Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.
This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.
So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.
This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.
For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like.
The CCP has openly placed a bounty on a Chinese-Canadian. When does this foreign authority extend to non-Chinese Canadians who say something offensive? Or never mind that, what if the U.S. placed an open bounty on a Canadian politician? How hard would Carney pound the table then?
And what’s with Trump assuming Carney’s victory in the upcoming election? What’s with this warm and fuzzy feeling following a phone call? I know there must be much more to this, but I don’t even like the face-value version of how that telephone call went.
Nothing makes sense.
https://youtu.be/t9AyASYPQRM?si=bxngaR8govlpaPp0
Is he in the jail house now?
Intelligence And Policy Failures – With Jeff Nyquist, Trevor Loudon, and Jimmy from Brooklyn
Johnny Anderson – Dynamic Independence – March 28, 2025
https://dynamicindependence.podbean.com/e/intelligence-and-policy-failures-with-jeff-nyquist-trevor-loudon-and-jimmy-from-brooklyn/
Breaking News! Russian Buildup in the Baltics
Johnny Anderson, Jeff Nyquist & Lee Wheelbarger
KLW WORLD NEWS – Premiered March 26, 2025
Rep. Cory Mills Introduces Legislation to Block Illegal Aliens from Ever Obtaining U.S. Citizenship
Florida Rep. Cory Mills has introduced legislation to block illegal aliens from ever obtaining U.S. citizenship.
The No Citizenship for Alien Invaders Act aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to “protect American sovereignty by ensuring that illegal immigrants cannot exploit the U.S. immigration system,” according to Rep. Mills.
If passed, the bill would add the line, “No alien who enters the United States unlawfully shall be eligible for naturalization, notwithstanding any other provision of the immigration laws,” to the end of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
“Under the Biden administration, we saw more than 10 million encounters at our borders, a crisis exacerbated by reckless catch-and-release policies that allowed criminals who broke our laws to remain in the United States,” said Congressman Mills in a press release.
Mills continued, “President Trump has made it clear that anyone that tries to unlawfully undermine, exploit, or bypass our immigration system is a criminal. The No Citizenship for Alien Invaders Act will ensure these criminals will never be granted U.S. citizenship, that privilege will be reserved for those who respect our laws.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/rep-cory-mills-introduces-legislation-block-illegal-aliens/
119TH CONGRESS
1 ST SESSION H. R. ll
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to preclude the naturalization
of any person who has unlawfully entered the United States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. M ILLS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on llllllllllllll
A BILL
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to preclude
the naturalization of any person who has unlawfully en-
tered the United States.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Citizenship for4
Alien Invaders Act of 2025’’.5
SEC. 2. INELIGIBILITY FOR NATURALIZATION.6
Section 312 of the Immigration and Nationality Act7
(8 U.S.C. 1423) is amended by adding at the end the fol-8
lowing: ‘‘No alien who enters the United States unlawfully9
2
shall be eligible for naturalization, notwithstanding any1
other provision of the immigration laws.’’.https://mills.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/mills.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/no-citizenship-for-alien-invaders-act_0.pdf
VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:14 Mar 10, 2025 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:\USERS\HRBRAZELTON\APPDATA\ROAMING\SOFTQUAD\XMETAL\11.0\GEN\C\MILLS
March 10, 2025 (1:14 p.m.)
G:\M\19\MILLS\MILLS_015.XML
g:\VHLC\031025\031025.045.xml (965305|5)
https://mills.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/mills.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/no-citizenship-for-alien-invaders-act_0.pdf
The Republicans are learning how to fight back, now if they can get this bill passed into law it will be a very big victory.
Karoline Leavitt accuses Democratic senator of leaking information to Russian oligarch
gatewayhispanic.com/video/karoline-leavitt-accuses-democratic-senator-of-leaking-information-to-russian-oligarch/
Karoline Leavitt accuses Democratic senator of leaking information to Russian oligarch
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt sharply criticised Democratic Senator Mark Warner, accusing him of leaking sensitive information to a Russian oligarch. She also charged that the current administration has used the encrypted messaging application Signal to conduct official business, raising questions about transparency and compliance with government regulations.
