This comment just came in from Stephen on the post about the OIC and Canada’s delegate to the meeting in the Ivory Coast.
—
I read this post with particular interest because we are presently vacationing in Canada, in Whistler, BC. As an American I am keenly interested in the path Canada is going down. The news that a senior administration official is gong to visit the OIC, with the stated purpose of
“The OIC council meetings will offer Canada a distinct opportunity to raise and advance our core values, including human rights, freedom, democratic governance and the rule of law.”
I thought I should point out some factual information the senior official could use.
When analyzing statements from the OIC, communications concerning human rights MUST be read with the presumption that provisions laid down in Articles 24 and 25 of the Cairo Declaration are in effect. (The Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam is a formal legal instrument promulgated on behalf of OIC Member States in 1990. It was formally served to the United Nations in 1993. In June 2000, OIC Member States agreed to support the Cairo Declaration and the document controls OIC policy on human rights.)
For convenience, Articles 24 and 25 can be reduced to a single statement to guide the senior official:
“Human Rights are defined as shariah law for the purpose of any analysis involving the OIC, a Member State, or initiatives reasonably arising from either — including all entities claiming Islamic law as the basis of law, including all elements of the Islamic Movement, the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, and al-Qaeda.”
In summary, when analyzing any “core values, including human rights, freedom, democratic governance and the rule of law” the senior official should remember that those can ONLY be addressed in terms of what Islamic law permits them to mean! Islamic law is the ONLY criterion by which a determination can be made in the event of any dispute requiring resolution.
I can only hope that Canada can learn from the nightmare that Europe is experiencing with its open-door immigration policy and avoid the same pitfall.
I believe that Canada’s PM Trudeau is in fact looking for the same results as European nations with open borders. He met for dinner last month with Obama as did Merkel. Clearly there is joint purpose as their is clearly parallel policies.
Eeyore.
TRUDEAU IS WORSE THAN OBAMA
Canada bans ‘Product of Israel’ labels for West Bank wines
Ruling singles out 2 settlement wineries, also blacklists Golan and East Jerusalem vintages; Jewish group calls decision ‘disturbing’
Canadian food inspectors have ordered liquor stores to stop selling wines made in the West Bank, saying their label identifying them as Israeli contravenes Ottawa’s policy on the territory.
Settlers and at least one Canadian Jewish advocacy group reacted with anger to the ruling, which singles out the Psagot and Shiloh wineries, made in settlements outside Ramallah.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/canada-bans-product-of-israel-labels-for-west-bank-wines/
As someone else so eloquently said here earlier, fuck it, I’m only buying Israeli wine now.
As someone else so eloquently said here earlier, screw these assholes, I’m only buying Israeli wine now.
You really have to work hard to be a bigger traitor to your nation, civilization and humanity the Obama, Trudeau is managing to do this.
Oops.
Firstly,there is nothing to lose and everything to gain from attending such organizations as the OIC,given who we are and our deep respect for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,as adopted by the UN in 1948.But lets not forget that in 1948 the Zionists and European Diaspora among others declared their Jewish state in the occupied Palestinian Homeland,after which the un recognized Zionist Israel.This evil act santified by the UN served to show in part the power and arrogence of the European and American powers to enforce their bias,influence and thinking on the body of this Organization and the world.So it not surprising that Islamic states should frame their own core values under Sharia.
That said,the UDHR is clearly superior in protecting the Human Rights of man,woman and child compared to those espoused by Sharia,and I do not believe it is under threat by our own leaders,including Canada’s Trudeau.Our presence at such Organizations can serve to demonstrate the importance of our respect for the Rights of Women being equal to men and the importance of man’s,and women’s,Religious Rights in the context of Human Rights.
Oh Ron, really?
Firstly, the man Trudeau sent is clearly in support of Sharia, not western law. He made certain Trudeau campaigned at every mosque. His role as an active promoter of Sharia over Canadian law is not speculation.
Secondly, the so-called “Palestinians” have never had a “homeland” having never been a nation with a history, language, currency, ancient king/queen or mention in any form of historical record. The Jews were cast off the land by the Romans who renamed it. The “Palestinians” took for themselves a name they cannot even pronounce in their Arabic tongue (no hard “P” sound) and they did this AFTER the re-establishment of Israel when the Palestinian Jews became Israelis. Compare and contrast the two PLO charters for a clue of what Palestinianism is all about; straight-up Muhammadan Jew-hatred. Meh, eh?
Thirdly, Trudeau’s dhimmitude, his legally unnecessary windfall payout to Omar Khadr is a clear case that our law is subservient to the Sharia already.
Ron, do you not think that Canada sending a representative to the OIC lends legitimacy to a legal paradigm (sharia) that enslaves about 900,000,000 Muslim women, rather than the critisicm it deserves? The term “observer” that you use implies someone with a discerning eye–someone who is prepared to return and report honestly on what has been observed. You know as well as I that no such honesty will be delivered.
The OIC clearly states that it uses the Cairo declaration of Human Rights in Islam. If someone was to bother looking up what that is, they wouldn’t waste electrons pretending that its not as sinister as we all know it is, everyone I have talked to in intelligence knows it is, and that it simply is.
Canada sent a sharia compliant and sharia demanding Muslim to the OIC because Trudeau wants to move Canada closer to the Islamic orbit, as Obama wanted to do with the US. And its simply a bad thing for the West, and has sweet bugger all to do with Zionists or Israel. In fact, Israel is more than compliant with the real declaration of human rights the UN used until the OIC ruined it with Islam. And now I know that Ron Grant is not an honest actor. Sorry, I wish it was just a difference of opinion. But this OIC story is clear cut. You either get it or you like whats going on, but you don’t get to pretend its not what it is.