Reader’s Links for January 7th, 2025

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

27 Replies to “Reader’s Links for January 7th, 2025”

    • That is real good shooting, you have to admire someone who can make a shot like that.

  3. Could Mark Carney be yesterday’s man? NZPA seems to be failing, Morgan – Stanley has joined a list of banks QUITTING Mark Carney’s backed climate Group. Goldman-Sachs and Wells Fargo have quit.

    The 5 major Canadian banks are still part of the net zero alliance, under the watchful eye of Mark Carney. Where is the money that was in the truckers accounts? Can we expect to see a return of that money?

    In other news Justine Trudeau says Chrystia Freeland was an “Incredible Political Partner”. Yes they were quite the twosome, just stop and reflect on what a Canadian Prime Minister and his Partner did to the Canadian citizens under the guise of the “Emergency Act”. First they came for……and many Canadians did nothing…..there lies the problem.

    Who was Garnet Harper? How did the College of Physicians and Surgeons “treat” him? What oath? He certainly was not included in there wokeness. What is a crime? Good God peoplekind the 35 year old man with a wife and five small children died.

  4. Headline: Poilievre and SIGNH say they’ll try to trigger an election as soon as possible.

    Insufferable Jagmeet SIGNH, who now is assured his pension, the same self-delusional maggot who propped up Justine and whose party fully supported the Emergency Act, now wants an election. I do hope Canadians give him what he deserves.

  5. Now that Haaretz {spit} is no longer recognized by the Israeli govt, JPost joins T-of-Israel in trying to fill the breach. Read THIS for a sardonic smile. (Lovely, kinda nasty word, “sardonic”.)
    =>[PT’s former Amb. to Israel flagged it on X for entertainment value.]

    Will Trump seize the opportunity for an Israel-Palestinian breakthrough? -opinion, NYU Prof.

    Trump faces a pivotal choice as conflict dynamics shift, with rising regional pressures and growing calls for a two-state solution amid fears of further violence and lasting instability.

    https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-836210#836210

  6. Now that Haaretz {spit} is no longer recognized by the Israeli govt, JPost joins T-of-Israel in trying to fill the breach. Read THIS for a sardonic smile. (Lovely, kinda nasty word, “sardonic”.)
    =>[PT’s former Amb. to Israel flagged it on X for entertainment value.]

    Will Trump seize the opportunity for an Israel-Palestinian breakthrough? -opinion, NYU Prof.

    Trump faces a pivotal choice as conflict dynamics shift, with rising regional pressures and growing calls for a two-state solution amid fears of further violence and lasting instability.

    https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-836210#836210

  7. Eretz Israel@EretzIsrael
    Egypt violates the peace agreement and establishes military obstacles within its own territory. The Israeli security establishment has detected military activity by the Egyptian army in central Sinai, which constitutes a violation of the peace agreement with Israel.

    https://x.com/EretzIsrael/status/1876070213743264045
    …..
    Well, Egypt…and Jordan…
    And Israelis are expected to turn somersaults for a hudna with Saudis?

    • When Fetterman stood for election, I teased democrats in a post that said” I hope this will not be another Fetterman massacre”. Sadly none knew what I meant as none had the slightest inkling of their own history(IIRC a Lt Fetterman led his soldiers into an ambush and all were killed~ roughly 1871″. Then I realized that they were democrats and what else could I expect?

      Fetterman seems to be a democrat who actually thinks about what is happening and he has stepped out of orthodox line more than once. I do hope that he continues to be his own man and not a standard democrat clone.

    • The man talks about Harry Hopkins being a Soviet Spy, don’t forget that the people who McCarthy correctly named as Soviet Spies were all either part of the FDR and Truman administrations but were also very influential in directing the actions of Congress. The truth about Stalin and the communist efforts to conquer the west are slowly coming out, all we have to do is fight and hang on and the world will shift back to freedom.

      • After reading “American Betrayal” I became convinced that Hopkins was just a patsy and that FDR(who IMHO sacrificed 5000+ US servicemen to enter the war and help Joe) was ALWAYS the primary traitor. Far too much aid was ready to pour into the USSR long before Pearl Harbour( the jap attack fleet was seen by a Dutch submarine and UK naval Singapore informed…funny that no one heard about this and that the sub’s crew were NOT allowed to leave their ship in Singapore and talk with anyone then the sub mysteriously vanished on a trip to Broome to deliver a mysterious package. Jap records show NO signs of any sub attacked by ship or plane in the area and time of thge sub’s journey.

  10. Teen’s breasts grew to triple G-cup size following COVID vaccination: ‘Concerns not adequately addressed’
    By Tracy Swartz
    Published Jan. 6, 2025, 6:57 p.m. ET

    A 19-year-old woman’s breasts stunningly grew from a B cup to a triple G in the six months following her Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination in what researchers are calling a first-of-its-kind case.

    The unidentified “healthy young woman” reportedly started experiencing the rapid growth one week after getting vaccinated in September 2022 — and it worsened after her second dose.

    “The patient believed that the vaccine caused her breast growth; however, her concerns were not adequately addressed by her primary care physicians, leading to mistrust in the healthcare system,” Toronto-based researchers wrote last month in the Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open journal.
    More than 13.6 billion COVID-19 doses have been administered worldwide since 2020. Researchers are reporting a woman’s breasts grew several cup sizes after receiving the vaccine in 2022. Here, a health care worker receives the vaccine. 3
    More than 13.6 billion COVID-19 doses have been administered worldwide since 2020. Researchers are reporting a woman’s breasts grew several cup sizes after receiving the vaccine in 2022. AP
    This is a photo of the woman before she underwent breast reduction surgery in 2023. Her breasts had grown from a B cup to a triple G. 3
    This is a photo of the woman before she underwent breast reduction surgery in 2023. Her breasts had grown from a B cup to a triple G. The ?Pfizer Boob Job?: A Case of Unexplained Gigantomastia

    The study authors pointed to the so-called “Pfizer boob job” phenomenon — some women claimed their breasts grew after getting the shot, but there’s no evidence that was the case.

    The researchers report that while lymph node swelling is a “known side effect” of COVID-19 vaccination, changes to the structure or density of breast tissue are “exceedingly rare.”
    Explore More
    Collage of a woman and a man, representing a colon cancer survivor sharing ignored signs
    I was diagnosed with stage 3 colon cancer at 44 — the 5 symptoms I ignored
    TikToker Milo holding up his “Amish amoxicillin” (left) and dressed in Amish clothes (right)
    My recipe for ‘Amish amoxicillin’ is all natural — it’s the remedy we tried before going to the doctor
    Tech billionaires Jeff Bezos, Sam Altman and Peter Thiel illustrated as babies with horrified doctors and nurses looking on.
    Behind the billionaire-backed longevity business — and the innovations that could help us live longer
    This photo shows the woman five months after reduction surgery, now with double D breasts. 3
    The woman five months after reduction surgery, now with double D breasts. The ?Pfizer Boob Job?: A Case of Unexplained Gigantomastia

    The study authors said there’s only been one published case detailing distinctive breast changes after the Pfizer booster, and it was a noticeable lump. This woman did not have a lump.

    The woman was found to have a very rare condition in which a benign lesion called PASH causes extreme breast enlargement — fewer than 20 cases have ever been documented.

    “This case is the first to demonstrate a temporal association between PASH-associated gigantomastia and a vaccine,” the researchers wrote.
    Get the latest breakthroughs in medicine, diet & nutrition tips and more.

    Subscribe to our weekly Post Care newsletter!
    Enter your email address

    By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    The Post reached out to Pfizer for comment.

    The woman reported feeling a tingling in her breasts before they grew. Doctors didn’t notice hormonal changes in her blood work and prescribed her steroids and antibiotics to no avail.

    Her breasts stopped growing after six months and she underwent reduction surgery five months later, according to the case report.

    She lost a lot of blood during the procedure, which limited the amount of breast tissue surgeons could remove. She has double D breasts and may get another breast reduction to return to her normal size.

    What do you think? Post a comment.

    The Toronto study authors are calling for further research to see if there’s a link between the COVID-19 vaccine, PASH and rapid breast growth.

