Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.
This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.
So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.
This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.
**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.
For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.
ADDENDUM:
This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.
Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)
We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary
or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.
Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.
This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.
Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.
Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.
This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.
Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.
Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.
Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.
That is dialectics.
On the need for anti-drone defense, which has not kept up with drone offensive capabilities. My simple take is that the explosive payload that can be carried by a very small drone is very difficult to detect and neutralize before it does damage. Here, a Jet Blue passenger craft was hit. Was the drone operator a delinquent hobbyist or a more nefarious actor gathering intel?
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/right-above-cockpit-drone-strikes-jetblue-final-approach-jfk
Armor, defense is always struggling to catch up with weapons, offense. New weapons always mean you have little to no ability to defend against them. Look at WWI and the machine gun, we still have only limited defense against them. WWII airplanes, tanks etc. still struggling. Part of the problem is that politicians don’t want to spend the money on research to develop the new defenses. They know the media most of the population will blame the military instead of the politicians.
Thanks. The Ukes and Russians use a lot of shot guns to take them out when they can.
That works, what we need is an inexpensive weapon that will hit them before they get into shotgun ramge
Remember the “UFO’s over new Jersey last year?
They were clearly testing US made weapons drones.
A few weeks after the constant reports (it was around the time of Trump waiting to take office this second term) there were major attacks on apartments in Moscow by drones.
There is no way you could take them out with a shotgun.
Probably their instructions are programmed in, and you probably cannot take them out with radio jamming or hacking as they likely fly by an embeded system on board or a programmed SD card or something like that with all its telemetry.
https://rumble.com/v706hdq-russian-apt-tower-hit-by-drones-launched-from-ukraine-tested-in-nj.html
The only thing that would work would likely be a laser based or otherwise directed energy weapon, and you would have to have them all over the place and you would NOT have time to bring one to the battle field.
Israel has the advantage of being small enough that a laser based system would be able to cover the borders pretty well, and mobile systems that could be in every city.
Close-range, sneaky drones are killing off IDF individual soldiers in southern Leb. A rather new development that has yet to be countered.
The only problem with that is the outlawing of shotguns as weapons of war. During WWI the US issued shotguns with 18 inch barrels to the troops fighting in the trenches, the Germans said that advancing across no mans land into massed shotguns was worse then advancing into mass machine guns. After the war additions were made to the Geneva Convention and the Germans got shotguns outlawed as weapons of war.
If you are using shotguns to take down drones and are attacked by ground troops most people will use the weapon in hand instead of changing to a rifle. This would be committing a war crime, the only way out of this is the portion of the Geneva Convention that says if you are fighting someone who hasn’t signed the Convention you don’t have to follow it.
These ROEs are written by lawyers without much input from fighters.
An example of the continual struggle between weapons and armor is the way in the 1906s almost all military organizations moved to small bore rifles for the troops. At the time body armor was stopping most rifle rounds and artillery was responsible for most causalities. Now with counter battery radar limiting the number or rounds an artillery unit can fire before the counter battery firing destroys the cannon we are once again shifting to medium bore rifles with heavy bullets that penetrate the armor. The modern technology is returning us to the days when battles were fought with shoulder arms and the supporting arms were of limited value.
I realize that the drones are taking the place of the airplanes of WWII but they are still of limited value and counter drone weapons are being rapidly developed. I doubt if drones have more then a 15 to 20 years period before they are forced out of the skies except for special unites.
Morocco beat the Dutch team in the World Cup. Moroccan community in the Netherlands enriches like never before:
Morocco fans overjoyed in cities after beating Oranje; Fireworks thrown at Hague police
https://nltimes.nl/2026/06/30/morocco-fans-overjoyed-cities-beating-oranje-fireworks-thrown-hague-police
Attacks on police: 17 arrested at Morocco World Cup parties in The Hague & Rotterdam
https://nltimes.nl/2026/06/30/attacks-police-17-arrested-morocco-world-cup-parties-hague-rotterdam
Group of moroccans on scooters terrorize the general public in Amsterdam:
https://www.dumpert.nl/item/100155856_e4ea7bfc
Same guys, telephone stolen at 0:22
https://www.dumpert.nl/item/100155855_e0a59bb6
Dutch guy grabbed from behind at 0:06, is whipped with bike lock:
https://www.dumpert.nl/item/100155871_11827f8c
More moroccan enrichment in the Hague, the Netherlands.
Cops seem to flee from crowd:
https://www.dumpert.nl/item/100155849_55969933
Cop punched at 0:06
https://www.dumpert.nl/item/100155847_79968f3b
Nothing says thank you to the country that adopted you quite like it:
…Meanwhile in Germany it seems this little rose petal is angry because she can’t urinate in the street without someone noticing:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kAotcpQUFIY
Someone should make a movie about all these foreigners being imported (at retail prices) by the ruling elites and running rampant with their disgusting f%ck^ry.
Russian drones struck a facility in Dnipropetrovsk. Much criticized in Ukrainian social media. A civilian grain storage facility!
– – But there’s been no sowing in years and stockpiles were sold off long ago.
– – A kinda handy location:
“A railway line runs through the facility, along with loading ramps and convenient vehicle access roads. A nearby oil depot is used for rapid refueling of military equipment. This is one of the largest logistics hubs for the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the region.”
– – But, but, but – –
…..!! It had been repurposed as a toilet paper manufacturing enterprise !!
Well, the smoke is mighty BLACK for “personal hygiene products”. And secondary detonation from toilet paper stock?
https://vk.com/clip-72801118_456270745
Comments from a Russian blog:
There’s no fuel in an oil-producing country! That’s the pinnacle of governance! Imagine if our entire administrative apparatus suddenly moved to the Sahara Desert—the sand there would disappear completely!
“The country with the largest hydrocarbon reserves, which could supply half the world’s countries with fuel, after almost three decades becomes an importer of gasoline….
“This is a real economic miracle…
“We had to try to bring it to this point… but our guys succeeded…”
“How quickly we find enemies among our neighbors… Maybe it’s time (after the autumn elections) to ask the eternally deceived Amazing Grandfather and his team to leave, who have brought things to the point that they haven’t even started anything yet, but are already bombing Moscow?”
I found a gem before it was deleted. I listened to the Putin interview he describes and thought the exact same thing.
There’s a preface:
“It seems that the topic of gasoline shortages is of little interest to anyone other than citizens.
I will quote part of the text of foreign agent Abbas Gallyamov: THIS MATERIAL WAS PRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED BY FOREIGN AGENT GALLYAMOV ABBAS RADIKOVICH.”
[comment quote]
“I recommend everyone read or listen to Putin’s interview with Zarubin. It becomes clear what’s going on in his head. There’s simply no room for anything other than what’s happening on the front. The head of state is completely immersed in the frontline context, falling into a state that can be described as ‘not seeing the forest for the trees.’
“Putin lists every village and town in detail, including the smallest ones, and is aware of how many houses have been captured, which streets are already under Russian control and which are not, and so on and so forth. In this situation, anything unrelated to what’s happening on the front seems insignificant to him, simply a distraction.
When he talks about Ukrainian attacks on the Russian rear, unlike the situation on the front, there’s no detail at all—he paints the events in the broadest possible terms, as if trying to quickly get rid of this nonsense and return to his favorite topic.
The desire to ignore the reality of everything happening in the rear in favor of what’s happening at the front has become obsessive. Perhaps it’s a form of protection against unpleasant news. As in, “Don’t bother me with your nonsense, I’m busy.”