CBC never met a commie or Muslim dictator they didn’t adore

1, CBC on Castro’s death and Trudeau’s love for him.

Trudeau also referred to the late president as a “legendary revolutionary and orator.”The prime minister went on to say that “Mr. Castro made significant improvements to the education and healthcare of his island nation.”

“On behalf of all Canadians, Sophie and I offer our deepest condolences to the family, friends and many, many supporters of Mr. Castro. We join the people of Cuba today in mourning the loss of this remarkable leader,” the prime minister said.

2. CBC on Pinochet. Not a President but a dictator.

Most of the disappearances occurred during the dictatorship’s early years, when Contreras was head of intelligence. His prominence in Pinochet’s government waned after the U.S. sought to extradite him for involvement in the 1976 bomb assassination in Washington of Orlando Letelier, who had been defence and foreign relations minister under Allende.

3. CBC on communist dictator, Nicolas Maduro:

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro tries to cheer up country with salsa radio show

Struggling to contain an economic crisis and an opposition push to remove him, Venezuela’s socialist leader Nicolas Maduro has launched a radio show devoted to salsa music in an effort to cheer the nation and boost his faltering image.

Maduro, a music aficionado who used to play in a rock band, debuted Salsa Hour this month and has broadcast four episodes from a radio booth specially installed in the Miraflores presidential palace, with each episode lasting several hours.

4. CBC on communist dictator Hugo Chavez:

Venezuela’s oil production is poised to reverse a dramatic decline that has seen exports fall by nearly half during Hugo Chavez’s time as president.

Following Chavez’s death Tuesday, Venezuela, which is a member of OPEC and sits on the world’s second-largest oil reserves, faces near-term political uncertainty that could bring further turmoil to its oil industry. And even under the best circumstances it would take years to increase production and exports, analysts say. But any new government would have a powerful economic incentive to make that a top priority.

5. CBC on right wing dictator, Jorge Rafael Videla

Former Argentine dictator Jorge Rafael Videla denied Tuesday that his government stole babies from women who were detained and then executed during the country’s 1976-1983 dictatorship.

Videla, 86, was defiant as he testified during a trial on charges that his administration stole 34 babies from their mothers as they were held in torture centers, going so far as to blame the women.

“If the removal of an underage minor took place, it was not because of an implicit order,” said the former strongman.

6. CBC on Yassir Arafat:

Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat was poisoned to death in 2004 with radioactive polonium, his widow Suha said on Wednesday after receiving the results of Swiss forensic tests on her husband’s corpse.

7. CBC on the Shaw of Iran

The widely despised Iranian leader flees in the wake of the 1979 Islamic revolution

8. CBC on the current dictator of Iran, who is acquiring nuclear weapons with which to annihilate Israel and attack the West:

Iran’s supreme leader on Wednesday endorsed a landmark nuclear deal reached with world powers, but warned the government to be vigilant, saying the United States cannot be trusted.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the final say on all state matters, endorsed the deal in a letter to moderate President Hassan Rouhani that was read on state TV. Until now he had declined to publicly approve or reject the deal while expressing support for Iran’s negotiators.

The agreement reached in July with the U.S., Britain, France, China, Russia and Germany would curb Iran’s nuclear activities in exchange for the lifting of crippling international sanctions.

9. CBC on Mohammad Morsi, the man who took power in a rigged election in Egypt after an Obama-Muslim Brotherhood led coup, and instantly began to turn the nation into a brutal ethnically pure (Shiia Islam) murderous dictatorship:

An Ottawa group plans to gather in front of the Egyptian Embassy in Sandy Hill to highlight human rights abuses in the country on the third anniversary of the military coup.

In 2013, Egypt’s first democratically elected president, Mohammed Morsi, was overthrown by the country’s military.

“The country has been ruled with an iron fist under the dictatorship of the military and the best and brightest in Egypt right now are behind bars. University professors, scientists, thinkers, philosophers, members of the press … are all behind bars,” said Ehab El-Komy with the Egyptian Canadian Coalition for Democracy.

(A Google search of “CBC on Egypt’s President” only points to Morsi)

10. CBC on Al Sisi, the current Egyptian leader who was put in place after the largest popular revolution in world history, both in raw numbers and percent of the population, and who rolled back the psychotic Islamic laws put in place by Morsi:

Secretary of State John Kerry has said that el-Sissi gives “a very strong sense of his commitment to human rights.”

And American, British and European officials can barely mention Egypt without including the phrase “democratic transition,” something that is not much in evidence.

Left diplomatically unsaid is the massacre of up to 1,000 protesters by el-Sissi’s shock troops in Cairo’s Raba’a Square 18 months ago.

 

I could do this all day.

A leader who represents more or less Western interests but is a harsh dictator is called a “dictator” or “despised ruler” and described in the sophomoric or sometimes erudite language of the CBC, but always to create the impression of a villain.

