Complete text of article on Michel Foucault

Thanks to PePi we now have the complete text of the article about French philosopher, Michel Foucault which we posted about yesterday. This guy is a hero to the left. He is a founder of all that Gender Theory horror show which is being used to motivate children and mentally ill people to get surgeries that mutilate and sterilize them, and which often leads to suicide or more surgeries to undo all these measures.

American People’s News:

English News Room:

Breitbart take on the story:

Woke Philosopher Michel Foucault Raped 8-Year-Old Children in Tunisian Cemeteries: Claim

French postmodernist philosopher Michel Foucault, whose writings have become central in modern woke ideology, has been accused of sexually abusing children as young as eight-years-old while living in Tunisia during the 1960s.

Foucault, a vocal proponent of paedophilia in his writings, signed a petition to legalise sex with 13-year-old children in 1977.

A contemporary intellectual, Guy Sorman, told Britain’s The Sunday Times that he witnessed Foucault courting young boys during his time in Tunisia when the French philosopher took a philosophy professorship at the University of Tunis.

“Young children were running after Foucault saying ‘what about me? take me, take me’,” Sorman said.

“They were eight, nine, ten years old, he was throwing money at them and would say ‘let’s meet at 10 p.m. at the usual place’,” he said, adding: “He would make love there on the gravestones with young boys. The question of consent wasn’t even raised.”

Sorman said that while he regrets not coming forward with the accusations earlier, the French media was covering up for the philosopher, saying: “There were journalists present on that trip, there were many witnesses, but nobody did stories like that in those days. Foucault was the philosopher-king. He’s like our god in France.” […]

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

7 Replies to “Complete text of article on Michel Foucault”

  1. It may seem trite to those to whom words have no meaning in and of themselves, or phrases or turns of phrase.
    To make chicken soup, one has to start with access and subsequent use of chicken in the soup, to make beef soup, have to start with beef available and subsequent users it is with ‘making love’, one would have to start with love and its subsequent use……
    the correct use of the words for the activity this dis-graceful ‘lover of wisdom’, meaning of the word philosopher, that clearly is not one, except maybe in the sense that Sophists were derigatorily referred to in ancient Athens, for word-smiths imitating philosophers, is ‘fornication in a perverse manner’. since money was exchanged they were, even as minors of age, in fact in roles of prostitutes…… and who makes love to a male or female prostate ???? it is simply fornication…..
    classical, modern or in post-modern philosophy, simple….
    Cheerful Love GrizzlyBear hug
    unuk

    • It may seem trite to those to whom words have no meaning in and of themselves, or phrases or turns of phrase.
      To make chicken soup, one has to start with access and subsequent use of chicken in the soup, to make beef soup, have to start with beef available and subsequent use so it is with ‘making love’, one would have to start with love and its subsequent use……
      the correct use of the words for the activity this dis-graceful ‘lover of wisdom’, meaning of the word philosopher, that clearly is not one, except maybe in the sense that Sophists were derigatorily referred to in ancient Athens, for word-smiths imitating philosophers, is ‘fornication in a perverse manner’. since money was exchanged they were, even as minors of age, in fact in roles of prostitutes…… and who makes love to a male or female prostitute ???? it is simply fornication…..
      classical, modern or in post-modern philosophy, simple….
      Cheerful Love GrizzlyBear hug
      unuk
      hahahaha, it seems the ai ‘spell-check’ had some issues, so here is an attempt at the correction, hahahahahah

      • The Sophists
        https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=198&v=2BkhnoQHxhs&feature=emb_title

        Iintellectuals, do not have roots back to their childhoods. If they did, they could never hurt a child, never be blind to the suffering and self-justification of a Beating or a Naughty Step, and they would communicate with ease from the heart to every innocent soul.

        But their life of authenticity was broken. They had put on a Breastplate of Righteousness. A faith in a received identity. Their New Self.

        How then can you meet a child going up, when you can’t be the child going down? Because there is seismic block of the Old Self in the way. This Self that is the same Self, but convinced they won’t stand trial because they Believe. This is the mental illness of denial. And a whole culture can go into denial. A Preferential Characteristic, never rapes, steals, or murders because it is never reported. The obvious hidden by omission. Pretense. And open to submission by force and intimidation.

        Likewise, a charm offensive can make it easy to be dancing along a Tunisian beach with impoverished natives as a king among the greater poverty: these children devalued because of islam. Here, the child is the least for a Mohammad’s right hand to possess; and the greatest, for a Jesus to set free.

        Memorizing knowledge. The enemy of wisdom. The friend of Pride.

        A child has no chance.

        A male of Letters, like in Thailand before, with the barbs of Oscar Wilde is not seen as a parasite who manipulates the guilty who judge – “do you want to see my big banana?”- who then so easily capitulate to displaying their virtues.

        Such giants are only are seen as free spirits. The dead longing to be really dead and made guiltless – and their pain stops. If, that is, no child can see.

        From frying pan to fire.