    More than 13.6 billion COVID-19 doses have been administered worldwide since 2020. A small proportion of those immunized were harmed by the shots, with medical professionals saying the benefits still outweigh the risks.

    censored photos at site

    https://nypost.com/2025/01/06/health/teens-breasts-grew-to-triple-g-cup-size-following-covid-vaccination-study/

    • Is that with or without the Kentucky Fried hormone laced chickens that gave 14yos breasts the envy of every adult woman? Not opinion but fact As I personally had to check out many young teens whose mothers were ultra concerned about the size and in many cases the teen ‘s breasts were larger than the mothers. All seemed to be consuming large amounts of chicken. IIRC the hormone use was supposedly ceased.

  11. Musk’s Response to Resurfaced UK Cop’s Threat Absolute Gold
    By Tom Knighton | 6:30 PM | January 06, 2025
    AP Photo/Keith Srakocic

    Elon Musk may be the most famous billionaire in the world right now, and part of that is because of his control of X, formerly Twitter. His decision to end some of the ridiculous censorship on the platform rocked a lot of people who seem to think that things they disapprove of should never be heard by human ears, which has only amplified his fame.
    Advertisement

    And, frankly, I think they’ve pushed him farther to the political right.

    Regardless, though, he’s generally supportive of people’s rights, including the right to keep and bear arms.

    This came into play when a threat by a UK cop resurfaced recently.

    Musk had…thoughts.

    On Monday, tech billionaire and Tesla CEO Elon Musk responded to a re-surfaced video on social media on social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. In reference to a warning issued last year by London’s Police chief about taking action against American citizens for their online remarks on UK riots, Elon Musk stated, “You have finger guns, we have real guns.” (sic)

    The comments of Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley were originally made in August last year, following a wave of riots in the United Kingdom. Mark Rowley had issued a stern warning through Sky News, stating, “We will throw the full force of the law at people. And whether you’re in this country committing crimes on the streets or committing crimes from further afield online, we will come after you.” (sic)

    He’s not wrong.

    Rowley’s “warning” riled a lot of people up, myself included, in part because we fought a whole war back in the 1770s to make sure we didn’t have to take UK laws seriously in the first place. They can try to enforce their freedom-infringing laws on American soil, but it wouldn’t work out well for them because, unlike British subjects, we haven’t given up our guns.
    Advertisement

    Personally, I’m of the belief that the only reason the British government gets away with some of its crap is because no one can resist in any meaningful way. They keep turning up the heat on folks and there’s no way to fight back, especially since free speech isn’t even a thing in England anymore.

    People there will take officials threatening to arrest them over words. We won’t.

    Musk’s comments may have irked a lot of people in both the UK and the US, but frankly, I’m fine with that. They deserve to be irked.

    We have guns for a reason, and Musk touched on why. We have them not for hunting or target shooting. We have them for tyrant hunting and dictator shooting. If the UK still wants to come over here and get rowdy with those of us who aren’t interested in playing along with their silly games, well, nothing ever said the tyrants and dictators had to be homegrown.

    No one here has shot red coats in a few centuries, but if British cops seem to feel froggy about reliving the past, we’re always happy to oblige.

    It won’t work out any better this time around for them, though.

    https://bearingarms.com/tomknighton/2025/01/06/musks-response-to-resurfaced-uk-cops-threat-absolute-gold-n1227291#google_vignette

  12. Massachusetts Man’s Arrest Raises Big Questions About State’s Gun Control Laws
    By Tom Knighton | 12:30 PM | January 07, 2025
    AP Photo/Michael Conroy, File

    The state of Massachusetts is anything but friendly to gun owners. In fact, it’s one of the most hostile states in the nation. At one time, it was probably the most hostile, but it’s been eclipsed by states like California and New York. That wasn’t because Massachusetts backed off on gun control, either. It’s just those other states added more and added them faster. That was it.
    Advertisement

    And a lot of people figure that because Massachusetts has relatively low crime, the gun control laws work.

    That’s not what’s happening, of course. Violent crime is a complex thing that doesn’t just vanish because you made it a smidge harder to lawfully buy a gun. Criminals don’t get guns through legal channels, after all.

    For example, we have this guy in Massachusetts.

    Police in Beverly made an arrest following a troubling threat, also seizing illegally owned guns and ammunition.

    Matthew Scouras, 34, of Beverly, was arrested at his home on Essex Street and arraigned Monday on numerous firearm charges and threats to destroy a place of worship.

    …

    “The search located numerous items in a bedroom occupied by Scouras, including a cellular telephone, two desktop computers, a Nazi flag, a 9mm Glock “ghost gun” with no serial number, six boxes of ammunition, three large-capacity rifle magazines, 11 lower receivers for various rifles, other firearm parts, scopes, pistol frames, a jig used for drilling holes into polymer pistol handles, rifle stocks, and more than $70,000 in cash,” police said.

    Scouras was charged with possession of a firearm without a license (12 counts), illegal possession of ammunition, possession of a large capacity feeding device, improper storage of a firearm, threats to destroy a place of worship, willful communication of a threat with a dangerous item (a firearm), and making of a firearm without a serial number.

    Advertisement

    The search came following online antisemitic threats.

    Now, it seems Scouras wasn’t a prohibited person, which means he could have gotten guns through lawful means. He didn’t, though. He clearly obtained guns with no regard for the legality of any of them. That includes the lower receivers, which count as firearms. There’s no mention of whether these were traditionally manufactured or whether he made them.

    However, I will thank the media here for counting the Glock as a “ghost gun” when it’s nothing of the sort. It’s a traditionally manufactured firearm, made by Glock, with the serial number removed. It’s not what people think of as “ghost guns.”

    Regardless, there was a lot going on with Scouras here.

    And he wasn’t deterred by the laws in place in the state.

    That’s because whatever other shady stuff he was into–most of us don’t keep $70,000 lying around the house unless we’re into shady stuff if we’re being honest–tended to go hand-in-hand with getting guns illegally. That’s what criminals do.

    That’s also why gun control is never going to work. People who want guns will get guns and there’s absolutely nothing any law can do to stop the truly dedicated.
    Advertisement

    Scouras got a pile of guns and broke just about every gun control law on the books in Massachusetts. You’re deluded if you think he’s somehow the anomaly and that gun control somehow keeps the rest of the alleged criminals disarmed.

    https://bearingarms.com/tomknighton/2025/01/07/massachusetts-mans-arrest-raises-big-questions-about-states-gun-control-laws-n1227297

  13. CCRKBA to California: You’re Being a Bad Bad Boy. New Law is Bigotry!
    By John Petrolino | 2:30 PM | January 07, 2025
    AP Photo/Jeff Roberson, File

    One of the biggest arrows that the progressive anti-freedom machine has in its quiver is propaganda. There’s no doubt that the lies and sensationalism from those forces that want to see us disarmed has a lot to do with negative views on firearms. How far will these pinkos go? A new law in California has the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms wagging their finger in the face of the Golden State. Rightly so!
    Advertisement

    “The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms says California’s new law requiring firearms dealers to provide gun buyers with a pamphlet warning about the dangers of gun ownership amounts to ‘legislative social bigotry,’” a release stated.

    That section of the law, from Assembly Bill No. 1598, is as follows:

    (a) The Department of Justice shall prepare a pamphlet in all of the languages described in subdivision (a) of Section 31640 that explains the reasons for and risks of owning a firearm and bringing a firearm into the home, including the increased risk of death to someone in the household by suicide, homicide, or unintentional injury.

    (b) The department may solicit input from any reputable association or organization in the development of the pamphlet.

    (c) The department shall design and make available on its internet website the pamphlet described in subdivision (a) in PDF or another imaging format to firearms dealers licensed pursuant to Sections 26700 to 26915, inclusive, to distribute pursuant to Section 26866.

    (d) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2025.

    When the bill was signed into law, Governor Gavin Newsom took a celebratory lap in a press release lauding 24+ anti-liberty bills enacted into law. “California won’t wait until the next school shooting or mass shooting to act. In the absence of congressional action, our state is once again leading the way by strengthening our nation-leading gun laws,” Newsom said. “Data shows that California’s gun safety laws are effective in preventing gun-related deaths — which makes the ongoing inaction and obstruction by politicians in the pocket of the gun lobby even more reprehensible.”
    Advertisement

    How a pamphlet is going to contribute to a safer California, Newsom did not express. Rather than come up with salient solutions to issues plaguing crime-ridden areas, California’s answer was to serve the people propaganda.

    Alan Gottlieb, the Chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms had something to say about all of this.

