The following are his words:

    1. In 2016, biased search results generated by Google’s search algorithm likely impacted undecided voters in a way that gave at least 2.6 million votes to Hillary Clinton(whom I supported). I know this because I preserved more than 13,000 election-related searches conducted by a diverse group of Americans on Google, Bing, and Yahoo in the weeks leading up to the election, and Google search results –which dominate search in the U.S. and worldwide –were significantly biased in favor of Secretary Clinton in all 10 positions on the first page of search results in both blue states and red states. I know the number of votes that shifted because I have conducted dozens of controlled experiments in the U.S. and other countries that measure precisely how opinions and votes shift when search results favor one candidate, cause, or company. I call this shift “SEME” – the Search Engine Manipulation Effect. My first scientific paper on SEME was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) in 2015 ( and has since been accessed or downloaded from PNAS’s website more than 200,000 times. SEME has also been replicated by a research team at one of the Max Planck Institutes in Germany.

    SEME is one of the most powerful forms of influence ever discovered in the behavioral sciences, and it is especially dangerous because it is invisible to people – “subliminal,” in effect. It leaves people thinking they have made up their own minds, which is very much an illusion. It also leaves no paper trail for authorities to trace. Worse still, the very few people who can detect bias in search results shift even farther in the direction of the bias, so merely being able to see the bias doesn’t protect you from it. Bottom line: biased search results can easily produce shifts in the opinions and voting preference of undecided voters by 20 percent or more – up to 80 percent in some demographic groups.

    2. On U.S. Election Day in 2018, the “Go Vote” reminder Google displayed on its home page gave one political party between 800,000 and 4.6 million more votes than it gave the other party.Those numbers might seem impossible, but I published my analysis in January 2019 (, and it is quite conservative. Google’s data analysts presumably performed the same calculations I did before the company decided to post its prompt. In other words,Google’s “Go Vote” prompt was not a public service; it was a vote manipulation.

    3. In the weeks leading up to the 2018 election, bias in Google’s search results may have shifted upwards of 78.2 million votes to the candidates of one political party (spread across hundreds of local and regional races). This number is based on data captured by my 2018 monitoring system, which preserved more than 47,000 election-related searches on Google, Bing, and Yahoo, along with the nearly 400,000 web pages to which the search results linked. Strong political bias toward one party was evident, once again, in Google searches.

    4. My recent research demonstrates that Google’s “autocomplete”search suggestions can turn a 50/50 split among undecided voters into a 90/10 split without people’s awareness ( A growing body of evidence suggests that Google is manipulating people’s thinking and behavior from the very first character people type into the search box.

    5. Google has likely been determining the outcomes of upwards of 25 percent of the national elections worldwide since at least 2015. This is because many races are very close and because Google’s persuasive technologies are very powerful.

  2. 7 – Portland has a shortage of police because so many of them have quit and moved to towns where they can do their jobs instead of having to stand around and watch antifa break the law. I don’t have any evidence of other cities on the West Coast having the same problem but I have heard that Baltimore has this problem as does St. Louis Mo.

  3. AGW is an apocalyptic cult, just as demented as those pursued by cults in the past. You must act now (repent, stop sinning), you must confess your sins (admit having a 100 watt bulb for instance), and pledge to lead a better (greener) life. Or, within a few years, the Disaster will be upon you and it will be your fault.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *