The following bit of reasoning is not a testament to my cynicism, but to the cynicism of those in high political office, especially in Europe, but probably now in Canada as well.
A number of stories have drifted past me in the past few days which may form a kind of pattern.
It began with a conversation with, and among our brilliant and long suffering translation team. One of them, Egri Nok, pointed out that although Germany has doubled its budget from FIFTY MILLION EUROS to ONE HUNDRED MILLION EUROS, to “fight far right wing extremism”, none of our people in Germany has seen a Nazi in a really really long time.
Quite a few jihadis are spotted daily though.
Have a listen to this short interview with Tommy Robinson on April 4th at about 6:50
He explains that the rise in reported Far Right Wing Extremism” can be explained by a new and Orwellian definition of “extreme”.
“A 14 year old boy was put on the PREVENT program for saying Islam is a fascist ideology”.
This means for a fact, that any statistics about extremism in the UK, and almost certainly everywhere else in the Western world are the pure fabrication that was made out of false equivalence.
That Germany has managed to embezzle one hundred million dollars from the tax paying public to fight a fiction, or else calling people stating facts and opinion about Islam on social media posts, far right extremists, and somehow making that an equivalent problem to the genuine existential threat to liberal democracy and rule of law that Muslims pose wherever they are in sufficient numbers.
Given that it is fact that the German government has granted itself 100M€ to fight “right wing extremism” and that there is likely no actual right wing extremists worthy of “fighting”, where does the money go?
This is where I feel its a brutal case of government cynicism.
Remember how the British Labour Party was caught actually planning the mass immigration into the UK in order to “rub conservative white Briton’s face in diversity”?
It is no less cynical to suspect that the German government, and likely the Canadian and many Western governments, perhaps especially the EU, are creating budgets to “fight right wing extremism” to fund their project to destroy classical liberal civilization under the cynical little pretext that forcing more and more unwanted muslim migrants on Western societies is fighting right wing extremists, where right wing extremists are anyone who does not wish these set of changes to be forced on them.
So in their minds, this budget is fighting right wing extremism. Just using the post-modern, very Alinsky-esque definitions of it. Which would be anyone who believes in rule of law, and Western values, and can correctly identify the threat that Islam and Marxism brings to it.
The function of “moderate” Majid Nawaz, the presenter interviewing Tommy Robinson, and others of his ilk is to dilute effective response against jihad by offering reasonable appearing concessions to reality in admitting that elements of jihad exist and are based upon legitimate interpretation of Islamic scripture but then demanding a quid-pro-quo concession from the British side, that not all Muslims are jihadis, etc. etc. Somehow the message of Tommy Robinson’s phone call in the first place got derailed and it ended up being all about Tommy and the disappointment he brought to Majid. Boo hoo. Yet very smooth, Majid. You’re an expert at misdirection.
This is simply an example of slow jihad. Dialoguing with serpents will not prevent them from striking when they feel the time is right.
Majid Nawaz, “Islamism is one reading of scripture…”
The true one. Shariah.
The rest of the Muslims profit from Socialist Laws of Preference and rule over the kufar with Privilege.
We win either way. What’s not to like living here Tommy?
You know where the money is coming from. Give me a break. You won’t name them, which just goes to show that the old adage about knowing who controls things by looking at who you aren’t allowed to criticize,is absolutely accurate.
First point the Talk Show Host is a leftist shill who is going to always shift the discussion to something that will make the anti-Jihadist look bad.
Second point your opinion on where the money to fight right wing extremism is going is probably right, we can’t prove this but this fits the pattern of the actions of the leftists in power in all Western Nations.
“…Germany has managed to embezzle one hundred million dollars from the tax paying public to fight a fiction…”
Not, “fight a fiction”, but to manufacture one entirely out of whole cloth. That it conveniently happens to support the German government’s existing Multicultural narrative is more than coincidental as well.
Equally easy to predict is that Germany will spend far more than 100 million Euros responding to terrorist attacks, many of which will have been facilitated by these same “immigrants” that Merkel’s political apparatus seeks to protect from “fight far right wing extremism”.
Perish the thought that 100 million Euros might be spent encouraging young native Germans to have more babies or law enforcement becoming highly proactive with respect to preventing terrorist attacks.
Islam creates Muhammadans and Muhammadans promote Islam. How does one disconnect one from the other? We don’t.
It is NOT our problem to be nuanced but to be blunt in regards to our safety and the future safety of our nation’s offspring. Islam has never contributed to any free nation in a positive way and never will as that’s NOT the goal of Islam and every single “moderate” knows it but will deny it to our face in the form of saying “radical” and/or “extremist” as if that’s not merely another role to play within the Islamic war strategy.
Muhammadans can get insulted all they want for us not wishing a Mogadishu on every corner.
“Blunt”: excellent approach.