    “This new law, AB 1598, is just another effort by anti-gun Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom to discourage Californians from exercising their constitutional right to become gun owners,” said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. “At what point do Californians tell lawmakers in Sacramento they’ve had enough of Democrats’ dishonest demagoguery? Demonizing guns is a deceptive strategy designed to fool people into believing something is being done to prevent violent crime, when the opposite is true.”

    Gottlieb is right in pointing out the issues with the Kool-Aid on the left coast. Californians have been lied to far too long, and now forcing more lies upon prospective gun owners via government-mandated propaganda is a bridge too far.

    “Why not force car dealers to provide a pamphlet to each customer, telling them about the dangers of driving,” Gottlieb wondered. “Owning a car, especially in California, is more dangerous than owning a gun. More people were killed in traffic accidents in 2023, the most recent year for which data is available, than from gunshot wounds that year. But nowhere in the Golden State are car dealers being forced to hand out pamphlets warning motorists that getting behind the wheel is hazardous to their health.”
    Advertisement

    Recent data shows that California had the most fatal car accidents in 2024 than any other state. In 2023, the most up-to-date data available, California saw 1,892 homicides, with no emphasis put on weapons used. That’s versus the 3,558 fatal traffic accidents in 2024.

    “Why are Gavin Newsom and California lawmakers singling out guns instead of cars,” Gottlieb asked. “After all, gun ownership is protected by the constitution, but owning a car isn’t. If the Democrats who pushed this into law wanted to discourage owning something which is dangerous, they should have studied their own data. According to the Long Beach Press-Telegram, the state suffered 4,013 traffic fatalities in 2023 while The Trace said California logged 3,208 gun-related deaths for the same year, the most recent period for which data is available.”

    Even when comparing the 2023 and 2024 data, there’s still a chasm that Newsom et.al. have to navigate over if they’re seeking to be honest.

    “All this proves Gavin Newsom and his Democrat colleagues aren’t really interested in saving lives,” Gottlieb observed. “They’re interested in reducing gun ownership by discouraging people from buying guns, and forcing gun dealers to act as their surrogates in the process. It’s really pathetic.”

    While this law came into effect on January 1st, 2025, a look at the California Department of Justice’s web page shows no new pamphlet. The law stipulated that this information shall be available to dealers, but did not differentiate if it should also be made public and not behind a gate. At the time of publication, there’s no mention of this information on the DOJ’s bulletin page.
    Advertisement

    Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised that this is something coming from California. The problem is that the left coast is the progressive breeding ground for testing unconstitutional provisions. It’s not known if there are any forthcoming challenges from any of the Second Amendment groups or individual plaintiffs on this issue, but it certainly does seem to be violative of several provisions of the Constitution.

    https://bearingarms.com/john-petrolino/2025/01/07/ccrkba-to-california-youre-being-a-bad-bad-boy-new-law-is-bigotry-n1227294

  14. Abolish The ATF Measure Introduced In Congress
    By
    Mark Chesnut –
    January 7, 2025 5
    Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colorado, author of the measure to abolish the ATF. AP image.

    Since the elections last November when President Donald Trump reclaimed the White House and Republicans gained majorities in both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives, there has been considerable discussion about abolishing the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

    Now that talk has turned into action, as first reported by Newsweek. On January 3, U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colorado, introduced House Resolution 129 to abolish the ATF, which, under President Joe Biden, has transformed into a lawmaking body rather than just an enforcement agency.

    The language for the measure is not yet available. However, the title of the resolution tells us everything we need to know: “To Abolish the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.”

    Boebert, one of the strongest gun-rights members of Congress, stated on X, that the time is right to completely get rid of the agency, not try to reform it.

    “The time has come,” she wrote. “ABOLISH THE ATF!”

    In fact, Boebert has long contended that the agency has lost its way.

    “Bureaucrats don’t create laws, Congress does,” she stated on the House floor back when ATF was advancing yet another final rule under Biden. “This rule functions like a law that Congress never passed. We don’t trust the ATF because of their overreaching actions exactly like we’re seeing with this rule.”

    Boebert also spoke passionately about the agency’s faults during a February 2023 speech on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives.

    “There’s been a lot of talk about defunding the ATF, even abolishing the agency altogether, and I’m still here waiting to hear a good reason why the ATF should remain an agency at all,” she said. “Instead of providing regulations that keep our communities safe, this agency has made our communities more dangerous by wandering weapons to the cartels. Operation Fast and Furious exposed the recklessness of the ATF, how little regard they have for the rule of law, and Americans have had a hard time viewing these agencies and their rules as legitimate.”

    Boebert is among several members of Congress who are frustrated with the ATF’s extensive “rulemaking” under the Biden Administration. During Biden’s term, the ATF issued several “final rules,” including controversial regulations banning pistol braces, redefining what constitutes a “firearm” and changing the definition of who is considered “engaged in the business” of selling firearms.

    In fact, as recently as last November, Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Missouri, voiced his desire to have the agency abolished.

    “The ATF is a disaster,” Burleson told Fox News. “For decades, they’ve been a disaster agency, and they’ve been violating the Second Amendment. Every time they try to get involved, they mess things up. They have a long history of mistakes … This is an agency that just continues to violate citizens’ rights and Second Amendment rights, and I think that at the end of the day, this agency needs to be abolished.”

    Incoming President Donald Trump has vowed to reform the ATF and pledged to fire ATF Director Steven Dettelbach on his first day in office. To preempt that situation, Dettelbach recently announced his resignation, effective January 18—two days before President Trump’s inauguration.

    https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/concealed-carry-reciprocity-act-introduced/

  15. Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act Introduced
    By
    Mark Chesnut –
    January 7, 2025 2

    Since voters in November granted Republicans a majority in both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives, gun-rights advocates have been hopeful for relief from the issues caused by the inconsistent state laws regarding concealed carry of firearms.

    The variation in carry laws from state to state often creates a nightmare for gun owners, making it difficult for them to determine what they need to do to travel legally. A measure introduced last week in the House, however, would significantly simplify this task.

    House Resolution 38, introduced late last week by U.S. Rep. Richard Hudson, R-South Carolina, aims to eliminate state-based restrictions on the concealed carry of firearms for self-defense purposes.

    The language is not yet available for this session’s Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act. However, Rep. Hudson’s similar bill introduced in the last Congress, which faced an uphill battle due to Democrat control of the U.S. Senate, provides us with good clues about its potential content.

    That measure would have allowed people with state-issued concealed carry licenses or permits to conceal a handgun in any other state, as long as the permit holder follows the laws of that state. It would also have allowed residents of constitutional carry states the ability to carry in other states.

    “H.R. 38 guarantees the Second Amendment does not disappear when crossing an invisible state line,” Rep. Hudson said in a press release upon introducing the measure. “The Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act protects law-abiding citizens’ rights to conceal carry and travel freely between states without worrying about conflicting state codes or onerous civil suits. I am especially proud to have such widespread and bipartisan support for this measure as I continue working to get this legislation over the finish line.”

    As the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) noted when Rep. Hudson introduced a similar measure in January 2023, the right to keep and bear arms is regulated differently by individual states, unlike other rights protected by the U.S. Constitution. While rights to speech, religion and protections against due process or search and seizure remain consistent and do not stop at state borders, gun rights differ from one state to another.

    “Reciprocity agreements exist, but not between all states and are ever-changing,” the report stated. “That puts individuals at risk of running afoul of varying state laws when traveling and crossing borders.”

    Naturally, those who have been following the issue of concealed carry reciprocity for some time are well aware that incoming President Donald Trump has promised to sign such a measure if Congress passes it.

    “I will sign concealed carry reciprocity,” Trump wrote in his Agenda 47 platform. “Your Second Amendment does not end at the state line.”

    The week following his election, President Trump doubled down on that statement.

    “I will protect the right of self-defense wherever it is under siege, and I will sign concealed carry reciprocity,” he said in addressing the nation. “Your Second Amendment does not end at the state line.”

