How to protect babies from the FDA and their attempt to add gene therapy to the school vaccine schedule

For the next few days this will be a sticky post and newer material will be below. The deadline for being certain your submission will be viewed is tomorrow, the 7th. But they continue to accept submissions till the 13th.

The FDA for some reason, and we will come back to that, has opened up the process of submitting objections to their attempt to approve, and then put on the school schedule, the various gene therapy shots for babies to four year old children. Once on the school schedule, the manufacturers are exempt from any and all liability for damage from the shots for people of ALL ages. So you can see why they are so anxious to approve these shots, and rush them into the schedule of vaccines for schools.

But registering an objection is easy and must be done NOW. If memory serves, the window closes on objections, Tuesday, June 7th. (The site is open for submissions till June 13th, but apparently only ones received by the FDA by June 7th will be guaranteed to be considered. As it was explained to me. So PLEASE follow these instructions and register your objection right now. Below, is the basic explanatory video from 3Speak, and if that doesn’t work, here is a direct link to the same video from Bitchute.

Here is the link to make your submission.

It is interesting that the FDA opened this process for what is an American legal issue, to anyone in the world. One has to wonder if that isn’t because they intend to rig the outcome, and then justify fast tracking this globally since the world had the ‘chance’ to object. Something doesn’t smell right here, but it does smell consistent with so much from these corporations and quasi-governmental bodies for years now.

Either way, please do register your objection. Last time they did this, they had so many objections that they cancelled the entire hearing process. Still fraudulent as it meant they were doing a work-around to the objections. But at least it means we can still have an effect.

Here is a tweet of the video should anyone wish to help spread this message by retweeting.

Skippy left this list of possible reasons to use in your submission:

Just to give people some ideas for objections, try these:
1. trials for the jabs did not include children, giving them now to children IS the trial
2. It always takes years to find out if a drug is safe, this is standard, but not this time
3. Technically, the trials should still be going on, but it was rushed to market beforehand and is not proven safe
4. children have DIED after the shot, nursing babies have died suddenly as well
5. They have no idea about short-term or long-term safety for children, who will pump out spike proteins potentially all their lives
6. Spike proteins are toxic, and they will produce them for decades
7. Fertility is a huge question, no one knows how this will effect children’s ability to someday have children
8. Children are not made sick by Covid, unless they have a serious underlying disorder such as a heart defect, diabetes, etc. For most children, they are asymptomatic or have a minor cold.
9. Vax carries more risk to children than Covid does, by far.
10. For every child saved from Covid by the vax, it is estimated multiple die
11. Children develop protective antibodies once they have had Covid
12. It is all a big experiment, and children are the guinea pigs, as adults are. But our leaders are perfectly happy with your child taking the risk.
13. Myocarditis is not “mild”. It causes heart damage and scar tissue to form, and can lead to heart failure within a few years
14. mRNA technology was used in cancer treatment, never as a way of delivering what they consider a vaccine.
15. There is no acknowledgement by the CDC that vaxxes cause ANY damage at all. It’s all good as far as they are concerned.
16. People who got the vax are getting Covid at least as much if not more than the unvaxxed. The “protection” from the vax lasts a few weeks, then appears to dive into negative numbers (you may be more likely to get it)
17. This is YOUR child, not the government’s. YOU are the ones to decide what medical intervention (or not) your child receives. You make that call. If anything happens, you will find doctors and the government find it “mysterious”. They will just not be able to figure out what caused the problem, may think it’s all due to “anxiety”, and will have no desire to hear about your child’s problem or what to do to help them. It will all be on you.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

31 Replies to “How to protect babies from the FDA and their attempt to add gene therapy to the school vaccine schedule”

    • Most effective cutoff is June the 7th. Before then it WILL be considered by the committee. BUT, you can still submit till June 13th, although it might not be effective.

      Really, we need this in by Tuesday, June 7th.

    • My child is not your experiment trails. It is to early for mrna know the effects on a human body. Compensation for damages will not cover the damage caused by mrna injury.

  1. “Dear Leader Xi,” the reporter named Dong asked, “One of the three astronauts is a woman. Surely there is another qualified man in all of China to do the job, and thereby avoid the complications of having both sexes in such close quarters for six months?”

    “Of course there is,” replied Xi, “We have infinite talent. But how do you expect China to be the leader in space if we do not procreate in space? So it is we must conceive in weightlessness the first Chinese child!”

    “What will it be named,” the reporter asked.

    “We’re thinking Bobby if it’s a boy. Maybe Sandy if it’s a girl.”

    “Not a Chinese name, Dear Leader?”

    “Chinese? Are you kidding? Why would we give it a Chinese name when we owe our whole space program to the hardware and software we have stolen from the West? So we tip our hat in gratitude.”

    “And the sex of the child is not predetermined?”

