About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

29 Replies to “So what about that Times Square attack?”

  1. It looks like it was a police-robber chase that went bad. (I’m not blaming the police, but I think he was fleeing them after robbing a store.)

    Obviously, given the location, I (and most others) assumed it was a Muslim ramming attack. But the evidence seems to indicate otherwise.

  2. This is the same SH!T as “gun control” and any other form of limiting weapons that has ever been known to humanity.

    Either the admission of violent loons into Western nations is reduced, or the abrupt killing of them is found to be more agreeable.

    Your choice.

  3. Fucked up crazy people killing is getting rare compared to your every day raghead animal acts.

    • raghead animal acts

      An increasingly less-rare triple redundancy.

  4. I doubt we will ever get to the truth. Whether this murderer was inspired by voices or by similar Islamic terror events – or is even a Muslim convert in his own mind, we will likely never know what caused this act. Certainly the police and the politicians will do everything to portray this as just another one off act of insanity.

    There is far too much silence to protect Muslims and the best bet is to assume it is a Muslim act until hard proof is presented. So far, we have nothing.

  5. Times Square car crash driver Richard Rojas ‘heard voices’ (BBC, May 19, 2017)
    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39971309

    “A man who drove a car along three blocks of pavement in New York’s Times Square, killing a teenager and injuring 22 people, said he had “heard voices”, according to law enforcement sources.

    Richard Rojas, 26, a US Navy veteran who was arrested twice previously for drink-driving, is now in custody.

    He also said he expected to die, the sources told AP news agency.

    According to Reuters, he said after being arrested: “You were supposed to shoot me! I wanted to kill them.”

    Mr Rojas has been charged with murder in the second-degree, 20 counts of attempted murder, and five counts of aggravated vehicular homicide. He is expected to appear in court later on Friday…”

  6. “In 2014, 9,967 people were killed in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (31%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States. Of the 1,070 traffic deaths among children ages 0 to 14 years in 2014, 209 (19%) involved an alcohol-impaired driver.”

    Maybe we should spend as much effort keeping drunk drivers off the roads as we do worrying about Islamic Fanatics.And keeping assault-like weapons out of the hands of creepy young white boys/men.

    • Intent is 100% of what makes a thing a crime in Western, reason based judicial systems. The left has managed to trick us into thinking that the actual consequences are what determines right and wrong. When its convenient to the agenda anyway.

      So if Israel kills more in self defence then they must be the bad guy. But when Muslims kill more its because the dead had it coming.

      Drunk drivers don’t set out to commit a crime any more than men who pay for sex intend to get Syphilis. Lighting kills more people than does jihad in the US so far, but lightning isn’t demanding that we all live under sharia and change the foundations of our culture to suit it.

      If you want to argue about the legality of drunk driving, that’s fine. But this case had nothing to do with it. It was an attack without question. The only question left is motive.