2. “The koran is not for you, its against you”
And this is why muslims usually don’t debate.
(Denmark may or may not know this, but this is a profoundly important move in terms of the future of that nation state. Once a law is passed, muslims will, as they do everywhere, mount a counter-offensive in all ways they possibly can. In Canada they used leftists to show that classic sanctimonious defiance against people who are safe, while trying to look morally superior supporting the violent supremacists of Islam. And it worked. The Quebec attempt at a burka ban was a failure.
But in France its a different matter. Each time there is an attempt to enforce the law, riots happen that result in deaths, and the destruction, usually by fire, of millions in property, both private and public. Most recently, the violence as a response to trying to write a ticket to a woman wearing a face cloth was so intense that the sale of gasoline was actually banned in that region of France for a time, because it was being bought to start things on fire.
This will happen in Denmark.
So the question is, will Denmark have the foresight to plan for it, and the spine to deploy those plans.)
Denmark joined some other European countries in deciding Thursday to ban garments that cover the face, including Islamic veils such as the niqab or burqa.
In a 75-30 vote with 74 absentees, Danish lawmakers approved the law presented by the center-right governing coalition. The government says that it is not aimed at any religions and does not ban headscarves, turbans or the traditional Jewish skull cap.
However, the law is popularly known as the “Burqa Ban” and is mostly seen as being directed at the dress worn by some conservative Muslim women. Few Muslim women in Denmark wear full-face veils.
4. This video is actually very old although its dated this month. But its importance is in the subtext more even than the text. The speaker is clear, even to “journalists present” that the muslim must vote for a muslim and the only attribute that matters in leadership is Islamic.
This goes to the incompatibility of Islam with the West. Christians, Jews, Buddhists etc. tend to measure a candidates values against their own. And this usually divides the community politically, and this is a good thing. Its why a secular state with a moral population works best. But Islam only holds one value as important. no where does he discuss policy. Only the domination of Islam.
5. Farage on current state of law in the UK and Soros’ role in the degradation of the West.
(What I find interesting about Soros is the constant stream of evidence of total sociopathy of the man. For example, in any question he is asked about the horrors he has committed, he gives the sociopath’s answer. “If I had not done it someone else would have”, or, as he said on 60 Minutes, I cannot think about the moral consequences of my actions”. Paraphrasing on both quotes from memory, but I am confident I have the correct sentiment.
So we have a man who was in fact a Nazi, and claimed it was the best time of his life, and has literally zero remorse for his actions as a Nazi in Hungary, but is in an extremely calculated fashion, capitalizing on the guilt felt by those who do in fact have a working conscience of the horrors of the Holocaust to destroy Europe. He has, Mr. Soros did, managed to weaponize the more noble human reactions to actions George Soros himself was a gleeful part of, as a tool against the Western world as a whole. A true super villain. A man who’s thought process is so monstrous that trying to understand it for a few minutes makes one need a shower.)
Thank you MissPiggy, M., Wrath of Khan, EB., Johnny U., Charles, Xanthippa, and many many more.
As usual, the joy is in the comments and today is no exception. Please take a deep dive.
Thank you all again for your support of this site and all our work in all the various ways in which people are able to do so.