    “Of course it is. I was only kidding about the gendered names. Do you honestly believe we would have a girl first? No, it will be a boy, and a great boy at that. We have chosen our astronauts very carefully. We have studied their lineages and genetics. These are the best candidates.”

    Another reporter at the back of the room then stood up. President Xi pointed to him. “Yes Mr. Wang.”

    “I have learned from the most reliable sources that our Soviet friends tried this years ago.” The press gallery erupted in whispers.

    “Silence!” said Xi. “Comrade Wang is correct. The Soviets tried it first many years ago, but the experiment went horribly wrong. You see, in those days the technology was very crude and there wasn’t the ability to study life on the genetic level. Our Soviet friends were, indeed, able to produce a space baby. They chose a very fine father candidate who was the revolutionary leader of one of their satellite countries. The mother, however, was defective. The result was an epic failure. The boy was born a retard. We shall not make the same mistake. Look at our success with gain-of-function research on Covid-19 and monkey pox. Our eugenics abilities are now superior. We shall not suffer the shame of producing such a human failure.”

    “Which Soviet satellite country was the father from?” Wang asked.

    “–An imbecile. Moron. Idiot. A dullard and a dolt,” continued Xi working himself up. “Simpleton, twit and dork. A doofus, oaf and jackass.” Xi was getting carried away. “A dunce, lump, halfwit and meathead.” Sweat beaded on his brow.

    “Oh,” said Wang. “You mean Justin Trudeau.”

    https://www.space.com/china-shenzhou-14-mission-arrives-tiangong-space-station

    • Justin doesn’t care if he is laughed at. He knows he leads a country and that’s enough for him. At the recent NATO meeting re Ukraine/Russia, leaders ignored him, and once again, he tries to include himself in conversations. When they pose for the group photo, he’s the only one with his legs spread open and that’s intentional.

      • Part of the political leaders in all Western nations are working to destroy Western Civ. They know that they can’t enslave the entire world as long as the idea of individual rights survives

    • they are desperate, they know that if they don’t will in the near future they will be set back a century or more in their quest to conquer the world.

  2. Interviewer is unprepared for the person interviewed. Don’t see this very often. On gold, economic and geopolitics 35 min:

    • He makes a lot of mistakes about history, but he is right about a lot of things. his biggest mistake on economics is his assumption that after the collapse of the worlds economy Russia, China and Iran are going to be strong enough to dictate to the world. Another big one is that Putin is fighting on the side of freedom.

      When the crash comes the entire world is going down. The big question is how far down they will fall? The bigger their economy the further down they can fall. With Biden working to destroy our economy we will have a shorter fall to the bottom. This gives us a big advantage of we can get Trump back in charge in DC

  3. My child is not your experiment trails. It is to early for mrna know the effects on a human body. Compensation for damages will not cover the damage caused by mrna injury.

  4. Just to give people some ideas for objections, try these:
    1. trials for the jabs did not include children, giving them now to children IS the trial
    2. It always takes years to find out if a drug is safe, this is standard, but not this time
    3. Technically, the trials should still be going on, but it was rushed to market beforehand and is not proven safe
    4. children have DIED after the shot, nursing babies have died suddenly as well
    5. They have no idea about short-term or long-term safety for children, who will pump out spike proteins potentially all their lives
    6. Spike proteins are toxic, and they will produce them for decades
    7. Fertility is a huge question, no one knows how this will effect children’s ability to someday have children
    8. Children are not made sick by Covid, unless they have a serious underlying disorder such as a heart defect, diabetes, etc. For most children, they are asymptomatic or have a minor cold.
    9. Vax carries more risk to children than Covid does, by far.
    10. For every child saved from Covid by the vax, it is estimated multiple die
    11. Children develop protective antibodies once they have had Covid
    12. It is all a big experiment, and children are the guinea pigs, as adults are. But our leaders are perfectly happy with your child taking the risk.
    13. Myocarditis is not “mild”. It causes heart damage and scar tissue to form, and can lead to heart failure within a few years
    14. mRNA technology was used in cancer treatment, never as a way of delivering what they consider a vaccine.
    15. There is no acknowledgement by the CDC that vaxxes cause ANY damage at all. It’s all good as far as they are concerned.
    16. People who got the vax are getting Covid at least as much if not more than the unvaxxed. The “protection” from the vax lasts a few weeks, then appears to dive into negative numbers (you may be more likely to get it)
    17. This is YOUR child, not the government’s. YOU are the ones to decide what medical intervention (or not) your child receives. You make that call. If anything happens, you will find doctors and the government find it “mysterious”. They will just not be able to figure out what caused the problem, may think it’s all due to “anxiety”, and will have no desire to hear about your child’s problem or what to do to help them. It will all be on you.

  5. Thank you for letting us know about this, and many thanks to this good doctor, this good man, for standing up for children. Even if we don’t have children, or our own children are grown, we should want to protect all children from any potential harm, from anybody.