Leavitt’s statements have generated controversy, as they put the ethics and security of communication within the US government at the centre of the debate.
https://gatewayhispanic.com/video/karoline-leavitt-accuses-democratic-senator-of-leaking-information-to-russian-oligarch/
NYC Court Holds Stun Guns are NOT Protected by Second Amendment
Ammoland Inc. Posted on March 29, 2025 by Dean Weingarten
Stun Gun iStock-Arijuhani 157107201
NYC Court Holds Stun Guns are NOT Protected by Second Amendment iStock-Arijuhani 157107201
Judge Eduardo Ramos, the U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, has issued an Opinion & Order that a ban on stun guns is constitutional. A New York State law prohibits the private possession of stun guns and tasers; a New York City law prohibits the possession and selling of stun guns. Judge Ramos has ruled these laws do not infringe on rights protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The case is Calce v. City of New York, filed in October of 2021. Ramos’ court is the first court to conclude that stun guns have not been established as “arms” covered by the text of the Second Amendment, since the Supreme Court rebuked the Massachusetts Supreme Court in the Caetano case. In Caetano, the Court unanimously held that:
The Court has held that “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,” District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. 570, 582 (2008) , and that this “ Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States,” McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742, 750 (2010)
Prima facie means “on its face”. The Supreme Court, in the three cases of Heller, McDonald, and Caetano, has repeatedly stated the text of the Second Amendment extends to all instruments that constitute bearable arms. The statement is very clear. It goes back to the establishment of what the words in the text of the Second Amendment mean. In Heller, the meaning of “arms” is established by reference to the dictionary definition at the time:
Before addressing the verbs “keep” and “bear,” we interpret their object: “Arms.” The 18th-century meaning is no different from the meaning today. The 1773 edition of Samuel Johnson’s dictionary defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence.” 1 Dictionary of the English Language 107 (4th ed.) (hereinafter Johnson). Timothy Cunningham’s important 1771 legal dictionary defined “arms” as “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another.” 1 A New and Complete Law Dictionary (1771); see also N. Webster, American Dictionary of the English Language (1828) (reprinted 1989) (hereinafter Webster) (similar).
Heller clearly establishes the word “arms” in the Second Amendment refers to “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another. ” There is not question of the definition of “arms” in the text of the Second Amendment.
Once the action in question in the court is established to be covered by the text of the Second Amendment, the burden of proof shifts to the government to show there were longstanding legal traditions which established exceptions to the text, such as limitations on “dangerous and unusual” weapons.
Courts defying the Supreme Court have adopted a strategy to dilute and deny Second Amendment rights. Those courts claim the burden of proof is on those supporting the Second Amendment to prove that particular arms in a case are in “common use” to be covered by the Second Amendment text.
In the New York case, this is the tactic Judge Ramos used to find in favor of New York City. Judge Ramos claims it is the burden of the plaintiffs to prove stun guns and tasers are “in common use” for them to be covered by the text of the Second Amendment. From Judge Ramos:
“[T]he Second Amendment does not protect those weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes.” Heller, 554 U.S. at 625. Therefore, Plaintiffs must show that stun guns and tasers are in “common use” today, and that they are “typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes.”
Judge Ramos is turning the burden of proof on its head. Just because some weapons may not be protected by the Second Amendment does not mean they are not covered by the text of the Second Amendment.
Most jurisdictions and courts are ruling differently. Several jurisdictions have removed their bans on various weapons, including in New York State. For example, On 14 December 2018, a New York District judge, Pamela K. Chen, an Obama appointee, struck down a ban on nunchakus as unconstitutional. In Rhode Island, District Judge William E. Smith found the burden falls to the state to prove particular weapons are not protected by the Second Amendment.
