Setting the record straight on leftist anti-science bias

Thank you Richard, and for the heads up NorseRadish. I cannot find a single error in the science and he covers all the main bases as well it seems, where Marxism and Marxist methodology has replaced the scientific narrative and its conclusions in popular thought.

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

4 Replies to “Setting the record straight on leftist anti-science bias”

  1. I cannot find a single error in the science and he covers all the main bases as well it seems, where Marxism and Marxist methodology has replaced the scientific narrative and its conclusions in popular thought.

    I saw no apparent errors of thought in the video. It is crucial that people realize how centuries of scientific progress are being put at dire risk. The Pomos will not be happy until all of us are watching a single television channel (at the same time).

  2. Totally true from my experience and leftist idealism only pretends to simulate altruism whereas from those whose humanitarian views come from within (religious or philosophical) are the real altruists. Leftist altruism does not require sacrificing yourself, only its simulation.
    In science(mostly biological), history, archaeology or anthropology if you try to publish an article with a left-unacceptable truth that you have proven unequivocally to be true, you will not pass “peer” review (that is, if it was ever really “peer reviewed” outside of your institution) and you will very suddenly lose your funding as well as made to feel like a pariah. Anyone who has ever been “sent to Coventry” by their “peers” for proving that some of their views are utter rubbish will vouch for this as can I. As an addendum….check out your most vociferous critic’s publications, then look at them to see if she/he has actually done ANYTHING other than enjoy the sinecure. Publication number means NOTHING as often significant content is totally absent.

    • Publication number means NOTHING as often significant content is totally absent.

      So, in the academic world, it used to be, “publish or perish”. But now, for Conservatives, it’s, “publish and perish.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*