  6. “Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Civid Injections” by Rhoda Wilson – May 27, 2022
    https://expose-news.com/2022/05/27/carbon-nanotech-and-thulium-in-covid-injections/

    “WATCH: Dr. Nagase reviews images from COVID vaccines, shows no ‘elements of life'” Western Standard – Published April 18, 2022
    https://rumble.com/v11go0d-watch-dr.-nagase-reviews-images-from-covid-vaccines-shows-no-elements-of-li.html

  7. JUNE 12 – 10 h PM – WaPo – Pfizer-BioNTech shot for children under 5 safe and effective, FDA staff says

    Food and Drug Administration staff said Sunday the coronavirus vaccine made by Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, for children younger than 5 is effective in producing a virus-blocking response and did not raise safety concerns, a prelude to a crucial review this week by the agency’s independent advisers.

    The analysis by FDA scientists was released ahead of a meeting Wednesday of the agency’s independent experts, who will consider a request for emergency use authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in the youngest children. It will also review a request from Moderna to use its vaccine in children younger than 6. FDA staff Friday said Moderna’s shot for infants and young children was safe and effective.

    After the advisers make their recommendations, the FDA will decide whether to follow the panel’s advice, which it often does. If the agency clears the vaccines, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention signs off, the shots could be available beginning next week.

    The FDA said the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine met the main requirement for effectiveness — it generated an immune response at least as strong as the protection afforded to young adults from the vaccine.

    Overall, the agency said, preliminary data indicated the vaccine was 80.4 percent effective in preventing symptomatic covid-19. The rate was 75.6 percent for babies and toddlers six to 23 months old, and 82.4 percent for children 2-to-4-years-old.

    But the FDA said it was too soon to reach “definitive conclusions” on the vaccine’s effectiveness.

    Side effects were minimal and included irritability and drowsiness for children 6-to-23-months-old, and pain at the injection site and fatigue for children 2 to 4, the FDA said.

    Babies and children younger than 5 — a group numbering 19 million — remain the only age group in the United States not yet eligible for a coronavirus vaccine.

    Some parents have been eagerly awaiting vaccines for their young children, anxious to provide them the same protection that older children, teenagers and adults have had for some time. But surveys show most parents intend to wait before getting their children vaccinated, or are not interested in the pediatric vaccines.

    The FDA made clear Sunday it believes vaccines for the youngest group are critical. Given the uncertainty of the pandemic and likely continued virus transmission in coming months, “deployment of the vaccine for use among children 6 months through 4 years of age will likely have a beneficial effect on COVID-19 associated morbidity and mortality in this age group,” the agency said.

    Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine trial consisted of two groups of children — 6-to-23-months-old and 2-to-4-years-old. The first two shots were administered three weeks apart, and the third was given at least eight weeks after the second dose. Each of the three doses is three micrograms, one-tenth of what adults get.

    For many children, the gap between the second and third shot was significantly longer than the eight weeks set by the protocol. For children 2-to-4-years-old, the median interval between the second and third shots was 10.7 weeks. It was 12.9 weeks for the younger children.

    Assuming both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines are cleared, parents and pediatricians will have a choice. Some might prefer the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine because of preliminary indications that it is more effective. But the three-shot regimen takes longer to complete than Moderna’s two-shot series, which might discourage some parents. On the other hand, the Moderna vaccine tends to cause more fevers, the data shows.

    Most children are expected to get their shots in pediatricians’ offices but states and communities also are planning vaccine clinics, and some pharmacies will administer shots. Some sites will offer both vaccines, but many pediatricians’ offices say they will provide just one.

    Sallie Permar, an expert in pediatric vaccines at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York, said her facility will offer both.

    “While there may be some confusion, it gives you more flexibility,” Permar said. “Parents can weigh all the information and decide.”

    On Friday, the FDA said the Moderna two-shot regimen produced the required immune response. The vaccine was shown to be 51 percent effective in preventing illness in children between 6 months and 2 years old, and 37 percent effective in children 2-to-5-years-old.

    Vaccines for young children have followed a twisting — and often confusing — path, marked by disappointing results, delays and changes in regulatory strategies.

    Pfizer and BioNTech initially tested a two-shot vaccine regimen but announced last December that the approach failed to meet the immune-response goal for the 2-to-4-year-old group. The vaccine makers added a third shot to their trial, delaying vaccine availability by months.

    But in late January, federal officials made the surprising suggestion that there might be a path forward for the two-dose regimen, despite the disappointing results. They said that even if the vaccine missed the immune response target, which is measured in the laboratory, the vaccine still might protect children from infections.

    But that data turned out to be disappointing, too, with only 28.3 percent effectiveness, according to the most recent figures, reflecting the emergence of the omicron variant of the coronavirus. The FDA dropped the plan to accelerate the vaccine and decided to await results from a third dose.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/06/12/pfizer-vaccine-young-children-fda-analysis/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*