The sick hypocrisy of Netflix, Warner, and Disney

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

16 Replies to “The sick hypocrisy of Netflix, Warner, and Disney”

  1. There’s a movie released 21st March 2019 called KESARI “based on the true story of one of the bravest battles that India ever fought — the Battle of Saragarhi.”
    Rotten Tomatoes had 33% Critics 94 % audience.
    https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/kesari

    This hindi movie opens with a woman being dragged out into the wasteland by muslims for an Honor Crime. See the Greek New Testament stories of exactly the same uncivilized men or today’s gender-transferenced running Human Rights Tribunals. Submission makes anyone and everyone into Nazis.

    A small troop of Sikhs under an Officer (who cannot be called English for fear of riots in the UK), are told to ignore such cultural practices (as in Rochdale), so that one of them – with a conscience that disobeys the order – attacks the gang.

    While killing the sword-bearers (uncles?) he gets caught. The muslims plan to remove his turban and shave his head before cutting it off. This triggers the rest of the Sikhs to join in.

    The muslims remaining alive – run off.

    “As a punishment, Ishar is sent to Saragarhi where a bunch of 20 unruly, undisciplined Sikh soldiers await him. And it is this bunch of cheeky but lovable rouges that Ishar leads into the battle when an army of 10,000 Afghani Pathans turn up at Saragarhi on the 12th of Sept 1897. It is now 21 Sikhs vs 10,000 Afghans on the battlefield.”

    A small gang returns as a bigger gang. Tommy Robinson knows this in Luton.
    https://youtu.be/iubnMH5nwSU

    India knews. The Hindu Defense League that is Sikhism to defend human conscience.

    • The woman at the beginning of the movie we learn later had blasphemed.
      (Like the Liberal’s islamophobic aka ‘Hate Crime of Communism’ that creates false charges to imprison people).

      At the signal-relay fort, where our hero was banished to lead a band of misfit Sikhs, he instills discipline and teamwork. At the local town he rebuilds the mosque. All people are equal we learn.

      There are a number of hindi romance and dance songs like Chitty Chitty Bang Bang that are interspersed, https://youtu.be/GND10sWq0n0 but they know their audience, (and don’t fast-track them).

      But the tribes had got together to drive the British out, and now, half way through this movie, the tribe-leader who wanted a holy jihad war, dragged out the woman that he had initially dragged out from the beginning. Then, off camera, at his hand command, her neck was sliced open like their animals.

      After all the laughter and joy of building a better relationships, we are back to facing islam again…

      • There was a pederast-sniper harrying the Sikhs. (muslim grooming gangs around the world do not seek to draw sexual-affection from children but cause them misery and pain just like they grew up with). Shot though the same barrel he usee was a fitting end. The West should do likewise.

        21 Sikhs died delaying the Afgan Army and saving the two other forts from destruction. Posthumously awarded the Indian Order of Merit.

        Ishar Singh fought valiantly as a lion to the last. He stopped short from killing a teenager in the gang, which was his undoing and allowed the mob to strike him down. And the last twist of the knife plunged into him was from that teenager he saved. Islam,
        getting children to love death more than they love life.

        The cook had been giving water to the injured muslims in battle, as every civilized nation would, but Allah’s Little Helper who had killed the unarmed Hate-Criminal Cis-Woman, went and killed him too.

        The only comeuppance for Muhammad was when he was leaning closely to Ishar to gloat and remove his turban, then to have the comb stabbed through his neck.

        Through the Bollywood-stylized production of clean clothes in battle, and the lack of pathos of The Manificent Seven, was reinforced the importance of ‘keeping turbans on’ in death and “One shall be forever blessed who says God is the ultimate truth!”

        This last quote, I could not find in any Sikh teaching.

        The founder of Sikhism Guru Nanak said: “He who has no faith in himself can never have faith in God.”
        https://quotes.thefamouspeople.com/guru-nanak-3656.php

        Anyone can say “Allah is Greater!” But none themselves are greater if by their tongue they wear the bridle of submission. (Know yourself first, that your pride is removed). So it is plain to see that their god is not great and all their neighbors suffer to live alongside these dhimmis. And every child born to such men is fatherless, which is why they act accordingly and Feminists love them in their crippled state of needing to rape the female to be a man.

        This video was watched on Amazon Prime – and I was surprised it was not censored or banned as a hate crime. But then, non-whites made it. Wimmin know who the real patriarchy are.

        • It was not censored because the censors have not had it sliced so finely as you slice it for us. But, then, once understood the light goes on, and the censor has new purpose.

  2. The leftist in charge of the big corporations are pushing the people to rebel, the irony is that they are followers of Marx but are acting like the people Marx opposed. The far left is creating a rebellion against the big corporations that are controlled by the left.

  3. Cronies really give capitalism a lousy name. As a capitalist I try to impart the simple fact that cronies must be a part of a company large enough to have political connections. When their breadth make them attractive to the apparatchiks, it is true romance. Reciprocity drives off under the setting sun of donations, and the rising moon of cleared red tape.

