Cops ‘arrest’ PCC candidate and EDL chief, Book thrown at Tommy

…and the de-democritization of England continues apace.

Here are five links. Make of them what you will.

H/T EDL Buck

1. Police arrest Kev Carroll 

2. EDL leader arrested on suspicion of entering America illegally

3. Political Policing Suppressing Democratic Protest

News update: Following Saturday’s events we learn directly from Kevin Carroll that he has been bailed until 30th November, which means that his election campaign for Bedfordshire Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) is unaffected. In contradiction to earlier reports, we can confirm that Kevin was not among EDL supporters stopped by police on the M1, but was arrested later whilst driving to his home. The police have no evidence against Kevin Carroll because he has committed no crime; their action appears to be a clumsy effort to discredit him in the run-up to the PCC election on November 15th. Rumours of the arrest of British Freedom leader Paul Weston are also completely false.

4. British Freedom on Tommy’s arrest

5. Tommy R arrested for assault on Saiful Islam

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

7 Replies to “Cops ‘arrest’ PCC candidate and EDL chief, Book thrown at Tommy”

  1. Let there be no doubt in anyone’s mind……..
    we live in a police state. I’m beginning to hate my own country.

  2. When the leftists organize marches and demonstrations, they generally appear as a mass of leaderless individuals.
    When you have “leaders” the state will always seek to deactivate them by any means.
    British law always seeks individual liability.No leaders and the liability has to be shared between hundreds of people.Dealing with hundreds of individuals equals a headache for the courts.

  3. Britain is going down hill faster all the time, the ordinary brits need to wake up to what is happening.

  4. Abu Hamza gets a decade of legal aid but Tommie Robinson, who protests against terrorism and extremism, gets none? How does that not add up to literal support for terrorism?

    Looks like we need to revise that list of terrorism supporting regimes again.

  5. Am I reading this correctly?
    are they saying that protesting is illegal if you are attacked?

  6. OxAO yup that is exactly what this means. If people want to commit assault upon you in England then you are the criminal.

    Unless you went to the right schools or have the right political beliefs, in which case they are the criminals.

    So basically everyone who was killed on 9/11 was guilty of terrorism because they were involved in an act of terrorism. Apparently now according to British law, the part they played in the terrorist attack is irrelevant.