    Gun owners, who played a significant role in securing a second Trump presidency and a Republican majority in both chambers, should prepare to hold their lawmakers accountable on reciprocity and do the same with the president if the measure reaches his desk. Talking a good game won’t fix the problem posed by a patchwork of state carry laws. This session is the time for action on the matter, and if your representative or senator doesn’t take it seriously, they should be hearing from you regularly.

    https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/concealed-carry-reciprocity-act-introduced/

  16. For obvious reasons I do not post her as it was never “my site” although I do look in on occasions: Below are two articles by a UK citizen with deep insight named “Jupp” that I thought might appeal. Do let me know if they are “old news”

  17. Farewell, Shit Prince
    Trudeau’s end marks the reality that nobody, literally nobody, actually likes a Globalist puppet.
    Jupplandia
    Jan 7

    So after 9 years of disastrous idiocy, economic mismanagement, pandering to Woke and Marxist bullshit, corrupt alliance, submission and respect for Communist China combined with relentless assaults on Canadian history and Canadian freedom, arch Globalist Puppet Justin Trudeau is on the way out.

    Typically, he won’t just leave. The reality is that Trudeau could go as soon as he announced his resignation. What governance his Liberal Party provides doesn’t need his continued presence. But that’s not the Globalist way. Even when they are forced to fall on the sword, they make a protracted drama out of it. Puppets like Trudeau are chosen for their combination of stupidity, vanity and soulless desire for the trappings of power, even if they don’t really call the shots and make the decisions. Letting go of being the apparent Guy in Charge is a difficult process for them. They need an ego soothing ‘transition period’ where they pretend that Very Important Things nee to happen before they can fully step down.

    Suspending Parliament until the 24th March really is an unnecessary and vain move. It’s Trudeau drawing national black curtains over the political stage because he has to go. It’s a perfect summation of how Globalist parties and party leaders are essentially criminally stupid narcissists. They are easily purchased by anyone who wants to buy them, they cling to ‘power’ with the instinctive grip of a pederast pressing young flesh, they are utterly immune to shame, regret, self-awareness or compassion and empathy (despite talking constantly about those things) and they always, always think The Show is Just About Them.

    Take the most venal self satisfied actors and actresses and you have one hundredth of the vanity, self pity and remorseless disregard of others found in a person like Trudeau. Because that is essentially what a Globalist ‘World Leader’ is-a particularly dumb actor who thinks they are the Hero of the Movie, hired to play a part, and then delusionally certain that they have really done Remarkable Things.

    And even when public discontent FINALLY registers enough for them to stab each other in the back, jostle for fresh positions, or oust a hated zombie like Trudeau, this sense that reality is a film they are directing or starting in persists with the rest of them. Here for example is the Canadian Liberal Party talking about Justin’s 9 years ‘in charge’:

    “Liberals across the country are immensely grateful to Justin Trudeau for more than a decade of leadership to our Party and the country.

    As Prime Minister, his vision delivered transformational progress for Canadians,” he said, citing programmes his government has implemented like the Canada Child Benefit and the establishment of dental care and pharmacare coverage for some medication.”

    Wow, what a record, hug? Why on Earth do you guys need to get rid of him? Why is so massively unpopular you all did the usual Walk of Betrayal and privately went to Justin to tell him his time is up? Why did his longterm ally Freeland quit, which was the first really tectonic shift collapsing the ground beneath Darling Justin’s dainty toes?

    The truth is that Justin Trudeau has been hated, literally despised, by the MAJORITY of the Canadian electorate for a very long time. His last election win was a cobbled together, semi-rigged tale of dodgy practices and secret deals where just enough of the corrupt Establishment could be marshalled behind him one final time to keep shoving policies hardly anyone wanted down the throats of the Canadian people. The reason he has gone or that Canada must endure a few more months of a Walking Dead government with a prorogued Parliament is because there was no longer any mathematical way to pretend any more that the Canadian people actually WANT either Justin Trudeau or the Liberal Party as the purchased front men and middle management professional traitors serving Globalist masters.

    As with the US electorate despising Biden and the Democrat Regime, the game was up long before the actors accepted it. And this is really the natural condition of Globalist o er nance-they govern against the interests of the majority, against the wishes, hopes, desires and wants of the ordinary citizen, serving transnational bodies, foreign powers and pure corruption.

    OF COURSE they end up with 20% or lower shares of the electorate backing them. The people are never as stupid as those who hold the people in contempt. Globalist Puppet approval ratings EVERYWHERE are always disastrous. If elections throughout the western world were conducted honestly, if the media reported honestly, if there were not in built systems for twisting results and imposing governments nobody outside the polirical Establishment actually wants, nobody like these people would ever get to even pretend to be in charge.

    In many ways Justin Trudeau was the purest archetype of the Globalist Puppet, the Pretend World Leader. Everything about him was fake and pitiful. Nothing about him was earned or a genuine achievement. Everything he had was an inheritance. Born as the declared, alleged son of a former Canadian Prime Minister, he had a place in politics thanks purely to his family background and contacts. Trudeau never had a real job. He never had a money worry that was real. He never needed effort in anything. He was born to a political dynasty. With a remarkable resemblance to a young Fidel Castro, what family influence and money couldn’t buy, bland good looks (so different to those of his ‘father’ Pierre) could obtain fairly automatically too.

    Even the unkindest critics must admit that Justin had good looks. Tall, dark, and handsome, if he had the slightest flicker of personality he would have been devastating. He could have been a male model, a role more fully suited even than politics to his vast range of abilities which included walking and smiling just like a Real Boy. The painfully limited intellect would not have been a barrier in a career focused entirely on those looks, and it’s a reflection of the state of contemporary politics that it wasn’t much of an impediment to a political career either. Justin never had the glib con-man verbal fluency of an Obama, or even the low cunning of a Blair. He has no charisma. Everything designed to fool people regarding him was purely visual-he did best of all when he didn’t speak.

    The man was more of a nice poster than a human being.

    All this made him utterly perfect for the gig, and utterly disastrous if you want a Prime Minister with a brain and a heart who actually improves and helps your country. His university and young adult cosplaying as a selection of Village People is on one level a trivial matter for which he should never have been criticised as severely as he was. Blackface is not a crime and the idea that a raging woke ideologue like Trudeau hates black people was always absurd (that’s not how wokeness works-it fetishises black people, it patronises them, it stereotypes them and assumes patronage as control over them, ultimately it infantilises and ruins them….but it doesn’t hate them). On a deeper level it’s understandable that Trudeau would have taken to the kind of party games that involve dressing up as other people. He was always a hollow person in search of an identity beyond mere Rich Kid. Life had never demanded that he become Real, and so he restlessly assumed a series of guises.

    The willingness to dress up in various ethnic costume displayed later in his career is part of the same emptiness. A rich white boy HAS no identity he can claim, by Globalist progressive and woke thinking. He has to don these garbs and adopt these manners to become a person, since only these Others are worthy.

    What’s the actual record of his period in office, what’s the effect of that essential internal hollowness and restless quest to worship, adore and become Something Else?

    Well, it’s a record of an astonishing level of Chinese influence and takeover. Not only was Trudeau empty enough to actually admire the ‘efficiency’ of Chinese Communist tyranny, the Chinese managed to entangle themselves even more deeply in Canadian politics and economics than they did in US affairs. In the US, it was primarily the academic institutions and Hollywood that became subsidiaries of Chinese interests, together with some of the worst and most corrupt US political families, such as the Bidens. But in Canada the Chinese set up a network of police stations monitoring Chinese citizens and Chinese descended or Chinese immigrant Canadians. There’s evidence of such Chinese security apparatus offshoots throughout the western world, but it seems to have been at its very worst in Canada. The Chinese level of influence within Canada, if ever honestly addressed, will take years to unravel.

    But I suppose resisting infiltration by Chinese Communist spies would be terribly old fashioned and racist.

    Fetishised woke Love of the Other also saw Trudeau doing enormous damage to race relations in Canada by becoming an abject slave of both Rousseau style Noble Savage fantasies and the cynical Native Indian political lobby that is skilled in turning white liberal guilt to corrupt modern advantage. Trudeau’s period saw a truly shameful mass racial smear and explosion of anti-Catholic bigotry and hypocritical anti white racism. The Canadian political Establishment immediately believed claims that Catholic mass murders of Native children were a historical reality. Trudeau and others pandered to this evidence free Blood Libel. Extensive investigations never uncovered ANY forensic proof of these claims, but the damage had already been done. Riots, statue toppling barbarism, and the usual Leftist/Ethnic alliance centred on tearing down everything ‘white’ provided a Native Indian led counterpart of BLM bullshit.

