Salim Mansur: Halt muslim immigration

29 Responses to Salim Mansur: Halt muslim immigration

1. oogenhand says:

   October 17, 2012 at 3:47 am

   Limiting immigration in Canada obviously invites charges of hypocrisy; efforts should be concentrated in destroying Islam in its weak spot, the Middle-East. If Canada can be declared a White country, so can e.g. Oman or Egypt.
2. Michael Laudahn says:

   October 17, 2012 at 4:09 am

   How thick can you be, Rick Dykstra ?!

   Rick.Dykstra(a)parl.gc.ca or http://www.rickdykstra.ca/index.php?option=com_contact&task=view&contact_id=2&Itemid=41

   But the longer I watch, the more of your kind I seem to see there. There must be something completely wrong in these circles who are supposed to represent us.
3. kegsfin says:

   October 17, 2012 at 5:32 am

   Wow, “I come before you as an un-hyphenated Canadian”…..well put Salim!

4. Pingback: SALIM MANSUR |

5. DP111 says:

   October 17, 2012 at 5:41 am

   Too late for that. The opportunity to reverse the damage was provided by 9/11. A heaven sent opportunity was spurned. Instead, the entire West opened up to Muslim immigration – Canada and the US in particular.

   Its too late to cry over spilt milk. Too late to learn lessons from past battles. The way forward now, is to find a way to reverse the situation without compromising our own values. Difficult but not impossible.

   As for the MPs in Canada’ s House, they are truly unbelievable. Most of Europe has given up on Multicultism, Canadian MPs are committed to it. In the rest of the West, social engineering was carried out in secret, Canadian MPs actually admit to carrying out wjhat can be termed as “soft genocide”.

   Anyway -all too late. The question now is how to undo the damage without compromising our values.
6. DP111 says:

   October 17, 2012 at 6:00 am

   Another thing. Has anyone noticed the preponderance of women on the committee. There are women who are of Indian, Chinese, Greek origin. Very few what could be called Anglo-Saxon women. Where are the men?

   When push comes to shove, and it always comes to that every time, it will be the men who will have to defend the community, and by extention, the nation -this is particularly so with Islam, and Muslim men. Yet there are few men on the committee, and those that are, adopt feminised caring attitudes.
7. oogenhand says:

   October 17, 2012 at 6:48 am

   Muslim men are indeed more problematic than their women. Maybe we should only admit fit refugees, like Ali G thought was cool.
8. Fred says:

   October 17, 2012 at 10:18 am

   DP111

   There have been certain people who’ve spoken out against multiculturalism in Europe, true. But has anything changed? No. Nothing can change, because the path to change runs through (violent) conflict. Action speaks louder than words. Thus far, only words have been spoken. Also, it’s a wee bit premature and inaccurate to state that Europe has given up on multiculturalism. It has done so in appearance only.
9. Fred says:

   October 17, 2012 at 10:34 am

   In the third part of the video the question to define human intelligence is asked. (Human) intelligence is the ability to recognize patterns. And, surprise surprise, that just happens to be an ability most of the members of this committee are obviously not very familiar with. If these people are elected officials, it underscores the fact that our western societies are decadently effeminate and infantile.
10. oogenhand says:

    October 17, 2012 at 10:41 am

    It is true only a credible threat of civil war can really change things. A credible threat is only possible if many non-Muslims have some command of the languages used by Muslims, like Albanian, Chechen, Somali and of course Arabic.

11. Pingback: Sluit de grenzen voor moslimimmigranten: Salim Mansurs getuigenis in het House of Commons, Canada | E.J. Bron

12. DP111 says:

    October 17, 2012 at 1:19 pm

    Oogenhand wrote: It is true only a credible threat of civil war can really change things.

    Quite. But that means Bosnias all over Europe. Almost all civil wars end in partition of the nation. This means that there will be multiple Muslim states in Europe as it fractures. Civil wars are also the most deadly, as they are fought close hand and on the streets. Thus, a civil war should be the very last option.