This correspondent views this ruling as another effort by judges who dislike the Second Amendment to delay and delay, hoping for a miracle to reverse current Supreme Court decisions on the Second Amendment.
https://www.ammoland.com/2025/03/nyc-court-holds-stun-guns-are-not-protected-by-second-amendment/
House Bill Seeks to Remove SBRs from National Firearms Act
By Tom Knighton | 5:29 PM | March 28, 2025
AP Photo/Lisa Marie Pane
Short-barrel rifles, or SBRs, are probably the most accessible NFA items out there. Yeah, you have to jump through the regulatory hoops for an NFA item in general, but once you do, you can just slap a new AR upper on your rifle or replace a pistol brace with a stock (back when that was an option) and you’re ready to roll.
Advertisement
But they really shouldn’t be on the NFA at all.
I get why they’re there. Short-barreled weapons like sawed-off shotguns might have been pretty common for gangsters and others to use back in the day, but the law didn’t stop people from using a hacksaw on Granpa’s old 12-gauge. Even so, they aren’t all that commonly used for violent crime these days, and I have doubts about how common they were back in the pre-NFA era.
So yeah, it’s stupid.
Now, a bill has been introduced to change that.
Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) is reintroducing the Stop Harassing Owners of Rifles Today (SHORT) Act on Thursday to remove onerous restrictions on short-barreled rifles, shotguns, and other firearms.
The bill would amend the Internal Revenue Code if 1986 and remove these firearms from the National Firearms Act (NFA) classification. If passed, it would rescind the extra restrictions and taxes imposed on those who own these weapons.
Sen. Marshall argued that “’Shall not be infringed is crystal clear – and the Biden-era abuses of the Constitutionally protected rights of gun owners across the country need to be undone.”
The SHORT Act takes a step toward rolling back nonsensical regulations that the National Firearms Act has placed upon gun owners. I challenge my colleagues in both chambers to pass this legislation and join me in fully restoring and protecting our God-given Second Amendment rights.
Marshall and other lawmakers first introduced the measure in 2023.
The SHORT Act will remove language treating certain types of shotguns as “destructive devices” while doing away with the $5 transfer tax for “any firearm classified as any other weapon.”
The bill also seeks to negate state-level prohibitions on these weapons and even includes language that would override licensing requirements, saying, “any person who acquires or possesses such rifle, shotgun, or other weapon … shall be treated as meeting any such registration or licensing requirement.”
So, yeah, kinda big.
Now, the question is whether this will go anywhere.
I’m a little more optimistic than I might have been a few days ago, thanks to the National Constitutional Carry Reciprocity Act advancing, but I do have my doubts about this making it to President Donald Trump’s desk.
It would have to go through the Senate, and as things currently stand there, I suspect this would never get a vote thanks to the filibuster. As I’ve said before, it kept a lot of bad gun laws from getting passed, but now it’s going to keep some good ones from getting passed, too.
But who knows, I may well be wrong. It’s happened before and will happen again, so why not on this?
The truth is that SBRs are demonized as somehow particularly dangerous weapons, mostly because they’re viewed as more concealable, but the fact that things like AR-pistols aren’t used in nearly as many crimes as some might like to believe kind of negates this argument, especially since the AR-style firearms are kind of like an adult Mr. Potatohead in that you can mix, match, and customize all you want, without needing a gunsmith to make many of the modifications.
If someone wants an illegal SBR, they can get one. You’re not stopping them.
But, as per usual with gun control, it does stop the law-abiding gun owner who might like a smaller, more compact and lightweight firearm for home defense purposes or just because they think it’s neat.
