Reader’s Links for June24th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

12 Replies to “Reader’s Links for June24th, 2026”

  1. With numerous online “Hate” censorship laws being passed in Europe and Canada, such unlawful laws may just have created the first real, modern example of Samizdat.

    Citizen Vigilante, a new film purportedly banned in Germany, is the blunt-force depiction of the consequences of European mass importation of sub-prime human capital.

    One cannot help but think this film has the strong shoulders on which those that follow will stand. Going Woke and broke Hollywood is providing the vacuum into which real voices are shouting their own truth. Going Woke and broke Western civilization will now face true grassroots reactions the veracity of which, to now, were always spied laterally by conservative intellectuals as dialectical recreations of the Comintern. This writer does not doubt the integrity of this film’s maker. However, it will be interesting to watch how the dialecticians now attempt to co-opt and invert bona-fide Samizdat. This is much more difficult to deal with than any Yellow Vest movement, or Freedom Truckers where state-made Nazi thespians are sprinkled into the crowd, then conveniently filmed by state-paid media in order to discredit counter narratives.

    The problem for establishment films critics is that they cannot touch this film lest they amplify it. It cannot be marginalized because it is born in the margin:

    https://youtu.be/14-8vR-QBes?si=pPULGrKL1VNufzLf

    Citizen Vigilante is necessarily unapologetic for what it shows because it is, explicity, a call to arms. Alexander Solzenitzen said it best here:

    “.. And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
    Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag

    So it is that when state thugs come to arrest the protagonist they are dispatched most violently. This is doubtlessly a well-measured moral statement considered by the writer. It tells us just how far down the Gulag road Europe’s comintern has taken the European people. And just to display his facility with subtext, he adorns the scene with playfully kitchy music as the massacre plays out. The scene does not tell, but instructs against apology for what must be done to oppose some thing, and someone much, much worse. Even greater gruesome stoicism plays out in the final scene. To see the mass murder that plays out here as being against human beings is to miss a huge point. Rather, it is the symbolic, resolved snuffing of the exhausted moral relativism summarized by the state dialectical spew delivered therein.

    Establishment film critics, were they to touch this thing with a ten-foot word, would portray the film as pedantic, preachy and mechanical. Herein begs a great question: what is it? The film does not only touch a nerve, but grabs THE raw nerve with an iron grip and twists it with clenched jaw. Take that, it says. But is it pedantic and preachy?

    The answer may be found in a odd place: journalism. Journalism traditionally averted such accusations because it was confined to facts, not narratives. Such was the baseline for reportage. That animal is largely extinct. Now, we have state-made narrative attacks everywhere fooling most of the people most of the time using plasticized truths and lies by omission. Enter stage right Citizen Vigilante which reverts the state inversions back to their proper upright positions by using inconvenient truths and facts by inclusion. See, it isn’t art because it isn’t meant to be. Its goal is to nudge the sniper’s nudged barrel three millimeters back onto the target. So again, what do we call it? It is not Dirty Harry or any other revenge genre film because the times they have changed. The luxury of freedom we had with which to make such films in 1971 are long, long gone. To compare the Then with the Now is absurd. Dirty Harry said ‘Make My Day’. This film says, ‘Rebuild My Western Civilization’. The difference is bracing.

    I cheered nothing while watching this film because cheering is not my style, and the dangers it depicts are visceral. It was necessarily made in Europe because Europe is ahead of North America in the population replacement agenda and, arguably, in alien violence

    What it does do is it recalibrates the Overton Window by brute force. By this it slots somewhere new on the genre spectrum. In the information battlespace traditional journalism finds an ironic brother in fictionalized hyper-realism.

    I guess this is what it takes to make solid, again, liquefied reality. Not coming to a theater near you.

    As a footnote, this film has not a single anti-Semitic bone on its body. Think on that.

    https://youtu.be/fVxmjwaPEFU?si=X3fG-FnOozERtE2m

  2. Gen. Avivi is awesome !

    A briefing on operations in Lebanon and Iran.
    Three major tunnel complexes have just been taken. I’ve seen a little in videos: Five floors deep, hewn out of bedrock; nothing short of North Korean quality and scale.

    Then he talks about spirit, what makes a winner. He’s a blessed Maccabee – that’s Hebrew for “hammer”.

    As for all the whining and arguing, remember what Moses had to cope with. Even with the manna it was no picnic.

    If you’re just looking for a boost, go to about 12:45. Or read the transcript in the description below the video. (His accent may be a challenge.)

    Israel’s Next Move on Iran — Hezbollah’s Endgame

  3. Gen. Avivi is awesome !

    A briefing on operations in Lebanon and Iran.
    Three major tunnel complexes have just been taken. I’ve seen a little in videos: Five floors deep, hewn out of bedrock; nothing short of North Korean quality and scale.

    Then he talks about spirit, what makes a winner. He’s a blessed Maccabee – that’s Hebrew for “hammer”.

    As for all the whining and arguing, remember what Moses had to cope with. Even with the manna it was no picnic.

    If you’re just looking for a boost, go to about 12:45. Or read the transcript in the description below the video. (His accent may be a challenge.)

