Matt Hancock and lying to the public to create fear and manipulate behaviour

Posted on by

Matt Hancock’s plan to ‘frighten the pants off everyone’ about Covid

Leaked WhatsApp messages reveal how health secretary hoped to shock public into complying with ever-changing lockdown rules

Throughout the course of the pandemic, officials and ministers wrestled with how to ensure the public complied with ever-changing lockdown restrictions. One weapon in their arsenal was fear. 

“We frighten the pants off everyone,” Matt Hancock suggested during one WhatsApp message with his media adviser. 

The then health secretary was not alone in his desire to scare the public into compliance. The WhatsApp messages seen by The Telegraph show how several members of Mr Hancock’s team engaged in a kind of “Project Fear”, in which they spoke of how to utilise “fear and guilt” to make people obey lockdown.

An Imperial College survey of Covid infections in the community – called the React programme and led by the eminent professor Lord Darzi – provided “positive” news for Mr Hancock and his team. 

The study they referred to appeared to have been a survey showing “decreasing prevalence” of Covid through May and an R number – the reproduction rate of the virus – of just 0.57. 

The study was in line with an Office for National Statistics (ONS) survey. But when the media focused on a separate report by Public Health England and Cambridge University showing a high transmission rate in some parts of the country – prompting speculation that local lockdowns could follow – Mr Hancock said: “That’s no bad thing.” Sir Patrick Vallance, the Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser, agreed. On June 5 2020, there were 1,020 reported daily cases of Covid and 160 deaths.

Much more at link above. Many more damning snippets of conversation. As anyone reading this already knows, we were lied to, manipulated, sickened and many were killed by these measures. 

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

6 Replies to “Matt Hancock and lying to the public to create fear and manipulate behaviour”

  1. In 1995, Judge Sandra Beckwith ruled in the case In Re Cincinnati Radiation Litigation (874 F. Supp 1995) that the Nuremberg Code may be applied in criminal and civil litigation in the Federal Courts of the United States.

    • Trying to find the evidence that Canada signed on to the Nuremberg code as law. I was told by a doctor that I trust, in fact he is so trustworthy that he retired and left his successful practice before he would recommend these shots to anyone.

      He knew that meant real problems with our nascent communist government. So he quit medicine.

      In any case, he said the uN adopted the Nuremberg code, and Canada signed on to it as law in I think he said, 1950. So there is that.

      • Canada is a signatory to the universal declaration or human rights.
        The crimes against humanity and war crimes act specifically points to the nuremburg declairation, and clearly states that forced and coerced medical experimentation is a crime against humanity.
        The preamble also states that this is the paramount law in canada, ands will not be suspended under any circumstance, even by god almighty in a speedo.
        2 (1) The definitions in this subsection apply in this Act.

        conventional international law?means any convention, treaty or other international agreement

        (a) that is in force and to which Canada is a party; or

        (b) that is in force and the provisions of which Canada has agreed to accept and apply in an armed conflict in which it is involved.?(droit international conventionnel)
        Binding on Her Majesty

        3 This Act is binding on Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province.

        Offences Within Canada
        Marginal note:Genocide, etc., committed in Canada

        4 (1) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence who commits

        (a) genocide;

        (b) a crime against humanity; or

        (c) a war crime.

        Marginal note:Conspiracy, attempt, etc.

        (1.1) Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence.

        So, yeah. Under canadian law, everyone who participated in this is guilty of crimes against humanity. The PM, the cops, doctors, flunkies and functionaries. All of them.

        https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-45.9/

  2. When do we roll out the ‘new variant’?
    My question is
    ‘When do we nail together the gallows and lynch these (LONG ANGRY EXPLETIVE LADEN TIRADE DELETED) tranny bag osculators?’
    No drop. Hoist them and watch them kick.

  3. This is good support for the notion that the difference between demonstrated facts and conspiracy theory is about two months.