I’m praying this one passes. It should because there’s no reason for these guns to be NFA items, even if I thought there were validity to the NFA as a whole. I don’t, so that just gives me another reason to see these removed.
https://x.com/GunOwners/status/1578756752606392320
https://bearingarms.com/tomknighton/2025/03/28/house-bill-seeks-to-remove-sbrs-from-national-firearms-act-n1228126
‘Luigi Mangione Act’: California Libs Honor Accused Murderer with Healthcare Proposal
thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/luigi-mangione-act-california-libs-honor-accused-murderer/
Mar. 29, 2025 5:20 pm
A proposed ballot initiative named the “Luigi Mangione Access to Health Care Act” has been submitted to the California Attorney General’s Office in honor of the accused murderer.
Mangione, 26, has become somewhat of a folk hero as he is accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024.
The proposal would amend the state’s Health and Safety Code to curb insurers’ ability to deny or delay medical treatments recommended by physicians.
KTLA reports:
The initiative would make it illegal for an insurance company to “delay, deny or modify any medical procedure or medication” suggested by a licensed physician in the Golden State, which could have serious consequences such as “disability, death, amputation, permanent disfigurement, loss or reduction of any bodily function,” the document stated.
If the initiative is enacted, any decision by an insurer to delay, deny or modify can only be made by a physician on behalf of any insurer. The initiative would also make it a felony to employ someone who is not a physician to review a decision made by a physician.
Should insurance companies delay, they would have to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the medication or procedure was unnecessary or would not result in disability, death, amputation, permanent disfigurement or the loss or reduction of any bodily function.
Public comments about the measure will be open through April 25.
Authorities allege that Mangione meticulously planned the attack and killed Thompson in cold blood, driven by frustration with the U.S. healthcare system.
A handwritten letter found on Mangione at the time of his arrest labeled insurance companies “parasitic” and decried corporate greed, sentiments echoed by bullet casings at the crime scene inscribed with “DENY,” “DEPOSE,” and “DELAY”—terms often linked to insurance claim denials.
Mangione is facing federal and state charges, including murder as an act of terrorism, and could face the death penalty if convicted on the most serious charges.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/luigi-mangione-act-california-libs-honor-accused-murderer/
(Richard: Actions like this tell us more about the Dems then all of their speeches. The murder was either a cold blooded murder or a political assassination, personally I think it was the later and that the Dems are delaying the trial until they can find a way to shove the incident down the memory hole and let Mangione loose to commit more violent political acts. This was a terrorist attack to try and scare other CEO’s into following the orders of the left or face similar act aimed at them and their families. Things are going to become more and more dangerous as the weather warms enough for the thugs to ditch their heavy coats and stay out during the night committing acts of vandalism and arson along with targeted murders.
The big difference between the US and the other nations where this type of color revolution has been tried is the Second Amendment, most of the violence will be confined to the States controlled by the Dems where there is harsh gun control laws and the ordinary citizens are disarmed.
“Before all else, be armed.” ~ Niccolo Machiavelli
“Rome remained free for four hundred years and Sparta eight hundred, although their citizens were armed all that time; but many other states that have been disarmed have lost their liberties in less than forty years.” ~ Niccolo Machiavelli
The above quotes by Machiavelli speak volumes about how nations remain free, Britain remained free while they followed the old Saxon law “Let All Free Men Be Armed”. In 1921 they started controlling who could own arms and what type they could own, they are now outlawing swords and knives while the rights and freedom of the ordinary Brits are disappearing faster then beer at a Veterans BBQ.
Johnny you are asking why PT supported Carney, I think it was because he sees what is coming to the entire world and knows that the US needs the Canadian land bordering the Arctic along with Greenland to ensure the freedom of the North Americans. He is probably thinking that he has to do everything he can to ensure that we gain control of that land and that the worse the Canadian Government is the quicker the Canadian Conservatives will move to join the US. This is harsh but the time when we need to control the land is short, he probably has a better idea about the time we have before things get real tense bu all we can do is pray and trust that the Lord is guiding PT to keep us safe and strong.)