    Israel’s Next Move on Iran — Hezbollah’s Endgame

  4. Historians Won’t Tell You THIS About The Crusades – Raymond Ibrahim

    (long but educational)

  5. WHO WILL WIN THE NEW SPACE RACE, CHINA OR AMERICA?

    This intense space race for geopolitical influence, resource extraction, and the establishment of standards for future exploration is not about proving what is possible but about securing a foothold.
    […
    The Chang’e Project is a large-scale, accelerated effort: a series of robotic and crewed missions to the Moon, with plans for lunar orbit, soft landings, automated sample collection, and the construction of a lunar station. By 2019, Chang’e achieved a soft landing on the Moon’s far side, making China the first country to do so. In 2020, samples were collected from the near side, and in 2024, rock and soil samples were collected from the far side, again marking a first.

    China plans a lunar mission with three astronauts by 2030, with two descending to the lunar surface for scientific exploration and a third remaining in lunar orbit.

    It is already developing the Long March 10, a superheavy-lift rocket; the Mengzhong, a next-generation partially reusable spacecraft; and Lanyue, a heavy lunar lander designed to carry two astronauts to the Moon’s surface. By 2035, it aims to establish an International Lunar Research Base on the Moon.

    China’s long-term strategy is to take control of the Moon, secure the resources needed to sustain life there, and further assert control over space. It has its eye on the Shackleton crater, located at the lunar South Pole and considered the most favorable for human habitation and future space exploration.

    The crater is the Moon’s largest, oldest, and deepest basin, a radiation-shielded, permanently shadowed region. It contains billions of years’ worth of ice, usable to produce oxygen, water, and hydrogen for rocket propulsion.

    Another advantage of the lunar poles is that the mountain ridges there are perpetually sunny, making them well-suited for operating solar farms to power human habitation, deep-space missions, and even manufacturing. Power from the solar farms could be used, for example, to extract the Helium-3 isotope found in lunar soil, which has great potential as a nuclear fusion fuel for the future.

    https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/06/who_will_win_the_new_space_race_china_or_america.html

  6. French woman allegedly held captive by husband for 12 years rescued in Pakistan
    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj0g71pnv3no
    Police in Pakistan have arrested a man who allegedly held his wife and children captive at home and abused them for more than a decade.
    His wife, a French national named Sylvie Yasmina, claims the man assaulted his family physically and mentally “on a daily basis” and described him as “very violent”, local police told BBC Urdu.
    One of their sons managed to sneak out to make a police report, which led to a raid of their house in Bara, a remote town in the mountainous Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.
    Police found Yasmina and her five children in a cramped and “extremely dilapidated room”, with bruises all over their bodies.
    Yasmina and her children have been taken to a women’s shelter in Peshawar. They plan to move back to France, the police say.
    According to Yasmina, 54, her husband had “effectively imprisoned” the family since they moved to Pakistan from Australia in 2014.
    “According to the woman… She was not allowed to meet anyone, their two older children had missed their studies, while the three younger children were born in Pakistan and never enrolled in school,” a senior police officer told BBC Urdu.
    Authorities have not identified Yasmina’s husband, a Pakistani national who they say was “residing illegally” in Australia when the couple met.
    They married in 2003 and lived in Australia until 2014, when they moved to Pakistan with their two older children. Yasmina claims she has not had any communication with the outside world since then.
    “We were deprived [of our] freedom, my husband didn’t take care of us the way he should as a husband and the father of my children. He beats us and put pressure on our lives on a daily basis,” Yasmina wrote in her statement to the police, parts of which have been published by local media.
    “I felt that my future was already ruined, the future of the children would also be ruined.”

  7. A condensed version of a letter to the National Post I read a few weeks ago written by the Honourable Harry LaForme,
    “I stood on my ancestral land and said what Carney would not.
    anti-Zionism is a libel-driven hate movement that incites violence and targets Jews with the goal of wiping Israel of the map.

    On June 6, I stood before Toronto’s Jewish community on the treaty lands of my ancestors. Days earlier, Prime Minister Mark Carney had stood at Toronto’s Holy Blossom Temple and acknowledged a painful truth: Canada is failing its Jewish citizens. He recognized that antisemitism has reached levels unseen in generations. He acknowledged that Jewish Canadians are disproportionally targeted by hate. He acknowledged the fear felt by families whose schools, synagogues, businesses and communities have been targets. He named the statistics. He named the suffering. But he did not name the ideology driving it, so I will.
    I stand before you on the land of my ancestors to say what the Prime Minister should have said: Anti-Zionism is a libel-driven hate movement that incites violence and the targeting, exclusion, and marginalization of Jews in the diaspora and has its ultimate goal wiping Israel of the face of Mother Earth and the death of all beings within it. There that is what should have been said, and now it has.

    Hope is determined resilience. But hope does not mean silence. Hope and resilience are sacred obligations we owe the seven generations who came before us and the seven generations who came after us. They are moral imperatives.
    Indigenous peoples in Canada are well versed in being let down by the governments and the failures of elected leaders. Our current Prime Minister profoundly disappointed many of us. With or without him, we will move forward. Because governments do not decide whether ancient peoples survive. We do.

    The Jewish people are not alone. I stand with them. Miigwetch, Shalom and Am Yisrael. Chai.”

    The Honourable Harry S. LaForme O.C. And I.P.C. Is a retired Justice of the Ontario Court of Appeal, the first Indigenous person appointed to the Appellate Court in Canada.