Understanding that supranational organizations are basically communist activist agencies: Links 1, August 19th, 2022

1. UN announces plan to fight “misinformation”. Which is pretty funny since they change what they say are the facts and the truth on a roughly bimonthly basis and ignore all science which contradicts their narratives. Here is a link to the UN site announcing the initiative. Below, is a video showing what the UN Secretary general actually thinks of freedom of speech in toto. This is likely part of a communist/United Nations effort to control all social media for narrative purposes. And yes if they can throw a sitting president off of one platform and stop the entire party from fundraising from another and no one calls that election rigging, they can do this.

2. A look at how the Australian agriculture industry is being manipulated as a mirror of how the US, (And probably Canada) also is being manipulated.

3. The Suppression of Useful COVID-19 Treatments

(The following is an excerpt of a very important document. It was sent to us by a doctor and scientist who worked for big pharma doing human testing of new pharmaceutical products.)

Eighteen months ago, the first in a series of articles on the management of COVID-19 was published in Quadrant. The constant in these articles was that optimal management combined spaced vaccine administration with effective early drug treatment to cover breakthrough infections. This article compares two groups of drugs promoted as effective in the early treatment of COVID-19: recycled anti-viral drugs that target specific replication and re-purposed drugs of biological origin that render target cells hostile to viral infection.

Background: Those who have followed this series and perhaps others, will recognise how a “vaccine narrative” and its ideology, promoted by the pharmaceutical industry, led to the cancellation of non-patented drugs. These re-purposed drugs had an extensive data base supporting prevention and early treatment of COVID-19. Opposition to their use was unprecedented, denying both science and the established practise of the doctor-patient relationship. This opposition threatened use of “off-label” drugs regularly prescribed with benefit by most doctors. Governments also banned the use of these drugs for treatment of COVID-19, threatening and enacting the deregistration of doctors who opposed the narrative and prescribed ivermectin (IVM) or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for early treatment of COVID-19 infection. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the Australian licensing body, succumbed to pressure by banning use of IVM for treatment of COVID-19, not because it was  ineffective but because “it may interfere with vaccine uptake; it may deprive indigenous patients use for scabies; and there may be confusion re appropriate dosage regimen”. This win for Big Pharma was a loss for thousands of Australians who would benefit, including many at risk of developing serious disease. […]

4. Hillel Neuer is a Twitter account worth following for those still permitted to use that platform. The following are few Tweets of his that are worthy of a moment to read them.

While we are on the subject of who can use what platform, Facebook and Instagram have banned Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s organization, Children’s Health Defence from posting to those platforms, without notice. Facebook is the same organization which prevented Donald Trump and the Republicans from fund raising on its platform for the 2020 federal election. How anyone can not say this is election rigging is an excellent test of partisanship in reason. They even unpublished previous materials.

(I saw Hillel present to some students in Ottawa several years ago. It was quite interesting how clearly leftist students levelled false accusations at him as if they were ‘Gotcha!’ moments which Hillel dealt with like a pro. The same leftists that would claim a monopoly on women’s and gay rights are 4 square allied with every petty and major tyrannical Islamic and communist regime or organization.)

5. Paul Joseph Watson does the expected “What if the roles were reversed” rhetorical device on this author and book about the total genocide of the White Race of mankind. But frankly it should be done. Because it is such an excellent example of the dialectic. The manipulation of language as a weapon focused on one target. Where the people in control of the narrative get to define words as suits their purpose, but also define how we mean the words we use, and thereby make us guilty of thought and real crimes based on how they impute meanings to what we may say. This is no joke. These weapons are semantic nukes.

Thank you all for your kind attention to these issues.

The following video is not for everyone. It shows a surgery to remove a blood clot from a beating heart. If there are any medical people watching this site and this video, perhaps they can comment as to if this is a normal thing, or if this only started happening in any kind of frequency since the mRNA gene-therapy injections.


About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

6 Replies to “Understanding that supranational organizations are basically communist activist agencies: Links 1, August 19th, 2022”

  1. 4/ …‘Gotcha!’ moments which Hillel dealt with like a pro.
    He is a “pro”!
    But Zionists use the term ironically. Most leaders of American Jew-“ish” orgs are professional parsel-tongues.

  2. Add to #1

    World Economic Forum Calls For Merging Of Human And AI Intel To Censor “Hate Speech” & “Misinformation”
    Tyler Durden’s Photo
    FRIDAY, AUG 12, 2022 – 08:35 PM
    Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

    Despite the fact that no one asked, the World Economic Forum is now advocating for the merger of human and artificial intelligence systems to censor “hate speech” and “misinformation” online before it is even allowed to be posted.

    A report published to the official WEF website ominously warns about the peril of “the dark world of online harms.”

    But the globalist body, run by comic book Bond villain Klaus Schwab, has a solution.