Getting Back to Autopen-Gate
thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/getting-back-autopen-gate/
Mar. 29, 2025 2:40 pm
Autopen/Image: Wikicommons
One reason we see the Dems in synchronized hysteria over the Signal messaging non-Imbroglio is not only the typical “gotcha” game, but there is also far more in play.
With the dramatic street theater of Representative Eric Swalwell (D-CA-14), Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA), and even Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), the contrived Street Theater had two desired effects.
First, some of the Democrat members of Congress were deluding themselves that they finally had an issue to stop getting crushed by President Trump and a growing measure of the American Electorate. However, those on the Blue Team that are clear-thinking know that they have a much larger issue in play: Autopen-Gate.
The second issue is the real reason for the Blue Histrionics. They are using chaff and flares to divert attention from the Autopen scandal. Autopen-Gate represents a distinct manifestation of a Constitutional Crisis.
The entire set of Biden Committee members that ran the Executive Branch during the era of #46 are culpable in a criminal RICO Conspiracy to evade the 25th Amendment and the requirement for a “wet signature” from the competent, cognizant President.
They performed this conspiracy to lie to the American public and Congress and hide a non-cognitive commander-in-chief. President Trump is in his full right to challenge every single document that was Autopenned by the Biden Committee.
This means potentially much of what was done during the era of the Biden Committee can be undone. This includes all the Pardons, all the Executive Orders, and all Congressional Legislation that was Autopenned into Enactment (Enacting is a fancy way of saying, “Signed by the President”).
There are indicators that it was White House Staff Secretary Neera Tanden who was the holder of the Autopen for this fraud. Being a CNN or MSNBC Contributor after leaving the Biden Committee is incriminating in itself.
The Oversight Project did an excellent analysis of Autopen-Gate. This is a very serious matter and cannot be trivialized, lightly dismissed, or faux fact-checked away. Their beginning statement explained the gravity of the situation:
“The United States Constitution vests numerous powers in one man and one man alone— the President of the United States. These powers include signing or vetoing bills, 1 signing or vetoing orders, resolutions, or certain legislative votes, 2 nominating and commissioning Officers, 3 and granting reprieves and pardons.4 In all of these instances, the President’s personal action is required, i.e., he “shall” perform some action. These mandates are exclusive to the President. Therefore, it is well established that the President cannot delegate these decisions to anyone.5 The President affixing his wet signature not only signifies consent, but is the legally required act.6”
Autopenning is a normal thing for past Presidents and Cabinet Secretaries on routine actions. Routine actions, that is, not more formal matters such as Executive Orders, Presidential Directives, and enacting legislation passed by Congress.
However, there were significant control measures in place.
As a closely related exemplar – for an official Secretary of Defense Memo, there had to be three things:
A Date Stamp
A Secretary of Defense Action Control Number
A “Wet Signature” for any substantive action
There were several times senior officials would waive around a bootlegged copy of a memo and then were embarrassed because it did not have all three and the Secretary changed course, and the unofficial copy was nullified. I saw it personally on multiple occasions.
Sometimes a Secretary would “pre-Wet Sign” a document before going on leave or travel when waiting for final confirmation of an important fact in the document. If confirmation was received, then the Executive Secretary would simply date-stamp the document and release it.
The Secretary of Defense would “Wet Sign” all substantive issues – especially when the action was going to the President for final decision.
The evidence that Biden was not cognitively functional is overwhelming, yet multiple sworn officials, starting with Kamala, failed their duty to invoke the 25th Amendment.
Autopenning is not bad in itself. It is unrealistic to assume a President or Cabinet Secretary will personally sign everything.
Trending: WATCH: President Trump Delivers Outstanding Answer to a Simple Question that Has Flummoxed Democrats for Years
Even if one has worked in the Office of the Secretary of Defense or the White House, unless one has been personally responsible for a staffing action for a Secretary of Defense or Presidential signature, one is blissfully unaware of the daily tsunami of staffing actions seeking a signature.