    Meanwhile, back in the real world, 90% of the real GDP is driven by the “disconnected” small business. These are simply beaten and taxed like dogs until they give up.

    • Capitalism – the freedom to trade. Including the trading ideas called free speech.

      “There’s a veiled criticism in this saying, that the English are fit for little else, and it comes as no surprise that the two contenders who might claim coinage of it come from two nations with some disdain for the English – the Scots and the French.

      The Scottish economist Adam Smith, in his Wealth of Nations, 1776, wrote:

      “To found a great empire for the sole purpose of raising up a people of customers, may at first sight, appear a project fit only for a nation of shopkeepers. It is, however, a project altogether unfit for a nation of shopkeepers, but extremely fit for a nation whose government is influenced by shopkeepers. ”

      Napoleon I, who was familiar with Smith’s work, is reported as later using a French version to dismiss England’s preparedness for war against France:

      “L’Angleterre est une nation de boutiquiers.”

      Josiah Tucker, the Dean of Gloucester, preceded them both in 1766, although not with the precise text of the currently-used version of the phrase:

      “And what is true of a shopkeeper is true of a shopkeeping nation.””
      https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/the-english-are-a-nation-of-shopkeepers.html

      The freedom of the individual, is the freedom of the nation.

      The income gap between rich and poor is inconsequential to this gap that can always be crossed. (Like Apple had started from trading from a garage).

      Margaret Thatcher, a grocer’s daughter. https://youtu.be/okHGCz6xxiw

      Oligarchs and Marxists never let you cross.

    • “Cronies really give capitalism a lousy name.”

      No they don’t. Avoid category errors (i.e., the fallacy of composition or division). If “Cronies” are the subject, then Capitalism is just their banner du jour to march beneath and of no further significance, save at the booking desk.

      Equally, if Capitalism is the subject and cronies actually pertain then, once again, it’s an issue of corruption or some other criminal enterprise.

      The one distinction which I’ve seen that’s worth making is between Financial- and Industrial-Capitalism. It cannot be I alone, who finds it worrisome that so much of Trump’s empire is based upon service economics (i.e., hotels and casinos).

      That said, Modi’s complimentary pimp slap was long overdue. If the Little Sultan gets his S-400 wedgie on schedule maybe New Deli will toe the line. India’s constant, and largely counterproductive, dancing with the Bear has only weakened the Subcontinent’s role as a counterweight to Communist China. This self-inhibition of ability to act in the West’s interest only makes India’s propping up of Iran’s critically faltering refinery capacity even more offensive than it always has been.

      • I think part of India’s romance with the Bear dates back to the British Empire when Russia was the big enemy Britain faced in the Far East. Since most in India see Britain as the enemy that makes the Bear as either a good guy or a semi good guy.

        • India was Non-Aligned.
          Soviets were pretty much good guys, never demanded fealty. India served as a sort of buffer against China, received plenty of second-hand equipment.
          China always worried Russia, even though the two were supposedly BFF.

      • If you are correct then “Crony Socialism” would be a thing, which it is not, because it’s redundant.

        • “If you are correct then “Crony Socialism” would be a thing, which it is not, because it’s redundant.”

          With more opaque minds, I’d leave this at, “And your point is?”

          However, in the spirit of naming things, suffice to say that the term “Crony Socialism” is NOT a category error.

          In fact, the mere presence of Socialism almost dictates the existence of cronies to help in pulling such a scam off.

          It leads one to speculate whether there’s ever been an instance of Socialism arising without at least one mesmerized flock of useful idiots, cheerleaders or whatever punch monkeys.

      • PT-friendly media says, “We’ll replace China with India! Cheap labor, huge market, a democracy, our friends!”

        That’s naive. (And offensive to Indians, as our media phrasing reduces them to a bargaining chip in somebody else’s deal.)

        Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand. Yeah, but India?
        India’s barely crawling out of a socialist-feudal pit, third world and corrupt. It’s in a bad neighborhood; tard issues are endemic.

        While Mr. Modi sees opportunities, others wonder. America’s suddenly infatuated with India as a significant other? The relationship with Russia goes all the way back: multigenerational, personal friendships. “Dancing with the Bear” sounds sweetly quaint.

        Some Bears are adorable, I have one of my very own.

        0 treated Modi like Bibi, and India like he’d treat Israel if he could’ve gotten away with it. A very bad time. Worse yet, to be in an OIC-dominated UN – unless you have a Tovarish with a Security Council veto.

        “Toe the line”? – India’s not our satellite.

        We turned on Mubarak and Gaddafi. Global MSM has PT hanging by a thread to finish a single term, our alliances are in disarray.

        The next Dem-Prez might be as bad or worse. Indian bloggers watch our Congress, attuned to the Jihabi-Barbies. Anti-Israel will be anti-India. Will the MB take over the Democrat Party like it did Labour in the UK?

        That’s what it looks like outside the conservative American bubble; that’s what Indians are seeing and saying.