A brutal murderous horrific dictator but for communism or far left wing extremism, is at worst a kind of lovable clown and usually referred to as President even if there was no vote, or the vote was utterly crooked.

The death of Castro who kept his people down for decades and decades, preventing anyone from making even a meagre living by serving tourists food, is made into a legend.

I hope to get a chance to do, and publish an interview later with someone who visited Cuba properly. Who went off the ‘eyes-right and ahead’ only tour like you get in North Korea for a better example.

 

 

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

25 Replies to “CBC never met a commie or Muslim dictator they didn’t adore”

  1. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro tries to cheer up country with salsa radio show

    Talk about low-budget panem et circenses (i.e., bread & circuses).

  2. Embedding historical lies is one of the greatest sins of the leftist media, God alone knows how many decades or Centuries it will take to remove those lies from the history books.

  3. CBC on the current dictator of Iran, who is acquiring nuclear weapons with which to annihilate Israel and attack the West

    This is a total misconception. Even genocidal (“wipe Israel from the map”) Iran will not be foolish enough to launch a nuclear attack against Israel. For those who are unfamiliar, please read up on “The Samson Option“. A single NBC (Nuclear, Biological or Chemical) hit on Israel—which its Muslim enemies laughingly refer to as a “one bomb country”—will result in the entire Muslim Middle East getting glassed over.

    All of which means that America (i.e., “The Great Satan”), and not Israel, will likely be the primary target for the first nuclear weapon that falls into terrorist hands. It is why the USA needs to quietly inform all rouge nations (e.g., North Korea, Pakistan, and Iran) plus its other more conventional Islamic enemies that—should we take a single nuclear hit—ALL OF THEM WILL DISAPPEAR.

    Use neutron bombs if needed (to reduce fallout and destruction of infrastructure), but there must be a clear message to America’s jihadist enemies that a single nuclear terror attack will be the closing curtain for Islam and other rogue nuclear nations.

    • First Israel doesn’t have enough nuclear weapons to destroy the entire Middle East.

      Second the Shiite end times prophecies say Iran will be destroyed before the Madhi returns, the current leadership of Iran think this is an acceptable price to pay for the return of the Mahdi.

      • First Israel doesn’t have enough nuclear weapons to destroy the entire Middle East.

        Richard, we are so often in such total factual agreement that any potential departure from that pattern is rather disturbing to me.

        It worries me no end that you exhibit (what I consider to be) a serious underestimation of Israel’s nuclear capability. At last (admittedly estimated) count, their speculative inventory was between 80 and 300 FUSION warheads (in whatever various stages of partial assembly). From: Nuclear weapons and Israel:

        • 2009– Estimates of weapon numbers differ sharply with plausible estimates varying from 60 to 400.

        • 2010– According to Jane’s Defense Weekly [one of the most reliable global sources of weapons information] Israel has between 100 and 300 nuclear warheads, most of them are probably being kept in unassembled mode but can become fully functional “in a matter of days”.

        • 2010– “More than 100 weapons, mainly two-stage thermonuclear devices, capable of being delivered by missile, fighter-bomber, or submarine”

        • 2014– Approximately 80 nuclear warheads for delivery by two dozen missiles, a couple of squadrons of aircraft, and perhaps a small number of sea-launched cruise missiles.

        • 2014 – “300 or more” nuclear weapons.

        • 2015 – “Israel has 200, all targeted on Tehran”[

        Please recognize that these numbers all are from the intensely ridiculously Liberal Wikipedia data base and, therefore, should be regarded as conservative, at best.

        According to a 2013 report by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which cited US Defense Intelligence Agency figures, Israel began the production of nuclear weapons in 1967, when it produced its first two nuclear bombs. According to the report’s calculations, Israel produced nuclear weapons at an average rate of two per year, and stopped production in 2004. The report stated that Israel has 80 nuclear warheads and has enough fissile material to produce 190 more. In 2014, former US president Jimmy Carter stated that “Israel has, what, 300 or more, nobody knows exactly how many” nuclear weapons.

        Again, please note that these are thermonuclear (i.e., FUSION) warheads and not puny fission firecrackers.

        Just a diminutive FIFTY of these H-BOMBS could reduce the entire Muslim Middle East’s inventory of major cities into a glowing slagheap of forevermore-non-anti-Semitic-exspanses-of-glow-in-the-dark parking lots.

        A “FEW HUNDRED” OF THESE THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES could ensure that Islam would have NO ASHES TO RISE UP FROM. Not in Saudi Arabia, nor even in Indonesia … especially now that Israel is acquiring Dolphin Class submarines and developing cruise missile technology that overcomes any shortcomings of their domestic, ballistic missile capability.