    As with every Globalist leader, and especially privileged university educated ones from wealthy families, Justin was an economic retard. The Canadian economy has struggled under his stewardship, with welfare increasing, inflation rising, real take home wages decreasing, and the energy sector being saddled by one of the most enthusiastic and self destructive commitments to Net Zero around. Again, as is standard with Globalist leaders, Justin opened the nations borders and welcomed hordes of economically parasitic refugees, asylum seekers and non contributing migrants. And of course he and his party were committed Covidians, doing damage to both the economy and individual liberty as zealously as they could during the COVID scamdemic.

    So what the Canadian people got was a supposed leader who spread blood libel smears about the country’s majority population, about its history, and about one of its major religions. They got economic decline and hypocritical, hate filled insults to their own identity. And during COVID they got a tinpot dictator enacting emergency measures that were designed to be specific to war time in order to crush the basic liberties of people who peacefully protested against death shot experiments. They got the Mounties riding horses over peacefully protesting grandmothers and banks closing accounts in pursuit of a State led ideological purge.

    Perhaps the most grotesque indicator of Globalist contempt for the mass of mankind came with Canada’s enthusiastic adoption of an industry of death. The Globalist Progressive, Trudeau mandated style of ‘compassion’ and medical care consists of telling the economically disadvantaged (including those put in that position by their government’s bad choices) to kill themselves. Medically assisted suicide is now the 6th highest cause of death in Canada. Increasing thousands of Canadians every year are being cajoled and persuaded by the State to kill themselves, all in the name of ‘care’. Canada’s death programme is the fastest growing in the world. Originally said to be legally limited to patients suffering terminal illness, the programme has expanded to include people with purely psychological illness or economic difficulty, a form of expansion that provides a mere gloss of persuaded consent over a near Nazi attitude to those in difficult economic circumstances or suffering from depression or mere old age.

    These are the real consequences of an empty, self-hating, utterly vacuous and absurd value system, all pressed by a vain, stupid, empty shell of a man possessed of no positive quality except reasonable looks.

    Canada of course will be far better off without Justin Trudeau. The sad thing, though, is that there are many others just as empty and nation wrecking as him. That’s the price of Globalist ideology, along with all the other costs. At least though we will soon be spared one of the creepiest and weirdest aspects of Puppet leadership, those grotesque moments when Trudeau would meet equivalents like Macron or Sunak and engage in bizarre fondling and nuzzling rituals with them.

    Thank God we have seen the last of that.

  18. The Lies of Our Times
    Just a summary look at the worst bullshit around
    Jupplandia
    Jan 2

    As a way of summing up 2024 and looking forward to 2025 here is s brief summary of the worst bullshit around. What are the truly awful bullshit lies that only the dumbest, led by the nose mainstream media influenced retards still cling to?

    The COVID Pandemic.

    In 2020 the western world divided between sado-masochistic authority loving perverts and normal rational adults. The perverts found that they really, really loved Daddy Government telling them what to do and enabling them to tell others what to do. They may have conveniently forgotten what absolute shits they were. Those of us who didn’t go mad still remember. So look back in anger. If you banged your pots and pans for the NHS, do you realise yet just what a fucking programmed idiot you were? If you wanted the unvaccinated punished or put in special camps or kept out of society until they CONFORMED, are you still lying to yourself about it all or do you realise now that what was revealed was just how much of an authoritarian shitbag you are?

    Let’s be honest, the whole thing was both a morality test and an intelligence test. If you went along with it all for a foreign holiday or because everyone else was or because you were genuinely scared, and never questioned why on Earth a virus would follow directional arrows on the ground or attack people when they were talking but not when they were eating, you failed the intelligence test. If you got very angry with people not wearing masks in the supermarket or you called anyone who refused the vaccine a danger to others you failed the morality test as well.

    The lie then was that any of it made sense or was anything more than a massive 4 trillion dollar wealth transfer combined with a test run to see just how fucking stupid people are and how willing they are to give away their basic liberties and those of others.

    The lie today is essentially the same, but basically that it’s normal that this all happened and that nobody has ever been punished for it despite millions of people having been killed by those who created the virus, created the insane measures in response to the virus, and created too the poisonous and reckless mRNA experiment forced by lies, coercion, State power and corporate greed on most of the population of the planet.

    An obviously dangerous, obviously insane, obviously cynical, dishonest and criminal set of policies built on lies wrecked economies and ended lives. Until that’s widely acknowledged and recognised and SOMEBODY pays for it we are still living a lie on COVID.

    It’s still as relevant now as it was in 2020. What ends it as an active lie is a global recognition of just how evil and criminal the whole thing was, together with an immediate end to all mRNA vaccines, an immediate global ban on gain of function research, an immediate return of legal accountability to all vaccine manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies for harms from their products, and a clear set of guidelines limiting what governments and international organisations are allowed to do to their citizens in the name of pandemic responses. It ends as one of the modern bullshit lies we live by when the harms are acknowledged, the guilt is assigned, and measures are taken to prevent any repeat.

    If you supported it, whether as a doctor, a citizen, a scientist, or a politician, you were guilty. People died because of you and what you supported. You imposed bullshit rules, you backed absurd bullshit, and everything you did-lockdowns, masks, social distancing, mandates, vaccines, demonisation of those who resisted-was stupid and dangerous and without rational or scientific basis. You should be ashamed of that. You should ask yourself How could I have been so fucking gullible and How could I have been so fucking authoritarian.

    Until everyone who supported COVID measures does that they haven’t dealt with the lie or acknowledged the consequences of the lie. And the necessity for acknowledging this lie and acting against it exists because until we do some new version, based on bird flu or some other mandated excuse for hysteria, will repeat the same evil crap to the sole benefit of the same criminal bastards.

    Race Hypocrisy and the Racism Lies.

    Black Lives Matter may also seem like old news. George Floyd died in 2020 and the entire BLM movement occurred in the same year as the ‘COVID Pandemic’. It’s now the start of the 5th year on from that.

    So BLM too was a 2020 lie. But again, it’s one that hasn’t been fully acknowledged as a lie. As with COVID, we saw some spectacular bullshit sweep the western world. As with COVID, much of it was a mass hysteria event based on a deliberate psy-op. The corporate world backed BLM and insisted that society as a whole should do so too. At its narrowest it was all based on the lie that George Floyd was the innocent victim of police brutality and racist assault by Derek Chauvin. But of course it represents much more than just that lie. It was part of the wider bullshit narrative that completely innocent black men are routinely targeted by racist cops. That too, feeds into part of a bigger lie.

    The truth is that BLM was a crooked organisation designed to profit from modern race hypocrisies. The support for BLM was also about crookedness. Corporations signed up to it as an easy virtue signal deflecting from their own negative practices. But the opportunity for all this only came about because the ENTIRE modern narrative on race is full of bullshit.

    The truth is that the western world is the least racist part of the world, at least towards anyone who is in a minority of any kind. The western world invented opposing racism or defining racial consciousness as a bad thing. Most of the rest of the world carried on, like most prior human history and as the human brain is actually designed to do, considering in group preference a perfectly natural, normal and rational thing. Nobody in Africa or Asia worries about the rights of white people, or about races that aren’t the majority in that particular place. None of the rest of the world has ever been asked to accept its total demographic replacement-even colonialism never made that demand on non western people except by total accident (American and South American tribes being very vulnerable to European diseases was not a plot, but a consequence of prior isolation).

    At the same time the attitude now extant towards white people is revoltingly racist and hypocritical. White people are told they are guilty innately, by birth characteristic. They are told that their history is one of crime and exploitation. They are told that they invented racism. They are told that they invented slavery. They are told that European empires were the sorts in history, the most exploitative, the most rapacious, the most brutal. They are told that they created every modern ill. they are told that they stole land, AND that they have no lands of their own where they have priority. They are told they can’t be considered native or indigenous anywhere, and that are always settlers and oppressors when it is their land others are now settling in and their race now being oppressed at home.

    All of this is racial hypocrisy and racism. And it’s the standard elite view, the university mandated view, the view behind most policy and law on every race issue. School lessons on being delivered based on this evil bullshit. National curriculums are based on this evil bullshit. ‘Decolonisation’ of the curriculum, entire academic disciplines, a significant proportion of all ceramic research, is based on or is distorted by this vile malicious race nonsense. DEI is based on it. Quotas are based on it. Employment law is based on it. Immigration policies are based on it. Advertising and messaging in TV and film is based on it.

