Its in writing. Pedophilia is a part of the postmodern agenda

Posted on by

Beyond the main point of the signatures of the founders and main thinkers of the French, postmodern philosophers all demanding that pedophilia be made legal, these guys make a lot of good points.

Also, it is food for thought about how similar the push to make little boys into drag queen strippers for adult men mirrors Afghan muslim culture.

H/T Xanthippa

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

8 Replies to “Its in writing. Pedophilia is a part of the postmodern agenda”

  1. Dhimmis receive Direction
    Cucks receive Correction
    Sucks receive Subjection
    For how they ought to be.

    Children hate for Allah
    Children hate for manna
    Children hate for mamma
    The Devil’s Trinity.

    Find the truth within you.
    Find the love within you
    Find the self within you
    Forgive and be set free

    Pederasts become you
    Pedophiles become you
    Sexuals become you
    For all eternity.

  2. If you google the 45 things that the communists had to do to conquer the west you will discover that one of them is destroy all traditional morality. After the left got “Gay Marriage” legalized they said that they next thing they were going to normalize was incest. Apparently they decided to wait on that one and move to pedophilia.

  3. Bachi baza (afghan “dancing boys”) is just the most well-known example of such pedo practices.

    It existed in Turkey under the name Köçek:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%B6%C3%A7ek

    In Egypt it was called Khawal:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khawal

    Turkey also had “masseur” boys, they were called tellak:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tellak

    Afghanistan also has the bizarre, non-sexual practice of dressing up girls as boys:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_posh

  4. Before, many of us viscerally understood the threat to society that gay marriage represented–that of another deconstructionist stepping stone to dismantling social cohesion. Many moderate conservatives did not understand so went along with it and said nothing. If I am honest I must say I had one foot in each camp. What two grown men did was their business, right? This sounds like the right thing to think. Now, many heteros who accept the gay life style in a live-and-let live fashion are beginning to see the graphically corosive effects of the political wing of such statistical deviency, and that the live-and-let live sentiment is not necessarily reciprocated (because pedophilia is glaringly not live-and-let live, but rather predatory). Am I wrong to group the gay political lobby with the pedophile one? Am I really? Ask your gay friends for an honest answer because I really don’t know, but I’m allowed to ask the question. What would our gentle expert Perfect Child say? That they are both of the right-brained, dangerous submissives? But here I’m over my head.

    We know that gender discussions in their totality are meant to create chaos and confusion rather than understanding, because adding credence and support to every subjective whim of the weak minded is ludicrous, and just loads another bullet into the chamber. –Even beyond the calculations of the postmodernist apparatchiks who offer such accommodation. The Canadian Human Rights Commission weaponizing crackpots and predators, such as pedophiles and Muslims, is quickly damaging hard-working normal people and society as a whole. I wonder how many regular guys’ complaints about transgender trespasses the HRC heard last week?

    Alas and as usual, when I come to the end of my written thoughts I realize the same old thing: that the very fact I was compelled to state all of the unoriginal obvious lends my floating that sinking feeling, and that I’ve just added to the noise and should simply shutup.

    • Actually someone does have to break the ice on the gay marriage thing.

      First of all, it was never about gay marriage. If it was, they would have asked for, or accepted a Civil Union, that would afford the reasonable benefits of marriage, such as hospital visits etc. on to a committed and formalized partnership.

      But gay marriage was never about that. It was about reformatting marriage as a whole to become something it was not, in order to damage it. Redefining something that worked into something that no longer does.

      We now see polygamy and women marrying themselves and every other form of thing, all of which degrades an institution that was meant to give support for the challenging task of life long partnership and children, into whimsical hedonism. Marriage is a party at this point.

      I can’t find the basic video online anymore, but here it is surrounded in material by Blaze TV:

      https://youtu.be/KQeLiullhNQ

      “The institution of marriage should not exist”

      That is what is it about. And that is what they are getting.

    • When dogs and hens mount each other, it is for dominance.and submission.
      Disturbed humans can latch onto it, only get an erection from it, and form a new identity of the peace released through it.
      They then reinvent the cultural narrative to surround and enshrine it.

      Nothing unusual. Islam have four whores, Socialism has Single Families. They are the bedrocks for perfect utopias where children born are fatherless.

      Submission, capitulation and surrender.

      Nothing more than beasts.

      Willing-slavery is what they call freedom.

      No Son of Man gives up their soul.

      Any Light is called a Hate Crime.

  5. To conquer the west the communists/Marxists/progressives have to destroy all of western society and civilization. Western Civ is pretty much gone and Western Society is in trouble, as this century plays out we will see many more attacks on our fundamental principles. Pay close attention to the Dem Platform during the 2020 election and what the left does after they lose the election.