German MSM ambush of classical liberal politician, Björn Höcke

This is the most disturbing interview I have seen for some time. Perhaps because it is the best example of pure Hegelian thought I have seen for some time. There is nothing of the interview in this video. There is no attempt to find out what this person thinks or what he wants to achieve.

Instead, what we see is an electric dialectic knife of transformation from who he really is and what he really believes, into a marionette of Adolph Hitler.

Pure sophistry. And truly horrifying.

Direct link:

https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmVAtBhnvCiw6pgD6T9HeiwfVCiAprxu9v77FGC7JKMhpX

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

6 Replies to “German MSM ambush of classical liberal politician, Björn Höcke”

  1. How Wiki frames him:
    “Höcke gave a speech in Dresden in January 2017, in which, referring to the Holocaust memorial in Berlin, he stated that “we Germans are the only people in the world who have planted a memorial of shame in the heart of their capital”,[20] and suggested that Germans “need to make a 180 degree change in their commemoration policy”.[21] The speech was widely criticized as antisemitic, among others by Jewish leaders in Germany, and he was described by his party chairwoman, Frauke Petry, in response as a “burden to the party”.[20][22] As a result of his speech, the majority of leaders of the AfD asked in February 2017 that Björn Höcke be expelled from the party. In May 2018 an AfD tribunal ruled that Höcke was allowed to stay in the party.”
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bj%C3%B6rn_H%C3%B6cke

    In the movie Alien, the horror in one scene was conveyed throught the face of a cat, a reflecting blank wall, for all your own imagined worst deeds that you would do to yourself.

    This, is played out here.

    (And what is reprehensible is that polititicians either have not read Mein Kampf – which the should – or that they have to virtue-signal that they haven’t when they had, or will simply deny that it obviously sounds like it would be in Mein Kampf without comparing the context and intent).

    The Left ban trigger-words, as Hate Speech.

    “German moral Absolutism will guarantee…”
    https://www.quora.com/Was-Hitlers-Nazi-Germany-based-on-moral-relativism-or-moral-absolutism

    This context, the source-material, needs to be found. All we can observe here, is the main stream media’s devious tarring of the man.

    • It is know by those who looked into it, that his speech was intended to refer to how they had owned up to their past while others who did similar things had not. He is not antisemitic.

      Also Mein Kampf is not legal to possess in Germany so how is anyone to read it there. Are they allowed to go to Poland or Turkey (where its still on the best seller list) and read it there?

      • The stupidest people in the world are people who think that the only possible reason someone would read “Mein Kampf” or “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” or the Hamas Manifesto or Elizabeth Warren’s Diary is that they agree whole-heartedly with the content and wish to be influenced in its direction. We’re talking just plain dumb…

        It’s also illegal in Germany to point out that the second letter in the acronym, NAZI, is for the word, “Socialist”. You’re not allowed to even think that in Germany…

  2. Calling somebody a “Nazi” is a grievous insult and a few years ago such an insult would have resulted in actual fisticuffs and bloody noses. Add a few more years to that and it would have been pistols at dawn. If you decked somebody over that in 1944 no judge would have faulted you for it. Why can’t he rise to his feet and shout, “Quit calling me a Goddamn Nazi or I’ll pound your face in! I demand an apology, sir!”.

    Exactly when did we become so pussified that we’re not allowed to do anything about it when people throw vicious vilifying slanderous insults right in our faces? Was it 1996? 1966? When did it become OK to insult people like that? Why do cops have to stand there and take it when people shout, “Fuck you, PIG!” into their faces?

    I feel the same way about the word, “denier”. That really gets my dander up too…

    • No to the pounding the face in but in general I agree. It’s not like this is something new, this name calling has been going on for quite some time.
      If an interviewer compares you to Hitler once, protest vigorously, (sometimes it is right to take offence). If they take no notice and continue to be offensive then walk out, interview over. And let the chips fall where they may.
      Because in that climate, whatever you say will be distorted any way.