First, the article is over at RAIR Foundation. It lays it all out.
Here are the two videos. One from Birmingham Britainistan in 2025
The second is from the Friday Sermon at the mosque in San Diego which was made famous by the two teenage National Bolsheviks who shot people near it a day later.
We are not saying these events are connected by the way. In fact I would go out on a limb a little and say that in fact they are specifically not connected. The National Bolsheviks who committed these murders had their own agenda and were almost certainly not sophisticated in their understanding of anything beyond being in the fan club of other National Bolsheviks like Tarrant in New Zealand.
Trevor Loudon details that in this interview from this weekend.
The purpose of this post is to try and get the message across that Islam is not like other religions. It is a complete doctrine for world domination. That exactly like communism, what is said means something quite different to people inside, or outside of the religion. It very much has and relies on an initiate language. The voyage from Mecca to Medina is symbolic of Islamic conquest over the unbeliever. It is not “refugees”. It is not “Migrants”. While individual Muslims may journey to a place that Islam hasn’t yet made into a sh*t-hole for personal reasons, the religion requires them to make it into one. And all the polls ever taken on the subject show a staggering percentage of Muslims in Western nations who do indeed want this. And the number is high enough that a determined fraction of them clearly can and do defeat a larger number of sleeping ignorant who simply cannot learn that when the enemy tells you what they intend to do to you, you should listen and act accordingly.
In fairness though, those muslims are acting in concert with Western leaders who clearly brought them here as the weapon of choice against ‘capitalism’ and Western civilization. So in one sense, the blame doesn’t lie with Western leadership, but with we the people, and those groups that form allowable counter-narratives such that no real opposition can form.
We can spot those groups by the ones that have organized meetings and use words like, “Islamism”, “Islamic extremism”, “Far right wing” (applied to anyone who doesn’t even have to speak the truth about Islam, but brings to your attention Muslims who say it directly) and will not tolerate anyone speaking factually or showing evidence of the real problems.
Know that the two videos presented above are two in thousands. They are just the momentary exemplar because one is so blunt and the other might carry special interest because of the news surrounding the attack at that mosque. But this site has been documenting similar things for nearly 20 years. RAIR Foundation, MEMRI especially focuses on this, obviously Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch, The Baron’s Gates of Vienna, named after one of the most famous attempts by Islam to conquer Europe, all have detailed these things in their own way and with their own styles for even longer.
Ultimately, one needs to understand that both leftism, and Islam, are separate systems of thought. When they speak, they mean something other than what we hear. This is by design.
The one thing they both have in common with Western Socratic thought though, was described perfectly by Orwell in 1984:
“In philosophy, or religion, or ethics, or politics, two and two might make five, but when one was designing a gun or an aeroplane they had to make four. Physical facts could not be ignored. In the laboratory, or in the factory, the laws of nature could not be ignored. Two and two must make four.”