But the important actions should be receiving the personal signature “wet signature” of the President. President Trump has shown his “wet signature” multiple times starting January 20, 2025.
Retired Special Forces Colonel / Professor Steve Bucci, a Military Assistant for a past Secretary of Defense, someone who I watched and worked with closely as he did magnificent traffic control for actions coming in and out of the Secretary of Defense had this to say about the Biden Committee Autopen Scandal:
“I think they will say they followed the policy pre-approved by the President. That is frankly nonsense. It is never supposed to be used to circumvent the decision-making process. The Autopen is for routine actions, like signing photos and standard boilerplate response to letter type documents.
Policy, pardons, executive orders, honest to goodness decision documents are supposed to be read, approved, and signed by the principal, not Autopenned by a staffer. The biggest crisis we had was when (someone) decided to Autopen condolence letters.
When the Boss found out, he went nuts. That never happened again. We never used Autopen for anything operational such as Deployment Orders. This (the Biden Autopen scandal) is Woodrow Wilson level fraud.”
All Biden Committee Pardons and Actions should be considered null and void. Autopen-Gate is a serious Constitutional matter that may need to go to the Supreme Court for resolution. Never has a Committee run the Presidency under such false and willfully criminal RICO conditions.
Pardonees – lawyer up. This issue is not going away.
That includes you Kinzinger, Cheney, Hunter, Fauci, and all others.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/getting-back-autopen-gate/
Satanist Arrested for Punching Someone During ‘Black Mass’ Ritual Inside Kansas State Capitol (VIDEO)
thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/satanist-arrested-punching-someone-during-black-mass-ritual/
Mar. 29, 2025 2:00 pm
The leader of the “Satanic Grotto” organization has been arrested for punching a young man who disrupted the group’s “black mass” ritual at the Kansas State Capitol on Friday.
At least three other members of the Satanic group were also arrested.
Satanic Grotto leader Michael Stewart and his group initially held a demonstration on the Capitol steps, where they desecrated unconsecrated communion wafers in front of hundreds of Christian counter-protesters.
The situation escalated when Stewart defied a permit restriction issued by Governor Laura Kelly that barred the group from performing a ritual inside the building.
Stewart entered the rotunda, began reciting from a script, and was interrupted by Marcus Schroeder, a 21-year-old Christian counter-protester who attempted to snatch the paper from his hands. Stewart responded by striking Schroeder in the face, and Capitol Police intervened to tackle the Satanist to the ground.
A video of the altercation inside the Capitol was provided to Life Site News.
EXCLUSIVE | Leader of Satanic Grotto ARRESTED at Kansas Capitol Building for attempting ‘Black Mass’ pic.twitter.com/VjLQ4pvqMs
— LifeSiteNews (@LifeSite) March 28, 2025
During the Black Mass ritual, the Satanists intended to desecrate a consecrated Eucharistic host, a sacred element in Catholicism. It is unclear if they could get that far before the arrest was made.
Stewart was arrested for disorderly conduct and unlawful assembly, and his bond was set at $1,000. Schroeder, despite being punched, was also arrested for disorderly conduct and has a matching $1,000 bond.
Two other members of the Satanic Grotto, Jocelyn Frazee, 32, and Sean Anderson, 50, were arrested for unlawful assembly after attempting to continue the ritual following Stewart’s arrest.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/satanist-arrested-punching-someone-during-black-mass-ritual/
The article in the Daily Mail is complicated but the reasoning is at least semi sound as far as the legality goes, I am not sure how the voters would react to this being tried and I am sure that the Dems would go ballistic if it is tried. I doubt that it would make the looming civil war any bloodier of nasty then what the Dems are already planning. For that matter as much as I would like to see PT continue to head the government as we continue to push to restore the Republic to what the founders wanted I am not sure how I would react to a lawyerly trick like this to get around the 22nd Amendment.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14536307/Trump-term-2037-simple-loophole-Constitution.html