    They want to merge the ‘best’ aspects of human censorship and AI machine learning algorithms to ensure that people’s feelings don’t get hurt and counter-regime opinions are blacklisted.

    “By uniquely combining the power of innovative technology, off-platform intelligence collection and the prowess of subject-matter experts who understand how threat actors operate, scaled detection of online abuse can reach near-perfect precision,” states the article.

    In other words, your free speech will probably get censored before you’re even able to post it on social media sites. Some are calling it “preemptive censorship.”

    Or as the WEF puts it, “Trust and safety teams can stop threats rising online before they reach users.”

    World Economic Forum Publishes Article Calling for Global Censorship Using AI and Human Intelligence
    By Naveen Athrappully
    August 12, 2022 Updated: August 15, 2022


    An opinion article published on the World Economic Forum (WEF) website has proposed creating an artificial intelligence program that could end up acting as a comprehensive global censorship tool.

    In the article, writer and cybersecurity expert Inbal Goldberger proposes combining a powerful AI network with input from human intelligence data to track and preemptively stop certain content from circulating online.

    “Since the introduction of the internet, wars have been fought, recessions have come and gone and new viruses have wreaked havoc,” Goldberger writes. “While the internet played a vital role in how these events were perceived, other changes—like the radicalization of extreme opinions, the spread of misinformation and the wide reach of child sexual abuse material (CSAM)—have been enabled by it.”

    The article mentions the importance of deciphering the coded language used by child abusers and pornographers to disseminate CSAM and removing the content before it’s widely shared.

    But along with this, Goldberger also mentions that the AI would be used to detect “extremism,” “disinformation,” and “hate speech.”

    The proposed AI program would be supplemented by “off-platform” human intelligence gathering, Goldberger stated.

    • AI ethics backed by Pope and tech giants in new plan
      By Jen Copestake
      Technology reporter

      28 February 2020

      The Roman Catholic Church has joined up with IBM and Microsoft to work on the ethics of artificial intelligence.

      Leaders from the two tech giants met senior church officials in Rome, and agreed to collaborate on “human-centred” ways of designing AI.

      Microsoft president Brad Smith admitted some people may “think of us as strange bedfellows” at the signing event.

      “But I think the world needs people from different places to come together,” he said.

      The call was supported by Pope Francis, in his first detailed remarks about the impact of artificial intelligence on humanity.

      The Rome Call for Ethics was co-signed by Mr Smith, IBM executive vice-president John Kelly and president of the Pontifical Academy for Life Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia.

      It puts humans at the centre of new technologies, asking for AI to be designed with a focus on the good of the environment and “our common and shared home and of its human inhabitants”.
      Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia said the meeting came about after he developed a friendship with leaders of Microsoft and IBM.

      Microsoft’s Brad Smith said: “I think it’s a challenging time because there is so much polarisation in so many parts of the world.”

      “We need people who can work to close the gaps that divide us – so in some ways I look at the Catholic Church, I look at a company like Microsoft, and I say why not?”

      The group wants to start a new dialogue on ethics and technology and invites other companies to sign up and work together.

      “In this sense I have to say the Gospel inspiration is very important, because the Gospel pushed us to serve, to spread fraternity not to divide,” Archbishop Paglia said.

      Common ground
      Mr Smith said agreeing a universal ethical paradigm on artificial intelligence may prove impossible because across human history people had not agreed a single ethical framework to rule their lives.

      But he said there were ways to bring together many diverse viewpoints for the common good.

      Are we on the cusp of an ‘AI winter’?
      How computers wrote BBC election result stories
      “I don’t think it will be easy to develop a singular approach to ethics for machines since we haven’t been able to do it for people,” he said.

      “But I do think we can find a lot of common ground and when you look at the world’s great religions and the world’s great philosophies, you do see some similar themes,” he said.

      ‘Immense potential’
      The Vatican’s interest in addressing ethical issues in technology has been growing for some time.
      Humanising technology
      All the speakers said they were inspired by the Pope’s leadership in this area.

      “I am convinced that the current Pope, Pope Francis, is God’s gift for the entire world,” said Archbishop Paglia.

      “To humanise technology, this is possible only if you have a great vision,” he said.

      “This is the only perspective in order to avoid conflicts, war, ecological and human disasters,” the archbishop said.

      Mr Kelly says the views of the Pontifical Academy for Life and IBM match very closely in the ethical sphere.

      “AI is so close to human behaviour and interaction this is really important to get right, so we are really proud to team up with the Catholic Church to get this one right,” he said.

        • (“In this sense I have to say the Gospel inspiration is very important, because the Gospel pushed us to serve, to spread fraternity not to divide,” Archbishop Paglia said.)

          Well, it is written:
          Luke 12:51-53
          King James Version
          51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:

Leave a Reply to Maplewood Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.