        The truth is too shocking. Foundations of disconnect. Every one.
        https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9414349/Oklahoma-pastors-wife-lover-arrested-murder-husband.html

  2. This should not come as a surprise, Foucault was a notorious pervert. He was a gay sexual sadist, he wrote openly about this. It may have influenced his worldview, with its obsession with power and power structures.
    He once debated Noam Chomsky, an demanded payment in hashish. Chomsky later said that he came away from the debate believing that Foucault had no concept of morality whatsoever.

    As for pederasty and boy prostitutes, Morocco is well-known for it. I didn’t know about Tunisia, but can’t say I’m surprised. I suspect it’s a cultural phenomenon throughout the Maghreb, unfortunately.

  3. Btw, I don’t think Foucault could be considered “woke”, that is a misinterpretation by the identitarian left. They use some phrases from his writings (“black bodies” comes to mind), but he himself was never into identity politics.
    I think it would have puzzled him, he certainly rejected it. He also rejected structuralism and postmodernism btw, he also distanced.himself from some of his earlier work.

    One interesting thing to note is his encounter with islamism:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Foucault#The_History_of_Sexuality_and_Iranian_Revolution:_1976%E2%80%931979
    in 1978 he travelled to Tehran in Iran, days after the Black Friday massacre. Documenting the developing Iranian Revolution, he met with opposition leaders such as Mohammad Kazem Shariatmadari and Mehdi Bazargan, and discovered the popular support for Islamism.[149] Returning to France, he was one of the journalists who visited the Ayatollah Khomeini, before visiting Tehran. His articles expressed awe of Khomeini’s Islamist movement, for which he was widely criticised in the French press, including by Iranian expatriates. Foucault’s response was that Islamism was to become a major political force in the region, and that the West must treat it with respect rather than hostility.

  4. More on Foucault’s perversion, which apparently knew no bounds. He was also an AIDS denier.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Foucault#Underage_sex_and_pedophilia
    Foucault was a vocal proponent of consensual adult-child underage sex and pedophilia, considering them signs of liberation of both actors;[180][181][182] he argued young children could give consent.[183] In 1977, along with Jean-Paul Sartre, Jacques Derrida, and other intellectuals, Foucault signed a petition to the French parliament calling for the decriminalization of all “consensual” sexual relations between adults and minors below the age of fifteen, the age of consent in France.[184][185] He’d also written an open letter in the Le Monde in defense of three convicted pedophiles.[180][181][186] In the second and third volumes of Foucault’s History of Sexuality, pederasty and “the possibility of the love for boys” serve a “foundational role”. [187][188] Foucault has been described by the Windsor Star as a “pedophile guru”.[189]
    In France-Amérique, Guy Sorman claimed that while staying in Tunisia, Foucault had practiced pedophilia by “paying for little boys”.[190] In a further interview, he claimed Foucault would have sex with children in a graveyard.[191]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Foucault#HIV
    Two years before his own diagnosis, Foucault expressed denial of HIV, suggesting an ideological motivation behind its correlation with minority groups, especially that with the LGBT community, of which he was a member himself.[192] A frequent visitor of gay saunas and S&M clubs, Foucault’s promiscuous sexual practices were criticized for imposing an overall higher risk of HIV transmission, being described as bugchasing and, more controversially, intentional transmission of AIDS.[193][194][195]

    Footnotes:
    192 Edmund White (6 April 2020). “Fear, bigotry and misinformation – this reminds me of the 1980s Aids pandemic”. The Guardian. “I remember when I visited Paris in 1981 I told Michel Foucault, the French philosopher, about Aids and he laughed at this American invention that seemed to target both gay men and Haitians. He said: “That’s too perfect, blacks and gays, only American racists and puritans would have come up with that delusion.” He died from the disease in 1984.”

    193 David Lehman (21 February 1993). “Michel Foucault: Vastly Influential and Rather Dangerous, too”. Chicago Tribune. “As a visiting professor at Berkeley, he frequented the gay bathhouses of San Francisco, particularly the ones specializing in “S/M.” He regarded sex in the light of a Faustian pact, judging it to be “worth dying for,” and he refused to alter his behavior after the AIDS epidemic had broken out. There have been strong rumors to the effect that Foucault knowingly infected others with the disease. Miller’s verdict: probably not. More likely, Foucault’s unabated promiscuity was suicidal rather than murderous.”

    194 Carvalho, John (2006). “Fact and Fiction: Writing the Difference Between Suicide and Death”. Contemporary Aesthetics. 4. “Miller tells a story that leads his readers to conclude that Foucault knew he had AIDS, knew it was potentially fatal and knowingly returned to those sites where the illness was spreading … If he was not knowingly endangering the lives of others, was he not at least endangering his own life? Was this a form a suicide, a death he chose rather than a death that chose him?”

    195 Woodward, Kenneth L. (31 January 1993). “A Philosopher’s Death Wish”. Newsweek. “There followed the clandestine rounds of the gay baths. In a literally painstaking hermeneutics of S&M techniques, Miller explains how Foucault’s fatal flirtation with death during bouts of alternating pain and pleasure offered him the e[c]static experience that had become his Nietzschean holy grail. Miller’s argument is persuasive: Foucault scripted his own death as the philosophical conclusion to a life of intellectual and moral risk. That he ignored the risk of infecting others to achieve his own ends calls for stringent re-evaluation of his entire philosophical project.”