    Meanwhile, the internal demographic threat continues to grow, even if all Muslim immigration is stopped.
13. DP111 says:

    October 17, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    A civil war will also lead to the destruction of all the ancient architecture of Europe. Muslims will destroy ancient churches and cathedrals.See what is happening in Bosnia and Kosovo.
14. oogenhand says:

    October 17, 2012 at 1:50 pm

    Muslims should understand that destruction of ancient architecture will be retaliated in their homelands. What happened to Belgrado can happen to Tetouan or Cairo. Civil wars are nasty, but there are methods of asymmetric warfare that I cannot mention on a polite blog. Muslim morale can be broken by pointing out the civil war in Syria. Warnings of eternal damnation are very credible because of this.
    Anyway, if you don’t learn Chechen, the war is lost before it is fought. 7una qeeta kha’i?
15. oogenhand says:

    October 17, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    Note: an oil boycot will hurt Muslims in Europe as well.
16. dodocanspell says:

    October 17, 2012 at 7:13 pm

    Salim Mansur is an intelligent and brave man. Many from his community will agree with everything he says but they will never admit it openly…that’s what makes him brave.

    That Dykstra guy is like the sound of the first syllable of his name and the NDP MP from Scarborough only wanted to hear the sound of her own nonsense not get anything of value from Mansur and Mansur knew it.
17. Richard says:

    October 17, 2012 at 9:45 pm

    dp civil wars end in partition only when a strong group (in the last century it was the west) insist on a negotiated settlement when the wars are fought to a conclusion this doesn’t happen.
18. morticia says:

    October 17, 2012 at 10:41 pm

    Salim is brilliant…Only a few on that committee understood what he was talking about, the rest are the usual dunderheads found on all committees of any kind….zeros….Keep it up Salim

    You are a man to create some powerful influence in a direction that can save this sorry state of affairrs…..

    Luvs ya…cute as a button, and soooooo tuned in, smart, hopefully you have Jason and Stephens ear…..

    thank you for this post
19. wlil says:

    October 17, 2012 at 11:13 pm

    I don’t trust any Moslem leader. Perhaps this is just another moslem wannabe leader. Moslems tend to say all the nice things just be be a leader and then nothing is done to prevent islamisation. Of course, any type of mass immigration from any backward, selfish, greedy community is bad for the host country.
20. wlil says:

    October 18, 2012 at 1:19 am

    If I am an European, I would like to be led by a real caring European, and not any unreliable Moslem, whether with a hyphen or not. Perhaps, people like Barack Obama is more suitable to be a leader in Indooesia or Kenya.
    Non-whites or Moslems should not lead Europe or the West because they are just not suitable to lead the West or Europe.
21. oogenhand says:

    October 18, 2012 at 1:58 am

    Islam should be destroyed regardless of the interests of the West/Europe. We should allow the West to become isolated from other non-Muslims.
22. Don says:

    October 18, 2012 at 4:30 am

    I think he is sincere and reliable. There are many people in the arab,countries and people in pakistan and bangladesh who say similar things. They are a group of people who say exactly the same things in some cases. One guy who is from Pakistan said on National pakistani TV (and it is on youtube in English) as to the reason why a certain government does not allow Pakistanis into a particular muslim country. The country in question was Brunei. He said the reason is because the government of that country know the filth that a hundred thousand Pakistanis will impose on that country. So I think this guy is of that mindset and I can trust that mindset. There aim is to stop immigration into countries like Canada so what is there not to support?
23. oogenhand says:

    October 18, 2012 at 9:50 am

    Even Muslim countries have troubles with Pakistanis? Why aren’t the Saudi methods copied?

24. Pingback: Canadian Muslim Salim Mansur: Halt Muslim Immigration « A Ruby In The Rough

25. wlil says:

    October 18, 2012 at 10:41 am

    It is up to people to accept moslem leaders or not. Hope they won’t come crying once the damage is done by moslem leaders. I don’t like Moslems or any people that are only nice to people who are richer than them.
26. wlil says:

    October 18, 2012 at 9:55 pm

    If Salim Mansur is really serious about halting msolem immigrants, he as a moslem should also leave, together with all his moslem community.
27. TheGentile says:

    October 24, 2012 at 1:04 am

    Nuke’m ALL and let G0d sort them out, …or wait untill they nuke first and sit back to watch the end of times
28. oogenhand says:

    October 24, 2012 at 8:02 pm

    Nuking? Start with a little city like El Hoceima.

29. Pingback: Suspend immigration from Muslim countries, Muslim political scientist tells Canadian MP’s (video) « Creeping Sharia