        Furthermore, there is speculation that Tel Aviv would generously manage to target a few of these warheads on Moscow or Paris for having been such dedicated facilitators of “Palestinian” terrorism. Never again with the Jews go peacefully into the night. I cannot blame them and hope that yucki might check in with her own commentary.

        Again, Richard, I am astonished at your lack of up-to-date information regarding this matter. It is my sincere hope that this might update your awareness.

        Warmest regards,

        NorseRadish

        text

        text

      • Shiite end times prophecies say Iran will be destroyed before the Madhi returns, the current leadership of Iran think this is an acceptable price to pay for the return of the Mahdi.

        In this respect, you are absolutely right. Most disturbingly of all is how Iran’s “twelver” doctrine demands that Shiites must be at the utter brink of annihilation before their Madhi will manifest. This apocalyptic brinkmanship is more than enough reason for Israel to read out the riot act to all of the Muslim Middle East.

        Ayatollah Khomeini declared:

        “We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.”

        — Speech in Qom 1980

        If anything, this one declaration specifically drove Israel’s “Samson Option”. Khomeini’s designating Iran as the world’s largest “suicide bomber” made it abundantly clear that Israel was obliged to take out a substantially larger “insurance policy”.

        However much I despise the possibility for such massive loss of human life, Islam’s genocidal Koranic doctrine makes it impossible for me to criticize Tel Aviv’s insistence that the entire Muslim world will follow them into the depths of hell. Again, the Jews will not go quietly into the night. And, again, I sincerely hope that yucki might check in with her own observations.

        It is why I continue to maintain that AMERICA may well be the primary target for jihadist nuclear terrorism … and that the United States should readjust its military calculus accordingly.

        I hope that this helps.

        NorseRadish

        • My understanding is that Israel only has about 200 warheads, call it 300 to cover any we aren’t suppose to know about. That means that then can hit all of the Holy Cities and Capitals (I hate to think of the historical artifacts this will destroy) and all of the major cities and military posts. hitting them twice or three times to ensure their destruction means there isn’t enough warheads left to destroy the rest of the towns. That will be up to NATO or even the US alone,

          Of course given the mess in India and the way both India and Pakistan have nukes most of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran may be taken out by them.

          However I still say that Isreal doesn’t have enough power to destroy the entire Middle East, Islam maybe since there wouldn’t be much left for the Mahdi to lead but not all of the Middle East.

    • The “Samson” article linked is garbage, unfortunately.
      If ONLY Israel were as powerful as the author imagines! Imagine – successfully blackmailing the US with threats to bomb the Soviet Union, assassinating JFK to put the more friendly LBJ in office, gobbling Lebanon, etc.

      The little graphic Star of David over a mushroom cloud is kinda trite, though…

      • OT: Rita said to give you some hugs from her so here they are, OOOOO.

        Back on topic. Israel has the Sampson Option but can’t do the damage that was supposed in the article. They are suppose to have 200 warheads and I would guess that there are more, possibly as many as 300. As I said above if India and Pakistan start throwing nukes and once they start flying India will be in a use them or lose them position, they may take out most of the threat from Pakistan, Afghanistan and part of the Iranian threat.

        • Unfortunately, a critical comment of mine is “awaiting moderation”. Yo, Eeyore, please do your duty!!!

          I sincerely hope that you (and yucki) might return to this thread once this crucial response is published.

          Please keep in mind that a few hundred thermonuclear warheads could ensure that the entire Muslim Middle East is clapped (back into) in its Iron Age chains beyond all retrieval. I have no desire to see this happen but, all the same, I have no pity on the jihadist populations that continue to seek the annihilation of Israel.

          • Put a limit of one device to a target and this would be a real big mistake since Iran has some limited anti missile defense in their latest Russian supplied air defense networks and you are still talking about between 200 and 300 targets destroyed if all of the warheads get through. Given the number of cities and military posts I don’t think this would be enough. The fall out would do more damage but not as much as the leftist fear merchants say. The two cities that were hit during WWII were cleaned up and radiation free withing about 5 years but give it 10 for the mid east. If neutron warheads are used the time fall out would be much less and the areas would be safe in one to two years. For your scenario to be valid the Israelis would have to use very dirty warheads that are designed to leave long lasting highly radioactive fall out.

        • Rita has so much goodness in her, I can feel her hug through the ether.
          ………
          Israeli nuclear capabilities are vastly overstated.
          I think. [Those who know don't talk, etc.]

          Much more importantly, there’s far less consensus among the decision-makers than outsiders presume. Things have changed since Israel turned away from socialist governance. They’re messier when it comes down to waging war.

          The senior military command is so dovish it’s scary. Since they’re not as subordinate to civilian command as our military, they aren’t entirely reliable. They’re part of the reason Iran’s nuclear facilities weren’t destroyed while it was still possible.