    Again, this lie persists until society as a whole acknowledges how evil and perverse it is. That means ending all Critical Race Theory. It means revising all race relations and race legislation to protect the white majority from discrimination and demonisation. It means returning to culturally homogenous and racially blind legal and moral approaches. It means ending DEI preferments and quotas and considering all positions on individual merit.

    Our children should not be poisoned with anti white hatred. Our public figures should not be allowed to voice anti white racism without push back and social contempt. It’s obvious why historical figures are portrayed by an inaccurate racial casting or why white people are always cast as villains in modern drama. It’s obvious too why real world realities like an Islamic Pakistani culture of child rape or a black street culture of gangs and violence are ignored. These things are ignored based on a distorted understanding of what racism is and based on treating racism as solely a thing done by whites to non whites. All of that bullshit has to be swept aside to get a decent society back.

    Much of the ideology that defines wokeness centres simply on considering anti white racism normal and good, whilst simultaneously considering all white majority history, culture and morality oppressive and evil. Every woke attitude is really about this modern racial hypocrisy and absurdity, and all of it should be recognised as laughable bullshit which no serious or decent person believes or supports.

    We Need Mass Immigration.

    Related to the above, we have the whole immigration agenda today. For 70 years the western world has been told by its leaders a set of totally bullshit lies on the issue of immigrations. These lies include 1. We need migrants to do jobs we won’t do 2. We need migrants to do high skilled jobs we can’t do 3. We need migrants for the care and medical sectors 4. We need migrants because our population is ageing and declining 5. Most migrants contribute and are a net benefit to our society 6. There are no negative consequences of mass migration 7. Most migrants are legitimately fleeing hardship and war 8. We have a moral duty to accept mass migration 9. We show that we are civilised and good by supporting mass migration 10. Our societies can’t exist without mass migration.

    All of these points are lies, save only for our birth rates being low (an issue solved by being socially and economically pro family not by importing new arrivals). The truth is that we have no moral requirement to save the rest of the world. The truth is also that most migrants do not contribute and in our welfare supporting nations are in fact a burden. There is no legitimate need for mass migration and demographic replacement. It’s a net expense and an active harm to your country and your existing citizens. No nation needs mass migration. Low skilled jobs can by definition be done by anyone. High skilled jobs are ones your own education system should equip your own people to fulfil. The problem is either that your education system is failing or that you have some incentive for people not to work, like welfare. Neither of these issues is properly resolved by importing foreign workers. You simply add new burdens with that false solution.

    With mass immigration and with open borders the only people who benefit are a small number of those who ideologically want to transform the nation for the worse, or an equally small number of people who want to depress wages and have access to cheap labour and cheap servants from any part of the world regardless of the overall consequences. This is why the only people who support mass immigration and open borders are those who have been ideologically conditioned to do so in ways that ignore obvious negatives.

    Open borders are vigorously supported by brainwashed woke fools, by those who hate western nations, and by those who believe in punishing western nations for alleged past crimes. They are also supported by those who want to level western societies down to the same position as third world societies, in order to make it easier to install third world standards of individual rights and the kind of disparity between a small class of very rich and a large class of very poor you see in third world nations. Globally this makes abolishing nation states and replacing them with global institutions much easier, since populations can then be transferred at will between these places and it is easier to govern globally if a series of nations have the same low expectations regarding individual rights and economic wellbeing. Developed nations with high internal loyalty and homogeneity are actually much harder to force into global forms of governance and administration.

    Islam is a Religion of Peace.

    One of the demanded bullshit ideas today is that Islam is compatible with the West, beneficial to the West and a great religion characterised by wisdom and shared noble values it holds in common with other religions and with ordinary people. All of that s the Religion of Peace lie.

    The truth is that the majority of terrorist organisations are Islamic, that Islamic values are not the same as western values, and that Islam is in fact a retrograde force which holds back human achievement and human potential. Islam has only ever spread by conquest and violence. Islam normalises primitive and backwards views. The attitudes of Islam to women and children are often vile and disgusting. The attitudes of Islam to apostates and non Muslims are often murderous and vile.

    Why is a bullshit take on Islam as wonderful, kind, worthy of respect and perfectly in line with western values so important to western Globalists and progressives? After all in many ways other special interest groups championed by progressives seem particularly threatened by Islam. Islam is not known for its advanced attitudes towards women and gays. Why do feminists ignore this? Why do LGBTQ+ supporters ignore this?

    They ignore this because they have been conditioned to worship the Other, to always consider the foreign, the alien and the non white superior to the known, the familiar and the Western. Few foreign forces or groups are more determinedly and obviously Other than Islam and Muslims are. Many Muslims will insist on alien dress and customs and public displays. They will impose their way. They will refuse to integrate and adapt.

    Self hating, brainwashed western progressives have been conditioned to see this refusal to integrate as noble and worthy. Those conditioned with suicidal altruism do not take the repeated evidence of Islamic incompatibility as proof of a problem with Islam, but rather as repeated and welcome opportunities to display their belief in progressive attitudes and their commitment to shibboleths such as inclusion and compassion (never compassion, of course, for the victims of Islam, but rather for Islam itself especially when Islam promotes terrorism or vile behaviours). If Islam causes harm, it must be in response to Islamophobia. If yet another Islamic terrorist atrocity or sexual atrocity occurs, it must be a rare exception and the first worry must be that this is not “exploited by the Far Right”.

    There is no degree of Islamic crime that can awaken a suicidal altruist to the simple fact that Islam is backwards and savage. The problem must be caused by the West not accommodating Islamophobia enough, not being open enough, not having enough Muslims to render Muslim terrorism unnecessary.

    But why do the Globalist elites favour Islam, where those elites aren’t themselves brainwashed by the asinine rhetoric of inclusion and diversity? Well in this instance the appeal of Islam is the collectivism of Islam, which is actually more amenable (at least until the Muslims are near being a majority) to the kind of society Globalist progressives want. While Islam might be an uncomfortable fit with Pride festivals and multiple genders, it does provide block votes and a non democratic framework of political action. A globalist progressive can offer concessions and support for Islam and gain a block Muslim vote that can ride roughshod over the old majority. This is what happens with leftist alliances with Islam, such as that displayed by the British Labour Party or the Scottish SNP. Parties which had long since lost their white working class base can suddenly have a motivated horde of instant supporters and activists, so long as they do obeisance to Islam and ‘the Muslim community’.

    The elite progressive has fooled himself about Islam. He believes the Beast is tamed and can be aimed solely at his enemies. He enjoys turning this Beast against the white working class or the traditional conservative patriot. It’s his tame monster. He doesn’t understand that the alliance is purely temporary until the Beast is large enough to no longer need the leftist and the progressive, and that he will be devoured by the thing he has welcomed. It is very like the way late Romans were devoured by tribes they had used as auxiliary military forces. For now, the Labour Party gets total control of London, for instance, through the Muslim block vote and Mayor Sadiq Khan. Somewhere down the line Khan or a successor will represent an openly Muslim Brotherhood style Party, rather than a compliant party of fools such as the British Labour Party. When numbers are sufficient the Muslim block vote will transfer to specifically Muslim political parties.

    The reality is that Islam is an existential threat to every western nation that allows it in. And the mainstream consensus on this is to lie and keep spreading total bullshit. Every moment of evidence to the contrary, every terrorist attack, every brutally abused child, every murder and every rape, requires yet more dishonesty, more candle waving, more sickening reality defying cant about the strength gained by diversity and more and more public social submission to an alien faith and its violent adherents.

    The Green Apocalypse Bullshit

    Of all the modern Globalist promoted bullshit lies we today have to deal with, this is the one that most closely mirrors what happened with the COVID scamdemic. Like the alleged need for draconian and authoritarian changes to deal with a supposed viral threat, the climate hysteria emergency depends on a sustained distortion of public perception on the basis of a created, artificial threat.