          The Supreme Court is decidedly leftish and activist: they’re into everything and at odds with the elected Executive and Knesset. The term “Supreme Court” is misleading; they’re not like ours. They might intervene at a strategic or even tactical level.

          • The publicly accepted figure is 200 warheads, There are probably more but the question is the size? Their warheads are mounted on sea launched missiles on subs and carried by fighter bombers. (I don’t think they have any heavy bombers) this limits the physical size and thus the yield rate. As I said above unless their warheads are specially designed there isn’t going to be a lot of long term radiation.

            • Apropos of Israeli capabilities, an article about the lovely new submarines custom-built in Germany. Expensive, but “One submarine is enough to shut down an entire enemy port.”

              Parenthetically, next time someone trashes the German people for the sins of the Nazis, here’s response worth noting. The Israeli commander of the submarine flotilla says:

              The shipyards that built those submarines are the same shipyards building Israeli submarines today. Their history of their role during WWII can never be forgotten. However, “you can count the number of countries capable of building advanced submarines, such as the Dolphin, on one hand, and they aren’t standing in line to build them for us. The Germans were very friendly toward us. In Israel people don’t even know how much,” says Kesari. To illustrate the point, Kesari says the Italians were supposed to build the snorkel mast, but at a certain stage the Italian Foreign Ministry announced it wasn’t willing to because “Israel does not protect human rights.”

              http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=38279

  4. Islam and Socialism profit from the Blockbuster model:
    “Yet Blockbuster’s model had a weakness that wasn’t clear at the time. It earned an enormous amount of money by charging its customers late fees, which had become an important part of Blockbuster’s revenue model. The ugly truth—and the company’s achilles heel—was that the company’s profits were highly dependent on penalizing its patrons.”
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregsatell/2014/09/05/a-look-back-at-why-blockbuster-really-failed-and-why-it-didnt-have-to/#35662ad1261a

    • The ugly truth—and the company’s [Islam’s A]chille’s heel—was that the company’s profits [Muslim Middle East’s supposed successes] were highly dependent on penalizing its patrons.”

      Dear perfectchild, this (however rearranged formula) is one of the more cogent observations I’ve seen at this site.

      You are absolutely right that Islam and Socialism penalize their foes for even the slightest hesitation when it comes to mounting substantial opposition against them. It is why I always have been a proponent of Massively Disproportionate Retaliation, especially with respect to Islam.

      After the 9-11 Atrocity, Mullah Omar’s hometown of Kandahar should have disappeared in a fuel-air bomb barrage. After Bali, Beslan, Madrid, London, Bali II and every other jihadist atrocity, another large Islamic city should have ceased to exist. If only pour encouragé les autres, as in ensuring that ordinary, everyday Muslims quickly sprinted down to their local mosques and immediately slit the throats of all there who preached jihad.

      Imagine how far along the West would be—had this policy been vigorously enforced—in terms of quashing jihad and, FAR MORE IMPORTANTLY, how far away we would be from the need to utterly annihilate all Muslim populations.

      This policy would likely prove to have been far more humane than how spineless Western lack of “leadership” will probably end up contributing to the Muslim holocaust.

      It makes me want to vomit when I think of how much closer we have inexorably been drawn to this entirely avoidable human catastrophe.

      • “I always have been a proponent of Massively Disproportionate Retaliation, …”

        Well, the ‘one man, one vote,’ policy of democracy that considers each person to act upon their own conscience, falls down to Mecca when a society is controlled by a block vote. Religious leaders and movie stars demanding their followers go along with them by threat or guilt – these actors-without-conscience who demonstrate they can walk without the need of air, tugging on those with the disassociative disorder for the need for approval. Those raised at the feet of four wives or single mothers. The human animal is disturbed.

        So there is already a disproportional attack on the system of freedom from these looking for identity and security, running from conscience.

        Deny a child by the age of seven, and they will be drinking for life out of your hand.

        And the disproportionate attacks by Communists and Muslims, from a knock on the door by night or in daylight respectively, (to induce fear of the unknown or fear of the known to vote for them), for entire families and associates forced into the prison of financial ruin by (IRS), or death (ISIS), will be considered normal and fair.

        Disproportunate? I think you mean proportunate to destroy their drug factories as they target your noble institutions.

        • Question: What is it about movie stars that gives them authority to demand anything of their “followers”? Or the flip side, why does anyone pay attention to such “authorities”?

  5. I always have been a proponent of Massively Disproportionate Retaliation,

    This is the only way to stop cultures like Islam, destroy a fair sized town for every small attack destroy a large town or small city for every large attack.

    • However much I dislike death on such a large scale, Islam adores human suffering in such magnitudes that I no longer have a shred of sympathy for the way that Muslims hunger for death to all Infidels. They can bite me.