    A few decades back climate apocalypse rhetoric was an obviously outsider interest. It was the language of kooks and hippies, of tree huggers and obsessed environmentalists. The proponents of the most urgent language on climate change were obviously extremists. Green parties secured a tiny fraction of the vote. The only green ideas that had widespread support were the ones which were more obviously sensible and defensive, the ones about limiting pollution in rivers and oceans or protecting the food chain from chemicals and industrial slurry. Campaigns against genetically modified organisms in the food chain spoke to a sensible rejection of pure greed or pure profit as the sole determinant of what is healthy and good, and expanded beyond extremist Green limits to express a commonplace and sensible caution. But on the whole talk about killing the planet and all industry, modernity and development being evil was quite clearly a misanthropic and Red position as much as it could claim to be Green.

    Most people realised this.

    But as with racial extremism gradually being adopted by the elite and championed as a new normality, so too we saw Green extremism gradually become first respectable and then mandatory. This transition coincided with the monetisation of the rhetoric. The corporate entities got on board when vast gobernmrnt subsidies could be claimed on various allegedly green grounds. As with the threat of a global pandemic, the threat of a global climate crisis proved perfect as a means of enacting large scale wealth transfers and using State power and resources to guarantee risk free returns to particular investors, share holders and billionaire influencers.

    All of the demands of the green revolution and of ‘saving the planet from climate change’ are ones which require vast expenditure. Those pressing for that expenditure are the ones who benefit from it, the ones who control the companies that will hold the contracts.

    This is why obviously religious, apocalyptic and absurd thinking and language is now advocated as Science. The green movement was a cult before it was a set of respectable corporate interests. Now, the corporations encourage the cults, because the fanatics who genuinely believe in this bullshit and genuinely fear a climate catastrophe occurring soon are excellent foot soldiers and useful idiots to use to pretend that there is great public demand and concern which the profiting companies and authoritarian governments are responding to. At the same time, the measures demanded to ‘save the planet’ can allow almost any otherwise obviously insane development to pass as a necessary or precautionary measure.

    Want to seize control of the land, hand it over to your corporate pals and sponsors at BlackRock, get your gifts and bribes for doing so, and punish people who traditionally vote against you? What better means for accomplishing all that than an inheritance tax on farmers, and then turning the farms they have been forced to sell cheaply into solar and wind farms or housing estates for your imported millions of foreigners?

    The great advantage of the global threat of severe climate change is that its global scale can be said to require global solutions. What this means is that it is a perfect vehicle for Globalism itself. What is to be delivered is more and more global authority under Globalist control, all excused as the only practical way of dealing with a global scale threat. Countries must universally agree responses. Individual national interest must be ignored for the greater good of the whole planet. The wishes of a particular electorate must not be allowed to contradict the globalist agenda. Healing the world requires ignoring your own citizens and voters. And all of it needs overarching transnational bodies taking more and more power away from sovereign nation states. In every way being more accountable to ‘the planet’ means being much less accountable to your national populace. Building the infrastructure of global climate accords means opening more opportunities for power no longer being constrained by anything so boring and limiting as the wishes of just one regional electorate.

    This is why the strongest advocates of the green apocalypse bullshit are transnational bodies, multinational corporations and globalist institutions. All of them recognise the climate scam as a broad excuse for transferring power to them, concentrating power in their hands, and expanding everything that they can do and still be considered legal and respectable while doing it.

    The truth is that climate change is both constant and beyond human control. The variables that go into libel climate are vast. The cycles by which climate changes are equally vast. The idea that man alone is in control of these processes is absurd. Ice Ages come and go regardless of human activity, as do interglacial periods. Sun spots and solar activity are beyond human control. Even cloud formation and water vapour in the atmosphere has more effect than human activity or carbon dioxide and was never factored into climate change computer modelling. Computer modelling is good for the very short term analysis of very small numbers of variables. It’s completely inadequate for predicting global weather patterns, temperature changes and climactic alterations over a single day, let alone over years and centuries. Even the idea of a global average temperature is something of an absurdity given the vast range of biomes and environments on Earth. The idea that a single human led variable, just one factor in carbon dioxide, controls everything relating to climate and its constant adaptations is spectacularly reductive and stupid.

    So many parts of the climate apocalypse bullshit are OBVIOUSLY false. It doesn’t require specific training or expertise to spot that those advocating the elite consensus are paid to do so, that pure self interest ensures that a climate scientist is unlikely to admit that his whole career is based on bullshit. Nor does it take a great deal of research to understand that temperature and carbon dioxide levels do not exactly correlate. Nor does it require vast scholarship to discover that we are at an unusually low level of carbon dioxide in parts per million in the atmosphere, not an unusually high level. We are much closer to all plant life going extinct because there isn’t ENOUGH carbon dioxide than we are to humans being uncomfortable because there is too much carbon dioxide. Casualty rates from natural disasters have been declining for over a century, not rising. The latest research indicates that sea ice levels have increased in the last 20 years, not decreased. None of the places we were told 20 years ago would be beneath water now are beneath water now. None of the ice shelves have disappeared, contrary to constant propaganda about their disappearance. Polar bears have increased in population, not decreased. Severe weather events are no more frequent than they have been for the last century. Despite constantly telling us that each year is the hottest on record, the reality is that the 1970s saw more severe heatwaves in western nations than any of recent years, and the 1930s and earlier saw the highest temperatures ever recorded in large parts of the US. There’s been no modern equivalent of the 1930s Dustbowl.

    The entire narrative thar the climate is getting significantly worse directly contradicts actual experience and actual death rates from natural disasters. It’s a narrative so false that it requires hysterical headlines and constant propaganda to prop it up, including ludicrous and manipulative graphic effects on every weather report (like depicting perfectly average seasonal temperatures in burning red backgrounds as if presenting us all with the flames of Hell).

    Now it may be that climate will change severely. It’s done that again and again with ZERO human input throughout the life of the planet. If such change comes, our task will be to adapt to it. There is no way at all that we could halt it except through insane geo-engineering far more likely to create or worsen than to avert a disaster. We are also subject to forces far beyond current human capacity to change. Increased solar activity could cause electromagnetic pulses that disrupt a significant amount of modern technology and which could easily affect climate. The magnetic poles and Earth’s magnetic field are subject to change-in fact our magnetic poles are shifting rapidly at this time and have been changing for the last 3,000 years. On average they completely flip every 145,000 years and we are long overdue such a change. A weakened magnetic field means the Earth being bombarded with cosmic radiation. Nobody knows precisely what effects a ‘flip’ would have but climate would be far more threatened by that global change than it is by carbon dioxide or human industry.

    It’s also obvious that the climate apocalypse bullshit is being dealt with in absurd ways. Geo-engineering the planet you live on is incredibly stupid, but this research is ongoing. We don’t understand a fraction of the processes, but we contemplate vast interventions anyway. Cloud seeding and weather manipulation is again astonishingly short sighted, with no understanding of any long term effects, but again this is done (and is not a conspiracy theory). Besides these incredibly reckless approaches, we have ‘solutions’ that are universally crap. Wind energy is unreliable, expensive, and far too variable. Wind farms require vast amounts of land and leave a vast pollution trail especially with swift obsolescence and short working life spans of the technology. It is a recipe for filling landfills with polluting metals. At the moment the UK electricity grid ends up paying vast sums to switch wind farms off when it’s too windy, and paying for nothing at all when the rest of the time there isn’t enough wind to generate energy. Solar panels are equally useless, easily destroyed by storms, and requiring huge amounts of land that could be used for far better purposes.

    If the green apocalypse agenda made any kind of sense at all, it would become the strongest advocate and argument for nuclear, which alone provides a viable and realistic alternative to oil and gas. But instead the people who demand the end of oil also demand the end of nuclear. In Germany this has already had a devastating economic impact.

    Finally the whole thing goes on while its strongest advocates all personally behave in ways totally contrary to their pontificating lectures to the rest of us. The elite don’t care about their own carbon footprint. Only about ours. They fly private jets to climate summits. They purchase beachfront properties while telling us everywhere will be underwater soon. On the national level we are told that western nations must ruin themselves ‘saving the planet’ whilst totally ignoring that India, China and developing nations are all much bigger polluters and are all ignoring all the measures the West is told are vital. We are supposed to destroy our energy supply while these nations build new coal fired power stations. A nation like Britain that contributes less than 1% of global emissions is supposed to pretend that any of its actions have more effect than India or China where nearly all carbon dioxide emissions and nearly all new industrial pollution is coming from.

    None of it makes sense-unless you are either a radicalised civilisation hating misanthrope who wants western society to revert to pre industrial levels of hardship, or unless you are a short term crook only interested in controlling new energy sources and gathering public subsidies for your private profit.

    We Must Save Ukraine

    Finally the most recent bullshit lie of our times which still holds a grip on public policy is the fatuous idea that we are morally required to support Ukraine in its war against Russia. Again, this was crafted and accompanied by a sustained media psy-op which saw waving the Ukrainian flag or putting it on one’s Facebook profile picture right up there with declaring “I’ve had my jab” or a Pride rainbow as proof of conformist idiocy and a total lack of independent critical faculties.

    The kind of person determined to Save Ukraine is also the kind of person determined to Save the Planet, Punch a Nazi, or Be Kind. It’s a person incapable of independent or rational thought. It’s a person who exists merely as the passive accommodating object of external control, subject to every mainstream mandated slogan and idea it is possible to be influenced by.

    I’ve never heard an independent argument for why the West has a moral duty towards Ukraine. Ukraine was never a western ally. There were no treaty obligations between the western nations and Ukraine. Ukraine did not have a strong record as a nation to be admired. In World War II the Ukrainians were Nazis. After World War Two they were Soviets. They were traditionally part of Russia and legitimately within a Russian sphere of influence. Western engagement anywhere in that region began and ended on just two occasions-once during the Crimean War in an imperial dispute with Russia, and once again at the end of the Russian Civil War when France and Britain briefly supported the last White Russian forces which occupied and then evacuated from Crimea. That’s it, compared to centuries of Russian connection.

    In the modern era leading up to the current conflict everything cited about western alliance with Ukraine is bullshit. We didn’t support an elected government-we saw the CIA and US neocons back a colour revolution that ousted an elected government. Our globalist leaders didn’t connect with and like Ukraine because it was a western leaning democracy-they liked it because it was run by corrupt oligarchs and because it was such a corrupt shithole that they could all enrich themselves there, as well as treating the whole country like an enormous Epstein Island. Our elites went there to do crooked deals, to steal, to build biolabs, to bury secrets, and to fuck children and whores out of sight of western citizens. That was the reason they had to defend and save Ukraine. It had nothing to do with the sacredness of borders or the rule of international law or any of the high moral cant about why we must Save Ukraine. That was bullshit for the especially gullible. It had everything to do with Biden family profits, McCain family profits, and Kerry family profits.

    Plus it was always intended as a way to punish Putin for closing the door on the post Soviet Russian resource grab that still had western globalists salivating. It was designed as a conflict the West wanted so that Putin could be removed and Russian regime change initiated, with a defeated Russia subject to the same BlackRock purchase that Ukraine has suffered. All of the pious bullshit was a thin cover for that, and of course for the traditional military industrial complex profits to be had from another unnecessary war.

    There Are 456 Genders

    Finally we come to the whole complex of bullshit on gender, identity, sexual orientation and sexual politics. This area sees the most obvious absurdities, even more patently ridiculous than any justification for nuclear war on behalf of Ukraine or for injecting people against their will with experimental gene therapies.

    As JK Rowling said, there are no trans children. There are also no gay children. And there are no non binary children. Children are exclusively male or female. So are adults. Your gender is defended by your biology. It is not a thing you choose, it is not a political statement. It is not a minutely specific sexual fetish or orientation. It is your biological reality, which is determined by nature, not by you. Most of the genders asserted as genders are in fact declarations of sexual fetish, or of attention seeking narcissism, or both.

    Biological reality, like all objective reality, doesn’t give a shit about feelings or delusions or polite fictions. It recognises you as male or female. It doesn’t care whether you are comfortable with that accurate label. It doesn’t care if you have some bullshit idea that you were born in the wrong identity. It knows that such a feeling is a delusion, a psychological problem rather than an emergent greater truth.

    If you are sometimes attracted to men and sometimes to women, sometimes sexually dominant and sometimes sexually submissive, if you like giving head to boys or taking an artificial plastic cock from a girl none of that changes your biology. No matter how extreme or unusual your sexual tastes are they are sexual tastes, not gender. If you are turned on by anime or by trees or by dressing up as a parrot none of that is a newly discovered gender. All of it is just a fetish. If you have no sexual feelings at all And are a male, you are still male. If you have 10,000 different sexual feelings you write down in a diary that makes the Marquis de Sade seem bland and are female, you ate still female. If you stroke a jelly for sexual kicks or make love to a dolphin you haven’t changed your gender. You are just a pervert.

    As with all the other bullshit we are talking about, there is a clear profit motive behind many modern sexual politics ideas and behind the entire bullshit agenda of pretending that perversions and fetishes are gender identities or that people are born trans. The trans idea creates an entirely new industry. Where there were once no gender clinics, today there are thousands. All of them provide lucrative careers for those doctors and nurses who just can’t get enough profit out of more prosaic medical corruption. If COVID payments or opioid crisis payments were not enough for you, the trans child mutilation industry can give you more. The whole thing is a sick industry monetising the mutilation of children and adults and reliant on lying to your victims that these artificial surgical and chemical changes will take away unhappiness or cure bullying or make the psychologically disturbed while again.

    In reality the doctor makes money and many of the patients end up killing themselves. All in the name of greater ‘compassion’ and ‘inclusion’.

    It is no coincidence that the generations which are the most ‘liberal’ and the most understanding of perversions and fetish are also the generations most prone to psychological anxiety, depression, and torment. The pervert understanding society encourages more abuse and more harm, the porn society creates more sexual dysfunction and the divorce of sexuality from love, meaning and marriage makes sexual experiences less and less fulfilling and more and more depressingly sordid. All of this was encouraged by psychological professionals. What did they care for the social impacts? Half of them were themselves perverts using their expert status to justify their kinks, as Kinsey did. The other half were, just like doctors dishing out meds for the pharmaceutical companies, more interested in the fees they could charge. A self fulfilling circuit was created. Psychologists removed moral judgement from social and sexual issues. They encouraged and created licence to do or be anything. That created more problems, and the problems were their profitable work and their excuse to exist.

    Just like a drug dealer needs addicts, a psychologist needs people who are mentally disturbed. The vested professional interest, the most profit, is in the ongoing harm, rather than the successful cure. Nobody has pressed gender confusion and bizarre sexual politics quite as vigorously as the psychologists have.

    None of the above is to say that these are the only instances of pure bullshit lie operating today, or that the Globalist controlled mainstream has a total monopoly on bullshit. There are of course alternative and anti Globalist positions which are also bullshit, most notably the widespread fantasy of Jewish conspiracy prevalent among many truthers and common to extremists of all persuasions. Various revisionist historical positions come from the alternative media now and are just as batshit crazy as the broad Globalist lies given above (the Illuminati are in charge, the Royals are alien lizards, Churchill was the chief architect and villain of World War II etc etc).

    But the six lies given above are the ones that are BOTH obvious bullshit AND profoundly respectable. These are the lies of our times, the lies that are officially supported and required. They are all embarrassingly obvious in their falsehood. It takes no great genius to reject them. Each of them could be summarised in a way that renders their absurdity obvious.

    For instance, it still surprises me that anyone can take the ideology behind cow farts are destroying the planet seriously. It amazes me that companies can develop fart and burp masks for cows and this doesn’t instantly expose the whole climate narrative as bullshit.

    Similarly as soon as there were rules saying a virus will pounce on you if you are talking but not if you are eating everyone should have realised the whole thing was bullshit, but many didn’t. The official narrative described a virus that was polite and smart enough to follow directional arrows, offended by religious gatherings, weirdly respectful of people eating meals, fooled by one sided barriers, and implacably opposed to open air sports. And people still didn’t admit it was all bullshit.

    There are even people who hear I’m a non binary pan sexual who is sometimes bi and sometimes furry or my pronouns are sparkle/moonbeam/unicorn and still pretend that this bollocks is real.

    But the truth is thar bullshit is nearly always instantly detectable as bullshit. That was true during COVID. It’s true with every some, progressive and Globalist idea or policy platform. You have to work far harder at being fooled than you do at being unimpressed. You have to be indoctrinated to accept it.

    None of it survives without lies. None of it lives in a person who insists on thinking. None of it is reasonable or believable to anyone sensible. You have to work at being a fucking idiot to go along with it. That’s why these things require the dishonesty of the mainstream media. That’s why the average man in the street instinctively recoils from it all. That’s why they need psy-ops to sell this shit.

    Because without that artificial nudge none of us would buy it.